Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Bouyancy Aids |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Author | |
Deimos ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 08 Nov 06 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 04 Feb 07 at 11:26am |
I always thought the buoyancy from anything (incl. buoyancy aids) was not so much to do with the item itself but more the volume of water it displaces (less its own weight). Thus, for 50N buoyancy the thing has to be a certain volume - which means things then come down to where the volume is located and how it is spread around. I don't like them that much myself and agree that there are some circumstances where they can be more dangerous than helpful. However, I assume somebody has looked at the advantages and disadvantages and the balance comes out in their favour. Ian |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Guys, I recommend an experiment - try swimming in reasonably lumpy water for 5 minutes with and without a buoyancy aid. See how easy it is to avoid getting mouthfuls and/or nosefuls of sea water with and without. You'll then be in a position to evaluate whether they are useful or not.
While you're at it you can also evaluate whether you float face up with your mouth and nose clear of the water without a buoyancy aid and might therefre be beter off without one... The reason why lifejackets are so very big and clumsy is because it requires a great deal of very carefully placed buoyancy to guarantee that you end up with face far enough clear of the water not to drown if unconscious. Such a large amount of buoyancy is impractical for dinghy racing. The reason for having a buoyancy aid is that the extra 50N of buoyancy makes a big difference in how easy it is to keep your face out of the water in waves. It means you spend a lot less energy in just stopping yourself drowning and so have it available to recover the boat. Edited by JimC |
|
![]() |
|
simsy ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 14 Jun 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 158 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have had to agree with Jim on this one. I have had experience with both scenario's stated. A bouyancy aid might not make a big difference in light winds and fine weather, but when it gets breezey and you unexpectabley take a dip, you will be thankful. Why waste energy on trying to keep yourself afloat when it can be better used elsewhere? It certainly doesnt make you look anymore professional. |
|
![]() |
|
Villan ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Nov 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1768 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anyone at the Tiger this weekend look at the A-Rater guys?
I dont think I saw them wearing BA's!! Wasn't able to stick around for the prizegiving, But I heard it was bought to the Comitiees attention, so does anyone know what happened? |
|
Vareo - 149 "Secrets"
TandyUK Servers |
|
![]() |
|
redback ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Tunbridge Wells Online Status: Offline Posts: 1502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not advocating not wearing a bouyancy aid but I do feel the design is poor. What use a bouyancy aid which rides up the body so that most of it is out of the water? And I think it particularly bad if its bulk on the chest makes it difficult to climb onto the centreboard. I'd like to see a design which is disposed around the body such that it is completely emersed when the wearer is in the water and does not bulk out the chest making it difficult to climb onto the board. I haven't noticed any designers/manufacturers contribute to this forum. |
|
![]() |
|
Deimos ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 08 Nov 06 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I remember many years ago when sub-aqua diving and dry suits were just starting to be used. People used to have to wear weights around their ankles due to the risks of the air moving inside them to your feet, turning you upside down then holding you upside down with "no way out" (and obvious consequences). I don't dive any more so don't know what happens these days but it does illustrate the importance of where the buoyancy is on your body. Ian |
|
![]() |
|
Skiffman ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 291 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
if you find it difficult to climb on the board then you have got the wrong bouancy aid or one that does not fit properly. The hardest part of climbing on to a board is to make sure you dont take a chunk out of it with your hook!! in 49ers most crews do not wear bouancy aids unless it is windy, especially in europe, aus and the usa. ISAF just states that you have to adequete personal bouancy how each crew member on board the boat and does not say that you have to wear a bouancy aid. It is up to class rules and the SI's of event to say that you have to wear a bouancy aid. At almost every UK event it will say you have to wear one but abroad they rarely do other than junior classes. Have you tried a magic marine skiff bouancy aid or racing bouancy aid?? Both do not ride up and are small compared to other makes. oh and in Higher and Faster that bit at the back of there harness is more likely to be heavy duty PVC or something to make the harness heavy (about 2.5kg) |
|
![]() |
|
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can we PLEASE stop the discussion about wether it's sensible to wear BAs. It gives totally the wrong impression about them and leads to youngsters doing everything possible to avoid wearing them. I would much rather face the tiny risk and minor discomfort of wearing one than be constantly worried that my son has decided to sail without it because 'it looks a bit geeky'. In any case it's the rules in most locations/events, get over it. I am on the lookout for a slim BA myself because I often get stuck under the boom when tacking (the boom on a Contender can be quite low you know:-). The current trend does seem to be for really high cut ones. Can't really see from the photo but the Zhik one seems to be a thinner panel at the back is that right? Edited by Matt Jackson |
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|
![]() |
|
Pesmo ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is a crotch strap viable on a BA to prevent it riding up ?
|
|
![]() |
|
redback ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Tunbridge Wells Online Status: Offline Posts: 1502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Probably a good idea but decidedly naf looking on the current crop of bouyancy aids so unlikely to catch on. That's why bouyancy built into a harness would be good. Alternatively bouyancy which extends down to waist level could then be retained at that level by a belt.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |