New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Important announcement from the Tornados
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Important announcement from the Tornados

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Important announcement from the Tornados
    Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 1:36pm

Thanks Stuart, a good answer to my apprehensions of the move. 

I do wonder if ISAF are being somewhat unfair by saying the Tornado is too expensive when the likes of the star and Yngling are in there.  Not what you might want to hear but could it be possible that they've made their minds up for good and they're just going to throw excuse after excuse at the cat world?  A bit of a far fetched conspiracy theory but as I've just mentioned, the star and yngling class aren't exactly cheap boats. 

 

Doug

Back to Top
Stuart O View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stuart O Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 11:09am
Doug

Whilst agree with your general thoughts..this thread is specific to the T and it hopefully regaining its ightful place as an olympic class. Therefore the class has listened to the problem of expense by ISAF and MNAs, Their viewpoint is that Olympic classes should be SMOD where possible, this they think will lower perceived costs and allow smaller nations to compete and with good platforms, as has been said in several previous threads, the platforms are capable of more than 1 campaign, this really left the sail development as an expense and with that in mind the class has reacted in a proactive way and put forward a suggestion which with good luck will result in a multihull regaining its place in the Olympics, and with multi...I personnaly hope Tornado.

It is my personnal understanding that the IOC would where possible like all olympic classes to be SMOD, ie equipment supplied


Edited by Stuart O
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 10:46am

Chris, I just wanted to put the point across that No matter what the development, I'm struggling to think of a single example (in dinghy sailing) whereby someone won through putting in LESS time and have less experience but had far better developed equipment.  I don't for a second think that development doesn't make a difference, because it does but as far as I know, the best sailor always wins. 

If cutting the cost to the sailors and restricting the arms race development cost is the issue, then there's a far simpler option.  Put in price caps.  E.g. Sails cannot cost more than £xxxx, The mast cannot cost more than £xxxx. 
Surely that would be more effective than restricting the class to one hull builder, sail maker and so on.  I realise this would be an extreme possibility but if more classes were to smod themselves, the potential is to end up with not much of an industy left at all. 
I realise it's not an olympic or even a true international class but the GP14 has sail price caps in place and it works.  The sailors are happy and the sailmakers are happy. 

Doug

Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 10:25am
Originally posted by Chris 249

unless one sailor spent more money developing more sails, which (according to every sailmaker I know) results in a faster boat.


In the UK that's what we call a Mandy Rice-Davies statement... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandy_Rice-Davies#cite_note-4

Ater all, unless you do really serious amounts of two boat tuning, who knows which is faster anyway?
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 10:13am
If the sailmakers and sailors were of equal skill, then it would be a close
fight...... unless one sailor spent more money developing more sails,
which (according to every sailmaker I know) results in a faster boat.

Developing sails, hulls, spars, is all fascinating stuff and arguably a great
test of the sailor (although I don't understand why being able to develop
the sails within a tight ruleset is seen as so important by some who
people ignore hull development or wider rulesets) but surely you can't
say that all the time, effort and cash that goes into making one sail faster
than the other does NOT affect results.

Certainly all the sailmakers keep telling us that it does!

Back to Top
alstorer View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 07
Location: Cambridge
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2899
Post Options Post Options   Quote alstorer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 9:25am
But Chris, what if two competing sailmakers just so happen to be of near equal skill? 
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Oct 08 at 9:03am
Originally posted by Doug.H

Originally posted by Stuart O

However by one designing the
white sails (spinnakers
are mainly Gran Segals) would mean that the ability is down to the sailor
and not because they have developed a radical sail.


Sorry but thats simply not true. Everyone having the same sails doesn't
make things more equal (believe it or not). I keep hearing this said time
and time again but when has the best sailor not won?? Whoever puts in
the most time and has the most experience pulls into the lead.

Examples:
Everyone has the same sails in the RS200 class and roger gilbert won. In
the merlin rocket class there are lots of sailmakers competing, roger
gilbert won.

Nick craig won the RS400 where everyone has the same sails and also
wins in the OK's and B14 class where there are competing sailmakers.

Ben ainslie won in the laser class where everyone has the same sails, and
wins in everything else he sails where there are many sailmakers
competing.

Shall I continue?

Making sails single manufacturer does one thing. It damages the health
of racing lofts across the world who rely on the business of international
classes.

Doug


Counter example- one SMOD regatta I know well was decided by a
distance of 18 inches in one heat. Another was decided by 3 lengths in 4
days racing. In one class, the two sailors weighed within 2kg of each
other; the other was weight-equalised.

Surely all the might and science of the modern sailmaking industry could
have made more than 18" difference in a 45 minute race? Surely a
sailmaker, working with a multi-millionaire four-time world champ ex-
Olympian (the runner up in the second champs) could have made a sail
that was fast enough to close such a narrow gap (other races were
probably closer)?

If the skill of the sailmaker cannot make a significant difference, then
shouldn't we just sack them all?

Surely, given time and money and sailor input, they can make a sail that
has a significant speed advantage over other older sails.

If not, then why bother with developing sails? If developing sails makes a
difference in results and speed, then spending cash on developing sails
can make a difference in results. If developing sails does not make a
significant difference in results and speed, then why bother?

I just changed from SMOD gear inside a development class to non-SMOD
gear inside the development class. Sure, the non-SMOD stuff suits my
weight better, but also someone else's input (the sailmaker and hull
designer) has now affected my results.....

Yes, the non-SMOD stuff is faster, arguably "better" in many ways, yes
selecting it can take some skill (although not always, it's not that hard to
ask what is fast and then walk out and buy it) but it is hardly a level
playing field.

In our 'loose OD' cat, sail shapes have changed. We went from being top
1/3 of our first nats, to the back in our second. We were using the same
sails, which had been hardly used (and should have been durable enough
to last given their age and the care with which they were used).

So did I sail a really stupid series (highly likely) or were the new gen sails
faster (as many said)? How do we find out? By spending a couple of
thousand quid on sails to replace our little-used, sound, tough but
outmoded sails so we can gain that vital minute or two per race. Oh, and
now there's another generation of sails and people are spending money
on more new sails and more recuts.

That's great in some ways, but a complete pain in others.

Making sails single manufacturer does one thing - it means that we can
go out and know we have the same gear as others. In the SMODs I sail the
few, if any, of the fastest sailors round here (including former Olympians
and world champs etc) have special selected gear and do NOT change it
every regatta as some claim.








Edited by Chris 249
Back to Top
Guest View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Oct 08 at 11:19pm

Originally posted by Stuart O

Originally posted by Guest#260

I dunno why cat sailors get into this them & us stuff ...


and lets not even mention sailboards...........

... do you mean air rowers?

Back to Top
Stuart O View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stuart O Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Oct 08 at 10:47pm
Originally posted by Guest#260

I dunno why cat sailors get into this them & us stuff ...


and lets not even mention sailboards...........
Back to Top
Stuart O View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stuart O Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Oct 08 at 10:39pm
CatsRule...you miss the whole point of what is being said...the ITA really ended up with egg on their face over the code zero and mitchs spin pole. Saying that there is nothing in the rules that said a code zero could not be flown. ISAF  and the ITA was made to look a little silly...I will expalin to you at the club when i see you the political issues behind it.....but it was a farce, Ill grant you this a comical farce...one that the cat community and others that were working hard on the 11th medal could have done without. It may have made good reading but the fact that mitch used a conventional rig says a lot...Mitch has and probably always will be on the cutting edge of development, he is also very good at the mind games.

I too am proud to sail cats but can see the work that 'non-cat' people are putting in to get cats reinstated to where the majority feel they should be. But it is those 'old fart half boat sailors' that may have succeeded in getting the 11th medal and maybe your dream chance at competing at the olympics back on track.

We maybe defined by what we sail...but lets not forget 1st and foremost we are all SAILORS....and dont forget catsrule that you sail under ISAF rules and compete at ISAF events...and if you want to compete at a 'worlds' then Im affraid sometimes you just have to listen to a bit of Beethoven


Edited by Stuart O
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy