Sailing Modes these days |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 19> |
| Author | |||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Sailing Modes these daysPosted: 21 May 10 at 1:08pm |
||
|
Warning - this is a post about history!
With the aid of a Y&Y article that had a historical bent even when I was a kid, we see that there's no long-term shift towards traps among classes overall (although we can't tell whether there's a shift towards traps in adult classes with raw data). The Y&Y survey in those days looked only at adult's classes with over 50 entries in the UK nationals, plus the Olympic classes. Looking at the 1957 numbers, we see that of the "50+ and Olympian club", 26% of boats had traps; 48% had kites; only 12% were singlehanders. Of interest (well, to us nerds), the top 14 in '67 were N12 (180 boats), Ent (170), Firefly and Merlin (both 163), then Fireball (134), GP14, MIrror, Graduate (109), Scorp, Int 14 (89), Osprey (88), Solo (86), OK, (84) and 505 (65). There were also 49 FDs. In 1974, which was pretty much the peak year of the dinghy boom in the UK, the top classes were the Ent (205 entries at the nats), Mirror (200), Fireball (175), GP14, Scorp, Merlin (138), Nat 12, Firefly, 505 (116, down by 1 on '73), OK, Albacore, Laser and Osprey (98). There were also 84 Fds and 78 470s. Singlehanders were still only 13% of the "50+ and Olympic" fleets. So there were five high performance trap doublehanders with BIG fleets in the peak year. The trap boats of 470 speed or more made up 27% of the total fleet of the most popular 22 boats. By '77, the Furball was the third most popular boat on the five-year average, and the 505 was the 6th most popular, so this was not a one-off. The average speed of the most popular adult classes was probably faster back in those days than it is today, and probably faster than it ever has been before or since - yet that was the era when the dinghy boom started to end. It's also interesting to see that the proportion of trap boats seems to stick very close to 25% over a lifetime. It would be great to see some figures from the '90s and '00s to fill in the gaps. Well, let me rephrase that - we sailing history nerds may find it interesting! ![]() Edited by Chris 249 |
|||
![]() |
|||
oldarn
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 10 Apr 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 1:12pm |
||
I guess those new classes in the 60's were mainly double handers while many since the nineties have been single handers yet most popular are the sixties designs. Solo, Streaker and Phantom. I think that the many large asymmetric classes have confused club sailors with kids aspiring to the thrills of the 29er and 49er and others which are far too fast for club sailing and are too demanding for most of us Those extreme classes that survive will be circuit/ olympic classes. I believe the fastest club classes should have kites of no more than about 20m2 and PY's no lower than 900. Thus twin trapeze classes are too fast for club classes. However there are quite a few two person single wire classes asymmetric and symmetric with PY's in the nine hundreds some of which should or could survive. There are just too many of them! Most of the popular two handed traditional hiking classes with ther company jockeys are becoming rather expensive which divides the class fleets into club boats and circuit boats. Could that drive more into single-handers? |
|||
|
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 1:50pm |
||
Dead right about the classes. I'm looking at a 1965 Dinghy Year Book. Looking only at boats designed in the preceding six years, we see promotion material for the Zenith, Bubble, Seafly, Signet, Scorpion, Vagabond, Minisail, Mirror, Mark, Lazy E, Mermaid, Fireball and Chub, and I think some others without dates would be of the same vintage. And that's just those in one book and from one country. There were about 137 dinghy classes with a Portsmouth yardstick at the time, which is a considerable number. It's hard to see that the strength of the sport at that time was due to having fewer classes. Edited by Chris 249 |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 2:12pm |
||
I'm not sure, though, that things like RS800s are more difficult to sail than 505 and 14s were back in the 70s. There have been so many advances in technology, clothes and all the rest of it. Its something that strikes the more mature Skiffies, Mothies and Canoe sailors from time to time: plastic masts, gust responsive rigs, ball bearing blocks, ropes that don't stretch, even wet suits that don't remove all chance of moving quickly: all these thing make sailing the extreme boats far easier than they used to be... |
|||
![]() |
|||
oldarn
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 10 Apr 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 2:49pm |
||
I agree that such modern 'extreme' boats as the 800 are not necessarily more difficult to sail than the older extreme boats such as the 505, but the size of the kites are far larger and it is that rapid increase in speed and change in direction to maintain controllability that causes the danger and confusion. |
|||
|
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
|
|||
![]() |
|||
alstorer
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 2:53pm |
||
|
the 800 has a spinnaker comparable to the original 5o5 kite (both about 20-21 sqm); new rules 5o5 kite being about 27sqm.
|
|||
|
-_
Al |
|||
![]() |
|||
oldarn
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 10 Apr 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 440 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 3:32pm |
||
Yes, but the twin trapeze puts it well into the extreme category with a PY of 820 ish |
|||
|
thefastexcitingrunningasymmetric
|
|||
![]() |
|||
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 4:37pm |
||
|
I don't think things have changed fundamentally. Nowadays with an RS800 in F5-F6 you get the kind of speed and control problems of a 70's fireball in very strong wind. I don't see much problem with the RS800 as a club boat, basically I'm a 40+ year old club sailor of no great talent or athleticism, and I can step into one and get it around the course in F4, have had the pleasure of borrowing one a few times. More than 15kts, we seemed to capsize a lot, hopefully that would improve with practice and coaching. Obviously not what I would choose for a small inland club, but I'm not aware of any real problems caused by such boats. If I was sailing in the right kind of partnership, I would seriously consider one. Let people buy what boats they want. There is a law of diminishing returns on size of kite and 'theoretical PY' i.e. the PY a boat should sail to, vs what the club sailor gets out of it. To get the most out of racing, you have to choose your boat and choose some good people to race against. I would chose sailing in a class fleet against having a 'better ' boat with nothing comparable to rae against any day. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guest
Newbie
Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 6:54pm |
||
|
The point is all those exciting fast boats simply didn't exist in the 60s. Having spoken to all the 60+ sailors I know they would have loved to have got their hands on some of todays kit when they were younger. Isn't really a sensible comparison. |
|||
![]() |
|||
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 10 at 7:38pm |
||
There are some fairly senior sailors who love to get their hands on them now! |
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 19> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |