Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Important announcement from the Tornados |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Author | ||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 1:36pm |
|
Thanks Stuart, a good answer to my apprehensions of the move. I do wonder if ISAF are being somewhat unfair by saying the Tornado is too expensive when the likes of the star and Yngling are in there. Not what you might want to hear but could it be possible that they've made their minds up for good and they're just going to throw excuse after excuse at the cat world? A bit of a far fetched conspiracy theory but as I've just mentioned, the star and yngling class aren't exactly cheap boats.
Doug |
||
![]() |
||
Stuart O ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Doug
Whilst agree with your general thoughts..this thread is specific to the T and it hopefully regaining its ightful place as an olympic class. Therefore the class has listened to the problem of expense by ISAF and MNAs, Their viewpoint is that Olympic classes should be SMOD where possible, this they think will lower perceived costs and allow smaller nations to compete and with good platforms, as has been said in several previous threads, the platforms are capable of more than 1 campaign, this really left the sail development as an expense and with that in mind the class has reacted in a proactive way and put forward a suggestion which with good luck will result in a multihull regaining its place in the Olympics, and with multi...I personnaly hope Tornado. It is my personnal understanding that the IOC would where possible like all olympic classes to be SMOD, ie equipment supplied Edited by Stuart O |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Chris, I just wanted to put the point across that No matter what the development, I'm struggling to think of a single example (in dinghy sailing) whereby someone won through putting in LESS time and have less experience but had far better developed equipment. I don't for a second think that development doesn't make a difference, because it does but as far as I know, the best sailor always wins. If cutting the cost to the sailors and restricting the arms race development cost is the issue, then there's a far simpler option. Put in price caps. E.g. Sails cannot cost more than £xxxx, The mast cannot cost more than £xxxx. |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
In the UK that's what we call a Mandy Rice-Davies statement... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandy_Rice-Davies#cite_note-4 Ater all, unless you do really serious amounts of two boat tuning, who knows which is faster anyway? |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If the sailmakers and sailors were of equal skill, then it would be a close
fight...... unless one sailor spent more money developing more sails, which (according to every sailmaker I know) results in a faster boat. Developing sails, hulls, spars, is all fascinating stuff and arguably a great test of the sailor (although I don't understand why being able to develop the sails within a tight ruleset is seen as so important by some who people ignore hull development or wider rulesets) but surely you can't say that all the time, effort and cash that goes into making one sail faster than the other does NOT affect results. Certainly all the sailmakers keep telling us that it does! |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But Chris, what if two competing sailmakers just so happen to be of near equal skill?
|
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Counter example- one SMOD regatta I know well was decided by a distance of 18 inches in one heat. Another was decided by 3 lengths in 4 days racing. In one class, the two sailors weighed within 2kg of each other; the other was weight-equalised. Surely all the might and science of the modern sailmaking industry could have made more than 18" difference in a 45 minute race? Surely a sailmaker, working with a multi-millionaire four-time world champ ex- Olympian (the runner up in the second champs) could have made a sail that was fast enough to close such a narrow gap (other races were probably closer)? If the skill of the sailmaker cannot make a significant difference, then shouldn't we just sack them all? Surely, given time and money and sailor input, they can make a sail that has a significant speed advantage over other older sails. If not, then why bother with developing sails? If developing sails makes a difference in results and speed, then spending cash on developing sails can make a difference in results. If developing sails does not make a significant difference in results and speed, then why bother? I just changed from SMOD gear inside a development class to non-SMOD gear inside the development class. Sure, the non-SMOD stuff suits my weight better, but also someone else's input (the sailmaker and hull designer) has now affected my results..... Yes, the non-SMOD stuff is faster, arguably "better" in many ways, yes selecting it can take some skill (although not always, it's not that hard to ask what is fast and then walk out and buy it) but it is hardly a level playing field. In our 'loose OD' cat, sail shapes have changed. We went from being top 1/3 of our first nats, to the back in our second. We were using the same sails, which had been hardly used (and should have been durable enough to last given their age and the care with which they were used). So did I sail a really stupid series (highly likely) or were the new gen sails faster (as many said)? How do we find out? By spending a couple of thousand quid on sails to replace our little-used, sound, tough but outmoded sails so we can gain that vital minute or two per race. Oh, and now there's another generation of sails and people are spending money on more new sails and more recuts. That's great in some ways, but a complete pain in others. Making sails single manufacturer does one thing - it means that we can go out and know we have the same gear as others. In the SMODs I sail the few, if any, of the fastest sailors round here (including former Olympians and world champs etc) have special selected gear and do NOT change it every regatta as some claim. Edited by Chris 249 |
||
![]() |
||
Guest ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
... do you mean air rowers? |
||
![]() |
||
Stuart O ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
and lets not even mention sailboards........... ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Stuart O ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
CatsRule...you miss the whole point of what is being said...the ITA really ended up with egg on their face over the code zero and mitchs spin pole. Saying that there is nothing in the rules that said a code zero could not be flown. ISAF and the ITA was made to look a little silly...I will expalin to you at the club when i see you the political issues behind it.....but it was a farce, Ill grant you this a comical farce...one that the cat community and others that were working hard on the 11th medal could have done without. It may have made good reading but the fact that mitch used a conventional rig says a lot...Mitch has and probably always will be on the cutting edge of development, he is also very good at the mind games.
I too am proud to sail cats but can see the work that 'non-cat' people are putting in to get cats reinstated to where the majority feel they should be. But it is those 'old fart half boat sailors' that may have succeeded in getting the 11th medal and maybe your dream chance at competing at the olympics back on track. We maybe defined by what we sail...but lets not forget 1st and foremost we are all SAILORS....and dont forget catsrule that you sail under ISAF rules and compete at ISAF events...and if you want to compete at a 'worlds' then Im affraid sometimes you just have to listen to a bit of Beethoven Edited by Stuart O |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |