New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Hardest nationals to win?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Hardest nationals to win?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 111213
Author
CT249 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 08 Jul 06
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 399
Post Options Post Options   Quote CT249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Hardest nationals to win?
    Posted: 11 Aug 06 at 12:41pm
Originally posted by Stefan Lloyd

Originally posted by CT249

It sounds a lot like what was quoted!

Only if you read it carelessly. You have deleted the qualifications I made. 



You said "Boat tune, at the level applied by dinghy and keelboat sailors, barely comes into it."

I left out the "at the level applied by dinghy and keelboat sailors" to keep the quote short, but only because it was obviously irrelevant given that the discussion was about comparing the tuning of dinghy and keelboat sailors to windsurfers, and therefore any mention of the level of dinghy and keelboat sailors' tune was tautology.

Obviously in a discussion of the tuning of dinghy and keelboat sailors versus the tuning of windsurfers, the level of  tuning in the former is a  factor.

 Comparing reasonably similar classes (ie International Canoes v Division 2 development boards, Windsurfers One Designs v Lasers) in which the fleets I sail in have similar world ranking and in which I have sailed with success at national level, I would certainly hesitate to say that tune "barely comes into it" in boards compared to boats.

For example, the guys I windsurf against seem to be VERY cluey about tweaks. Their record includes Olympic 470 rep, 1st and 2nd in the 18 Foot Skiff worlds, 1st or 2nd in the Tornado Euros, 3rd in two-man dinghy in Youth worlds, 3rd in 29er worlds, and better results nationally.

Sailors with this sort of tweaking knowledge are then put in an environment (boards) where very rigid sailcloth on carbon spars means that the sails respond dramatically to minute tweaks (one multi world champ in boards says that she adjusts her clew 6-8 times per beat, over a range of some 5mm....staggering to think she could tell the difference but I'm convinced she can given the standard at which she sails and the way the rig reacts to tiny movements) and this means that tweaking and tuning certainly does matter.

I would, however, agree that this sort of discussion is impossible to be dogmatic about, because it depends on your vantage point. Surely no one who has sailed dinghies can sail boards without their viewpoint being influenced by the type they came from. I find it hard to assess how Laser sailors think, for example, because I've been fascinated by the technical side of sailing and I tend to assume all Laser sailors are the same and come from the same angle.

PS why do younger sailors do better in Lasers and boards? Largely because older sailors aren't up to the physical demands. I used to train against a guy who got a PhD about Laser sailing, they're not all intellectual lightweights.


Edited by CT249
Back to Top
CT249 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 08 Jul 06
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 399
Post Options Post Options   Quote CT249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Aug 06 at 12:45pm
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by Stefan Lloyd

Originally posted by JimC

Why should the settings be any less critical because there are less strings to pull? .


I didn't say less critical. I said less complicated. 



I don't know about you, but I have separate adjustments for the different controls on my boat because it makes it easier to tune, not more difficult. If I had less controls then it would be harder to achieve the same results.

Rightly or wrongly, the reason why I never fitted a self tacking jib on my Cherub is because I found that fine tuning the slot and jib twist was quite critical to upwind speed, and with a self tacking jib I wouldn't have had that same detailed level of control I had with a conventional jib. So I definitely felt that more strings made it easier. More complicated in number of strings sure. More complicated as in the precision and care needed to get optimum performance - definitely not.


Sounds very right to me. I really notice it in yachts. The complicated rig on my half tonner (twin in-line spreaders, runners, checkstays, backstay, rakable deck-stapped mast, multiple sails) is complicated in some ways, but simple in others. Want to get more power and depthj in the heady? Just dump runner.....simple.

In the Flying 15, J/24, Farr 52 or Etchells, the rig is simpler but getting the same sort of result can be very complicated....if I reduce backstay tension that will give more depth in the jib but affect the main...same if I take out the chocks or change the lowers. AAAaaaarrrgghhh.

The board or Laser is the same compared to the Canoe, in some ways. Every string on the Laser or board has lots of effects, unlike in the Canoe.


Edited by CT249
Back to Top
Chew my RS View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 790
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chew my RS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Aug 06 at 1:08pm
If you want to try and win a nationals this year, I suggest the Tasar.  The prize for the highest placed dacron boat is a new set of mylars - must be worth £800.  They usually get about 30 boats out, and most of the top guys will have made the switch to mylar by now anyway, so there will probably only be a dozen or so boats to beat.  Seems like good odds for such a good prize.
http://www.sailns14.org - The ultimate family raceboat now available in the UK
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 111213

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy