New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Dinghy hull weights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Dinghy hull weights

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 111213
Author
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Dinghy hull weights
    Posted: 22 Aug 16 at 3:00pm
Quoted weights can be very unreliable indeed... and some manufacturers had a record of struggling to meet them. I wouldn't expect hull weight to include foils for any class. All else being equal the smaller the boat the lighter its likely to be. The Streaker is one of the lighter traditional classes for very much that reason.

The best thing I did was to treat myself to an aluminium trolley: that thing is wonderful.
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Aug 16 at 2:50pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

(and before anybody suggests a laser my legs are far to short to make sailing one a pleasant experience)

don't worry Sam, longer legs don't make it a pleasant one either.

Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Aug 16 at 2:42pm
There is usually a tolerance on SMOD boats but rarely are individual hulls weighed.

I know the early Giles built Supernovas had a very wide range against the published weight. Even the venerable Laser had a reasonable wide tolerance.

Thankfully QC seems a bit better with more recent boats or for boats that have a min hull weight (which have to be weighed so lead can be put in).

What are you considering in terms of class? People may have more information if you name a class you are looking at.
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Aug 16 at 2:22pm
I'm considering another boat (a singlehanded) for fun sailing and a little low key handicap racing. Winning is not the primary consideration (I have been racing my Spice for the last few years Ermm so, with the manufacturers chosen PY winning is always unlikely). Weight is a consideration along with ease of sailing (I am a moderately fit 63 year old with a fair bit of dinghy experience) and to that end I have devised a crude way of weighing my Spice. All up sailing weight plus the trolly I'm getting a weight of around 160kg. Published hull weight is the same as the RS400 at 85kg, both boats were/are built by White Formula, have similar sail area and tin rigs so an estimated sailing weight of 130kg seems plausible as it matches the RS400s published 129kg closely enough. 

So my question is :- how do the manufacturers quoted hull weights compare with the actual weight of the boats? RS quote 'hull without fittings' for the RS100 but 'hull weight' for the others, most don't quote 'sailing weights' or specify whether 'hull weight' includes foils etc.

Realistically I'd like a boat that is easier on my dodgy back up and down the beach and if funds were unlimited I'd just buy an RS Aero 7 (and before anybody suggests a laser my legs are far to short to make sailing one a pleasant experience)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 111213

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy