Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
V Twin |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1112131415 142> |
Author | |
tickler ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Jun 07 Location: Tunstead Milton Online Status: Offline Posts: 895 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 05 Jun 12 at 8:01pm |
Well said Jim, I agree with you. The other thing is 'horses for courses'. Now GRF may not wish me well in my Solo career, but I wish him well. Let him play about with his Vtwinny thing and it could be a worthwhile effort in the end, if that is what he wishes to do. For my part the elderley Solo careered around the lake in 20mph gusts out of controll as I dropped the tiller and fell over, but it achieved my aim, I kept my knickers dry!
The other thing about young Fuller is that he provides us with entertainment and the oportunity to have a good old patronise when things fail to work out. Keep going lad some of us are behind you. |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think I'd want to see a lot more development of this one plus a couple more prototype hulls before I wrote the whole concept off as being intrinsically flawed.
I think you guys are somewhat naive about just how much time, effort and money are required to properly evaluate a competely new idea. I do wonder how many good ideas are stillborn because the evaluation isn't done properly. I remember trying what we would now call a mast stump out on my Cherub in the 1980s. It was a complete disaster - mast through the deck twice in three outings - and I abandoned it in disgust, but with new materials and competent engineering the Twelve footer sailors made their version of the concept work, and there are substantial numbers of boats sailing with what is essentially the same idea, independantly developed and done properly. I am still not prepared to say I think whether GRFs is fundamentaly flawed or not basically because I still don't really understand it. And I wouldn't want to say whether its fundamentally impossible to achieve a better balance between speed and handling than we have now. One should not forget Clarke' first law: "1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong." |
|
![]() |
|
Presuming Ed ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 641 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Still don't understand why if he wanted a scow, he just didn't buy a scow.
|
|
![]() |
|
Atrocity ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 23 Jan 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mileage as what? A double hander that is quick in a breeze? Well there are no shortage of those, International 14, 505, Alto (which I think he still owns), all manner of RS boats both trapeze and hiking and all of which will show the V Twin a clean pair of heels around a sailing course. The design brief as supplied by GRF was simple, a fast singlehander which is easy to sail by a helm of around 70kg. It was a fools errand from the start, outrageous in dimension, wetted area and weight, therefore requiring a sail area of significant proportion to get it going and as a consequence unmanageable by one lightweight. Give it a manageable sail area and it never gets going. It has been interesting to follow and remarkable to see in the flesh, but as a ground breaking singlehanded sailboat design, a disaster. Given the brief I don't see how it can be considered as anything else.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pierre ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1532 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think two-up in a breeze it is probably a quick bit of kit.
Yes I know it's supposed to be a single hander, sticks in the light stuff etc etc etc... Mileage in it yet I believe.
|
|
![]() |
|
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The V Twin was not a fool's errand, and I still applaud GRF for it - but the expectations from it, neatly put in perspective by Chris249 were a fool's hope.
|
|
![]() |
|
tickler ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Jun 07 Location: Tunstead Milton Online Status: Offline Posts: 895 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the "fools errand" remark is a little unfair. The idea could have worked and with drastic alteration still could. Tackle the inversion problem and make it a double hander. CAD and technical bollock scratching are one thing but there is nothing like trying something out. L123456, sounds like a Laser number, hummmmm......enough said.
|
|
![]() |
|
L123456 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 30 Apr 12 Online Status: Offline Posts: 500 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is this the final realisation of what was stated at the outset ... yet GRF was encouraged on this fools erand by many on here ...
|
|
![]() |
|
haroosh ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 521 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
'Nope, you can't get a singlehanded dinghy that goes faster than all the rest while also being easier to sail than all the rest'.
There is but it's a Cat. |
|
Keith
RS100 GBR 116 (XLR8) |
|
![]() |
|
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nope, you can't get a singlehanded dinghy that goes faster than all the rest while also being easier to sail than all the rest, just like you can't get a Formula 1 winner that takes the family for a comfortable holiday like a Winnebago, you can't get a winning waterski racing boat that is perfect for game fishing 100 miles off Zanzibar, you can't get a downhill bike that will beat a TT bike on a road, and you can't get a hybrid board that keeps up with a real longboard. Not only that, you can't get a 200 quid London flat with extensive parklands in the kitchen, a tropical beach in the second bedroom, and alpine skiiing in the hall. There's a thing called the laws of physics that regrettably cannot be escaped. ![]() Dinghy sailors may be tighter than windsurfers, but maybe that's why dinghy sailing didn't crash so badly. I remember many years ago meeting a certain Mr Pryde who said "windsurfers of today want quality and will pay whatever it costs" or words to that effect. What got me then, and now, is that if people want "quality" in boards or boats, then they will also demand "quality" in their BMW, Audi or Porsche, and "quality" in their waterfront home and trendy city residence, and "quality" in their Biarritz ski lodge and their maxi yachts and their private schools, cocaine habits and mistresses/masters. But no one who follows the "people should pay top dollar for everything" maxim has ever explained how many people actually earn that sort of bucks, and how many people who do earn that cash actually get the time to go sailing. I know in my line, you either get big bucks OR have a life.... I know which one I chose, which is why I race on hulls that average about 30 years old, although having 4 boats, 3 racing bikes and 20 something windsurfers also helps. ![]() Even dinghy sailing can be a damn expensive sport compared to what most people pay for fun, so to say that dinghy sailors are tightwads is surely to ignore reality. And on the other hand, the tiny minority of big yacht owners spend such vast amounts that even the most spendthrift of dinghy sailors looks like a street-corner beggar, so really who can claim to judge how much people should spend? Edited by Chris 249 - 04 Jun 12 at 12:34pm |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1112131415 142> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |