New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Dinghy hull weights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Dinghy hull weights

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 13>
Author
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Dinghy hull weights
    Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 8:30pm
Originally posted by JimC

To my mind the main reason boat weights are so opaque is that its surprisingly troublesome to organise weighing a reasonable sample of boats accurately.

Not much point in getting tetchy about it.


The way they do it at a Merlin Nationals, it takes about a minute a boat.
Put boat + trolley on 3-point scales, push button. Lift boat to get trolley weight, push other button.
The answer BTW is 90-odd kg for a hull, centreboard and some of the string. But that includes a lot of lead.
Back to Top
drifter View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 09 Jun 08
Location: Oxfordshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177
Post Options Post Options   Quote drifter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 9:12pm
The last time my Graduate got weighed at the Nationals it was peeing with rain (Bala-anyone surprised?) and it was a fair bit overweight...I asked to see a certificate of calibration for the balance, and I was refused.

Classes that insist on dismantling the boat for weighing (Solo) need to take a long good look at themselves...
Stewart
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 9:19pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons


I have, today, more accurately weighed my Topper Spice (346, built by White Formula in, I think, 1998) and, all up, it weighs 152kg (+/- 2kg I'd say). That is 134kg for the hull and mast, with rigging, jib and kite onboard and 18kg for the other bits (mainsail, boom/mainsheet tackle daggerboard and rudder assembly). A disappointing 20kg more than I hoped. I guess my 'not entirely watertight' hull will have absorbed a little H2O over the years but I can't believe 20 litres. 
I also weighed my mate's L3k and arrived at 116kg (just to rub salt into the wound.....).
Might weigh a 'tin rig' Phantom tomorrow if my other mate will risk the embarrassment, and possibly a Topaz Trez. Then I plan to find a L@ser to weigh.......



I can easily believe 20kg for water in the lay up, as I've seen it in smaller boats before. Not sure how it is possible, or where exactly it hides.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
Roger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 04
Location: Somerset
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 524
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 9:20pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

I have, today, more accurately weighed my Topper Spice (346, built by White Formula in, I think, 1998) and, all up, it weighs 152kg (+/- 2kg I'd say). That is 134kg for the hull and mast, with rigging, jib and kite onboard and 18kg for the other bits (mainsail, boom/mainsheet tackle daggerboard and rudder assembly). A disappointing 20kg more than I hoped. I guess my 'not entirely watertight' hull will have absorbed a little H2O over the years but I can't believe 20 litres. 

I also weighed my mate's L3k and arrived at 116kg (just to rub salt into the wound.....).

Might weigh a 'tin rig' Phantom tomorrow if my other mate will risk the embarrassment, and possibly a Topaz Trez. Then I plan to find a L@ser to weigh.......


Blimy those boats are heavy, a 505 has a sailing weight of 127.4kg, and that includes everything apart from the sails.


Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 10:12pm
The RS400 has a quoted all up weight of 129kg (with a hull weight of 85kg, the same as the Spice) and I was hoping my Spice would be close to that weight with sails, foils and rigging.

The 505's 127.4 'sailing weight (hull, fittings, foils and rig but no sails) is pretty impressive for a 50 year old design but exotic materials (CF, kevlar, epoxy etc) are commonly used in their construction. Given all of that the RS400 at 129 kg is not so heavy, it's a bit shorter than a 505 but is built in relatively conventional materials (vinylester resin, not epoxy and not much, if any CF). Sails will account for around 10 kg so if the 400's 'sailing weight' is without sails I feel a little better with a wet kite and jib hung on mine when I weighed it at 134kg (plus mainsail, boom and foils).


Edited by Sam.Spoons - 25 Aug 16 at 10:14pm
Back to Top
Roger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 04
Location: Somerset
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 524
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 16 at 10:26pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons


The 505's 127.4 'sailing weight (hull, fittings, foils and rig but no sails) is pretty impressive for a 50 year old design but exotic materials (CF, kevlar, epoxy etc) are commonly used in their construction. Given all of that the RS400 at 129 kg is not so heavy, it's a bit shorter than a 505 but is built in relatively conventional materials (vinylester resin, not epoxy and not much, if any CF).


This year my 21 year old 505 was weighed at 1kg overweight, and it still carries 2kg of lead, so a full reweigh would put it minimum weight. It is built from polyester resin with end grain balsa sandwich in high stress areas, it also has an alloy boom, the only carbon is the twin poles and tiller, there isn't anything exotic in the hull.
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Aug 16 at 6:58am
Originally posted by Roger

Originally posted by Sam.Spoons


The 505's 127.4 'sailing weight (hull, fittings, foils and rig but no sails) is pretty impressive for a 50 year old design but exotic materials (CF, kevlar, epoxy etc) are commonly used in their construction. Given all of that the RS400 at 129 kg is not so heavy, it's a bit shorter than a 505 but is built in relatively conventional materials (vinylester resin, not epoxy and not much, if any CF).


This year my 21 year old 505 was weighed at 1kg overweight, and it still carries 2kg of lead, so a full reweigh would put it minimum weight. It is built from polyester resin with end grain balsa sandwich in high stress areas, it also has an alloy boom, the only carbon is the twin poles and tiller, there isn't anything exotic in the hull.

I am surprised there's no carbon at all in a mid 90s 505, not even around the mast/bulkhead/chainplate area?
The 400 does have a little kevlar in this area allegedly.
What the 90s 505 does have is 30 odd years of refinement and competition between builders, compared to 400s being knocked out by subcontract moulders. What your boat may lack in materials is compensated by a great deal of (iterative) design effort and build cost. The 400 does not even have a proper bulkhead for the rig.
 My 400 is similar age, when new it was a much cheaper option than a 505. Even allowing for the 505 being a bit bigger. The 400 is a good design, but is a compromise for cheapness in the factory. The design work was good enough for RS to get 800-odd boats sold before the facelift of a few years ago.
I wonder where the break even point was?
Was it around the end of the 80s Parker had their 'type 25' 5-oh? and that development was going on in all the rival builders too.

Don't know what my 400 weighs. I know the mast is very much heavier than a Merlin's carbon one, and weight aloft slows a boat much more than weight in the hull....
And the trolley could be lighter for sure!
Back to Top
maxibuddah View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1760
Post Options Post Options   Quote maxibuddah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Aug 16 at 8:12am
Tha heaviest phantom, polyester rather than a wooden one, weighed in the last 15 years at the nationals I think was approx 14kgs overweight,making it 75kgs without rig.

Edited by maxibuddah - 26 Aug 16 at 8:13am
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Aug 16 at 9:22am
Originally posted by maxibuddah

Tha heaviest phantom, polyester rather than a wooden one, weighed in the last 15 years at the nationals I think was approx 14kgs overweight,making it 75kgs without rig.

I know that boat I think..... Jack in the Green I think it was called.....
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Roger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 04
Location: Somerset
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 524
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Aug 16 at 10:47am
Originally posted by RS400atC


I am surprised there's no carbon at all in a mid 90s 505, not even around the mast/bulkhead/chainplate area?

Was it around the end of the 80s Parker had their 'type 25' 5-oh? and that development was going on in all the rival builders too.




I can assure you there is no carbon in this particular 505 hull, built by Kyrewood, they did build some hulls around that time in carbon, but they continued to offer both options so there was a lower priced hull and the carbon one. However even without carbon it is still very stiff, certainly in comparison to similar age boats from other builders. Some of the build is is purely glass, and in the high stress areas end grain balsa sandwich.
I guess during the 80's 90's as you say there were several 505 builders, all trying to get an edge on their rivals, but I guess my point, given what this thread is about, is that not all boats, even those of more "basic" construction will take up water. Perhaps the secret lies in the build process as well as the care taken with the boat over the years?

Somebody suggested earlier in the thread that a boat may have taken up 20kg of water, really?, that would be aprox 20 litres, is that realistic in a 4-5m long dinghy, it may be of course if there is a lot of timber under the fibreglass as that would hold water very easily if it got in and have difficulty getting rid of it, I have certainly heard horror stories in some classes.

Certainly weighing boats should not be a major problem and could save a lot of trouble. At Phantom nationals in the past we used to simply place the boat on a bench scale similar to these https://www.ourweigh.co.uk/bench-scales/WS12000AAZAAAA.html?gclid=Cj0KEQjw0f-9BRCF9-D60_n4rKcBEiQAnXW4-5yvE2Bo0GpirmGIdU0qeeUtDeBiIisSLrWWVYJFYzUaAp7m8P8HAQ  once you knew where the balance point was it was simple and took very little time, I have also seen the same used with a custom made V or U shaped pad on top which you can rest any hull on. For the sake of £80 a set of scales would be a good investment.



Edited by Roger - 26 Aug 16 at 10:49am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy