Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS aero |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3233343536 141> |
Author | ||
Woodburner ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 Mar 15 Location: Folkestone Kent Online Status: Offline Posts: 332 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 Mar 15 at 10:10am |
|
Didn't the RS 300 have two rigs? I never read any moaning about them. We're going to have to deal with an RS100 our lead Laser and MPS sailor has had a knee operation and gone for one rather than a Blaze, now he is good, so he'll get yardsticked for the 10.2 rig whatever, but he's a big guy and if he did change down, chances are it will be howling anyway. I'm not sure what happens with the Mackerelati I've noticed my old mate recording both Standard and Radial results in the same series and now the Laser fleet is getting quite large I guess it's a nettle we'll have to grasp, especially now that Radial handicap has reached Bandit territory of epic proportion thanks to the PYAG blunderers.
|
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The 10.2 on the 100 was a bit of a gybing mare in real wind, whereas the 8.4 was spot on , thats why it died.
The aero 9 is powerful, but very manageable so I don't see that happening. The rules are pretty clear, three separate classes. They have taken the opportunity to set out some base handicaps. I guess the handicaps are there for this season as the RYA haven't set an EN. Its the 'Lymington' formula on 'reefing' which seems fair enough but not sure it needed to be in the rules. |
||
![]() |
||
Eminoxon ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 12 Jun 13 Location: Bicester Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I read them as being the same as the laser then. You are governed by class rules whether you are at a class event or in a handicap fleet surely? in which case 3 rigs, 3 classes
|
||
Newtothis
RS feva 4624, share Rs200 1317, daughters RS tera 798 rs aero 1301 |
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
How else would you recommend they do it.... numbers at RS Events are dipping in most fleets. One poor sod turned up to the winters in their RS500 and had no one else to sail against. I hope they're a glass half full kind of crew.... otherwise they came last. 200 numbers weren't much to write about either. And the Vareo is all-but dead now. The one class which is showing real promise is the RS300... but that's just Steve and Co making 'boo faces' with flashlights at the end of the tunnel. No one races a 10.2 anymore in the 100s. So clearly RS don't want that to happen with the Aero- what happens if the Aero 7 gets too popular and the 9 fades away, or simply drops below a nominal 'critical mass' at circuit events? F*ck... RS just lost its Fat Dad offering.... and there are a lot of us. I think we all need to remember that these rules are written with a total focus around RS class events- how they impact on club PY racing is not really given much thought. Taken in isolation of a class organised event, the document and rule set makes sense and seems fair. But if I were an organiser of club racing, a handicap open or sitting on the PYAG and needed to consider the impact on competitors from other classes, classes who don't write their own PY numbers, I'd probably treat that document with a similar level of contempt in response. It would be good to get clarity from the RYA/PYAG as to what input they have had in the drafting of these class rules. I would assume none... but I might as well throw it out there, does this explain the apparent stalling of an EN (or indeed 3 of them) from the 2015 release? Edited by turnturtle - 30 Mar 15 at 9:52am |
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
so not BS then....
|
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Em - officially the Laser, Laser Radial and Laser 4.7 are three separate ISAF classes. They have three separate PY recommendations from the RYA as per the list. Whether your club allows switching of rigs across a series, and how they managed that process and the PY allocation is down to your club. Some clubs allow it, some clubs don't. Some let you and then issue the relevant handicap (and assumes we all have the good grace to sign on properly), some might opt to just offer the fastest handicap. It's a decision for each and every club. On the one hand allowing it enables that boat to get on the water when maybe they otherwise wouldn't launch, but the flip side is, it can create animosity amongst others who may perceive it be cheating. Strictly speaking- imho - sailing a Laser one week, then swapping it out for a Radial the next is no different to a guy or girl who sails a Phantom one week and a Solo the next. I don't have a problem people entering the series multiple times, especially if the usual full rig sailor gets to go out in a blow and still get a race with his old radial sail. But I do find 'rig swapping' and expecting the results to be merged, is probably more trouble than its worth for everyone else.
Edited by turnturtle - 30 Mar 15 at 9:07am |
||
![]() |
||
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 823 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Officially the Laser situation is quite straightforward - there are 3 classes, 4.7, radial and standard (or even 4 if you count the 8.1 unofficially). You can't change your rig as you change class by doing so. Unofficially, of course, the situation is more complex and varies a lot from club to club, and within clubs.
|
||
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Roger, AIUI those numbers are the numbers to use at class events - somewhat confusingly racing handicap at single class events. They are not the number (for there should be only one) to be used in general open racing, which the RYA will, in the fullness of time, be responsible for calculating/suggesting.
|
||
![]() |
||
Eminoxon ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 12 Jun 13 Location: Bicester Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
i think its fair enough to keep a full rig laser/aero at that py for the whole series regardless of what sail they use, but to give someone who regularly/only sails a 4.7/aero5 the full rig py is wrong. thus 3 seperate classes seems the fair way to go. i think we get the option at our club to either have seperate entries or if u use smaller rigs for a windy day its all on the large rig py. still no clarification if this is how lasers are officially treated?
|
||
Newtothis
RS feva 4624, share Rs200 1317, daughters RS tera 798 rs aero 1301 |
||
![]() |
||
Roger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 04 Location: Somerset Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ignoring all the other bits which will take up pages here....
In the event of one or more rig sizes racing together the results shall be determined based on the Portsmouth Yardstick system with ratings as follows - RS Aero 9 – 1035 RS Aero 7 – 1065 RS Aero 5 – 1102 Re the above, should it not read suggested yardsticks, and the actual PY to be used is to be decided by the organising authority? Or something similar. Edited by Roger - 29 Mar 15 at 10:43pm |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3233343536 141> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |