New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Carbon v Glass
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Carbon v Glass

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Chew my RS View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 790
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chew my RS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Carbon v Glass
    Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 12:35pm

Happy New Year!

I am doodling a 15' hiker (I know there's plenty already available) and wondered what the cost/weight difference between glass and carbon might be?

Do any of you Cherubby chaps know how much weight is saved by building from carbon/foam sandwich rather than glass/foam sandwich.  And what is the cost increase?

Also, any thoughts on whether to go for SAN (Corecell) or PVC foam core?

Cheers

 

Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 1:02pm
Speak to some of the Phantom boys too. I believe Vandercraft have not long changed construction which means they can build a Phantom hull down to weight and one that is also durable.

FWIW they have lost approximately 10kg on hull wight with this (one of the guys at my club has just 'upgraded' and he tells me that is the difference).

Paul
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
russell View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Post Options Post Options   Quote russell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 3:49pm

Phantoms changed from polyester to epoxy - the hulls are not carbon.  My Vandercraft hull has 2kg correctors to bring it up to the minimum weight of 61Kg (including foils etc).  I believe this is about the usual now.

Carbon masts and booms were also introduced a few years ago now.  The adjustable carbon rig has made a big difference to the sailability of the boat - its now a real pleasure and has opened up the weight range.

Red Eye sails are also introducing a new hiking single hander, based on a smaller Phantom. Check out http://www.redeyesails.co.uk/Redeye%20Solution.htm

Russell

Phantom 1330
59er 090
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 4:35pm
Its a bit of an "it depends" question.

What it most depends on are things like durability, dent resistance, and your own construction skills and facilities.

The latter can make a big difference to cost - a pro using vacuum bagging could quite easily use half as much resin as someone who builds a boat with out paying much attention to resin/fibre ratio.

As for carbon against glass, well if you are building a minimum weight hiking boat with no consideration for how much it will dent and respond to knocks then a single layer of 100gsm carbon each side of the foam will probably be stiff enough. By contrast a bash resistant polyester/glass boat might use three layers of 200gsm glass. That's several times as much resin as well as the cloth, so the actual material costs are probably not a lot different (haven't looked at prices lately I admit!)

Back to Top
swiftsolo.org View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jul 05
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Post Options Post Options   Quote swiftsolo.org Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 10:09pm

The material on the outside of the hull is there primarily for impact resistance so it is not quite as critical to use the strongest possible material. The reinforcement inside the hull is where most of the forces will be concentrated. This is where strength is most important.

On the Swift Solo I'm building we use S Glass on the outside of the hull - about 30% stronger than E glass from memory. On the inside we use a carbon/ kevlar composite which is strong! and expensive. If you are considering doing something at home I would suggest that you use epoxy. It is stronger and more expensive but the main thing is that it doesn't stink like polyester.

If you want something that is strong light and not too expensive I would use E glass on the outside, carbon on the inside and epoxy as your resin.

Building a Swift Solo
First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser
Back to Top
I luv Wight View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Post Options Post Options   Quote I luv Wight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 06 at 10:32pm
Weights for cherub hull:
carbon ~ 40 kg
glass ~ 45-50kg ( estimated because no-one builds in glass any more)

( as JimC says, you need more glass than carbon, so the weight and time to build goes up )

If you are homebuilding, then there is some cost saving using glass.
This is only a very small percentage of the overall boat cost however.
For a boat builder, the cost saving on materials is negated by the extra labour.

Umm... the strongest laminate should be on the outside!
- if you are using foam.
For timber construction ( ie that weighs nearly 5 times as much as foam ) then both skins can be lighter, because of the compression strength etc of the wood. ( because it's heavy )

For lightest weight, you could use 150g/m² carbon outside, and 60g/m² inside, over 75kg/m³ foam, epoxy prepreg - ( but that means much more work on temperature stable moulds.)

Typical very light 'standard' construction would use 200g/m۔² carbon in epoxy each side of foam, maybe with extra 100g/m² glass ouside to give more impact protection.

S-glass is not now readily available in UK, hence the cost is close to carbon, so it's normally only used in classes that ban carbon.

rigid PVC eg airex is good
linear PVC eg airex R63 is good for heat-forming curvy parts ( and has better long-term fatigue properties)

corecell is somewhere between - fairly rigid, but also a bit bendy with heat.

Some foams have more open cells, and soak up much more resin.
Back to Top
Chew my RS View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 790
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chew my RS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jan 06 at 8:35am

Thanks for all the advice, it's much appreciated.

I suspect it will remain a paper exercise as I have no facilities (or skill!) to build the thing, but the design is intended for my local lake and so would only sail on flat water and rarely go out above a force 4.  Therefore it would be unlikely to get bashed about too much, but I'd want it to survive if it did get dinged.

I will/would probably opt for the 200g/m۔² carbon in epoxy each side of foam, with extra 100g/m² glass ouside.  Sub 60kg would be the aim. 

Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jan 06 at 9:14am
Originally posted by russell

Phantoms changed from polyester to epoxy - the hulls are not carbon.  My Vandercraft hull has 2kg correctors to bring it up to the minimum weight of 61Kg (including foils etc).  I believe this is about the usual now.

Carbon masts and booms were also introduced a few years ago now.  The adjustable carbon rig has made a big difference to the sailability of the boat - its now a real pleasure and has opened up the weight range.

Red Eye sails are also introducing a new hiking single hander, based on a smaller Phantom. Check out http://www.redeyesails.co.uk/Redeye%20Solution.htm



Was looking at this as a replacement for my Laser (not sure I can afford it though). I am 85KG and find myself losing out because of the additional weight I carry that better boat handling etc.. cannot compensate for. Anyone have any ideas on costings yet??

Paul
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
russell View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Post Options Post Options   Quote russell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jan 06 at 9:35am

The Phantom class association has a web site at: http://www.phantomclass.org.uk/

I think there is a for sale page, although this may have moved to be on the forum now.  I bought a second hand GRP boat to start with as I recall for about £2500, and then bought a new one (almost new anyway) after deciding that the Phantom is the boat for me.

Russell

Phantom 1330
59er 090
Back to Top
Pabs View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king


Joined: 05 Jan 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 177
Post Options Post Options   Quote Pabs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jan 06 at 1:30pm
Originally posted by jeffers

Originally posted by russell

Phantoms changed from polyester to epoxy - the hulls are not carbon.  My Vandercraft hull has 2kg correctors to bring it up to the minimum weight of 61Kg (including foils etc).  I believe this is about the usual now.

Carbon masts and booms were also introduced a few years ago now.  The adjustable carbon rig has made a big difference to the sailability of the boat - its now a real pleasure and has opened up the weight range.

Red Eye sails are also introducing a new hiking single hander, based on a smaller Phantom. Check out http://www.redeyesails.co.uk/Redeye%20Solution.htm



Was looking at this as a replacement for my Laser (not sure I can afford it though). I am 85KG and find myself losing out because of the additional weight I carry that better boat handling etc.. cannot compensate for. Anyone have any ideas on costings yet??

Paul

I would buy a RS300 sounds ideal for your weight range and skill level. You also get good value for money

Paul

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy