New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: 'Weight on the Wire'
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

'Weight on the Wire'

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>
Author
Mikey 14778 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 05 Feb 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 298
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mikey 14778 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 'Weight on the Wire'
    Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 7:10am
Yep, or more in some cases

But... but... but... whether the force is applied to the board or the skeg or somewhere in between isn't
affected by where you put your feet (assuming you can hold yourself still and not get swung around), it's purely
down to where the centre of effort (fore & aft) of the sail is. Everything must balance out (ask
Newton!).


Thinking about it, this is true. But the way that your body transmits the forces to the board is significantly
affected by where you put your feet. It's not about what forces the board ends up with (which physics dictates
to be a constant for a given rig position) so much as the distribution of forces through your body, the rig and
the board itself.

I *think* that the fact that the bulk of the sideways force was going straight into the c/b basically removed
this from the whole 'balancing, steering, not falling off' equation and allowed the sailor to deal more directly
with the rest of the forces.

I don't think it was all that much to do with keeping the weight out of the ends as there were no waves to speak
of, although it did perhaps help to keep the nose down and improve the w/l length - we are talking displacement
sailing here. And a feet-together position gives you maximum height, which can't hurt in terms of leverage
either.

Whatever, it was fun at the time
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 8:41am
Originally posted by Roy Race

It never ceases to amaze me how boats which in the grand scheme of things appear to be very similar - in this case, 505's, 470's and Fireballs - arrive at such very different solutions for rig set-up.

My theory is that because the performance of the sailors is probably around 90% of what makes a top team and boat speed is probably around 10% no class ever really knows what's fast and what isn't. Thus fashions in setup are defined by what the current hot guys in the class use rather than absolute speed. Haven't we all seen the supposedly lightning fast boat that gets sold on and never appears at the top of the fleet again?
Back to Top
Roy Race View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 275
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roy Race Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:12am
Originally posted by Noah

Considered opinion recommends 400lb on the
jib luff for a Fireball that'll take it...


I stand corrected.
The rigs are set up quite differently though. I've
sailed both classes and the Fireball rig is bendier than
the 470 rig. The 470s have 60 - 70mm of static prebend
and much longer spreaders. This makes the rig quite
solid. The Fireballs have 25-30mm prebend and the
spreaders are quite short and high up the mast which
makes the whole thing quite flexy.


Back to Top
Medway Maniac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 13 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2788
Post Options Post Options   Quote Medway Maniac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:31am
That seems reasonable, given that the 470 is underpowered relative to the Fireball, in terms of crew weight requirement, or so it's seemed to me when I've sailed both with a lightweight crew - we could still drive the 470 in blow, but the Fireball made us feel the need for kilos.
Back to Top
Mikey 14778 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 05 Feb 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 298
Post Options Post Options   Quote Mikey 14778 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 10:31am
Prebend is determined by the sailmakers, so we have to hope that they know what they're doing there.

Longer spreaders don't appear to work so well in the Furball, although I have no idea why not. In theory I would have
thought that whatever works for the 470 rig would be largely good on the 'ball. Anyone got any ideas why this appears
not to be the case ?
Back to Top
Granite View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 04
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 476
Post Options Post Options   Quote Granite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 11:25am

The fireball has a narrower shroud base so shorter
spreaders will give the same deflection to the shroud so
the same control of the mast.

The 470 only allows deck level control of the mast whereas the ball allows struts this would let you move
the spreaders up.


If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 11:30am
The Fireball and 470 rigs are different in detail, the Fireball rig is quite low aspect ratio with a long boom.

Then the Fireball is narrower. As well as righting moment that affects relative rig tension, effective spreader length, all sorts of things. I don't think I'm smart enough to work out a way you could take a set of 470 settings and spars and translate them to a Fireball with all the different variables... Two inches of spredaer offset must have quite different effects on each boat...
Back to Top
Roy Race View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 275
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roy Race Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:37pm
Originally posted by Medway Maniac

That seems reasonable, given that
the 470 is underpowered relative to the Fireball, in
terms of crew weight requirement, or so it's seemed to
me when I've sailed both with a lightweight crew - we
could still drive the 470 in blow, but the Fireball made
us feel the need for kilos.


Agreed, but that's why the crew weights are different.
Fireball crews tend to be about 13 stone and 470 crews
11 stone. This should account for the FB being narrower
and therefore less righting moment.

But once you've got a heavier crew, the rigs should be
similar I'd have thought.
Back to Top
Roy Race View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 275
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roy Race Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:41pm
Originally posted by Granite



The 470 only allows deck level control of the mast
whereas the ball allows struts this would let you move
the spreaders up.



I guess so. Merlins take it to another level though. The
spreaders are much higher than even half height between
gooseneck and hounds. I've never had this explained to
me properly.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 09 at 2:54pm
Originally posted by Roy Race

The spreaders are much higher than even half height between gooseneck and hounds. I've never had this explained to me properly.


Its a question of where you need control. With a traditional deck stepped mast the mast is effectively free to pivot at hounds and at the deck, so all else being equal the point of maximum bend will be half way between them. Thus that's where the spreaders should go.

If, however, the mast is keel stepped with a fixed mast gate, or has a prod and lowers, then because the bottom of the mast is held rigid there's a sort of cantilever effect, and point of max bend is further up, hence the spreaders are higher. 66% used to be conventional.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy