Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
The RS100 Owners Thread |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 217218219220221 248> |
Author | ||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Oct 13 at 9:16am |
|
I just checked the ISAF regulations.
1) It seems no longer necessary to appoint an IJ, given ISAF permission. Quite right too IMO, bearing in mind events where an IJ has had nothing to do except get bored. 2)
10.4.b requires (for boats under 6m) 30 boats from 5 countries and 2 continents (these are relaxed for bigger boats). 10.4.b also includes
So as far as I can see there is (rather to my surprise) nothing wrong with the RS100 having two separate World champions this time, provided one (presumably the small rig) is called a subsidiary, and also (assuming permission) nothing wrong with them not having an IJ. However unless they can ramp up turnouts appreciably they may well have problems in future maintaining the right to hold such events. They also need to be very grateful to their one non-European competitor!! [Later] Its amusing that, if (big IF he says again) I read the regulations correctly then with an entry for the whole event of 38 boats from 6(I think) nations on two continents the whole event just scrapes into the regulations, and with 31 boats from 6 Nations and two continents the "subsidiary" worlds for the small rig just scrapes in, but the supposedly main world championships doesn't seem to be required to hit the 30/5/2 regulation. Not, I suspect what was intended! I wonder if there'll be a little rewriting of the regs coming up? Edited by JimC - 07 Oct 13 at 10:01am |
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
[/QUOTE] that bit's quite odd reading.... but it looks like we were wrong, it's not a noddy world championship.... damn, wish I still had a boat and could have gone... Top 8 guaranteed in an Approved ISAF Worlds...
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
L123456 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 30 Apr 12 Online Status: Offline Posts: 500 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
A convenient ex-pat? So the 10.2 winner will be "the" world champ and the 8.4 will be the subsidiary champ based on "discipline" ....
Edited by L123456 - 07 Oct 13 at 9:56am |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
We had used the exception for having no IJ for a couple of Worlds in the B14s, but this year were fortunate to get sponsorship to cover their costs. They promptly set about causing mild chaos with their interpretation of Rule 42 as applied to boats surfing down waves...
|
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I guess it would be cadged together like that, although I'm not sure the chaps in the girlie rig will appreciate their title being seen as the subsidiary... especially as, objectively looking at it, it's their numbers which are contributing the most to meet the overall requirements of 30 boats.
Edited by yellowwelly - 07 Oct 13 at 10:03am |
||
![]() |
||
getafix ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
less of the 'girlie rig' guff please, if you're not 100kg+ or 6ft + the 8.4m sail is perfectly adequate for getting the boat around a course and leaving a long-lasting grin
|
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
not adequate enough to race mano-a-mano against the proper ISAF class though?
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Think the RS100 bashing is getting a bit tedious folks, especially when it extends to about three simultaneous topics...
|
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
it's not bashing- it's questioning with dry humour the decisions the class is taking / making.
It's a new class, one that represents over £2.4m* of real punter investment into 'dinghy development' over the past 3 years or so. Nothing else has seemingly come close to that level of market acceptance from launch for as long as I can remember- not as long as some admittedly. But conversely there seems to be a fairly high turnover of owners- I've nothing to benchmark that gut feel to, but a look at who's sailing them now verses who was in the first traunch doesn't show much cross over. Is that 'normal'... I dunno, but numbers are down- both at the nationals and the worlds, so going in the right direction given the level of investment? Even a quick look through the club results of Hayling & Datchet you'd see the activity has a marked drop off from a year or so ago. They both had a proper fleet of them didn't they? Anyway, I don't think anyone is bashing it in a conventional sailing forum '4 knot sh*tbox' rinse-down, and I don't want to take anything away from the World Champ- although it's interesting to note that he's made a comment about getting the 8.4 next time. (conservative fag pack estimate- £8k x 300 private new sale boats)
Edited by yellowwelly - 07 Oct 13 at 2:07pm |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 217218219220221 248> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |