Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Not seen at the show |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567 9> |
Author | ||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Mar 18 at 11:14am |
|
After several iterations this was my preferred Cherub layout. Track on the front bulkhead so fastenings are in shear, cam cleat on the track for height adjustment on the barber hauler, just pin stops on the track for slot width. ISTR I drilled a couple of extra ones in the critical area.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bit curious about the big lump of shiny at the back of the chute? Surely that could be lighter and cheaper in GRP? Or do we need a bit of chrome for some markets? :-)
Lightweight stainless ... always 'slippery' and not prone to damage from lines. There for good technical reasons - although it does look rather good as well ! |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yeah, the stainless is a good call on a production boat. A laminate will end up grooved and goodness knows what else. If there was space I'd prefer a large diameter alloy tube, but I strongly suspect there wasn't. Also rather more expensive to fabricate curved I imagine. I ended up with a layer of kevlar mixed with graphite filler, which lasts, but is not aesthetic.
|
||
![]() |
||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That would be true if the boom was the only element being accelerated but it is attached to the mainsail which generates the acceleration. I suspect with either a carbon or ally boom the resulting terminal velocity in a gybe (or tack) will be related to the sail with the boom having a very minor effect, but when it makes contact with your noggin it's, to all intents and purposes, floating around loose so the one with least mass hurts less......
|
||
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
||
![]() |
||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've been hit by a round carbon boom, a round ali boom and an ali Finn boom, and they hurt the least to worst in that order. Im thinking it doesn't matter how fast they go but how easy it is to deflect their current trajectory when they hit. Those with the least mass are probably going to deflect the easiest. Oh and round is obviously better than square
|
||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Do booms 'float loose'? The kicker will stop it deflecting up. The energy and force comes from the sail, so I can't see the weight of either carbon or alloy having any effect. You have the weight and momentum of the sail and the air which would surely make the weight of boom less significant. I can imagine a round and larger diameter would hurt much less.
Obviously, there seems to be a consensus that carbon booms hurt less, but you all admit suffering many blows to the head too... so...
![]() I am genuinely surprised that people consider how much it hurts when selecting materials for a boom! Maybe consider shape in a training boat, but this is a racer! Carbon or alloy, both are pretty bloody hard. If you're getting hit regularly enough for it to be an issue wear a helmet or put padding on the boom. Anyway, sounds like they're going with a carbon boom... I guess it will fatigue less and avoid some corrosion issues so the outlay may be worth it over time. But i'd take a SMOD that was £500 quid cheaper over one with a carbon boom, or one that had £500 better mast, or £500 better sails, that's all. Edited by mozzy - 08 Mar 18 at 10:57am |
||
![]() |
||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Carbon (ie light) booms are better for many reasons.
But on the one issue of its effect on contact (with head or whatever) try to imagine it being made not of carbon or of alloy but let's say steel, nice heavy gauge industrial steel .... who still wants to suggest that mass/weight makes no difference ? .... on your head be it ! It might initally be slow to get moving in a gybe because it has to be accelerated but once it gets going just keep out of its way ! This is of course only a mind experiment - so just make sure you don't place your head in its way in some sort of real but totally bonkers practical experiment. Edited by Cirrus - 08 Mar 18 at 11:06am |
||
![]() |
||
Old Timer ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 05 Jun 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Looks nice; carbon boom is defiantly superior for a whole range of reasons including being bashed about the skull.
I would have tried to juggle the jib and chute mouth to put the chute ahead of the jib tack but too late for that now... Good luck; who is building it?
|
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Me this weekend:
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567 9> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |