women's skiff |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 13> |
| Author | |||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: women's skiffPosted: 03 Nov 10 at 1:42pm |
||
|
amongest the differences- crew gets main sheet upwind! 800 is a little, um, boring for crew upwind- and class association keep it that way. |
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:34pm |
||
|
Surely the rules don't dictate who can pull what string?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeBz
Really should get out more
Joined: 21 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 536 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:35pm |
||
Ah, but those wood pole kite boats weren't skiffs, as we now know them [FX: laughs and runs away].
I think as a proportion of active dinghies skiffs are way more popular than ever. You could compare todays turnouts with the vast numbers of Enterprises, Lasers, Mirrors, GP14s etc. which used to attend National Champs back in the 70s and conclude that non-skiff sailing has become much less popular. Too many classes, too much fragmentation.
As to the "what's the point of the Rebel when the 800 already exists" question, my answer would be that the 800 just isn't 'Skiffy enough' to take an Olympic 'Skiff' slot.
Mike Edited by MikeBz - 03 Nov 10 at 2:36pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
ellistine
Really should get out more
Joined: 06 Mar 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 762 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:36pm |
||
Not just the RS800 class either.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:44pm |
||
|
Not sure how the 800 isn't 'skiffy enough" From what i understood, when the 800 and other boats were trailed a couple of years ago the preference of the vast majority of actual sailors at the trials was that the 800 was better than anything else there.
If it isn't a bethwaite design or doesn't have skiff in the name does that mean it isn't a skiff?
Perhaps they should trim the sails with flourescent green - would that make it more skiffy? I don't have one, but have sailed it and a 49er. It seems to give you similar performance, but not the same level of cost and is more attainable. |
|||
![]() |
|||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:53pm |
||
They do indeed
Buried a bit in here. 1.3.26.
As I understand it, the rule has been challeneged several times but endured.
|
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 2:59pm |
||
Presumably because it's heavier and less powerful?
I've sailed 800's a few times and I wouldn't mind one, if I had a more suitable club.
But in light weather, I'd rather be sailing something else.
Will the Rebel have a weight equalisation system?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 3:01pm |
||
|
Good grief. Why?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 3:03pm |
||
|
Oops, sorry for the awful formatting!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Nov 10 at 3:18pm |
||
|
"heavier and less powerful" - Hmm surely if they have the performance in all airs, then weight and sail area are irrelevant. The 800 has a relatively small sail area, which surely proves how good the hull shape and development process were and must have been.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 13> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |