6ft Skiff |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 16> |
| Author | ||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: 6ft SkiffPosted: 15 Mar 06 at 9:54am |
|
Well, what a submarine doesn't have is wavemaking resistance, because it doesn't create waves. I think other kinds of drag increase though. Need a *naval* Naval architect here really, but I rather suspect that wave making doesn't magically go away when a vessel is submerged, instead it depends on how deep it is. So your submerged boat probably has to be pretty deep to eliminate wave drag, which in turn means you need a lot of sttructure to get up to the surface where crew and sails are, which in turn creates other sorts of drag... |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 10:52am |
|
|
Weren't there pics on the Moth site a while ago of something that was trying the torpedo thing? I seem to remember that turning corners was a bit of a problem...
|
||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
Chew my RS
Really should get out more
Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 11:10am |
|
|
Yep, that's correct. Subs obviously have no air/water interface and therefore don't suffer from wavemaking resistance in the form of a conventional bow wave. However at shallow depths a wave will form on the surface. Also, if not deeply enough submerged the hull can broach the surface due to wave motion, surface suction effect and changes in water density (e.g. sailing past a river estuary). At slow speeds control can be very tricky. You also end up with a much higher wetted surface area, increasing resistance at low speed. That's not to say the concept couldn't be made to work for a dinghy, but its not as simple as it might sound, and to say they have almost no resistance is exaggerating. |
||
![]() |
||
Javelin53
Groupie
Joined: 13 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 60 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 1:06pm |
|
|
any photos of the original 6 footers available?
|
||
|
I hoped the threat would be enough!
JAVELIN 53 ENTERPRISE 16691,RESTORATION JOB TOPPER 29388 BUCKENHAM SC |
||
![]() |
||
timnoyce
Really should get out more
Joined: 05 Aug 04 Location: Hampshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 1:17pm |
|
|
There are a few on there, but they are a bit few and far between. No close ups found as yet i don't think...
http://www.6ft.flatwater.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content& amp;task=view&id=5&Itemid=30 |
||
|
BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb |
||
![]() |
||
Javelin53
Groupie
Joined: 13 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 60 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 1:26pm |
|
|
thanx
|
||
|
I hoped the threat would be enough!
JAVELIN 53 ENTERPRISE 16691,RESTORATION JOB TOPPER 29388 BUCKENHAM SC |
||
![]() |
||
Isis
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Sep 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2753 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 5:41pm |
|
![]() |
||
Javelin53
Groupie
Joined: 13 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 60 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 8:28pm |
|
|
I hoped the threat would be enough!
JAVELIN 53 ENTERPRISE 16691,RESTORATION JOB TOPPER 29388 BUCKENHAM SC |
||
![]() |
||
Chris Noble
Really should get out more
Joined: 26 Nov 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 710 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 8:49pm |
|
|
were you thinking of this:
more info at http://www.int-moth.org.uk/DesignsLittleWing.htm
Edited by Chris Noble |
||
|
Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine
FOR SALE: I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list. |
||
![]() |
||
tickel
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 21 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 408 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 10:08pm |
|
|
That looks great fun but as has been said the torpedo has to be totaly submerged with the lowest drag conection between it and the above water superstructure. Regarding drag the "tube" given its 6' length would not need a very big section to provide enough bouyancy to just support a 10 stone sailor an minimal rig. If the "vesell" was traveling fast and the bow wave surfaced behind would that cause drag?
|
||
|
tickel
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 16> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |