| Free mast for Merlin Rocket - has a bend! Guildford |
![]() |
| Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
| Bruce Roberts classic 45 Valencia, Spain |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
'Weight on the Wire' |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Author | |
Mikey 14778
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 05 Feb 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 298 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: 'Weight on the Wire'Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 7:10am |
|
Yep, or more in some cases
Thinking about it, this is true. But the way that your body transmits the forces to the board is significantly affected by where you put your feet. It's not about what forces the board ends up with (which physics dictates to be a constant for a given rig position) so much as the distribution of forces through your body, the rig and the board itself. I *think* that the fact that the bulk of the sideways force was going straight into the c/b basically removed this from the whole 'balancing, steering, not falling off' equation and allowed the sailor to deal more directly with the rest of the forces. I don't think it was all that much to do with keeping the weight out of the ends as there were no waves to speak of, although it did perhaps help to keep the nose down and improve the w/l length - we are talking displacement sailing here. And a feet-together position gives you maximum height, which can't hurt in terms of leverage either. Whatever, it was fun at the time
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 8:41am |
My theory is that because the performance of the sailors is probably around 90% of what makes a top team and boat speed is probably around 10% no class ever really knows what's fast and what isn't. Thus fashions in setup are defined by what the current hot guys in the class use rather than absolute speed. Haven't we all seen the supposedly lightning fast boat that gets sold on and never appears at the top of the fleet again? |
|
![]() |
|
Roy Race
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Aug 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:12am |
I stand corrected. The rigs are set up quite differently though. I've sailed both classes and the Fireball rig is bendier than the 470 rig. The 470s have 60 - 70mm of static prebend and much longer spreaders. This makes the rig quite solid. The Fireballs have 25-30mm prebend and the spreaders are quite short and high up the mast which makes the whole thing quite flexy. |
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac
Really should get out more
Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:31am |
|
That seems reasonable, given that the 470 is underpowered relative to the Fireball, in terms of crew weight requirement, or so it's seemed to me when I've sailed both with a lightweight crew - we could still drive the 470 in blow, but the Fireball made us feel the need for kilos.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mikey 14778
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 05 Feb 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 298 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:31am |
|
Prebend is determined by the sailmakers, so we have to hope that they know what they're doing there.
Longer spreaders don't appear to work so well in the Furball, although I have no idea why not. In theory I would have thought that whatever works for the 470 rig would be largely good on the 'ball. Anyone got any ideas why this appears not to be the case ? |
|
![]() |
|
Granite
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 12 May 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 476 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 11:25am |
|
The fireball has a narrower shroud base so shorter spreaders will give the same deflection to the shroud so the same control of the mast. The 470 only allows deck level control of the mast whereas the ball allows struts this would let you move the spreaders up. |
|
|
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 11:30am |
|
The Fireball and 470 rigs are different in detail, the Fireball rig is quite low aspect ratio with a long boom.
Then the Fireball is narrower. As well as righting moment that affects relative rig tension, effective spreader length, all sorts of things. I don't think I'm smart enough to work out a way you could take a set of 470 settings and spars and translate them to a Fireball with all the different variables... Two inches of spredaer offset must have quite different effects on each boat... |
|
![]() |
|
Roy Race
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Aug 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:37pm |
Agreed, but that's why the crew weights are different. Fireball crews tend to be about 13 stone and 470 crews 11 stone. This should account for the FB being narrower and therefore less righting moment. But once you've got a heavier crew, the rigs should be similar I'd have thought. |
|
![]() |
|
Roy Race
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Aug 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:41pm |
I guess so. Merlins take it to another level though. The spreaders are much higher than even half height between gooseneck and hounds. I've never had this explained to me properly. |
|
![]() |
|
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:54pm |
Its a question of where you need control. With a traditional deck stepped mast the mast is effectively free to pivot at hounds and at the deck, so all else being equal the point of maximum bend will be half way between them. Thus that's where the spreaders should go. If, however, the mast is keel stepped with a fixed mast gate, or has a prod and lowers, then because the bottom of the mast is held rigid there's a sort of cantilever effect, and point of max bend is further up, hence the spreaders are higher. 66% used to be conventional. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |