Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
The vortex concept |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Author | |||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 Feb 07 at 6:09pm |
||
Sorry Jack, just went back to page 1 to remind myself what this thread was all about, and saw your unanswered question. I rate boats for displacement, marginal planing (roughly, trapeze-asymmetric boats are, others are not), and 'everybody's planing' conditions. The Laser 2000, as a hiking boat that prefers some wind, is my datum boat, and has zero correction. The Vortex A has a -8%, 4% , 4% corrections, respectively The kite-less Vortex is -9%, 3%, 6% A Contender, is -6%, 0, 6% Most boats are around + or - 2%, e.g. Laser 4000: -3%, 2%, 1%. I don't pretend these figures are scientifically accurate - you'd need to run 100's of races to get near that, but I've tended to under-correct rather than over-correct, bumping up the corrections only when they're clearly inadequate. As an interesting aside, I started with a 10% spread between novices and experts. Now I'm up to 20% and it's still not enough, especially in tricky conditions!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
English Dave ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 06 Location: Northern Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 682 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Hector, just because you don't agree with some of the negative comments doesn't mean that you can slam them all as exaggerated and misleading. I got this from you.
Medway got this for his sins:
So are you saying that the Vortex is only a boat for experts? If so it is never going to succeed in a handicap fleet of mixed boats and abilities. And it was originally marketed as being relatively easy to sail for it's performance. Laser stopped building the Vortex because not enough people bought them. Perhaps you don't rate opinions of the general boat-buying public either! |
|||
![]() |
|||
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Know a few people who bought Vortexs and then decided that cats were a far better option. Not bashing the Vortex but suppose it's horses for courses and for restrictive inland sailing or at clubs with small cat fleets, can see the argument for the Vortex as sailing on handicap against mono's might be more interesting due to there not being a massive gap in handicap between them.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Why not if they are exaggerated and misleading? Perhaps I'm not as elequent as some on here and have put it badly - Reading it back I was perhaps a bit harsh on you in particular. Perhaps I should have added 'in my experience'. So I guess it is possible to sail a Vortex as slow as a Topper just as I suppose it is say a Contender - in my experience it's very unlikely (and I've provided actual evidence of light wind performance). To be fair to Spin Cycle, he was a long way ahead on the Sunday at Keilder so he probably wasn't aware how well the Vortex were doing - that doesn't make his comments accurate though. Of course it's not a boat 'just for experts'. But like any boat it's results will be better when sailed by those from the front half of the fleet. You may think that's why Laser stopped building them - I think it's because they are a volume selller, they had other problems and changed marketing strategies. It's true they weren't making enough money selling at the volumes involved and yes sales did slow considerably once they stopped marketing the boat - little suprise there. The class is talking to potential new builders right now. Do I rate the opinions of the general boat-buying public? Do you mean the masses who buy Picos etc? Anyway, if the lack of 'general boat-buying public' buying a particular class means that class is fair game to have 'iffy' statements made about them on here, then I await the onslaught on the dozens of classes with less support than the Vortex. Tell you what, come and see me on the Vortex stand at the show this weekend, and we'll discuss it over a pint - same goes to you Medway Maniac. BIG edit in penultimate Para - and apologies to ayone from Cherubs/ IC/ 18' Skiff who may have read original - I didn't mean to drag you into this discussion. Edited by Hector |
|||
![]() |
|||
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Do I read the stats in your post above right? i.e. Vortex -8% to +4% ie 'swing of 12% Contender -6% to +6% i.e. swing of 12% Am I missing something - or is your statement above a tad m*********g (self censored for fear of getting told off by E.D.!.) BTW I notice Mikes Vortex is second in your series ATM and according to the Y&Y report that's because of his consistent results - So do you adjusted PYs for all races / days? I'd be interested to hear (perhaps in a new thread) about the swings for various classes, and what classes are most consistent. Don't forget that offer of a pint. Edited by Hector |
|||
![]() |
|||
English Dave ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 06 Location: Northern Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 682 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Can't make the show (I need an airplane to get there so only do every 2 or three years) so pop the pint in the post! What does strike me though on your Kielder race results is that both Phil and Keith dropped six places in that last race - the one with really light wind! My point has never been that the Vortex sails like a dog. Rather that in any racing, you are best sailing like against like. This is clearly not the easiest thing in handicap fleets but the Vortex's performance characteristics have a noticeably different profile to monos across the wind range. Racing a Vortex in a F5 remains one of my all time favourite experiences. It's a cracking little boat, tough as old boots, the helm is light and the daggerboards stay where you put them. I just couldn't make it work in the light stuff and I don't think that was all down to me. (PS do you still swap the cunningham and gnav controls over? Mine was 1089 - I think) |
|||
![]() |
|||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think we were talking about the light airs performance of the Vortex, and in my book -8% for the Vortex A and -9% for the (formerly) standard Vortex are larger corrections than -6% for the Contender. And those compared to a boat which is by no means a light airs flyer, the Laser 2000. We use uncorrected PN's and I RO and write the reports for the Warm-Up Series. Mike has indeed been very consistent. But that's largely down to Mike - he is really getting it together lately, and has more 'time in boat' than a lot of the other competitors who are in new pairings or in new (for them) boats. Plus, all races have so far been held in winds of at least marginal planing strength. No light airs yet - those were reserved for the Hoo Freezer, when, as I've mentioned, we caught Mike's five minute 'Fast Fleet' lead and passed him in the 3000, another boat that likes a bit of wind. I shall look out for a floppy-eared dog on the Vortex stand, but I think it's going to be a hectic day: I've never yet left a Dinghy Show having seen all I wanted to, and I'm on the stand this year...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I thought we were going to leave the light wind perfomance thing alone now.... ahh, you mean Hector Sorry couldn't resist. |
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Very sharp!
Edited by Medway Maniac |
|||
![]() |
|||
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Tee Hee! That's actually very good. I'll sort you out later Matt BTW when does Scaling re-open? |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |