women's skiff |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 13> |
| Author | |
Phil eltringham
Really should get out more
Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: England/Hitchin Online Status: Offline Posts: 1105 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: women's skiffPosted: 02 Nov 10 at 4:39pm |
This is the same problem the 29erXX and some of the other boats at the 2007 trials have had as well.
|
|
|
FLAT IS FAST!
Shifts Happen |
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 5:23pm |
Don't reckon so. If there was demand they'd be selling. The 49er was selling before it got Olympic status and the 29er was flying out of the shops long before it got adopted for anything. By contrast the 29erXX seems to be a boat the market doesn't want - as indeed seemed to happen to the 59er... Come to that according to the YY Nationals stats, trapeze boats, excluding youth classes, seem to be at something like a 40 year low in popularity. Performance doesn't appear to be selling. Edited by JimC - 02 Nov 10 at 5:27pm |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 5:38pm |
|
For it to sell, it has to appeal to people above the alternatives.
The obvious alternative in the UK is the RS800.
So if it offers a performance improvement over the 800, and is not impossible for club sailors to cope with, some people will buy it. But those who want fleet racing will not be among the first.
Price will matter. The 800 looks quite good value compared with most boats of comparable speed.
Olympic status would change that.
As would the kind of international sales the RS100 has enjoyed.
Maybe some will see it as a stepping stone to the 49er?
Of course there may be something even better about to be revealed for the trials?
|
|
![]() |
|
Menace
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 16 Oct 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 296 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 8:10pm |
|
If the Rebel class becomes reasonably supported, it is a class I'd buy in to in the future. When I saw her, she looked like a combination of a nice alternatives to the 800, b14 and i-14. I don't really like helming 14s as you have to steer the boat round the course which is counter intuitive as most other boats I've sailed it's all been about minimising rudder movements. The rebel sort of ticks all the i-14 boxes for me without the ball ache of a T-foil, their not difficult to use, I just don't like them. Just need to see how the performance stacks up against other classes, my gut reaction was it should nail an 800 and if the class was semi-decent, ie more than 15 boats at the nats, there is where I'd be spending my money.
I don't really care if the Rebel gets ISAF selected for the Olympics, if it's a good boat, it's a good boat! I think the "there's too many classes" nonsense is rubbish. The Rebel may be a good alternative to a lot of aging classes and how are we meant move forward if we stiffle innovation. Maybe the High Performance class numbers are down as a result of the OD classes being well over 10 years old and people aren't that excited about them anymore, which is bad as these classes thrive on people's excitment. When Ford realised they weren't selling many Escorts anymore, the Focus was launced, to say there's no room for more High Performance boats is like ford saying lets stop making small cars as our sales are down and scrap the Focus idea.
I like it how Y&Y are giving the Rebel a good support, and also have been documenting the ICON well on the site. I think it's the way forward and I like a magazine that supports the up and coming guys, maybe the smaller builders can't afford mass marketing campaigns but given the right coverage, hopefull they'll thrive.
|
|
![]() |
|
aardvark_issues
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Jul 05 Location: Weston-Super-Mare Online Status: Offline Posts: 505 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 8:21pm |
|
I'm kinda surprised they don't mention the SK4 in any of the marketing given they lifted pretty much the entire concept from it. Fair enough that they have taken it and run with it, but credit (to Kev) where it's due...
It does look like a tidy craft however and tagged on a pretty sneaky piece of marketing - they have attached all the womens skiff blurb to it while putting more than enough canvass on it to take a couple of biggish folk - I wouldn't be surprised if a smaller rig goes on it to take it forward wrt Olympic selection as the sheet loads on the SK were bigger than expected for 60-70kg peeps. |
|
![]() |
|
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 8:33pm |
|
It's a deep worry that ISAF may replace boats that vast amounts of people choose to sail (dinghies) with boats that (while fantastic) are only chosen by a tiny percentage of sailors.
Skiff types are just not a large proportion of centreboarders anywhere in the world bar two cities where vast sums of money from bars and one-armed bandits goes to supporting them. Even there (Sydney and Newcastle) they are struggling - one skiff club just collapsed, about a third of the rest no longer sail skiffs. Brisbane and Auckland have about 5 boats per class. The plain fact is that while skiffs are wonderful, even here in Oz where they have more promotion than any other class, apart from I-14s and a 29ers (in small numbers) they are extinct or the closest thing to extinct in most parts of the country. And that's despite skiff clubs giving them more support (probably) than the Olympic classes get. As Jim has already pointed out, the UK numbers show that skiff types are losing popularity. It's similar elsewhere - just 15 I-14s at the US nationals this year, for example. Menace, you make some good points but I think you'll find the reason there are so few new skiff types is because very few of them have been successful since that initial spurt of popularity. Given the choice of sailing a 49er, 4000, 8000, B14 whatever, an increasing number of sailors are moving away from high performance crewed centreboarders altogether. Skiffs are fantastic, but the plain, simple, unadorned truth which should be impossible to ignore is that they attract FEWER sailors than other types, even in the country which has had them for 120 years, and that if we focus on them as the way forward we could seriously harm our sport. As for getting more TV at the Olympics - we had Tornadoes with kites, RSXs and 49ers in big winds at the last Games and sailing still got out-rated by people swimming at 4 knots and guys rowing on flat water at 8 knots. Assuming that fast boats will attract viewers just isn't working, just like the 18 Foot Skiff Grand Prix didn't attract enough viewers, just like the Extreme cat series, ProSail, Ultras, Ultimates, etc didn't attract enough viewers to stay alive (or keep their title sponsor, in the VX 40's case). Edited by Chris 249 - 02 Nov 10 at 9:20pm |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 9:23pm |
Not many people choose to sail 470's
or Ynglings
The RS800 shows twin trap boats are reasonably accessible. And significantly popular.
The Olympics should be about aspiration and high level sport, not TV.
The reason I don't sail a high performance twin wire boat is because I am an amateur who does a bit of sailing as recreation, choosing the most convenient, easily enjoyable boat for me and my partner. What masses of ordinary people like me are able to do in their spare time should not hold back Olympic sport!
Bit like saying the weightlifters should only lift what the average gym user lifts?
What would you do, give them GP14's?
I think there is space for high performance skiffs, alongside more traditional dinghies.
Personally I don't watch much TV sport, so I'll just view it as a nice boat rather than as part of a media circus.
In some ways of course, olympic selection will spoil the class for the ordinary amateur sailor, hence some established classes have actively sought to avoid selection in the past IIRC.
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 10:03pm |
But they do... 125 470s built in 2009 worldwide, 818 in the last 5 years, 95 boats at the 2009 mens worlds from 29 countries, 57 boats from 24 countries at the women's worlds, and 54 boats from 23 countries at the Junior Worlds. If you were to add together the numbers for *every* twin string class in the world together I'd be quite suprised if they matched those totals... Edited by JimC - 02 Nov 10 at 10:05pm |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC
Really should get out more
Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 10:13pm |
|
Fair comment Jim I was speaking only of what I see in the UK.
125 boats worldwide is probably going 50% or more to olympic hopefuls though?
That's only 4 and a bit per country!
25 years ago virtually nobody sailed 2 wire boats, and only a few helmed from the wire.
Promoting a two wire boat that is not as extreme as the 49er, but suitable for adults, via the olympics might work?
I'd prefer it to keelboats anyway.
|
|
![]() |
|
Smight at BBSC
Really should get out more
Joined: 09 Jan 07 Location: Great Britain Online Status: Offline Posts: 1129 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Nov 10 at 10:26pm |
|
Personally I can't see it getting selected over the RS 800.
Having sailed an 800 with the re-designed cockpit I was hugely impressed with what a lovely boat to sail it actually is. I'm also always staggered at what a turn of speed, and the amount of power, the 800 produces with sails far smaller than that of an i-14 or 49er, so I could see this Rebel possibly slightly over canvassed for the target weight range. Saying that I think it looks really great and would love to see a Women's fast double hander along side the 49er at the olympics. As always just my opinon! |
|
|
RS600 988
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 13> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |