New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Definition of a spinaker
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Definition of a spinaker

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Strawberry View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1337
Post Options Post Options   Quote Strawberry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Definition of a spinaker
    Posted: 19 Jul 05 at 9:19pm

How would you define a spinaker?

Supposing someone put a 21sqm sail on the front of a Cherub which could go be used to beat?

Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry
Back to Top
maxim View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 127
Post Options Post Options   Quote maxim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 05 at 9:36pm
that would be a very large genoa would it not...
Back to Top
kasey3000 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 06 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Post Options Post Options   Quote kasey3000 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 05 at 11:04pm

Spinnakers have an unstable luff.....thats why they collapse on too tight a reach and why they won't fly at all upwind.

......Think about it....main's have the mast to support the luff and the jib/genoa has a wire in the luff to add support.

If you stuck a wire in the luff of a kite and put tension in the wire(like you would on the jib/genoa)...it would probably sail upwind!

........i think !!!!!!

Although I think this is open to discussion?

Kasey

Back to Top
Ian99 View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 07 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 138
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ian99 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 12:21am
It doesn't need this to sail upwind . I remember sailing against a GP14 a few years back who managed to get around an entire race without taking his spinnaker down.
He wasn't going particularly slowly either - nearly keeping up with me in a laser! Admittedly he did have a little help from the tide and the "upwind" part of the course was a series of fetches. I was quite impressed how effectively he tacked with the spinnaker up though - very few boats can do this without going backwards!
Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 6:56am

RRS 50.4

"The difference between a headsail and a spinnaker is that the mid-girth of a headsail, measured from the mid-points of its luff and leech, does not exceed 50% of the length of its foot, and no other intermediate girth exceeds a percentage similarly proportional to its distance from the head of the sail. A sail tacked down behind the foremost mast is not a headsail."

 

 

 

 

Back to Top
Phil eltringham View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 04
Location: England/Hitchin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1105
Post Options Post Options   Quote Phil eltringham Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 10:14am
I remember trying to sail upwind in a 200 with the kite up, you just ease the halyard about six inches and it works reasonably up to about F2, not sure if its really faster, but it was good fun. 
FLAT IS FAST!
Shifts Happen
Back to Top
jpbuzz591 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 05
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 793
Post Options Post Options   Quote jpbuzz591 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 10:58am

my knackered spinnaker wont fill if u try to sail it deep and the only way to fill it is to keep heading and we got very close to beating with it. Very strange

Jp Indoe
Contender 518
Buzz591
Chew Valley Sailing club
Bristol
Back to Top
kasey3000 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 06 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Post Options Post Options   Quote kasey3000 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 11:19am

We can sail on v.v.v.tight reaches in the Kestrel with our kite.....but none of our fleet have managed it on a beat

We find that on extremely tight reaches or even when it's a fetch and we carry the kite.....it is slower, it feels like we're sailing through treacle!

Once we tested it with my 200 and a friends Kestrel on the same leg of the course( a tight reach)....and the symmetric kite of the Kestrel could sail higher than the 200 with the asymmetric... which we found odd because the asymmetric is the same sorta shape as a jib!...so we thought the Kestrel kite would falter....but it didn't

We found that older kite's don't like sailing on tight reaches!!!.....the luff would just collapse straight away!

Oh well!!!

kasey

Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 11:44am
50.4 doesn't apply to Cherubs: its specifically excluded in the class rules.

Back in the 60s the class widely used little triangular kites with wire luffs (set from poles). You whammed down on the pole and it would carry well above a true beam reach. They were lousy on broader reaches though, and they disappeared as Olympic courses became widespread and you never sailed beam reaches anymore.

Now you could create a triangular asymmettric that would carry upwind. It would be a bit undersize probably. You'd probably have to relocate the daggerboard forward of the mast in order to make the boat balance. Then you'd find that the extra speed would bring the apparent wind well back so you'd have to be sailing very low upwind, so wouldn't gain as much as you'd think. Then you'd discover that your performance offwind sucked because the kite only worked well hard on the wind and you're only allowed one kite on board under Cherub rules.

Taut luff asymmettric kites were common on 18s and things before the 80s, maybe before 70s. The loose luff modern asymmettric, as conceived by Andrew Buckland and popularised by Julian Bethwaite has pretty much made them existinct.
So you can try it, but I doubt it will be a race winner 95% of the time: it would certainly be prettty poor on windward/leewards.


Here's a celebrated pic of a wire luff kite on a 60s Cherub.


Edited by JimC
Back to Top
Scooby_simon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 02 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2415
Post Options Post Options   Quote Scooby_simon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jul 05 at 12:31pm
Most of us at the ECPR were using our kites up wind quite well for part of the trip out of the river (Was keeping up with most of the Tornado's too  and then it all went wrong !)
Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy