Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Laser Whinging Thread |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 891011> |
Author | ||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 Apr 11 at 11:36pm |
|
Electronic scoring in fencing dates back to before 1936 and (although I just mess around at a local fencing club) I've yet to see anything as "modern" as a Laser in the design and technology of fencing kit. So Andy's basic point appears to be quite correct. There are many, many sports that reject many technological advances in performance.
Similarly, swimming (brought up earlier) is a classic example of a sport RETREATING from technological progress. The semi-buoyant streamlined suits that enabled 130 world records to be broken in about one season were banned in 2010 - see http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/25/sports/25swim.html The suits caused a massive controversy and some call for all the records created by swimmers using them to be struck off. Many of the swimmers were against them - at least one likened using a faster suit to doping. So clearly, elite competitors in other sports completely understand and support the concept of banning technological performance improvements. The article notes that the super-fast suits will go "the way of square-grooved clubs in men’s professional golf", which is a reference that golf also uses a lot of gear with restricted performance - you are simply not allowed to create a golf ball that flies longer than a certain distance. Clubs are also restricted in design and performance. Cycling is heavily restricted, even the Tour De France and Olympic stuff. Contador's bike is as slow compared to the ultimate bicycle as the Laser is compared to the Moth. The most prestigious record is restricted to gear of the same basic design age as the Laser itself. The oldest international dinghy class of all is actually on a resurgence at the moment and is considering applying for International status once more. The fact that a 1912 12 footer attracted almost as many entries to its biggest international regatta as the Moths (the most advanced dinghy class) did seems to show that technological progress is NOT required. None of this is saying that we shouldn't have classes that develop, it's just saying that any claim that classes MUST develop (or develop faster than the Laser) may not be correct. It's great that some kids look at a C2 rig with interest, but the attraction of such sails certainly isn't universal, given that the facts indicate that most people don't buy classes with film sails. Well, in windsurfing they do, because windsurfing chases "progress" - and it's about 8% as big as it was in dacron days. Hmmmmm........
Edited by Chris 249 - 14 Apr 11 at 11:37pm |
||
![]() |
||
Andymac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Apr 07 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 852 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thanks Chris, you've expanded my point rather well.
I'd forgotten the 'backward' technological step that had been taken in cycling with the one hour record. All the records set since Eddy Merckx 1972 broke it (at altitude) have been shelved sweeping aside all those set with disc wheels and aero type (tri) bars with increasingly radical streamlining and more ergonomically efficient positions. It is again now attempted on a 'standard' format track bike with old style drop handllebar position.
As an aside, I remember treating myself to a set of Cinelli Spinaci clip on bars back in the early nineties, promptly before the governing body banned them from massed start road races, anyway, they turned out to be an expensive set of bicycle storage hooks in the shed!
|
||
![]() |
||
ob1 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 21 Feb 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Not to disagree with the whole point, but it is certainly not only "elite competitors" that understand theses things or whose views count.
And Actually the argument that we Don't need to develop any further doesn't go far enough for some people. For example The environmentalist James lovelock argues that it is essential the we MUST regress to survive. Of course there are probably exceptions where a bit of evolution might help (and this probably the only time the laser and GRF gall in the same category ;-) ) |
||
![]() |
||
getafix ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
This appears to be careering off on a tangent again... IMO it's not about evolution, design development, sailors opinions, class 'values' or anything else... it's about money
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Is it about money as in "The Laser is a great value for money boat you can race in a club fleet pretty much anywhere, have a well attended domestic circuit and, if you are good enough travel the world sailing them" or about money as in "They are a bunch of crooks, ripping people off with huge margins and forcing people to only buy spares from them"? |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
Mikey 14778 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Feb 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 298 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yeah, but it was a good tangent, with some well thought-out points of view.
|
||
![]() |
||
getafix ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ohhhhhh now I geddit, you want sailing to be UNLIKE cars, TVs, computers, bikes, mobile phones, cameras, boilers, printers, satellites, commercial aircraft, military aircraft etc... etc.... etc.... Let me assure you, indeed guarantee you, that if I had (or thought I could get) the rights to a 10k+ selling boat I wouldn't be letting someone else in to the game and spoiling the view from my mansion by helping themselves to some of the margin. Just 'cos it's fun, doesn't mean someone don't expect to make some dough somewhere along the line |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Not sure I get your point - of course people need to make money, I just can't work out why this thread should be all about money, nor in which direction you are meaning - good or bad.
|
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
ob1 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 21 Feb 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Oh no The Thought Police are out again! Actually this is the whinging version of the thread so there isn't an "on track" to be on. Edited by ob1 - 16 Apr 11 at 8:33am |
||
![]() |
||
tickel ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 408 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sure Chris, let the bicycle develop until it is pretty near perfection then halt development to avoid an arms race. Laser are very long way off that point. There are better developed boats around than Lasers, take Lightning. Roughly as old as Laser but with proper twinned control lines, centre sheeting and a flexible tracked mast. Always cheaper as well. Not content with an already good boat John Claridge took over and made a series of modifications recommended by existing sailors. Altered deck molding, removed the thwart and supplied an optional mylar sail. The boat is now more desirable and becoming very popular. Did a new or modified boat win the Nationals last year? No it was 104, 30 years old retaining its thwart and with a dacron sail. Is the boat now sexier and more comfortable to sail? Yes very much so and that is why so many new boats are being built even though performance seems little improve. Byte is a different proposition because the alterations were so much more radical. When the C2 rig appeared it did render older rigged boats obsolete but the class was dying anyway. Byte should be more popular than it is but its small size puts it into an awkward market sector which is a shame. If laser sailors wish to keep sailing and enjoying lasers then fine but would it really be so difficult to centre sheet it and dual the controls? This would not massively improve performance. Good sailors would still do well in old boats the same as lightning but the boat would be so much nicer to sail.
If I had any money (which I don't) I would produce a C2 type rig for laser hulls and create a new club racing class. |
||
tickel
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 891011> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |