New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: your responsibilities as a sailor
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

your responsibilities as a sailor

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1415161718 21>
Author
PeterG View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 12 Jan 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 823
Post Options Post Options   Quote PeterG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: your responsibilities as a sailor
    Posted: 20 May 13 at 3:13pm
If we all accept that a BA should be mandatory, then logic would decree that a TH should be banned.

The logic does nothing of the sort. A trapeze harness is essential for some types of sailing, and of course people who use them should be aware of the risks. Personally I wouldn't use one without a quick release hook, and as I'm sure you are aware there has been plenty of discussion about that issue. But the notion of banning THs is a completely different issue than saying that wearing BAs, which are not essential to the sport but are generally believed to reduce risk, should be compulsory.


Peter
Ex Cont 707
Ex Laser 189635
DY 59
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 3:32pm
Originally posted by Sheetpuller

when an absolute hoolie comes down the Solent and boats are capsized all over the place and half the people in the water aren't wearing a PFD because it was nice and sunny when they left the beach? 
 

See this picture...


An absolute hoolie blowing offshore with 100's of sailors, none of them wearing a PFD, tell me what is the difference?

The difference is the boat and it being on it's side, not the people, they really are better able to self recover, get back in on their own, maybe help get the sails down to be towed in on the bare pole, than if they are all trussed up in the energy sapping mess of clothes.
Back to Top
pondmonkey View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2202
Post Options Post Options   Quote pondmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 3:45pm
Originally posted by PeterG

If we all accept that a BA should be mandatory, then logic would decree that a TH should be banned.

The logic does nothing of the sort. A trapeze harness is essential for some types of sailing, and of course people who use them should be aware of the risks. Personally I wouldn't use one without a quick release hook, and as I'm sure you are aware there has been plenty of discussion about that issue. But the notion of banning THs is a completely different issue than saying that wearing BAs, which are not essential to the sport but are generally believed to reduce risk, should be compulsory.



for clarity, I'm not advocating the banning of traps... far from it.  I'm just highlighting the assumptions made in sailing that PFDs are 'always good' and thus given the gravitas that it has with the RRS and local by-laws.  Not to mention amongst sailors themselves.... apparently we are setting bad examples by not wearing them in front of kids???

From what I can tell, there are no stats and little colloquial evidence that supports our almost universal endorsement of PFDs.  However there is plenty of evidence, and indeed  much research and development into QRH for harnesses that was almost brought into the RRS, because of entrapment issues with trapezing.  

The stats don't back up the actions.  I accept this is a somewhat fallacious point, but it seems illogical to me that we can give one sailing item such high regard to enforce it through RRS; yet another, with a seemingly questionable safety record, is neither banned, nor at the very least restricted in its use.








Edited by pondmonkey - 20 May 13 at 3:48pm
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 4:05pm
Originally posted by pondmonkey

From what I can tell, there are no stats and little colloquial evidence that supports our almost universal endorsement of PFDs.

You won't, inevitably find many public reports on lives saved: after all news wise its a non-event. However if you read through a selection of MAIB reports on fishing boat fatalities I'm sure you'll find quite a few where lack of personal buoyancy is listed as a contributory factor.

How much benefit the universal rule really brings to sailors on a 50ft wide river is of course questionable, but at the same time ISTR having seen lack of personal buoyancy listed as a contributory factor on various fatalities on the Norfolk Broads.

You could argue that because organisations like the MAIB will almost invariably list lack of personal buoyancy on a report as a contributory factor then that in itself is an argument in favour of the rule - the sport doesn't need pointing fingers.
Back to Top
pondmonkey View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2202
Post Options Post Options   Quote pondmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 4:23pm
so you appease the H&S mob with a blanket rule, that may or may not have much substance given the experiences of sailors who've found acts of self-rescue impinged by PFDs?
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 4:55pm
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by pondmonkey

From what I can tell, there are no stats and little colloquial evidence that supports our almost universal endorsement of PFDs.

You won't, inevitably find many public reports on lives saved: after all news wise its a non-event. However if you read through a selection of MAIB reports on fishing boat fatalities I'm sure you'll find quite a few where lack of personal buoyancy is listed as a contributory factor.

How much benefit the universal rule really brings to sailors on a 50ft wide river is of course questionable, but at the same time ISTR having seen lack of personal buoyancy listed as a contributory factor on various fatalities on the Norfolk Broads.

You could argue that because organisations like the MAIB will almost invariably list lack of personal buoyancy on a report as a contributory factor then that in itself is an argument in favour of the rule - the sport doesn't need pointing fingers.


Well the counter argument is that windsurfing has a surprisingly low incidence of fatality over the years in fact I would bet fewer than yachting and dinghy sailing precisely because we don't have buoyancy aids.

As to the Norfolk Broads, they are issued as a matter of course to all Norfolk Broads vacationers, but if you've ever visited the Broads, you'll note that Darwin is under heavy pressure due to the presence of alcohol and car workers on water.
Back to Top
maxibuddah View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 06 Mar 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1760
Post Options Post Options   Quote maxibuddah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 5:20pm
Is windsurfing safer than boating though grf? If it all goes wrong on a board the fall falls over and you sit or lie on the board. Nothing stuck up in the air driving you downwind. No pulleys or ropes to snag on, etc, etc.

A boat has a boom that hurts, rigging to get snagged up in, and various other bits of stuff that sick out to impale you on, etc, etc. Also it can blow away from you surprisingly quickly and takes far more effort to get upright.

Not sure how you surmise that the number of fatalities is mostly down to buoyancy aids without any actual statistics, unless of course you have them then I will happily accept your words.

It strikes me that most of the arguments and counter arguments in the latter part of this thread are based on personal opinion rather than facts. If people don't report when a pfd has helped then the results will always be skewed to those luckily rare occasions when something tragic had happened. I suspect that GRFs last paragraph has a lot to do with things, though of course I don't have any facts to back that up....

If you take the recent accident down south west where the family got either hurt or killed by the power boat then a pfd wouldn't have helped our hindered, it was the lack of kill cord that did for them. Still in the official statistics though
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
Back to Top
SoggyBadger View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Oct 10
Location: The Wild Wood
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 552
Post Options Post Options   Quote SoggyBadger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 5:21pm
Originally posted by PeterG

The logic does nothing of the sort. A trapeze harness is essential for some types of sailing, and of course people who use them should be aware of the risks. Personally I wouldn't use one without a quick release hook, and as I'm sure you are aware there has been plenty of discussion about that issue.


I raced Ospreys for several decades. Never had a problem with the trapeze harness and never heard of anyone else having a problem either including two crews who I trained up from total novices. Never heard of anyone in the Fireball fleet having a problem either.
Best wishes from deep in the woods

SB

Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 5:29pm
I would expect windsurfers to have a fairly low fatality rate, as they seem to spend most of their time on the beach.
I have probably been in a few situations where I could easily have been in trouble had I not been wearing buoyancy. But that does not stop me going afloat without when I think it's reasonable.
I think the entrapment thing is grossly overstated, but it's something people don't think about until they get a big scare. You don't need a trap harness for that, in my experience.

To put it in context I have known a lot more people who've died of cancer, car accidents or futile wars
than the very few I've known very slightly who've died sailing.

 
To get back on topic, yes we have some responsibility to our clubs and the sport in general not to be seen as complete idiots and not to lead kids astray with macho attitudes to LJ's, PFD's, kill cords and what have you. We also have a responsibility to kids to teach them that it's the real world out there and there is more to it than just wearing the favoured safety clobber.
Maybe we should also tell them that its worth the very slight risk?

Back to Top
2547 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote 2547 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 May 13 at 5:48pm
You often see discussions like this on cycling forums about helmets and nanny state. 

I think ba's should be a matter of personal choice for adults when free sailing but if you wish to participate in an organised event then you have to accept the organisers requirements. 

Their demands have been shaped by the blame and claim culture. 

It is a facet of modern society unfortunately. 


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1415161718 21>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy