Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
V Twin |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2728293031 142> |
Author | ||||
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 May 12 at 9:38pm |
|||
.
No, sorry your world is clearly different to mine, do you sail GP14 by any chance, that's the type of person you are describing, they are exactly the market that is all too prevalent and pandered to in dinghy world to the detriment of what could be.
Using the car analogy, folk do not still drive round in Austin sevens because they are good sport. So what about a five year cycle rather than the current average thirty year cycle of change then?
Let me give you another world of basic economics, Bikes, where they spend £5-6000 a pop, frequently and own two or three, the sad fact is there are parallel worlds where people are still spending big sums on their sport activities, provided the product brings with it added value and reason to change. Take away the reason to change and you take away the desire to innovate and improve, having the fixed status quo of people like you as 'advisors' to the newcomers to the sport perpetuates the stagnation. Having everything so difficult, just because you and your peers took so long to learn, so that must be the way for everyone, also limits potential. It's not a question of cost, and talking of sane, why is it sane to spend tens of thousands on a clinker built anachronism because it's what, anti-cool? Building a £1200 carbon mast that is so spindly it snaps at the first half decent gust, those boys at our club who recently bought one must be gutted. There's plenty of money around if the need arises, what the problem is, is the route to the market for the folk who have the money, what happens to them is they get advised by people like you and so the charade persists. There is no super GT performer to sell at added value, even you fell for what we all thought was one, then got bitterly disappointed because it was a shiny version of the same ole same ole and riddled with faults that no entry level adult could cope with, even quite reasonable and capable sailors had to junk it, so, all the time that continues you'll dwindle, which is a shame, because it needn't be that way. I'm taking a total newcomer, MD of a local company, I'm going to teach him to sail and crew for me in the Alto, would I have a hope in hell of doing that in a 505? No, not a chance and even now after 8 years and I'm not exactly a newcomer to sailing, would I go near anything as complex as that, it's needlessly complex in this day and age. So you and I, we're worlds apart, you however already have what you want, it's all there, exactly as you like it and dying exactly as I predict it will unless there is an easier yet still accessible high performance route into sailboat racing that attracts the adult adventure seeker with high levels of disposable income, sorry to break that to you, but as usual like most dinghy sailors you're wrong.
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Jaws ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 27 Nov 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 92 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
One thing I really like about the 600 is that it's so light to move on the shore compared to some boats I've sailed. In a nice offshore wind it's a pleasure to sail, accelerating quickly, easy to right etc. When the wind swings round to an onshore and there's all that nasty estuary chop things change. The lack of momentum makes it incredibly hard to tack. I remember when I first sailed it in those conditions; I simply couldn't tack it. I'd build up speed, fly into the tack and the boat hit a wave (unavoidable because there's such a short wavelength) and just stopped. Sail catches, get blown back round onto original tack. Repeat 10-15 times, trying all sorts of different things, still doesn't work. If the 600 were any lighter, there'd be even less momentum, and this problem would be worse.
I've got better technique now, but I still find it really tough to do. Even just going upwind I get stopped in my tracks by waves. If it were made with modern carbon construction, it would become impossible for newer sailors. I once compared it to my old 29er, which tacks fairly well in those conditions. With crew included, a 29er weighs in the region of 220kg. 600's just 120-130 (with myself at 60kg). A certain amount of weight make a boat more seaworthy. I'm sure a carbon one would be a dream on flat lake, but having some weight makes the thing behave better. It's about finding a balance between the two. I'm sure someone will say "pull this rope" or "tack faster" etc. but I don't want to sail something completely impossible. That's no way to pull people in. I maintain that, with hindsight, I've never enjoyed racing more than when we got 10 lasers out on a short course, done 5 laps and called it a day. I sail a far faster, "nicer" boat now, but being able to sail the thing in any conditions and race on a level playing field is the best you can do. I'm basing all this on assumption. If somebody can explain that momentum has no impact and it's just the big fully-battened main then I'll accept it, but as far as I can tell heavy boat = better seakeeping, at least to an extent. GRF always complains about that 49er medal race... I dare say that if they made those boats lighter then things would have been even worse.
|
||||
RS600 794
|
||||
![]() |
||||
marky ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 52 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Interesting link to the MPS weights, thanks. I like the idea of controlling all-up weight. Crew weight is a two-edged sword, it slows you down if the power is constant, but allows you to develop more power. I think it's a mark of a good class where these two effects broadly cancel over a useful wind range. I think the 400 is not bad in this respect. Although the RS400 is a great boat, and a good yardstick for comparing others with, it was designed down to a price about 17 years ago. Has nothing changed since then? For all the hype, the Icon seems to go about the same speed as a 400 or Merlin without a kite. |
||||
![]() |
||||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
It all adds up ...
This weight obsession is misguided ... yes make it light, but also robust and long-lasting.
What is interesting is the massive variance in crew weights yet performance is similar ... so weight is not that big a preformance factor IMHO ...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The icon is 87kg all up.
That is not bad, in a last-century way. But you have to remember it has also shed the spinnaker, so you might as well ditch the crew as well. Of course we could have gone lighter still ... all classes are compromises and that does include some nod towards costs. However Icon IS 85-87kg all up - and that is about 45+ kg less than a 400 and still gives us a strong and durable production boat ... you could say that differance is over 90lbs as the real luddites might recall. Nothing wrong with the 400, it does what it does very well indeed, I'm just using it as a well known example, but it is about 50% heavier all up than Icon. That lower weight is substantial and really does help the Icon cause, allows a modest rig and light sheet loads both ends of Icon and in summary it does what we wanted in the first place rather well. Icon is not targetting any particular exisitng class but it does provide something new and a bit alternative at a very reasonable package price. Now there are days you might like to could lose the crew (Crews out there - you might like to consider loosing the helm as an alternative) - BUT in most breeze you would be considerably slower of course without that mobile weight. But it is does take quite a lot of crew input beyond shoving lard around to do well - the sailplan is designed around the dangle system and the jib is a tad bigger at 3.6m than that sailcloth sample on a N12 ... (No don't write - only teasing) if the crew does not 'do it' right you can forget a decent result - there is a lot more than just sheeting involved .. it feeds the main of course and not just close hauled. Now guys go out and actually WEIGH your current boat and let the world know what is REALLY tips the scales at .... not just the hull mind you .. the whole lot. We've did it with many different classes during the Icon development. We expected some differences but were staggered in what we found - There are very significant differences between the claims and the actuals on many boats and when the rigs are included the figures can get a bit frightening. Naturally the claims are lower than the actuals in nearly, but not all, cases. Anyway - must now depart very soon for a bit of light afternoon / evening sailing ... in Icon. And then a bite to eat washed down with a decent pint... Suggest you get off the keyboard as well and just ....SAIL. Far to much serious stuff here ! Mike L. |
||||
![]() |
||||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
if anyone wants a fag packet business plan to make money out of this industry...
Design a low cost, low maintenance, slightly more modern boat like a Laser. Iron out a couple of the niggles by putting on decent cascade kicker, no need for fancy brands here (white label chinese will do) and a centralised mainsheet. Make it slightly more modern in appearance and ergonomics to not breach any copyright. However, and this fundamental, make sure it is hull form is NO FASTER than a current new Laser- both top end and acceleration. Here's what you do next... get your production costs and a multi-route supply chain ready to ship €3000 complete- including a basic trolley. Primary units on direct shipment with commission to local agent, spares and ancillaries via agent on conventional distribution/sub distribution basis depending on the territory. Now get your local agents to market like hell as a boat to race 'alongside the Laser' in club racing and a cheaper upgrade alternative. Run light hearted open meetings which also allow Lasers to join in- inclusion, inclusion, inclusion. Offer to trade in used Lasers against new sales. What trade-ins aren't re-sold domestically get shipped to emerging markets, with a new sail, new brand identity, for knock down rates/cost to build global presence. What you've effectively developed is product that does not breach copyright, (you're not selling a Laser) but retains a one design ethos, addresses legacy issues with the current Laser and has the opportunity to develop a new identity it own right, all at a price point consumers will tolerate. I'd also say keep the disposables like sails disposable- but charge a realistic price for them so folks who sail regularly enough are happy to buy a couple sails a season to maintain tip top performance. A runner will spend £100 on a pair of new trainers every three months or so.... that's what you are competing against. |
||||
![]() |
||||
fab100 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
So here is a question for you GRF: do you throw out your PC/ipod/TV/car/trousers/whatever and buy new every time a slightly updated version comes out? Perhaps you do.
But sane people don't. They wait until the old one breaks beyond economic repair, slows to a crawl from software updates (PC), granny wills them some money or they can afford a new one, many updates down the line. What does not happen is that as soon as Apple/Intel/BMW releases a new model, everyone is obligated to bin the old one and buy new. But this is what you are advocating. Yes, you could perhaps build a laser or RS200 shaped boat in carbon et al for half the weight and twice the price. But you would destroy these highly supported and completive classes for no tangible gain. The racing would be worse not better, as you would lose most of your people, and quite right too. For what, so the gullible could all go 7.89% faster around the course? So what? No one cares. Its about the competition not the speed. So grass roots support and momentum are what drives the market. This is basic economics and will not change even if you personally gift every household in the country the £15k on the proviso they buy your wonderful new lightweight super-boat (that most of us will hate 'cos the racing will be cr@p). And repeat every 3 years thereafter, insisting they give the old one back as it too is now useless. Unlike branded clothing, the selling USP does not come from being the latest, trendy thing, but from almost the opposite, the strength of the existing network. And building a network from scratch in an already widely diverse market is a huge ask. All the cards are stacked against. This is why the industry is like it is - it has to deal with the world as it, not as you think it should be. So as I said yesterday, get yourself a Moth. And if it does not suit your current club, get in the car and drive somewhere else where it does. But be warned, even in a Moth you will need to hike hard to be competitive with the guys who know what they are doing. |
||||
![]() |
||||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
There's plenty of innovation, what there isn't is commercialisation for it. As it stands, the industry fails to engage the consumer with enough interest to deliver something that is innovative enough to make us want to switch. Even at an elite level, where the same market constraints really don't apply, the sailors voted for the 49er with a girly rig, rather than the other options presented. At least they got what they wanted, whether they come to regret that decision is another discussion entirely. Even when you do get pockets of liberal thinking, the industry has responded by doing what it wants, rather than what the customer wants. Take the RS100- enough initial interest, backed with some reassurance from a popular brand, but when sailed at a small locations racing around cans, the 'one trick pony' just losses its wow factor when its beaten over the water by a Phantom, or in some extremely sad instances, a Laser. The solution... travel around the country and come to class events. They've just decimated their customer base, even if that wasn't the intention. We are in a macro-conservative economy now, folks are far more cautious about spending out on big purchases and 10 grand toys are big purchases. If the industry really wants to push the innovation agenda, then I think they're going to have to look for new emerging markets, without the legacies we have that will invariably hamper 'progress' here for any new entrants. The alternative is to look at the cost reduction market... we've seen sailors switch from more expensive (running & depreciation terms) down to Lasers and there must be a 'better option' surely? Rooster Project X... the money didn't stack up I take it. Sure they start with a bit of shed, but they buy new sails, new tiller extensions, XD systems and get engaged with the brand, and more importantly, the class racing ethos. They then potentially upgrade to a new boat when the trade-in deals get announced. I know a few of our members are looking forward to the autumn when the Olympic boats get released for general sale... it's a cyclically business model and from a quick glance looks to be the most successful out there in terms of retaining sales and after market revenues. Which is why it bemuses the hell out of me as to why it isn't more commercially sustainable....
Edited by pondmonkey - 23 May 12 at 2:33pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The icon is 87kg all up.
That is not bad, in a last-century way. But you have to remember it has also shed the spinnaker, so you might as well ditch the crew as well. |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2728293031 142> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |