Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
NS14 - Are they Good? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Author | |
damp_freddie ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 20 Oct 05 Location: Aruba Online Status: Offline Posts: 339 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 18 Apr 06 at 3:34pm |
If you want to expereince NS14 style sailing with a good learning curve
and no messing about with traps then the easiest way in the UK is with
the tasar
old boats (some kevlar foam sandwich, others glass foam under 64kg) are still competitive- as I say on the other thread. It is a simple boat to get in and sail but hard to master, hence allowing you and the er wife or like to develop skills and learn to plane upwind without the need for learning trapezing. Also the NS14s and the tasar mostly go on top of a large car. |
|
![]() |
|
combat wombat ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 345 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast. Its a
narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average
weight with average sail area. It has no spinnaker. Whilst
I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely
to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and
will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a
stiff breeze.
As they say in Sailing Anarchy, pics or it didn't happen. Just my 2pence but... |
|
B14 GBR 772
|
|
![]() |
|
Chew my RS ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, at the risk of opening the PY debate (again) the Tasar has virtually the same handicap as the Merlin Rocket and there's not much between a Fireball and a Merlin. The NS is a foot shorter than the Tasar and has much smaller sails, but is more highly developed so is (I think) a little faster overall. Now, if you were to add a swing rig to it, the jib would act a little like a kite, so would have improved offwind speed. Hence I think you could get sub 1000.
|
|
![]() |
|
tickel ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 408 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Tasar will do" what it says on the tin" but it still requires learning. Long, light and efficient. |
|
tickel
|
|
![]() |
|
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
" I refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast. Its a narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average weight with average sail area. It has no spinnaker. Whilst I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a stiff breeze. ....." Yes they can plane upwind in the right conditions but that is as much to do with its ultra efficient mast/sail combination (over-rotating specialist section) as it is to do with an effective and very light hull - makes you wonder what other boats could be a lot faster with an updated over-rotater but for the current SMOD fare it would look a bit expensive for the manufacturers involved perhaps. It was poorly marketed in the UK originally but thrived in many other countries. As for refusing to believe ..... 30 years of Tasar racing on several continents has not softened the PN yet but like the Laser it a tough one to sail below - subtle technique required. Blaze 720
|
|
![]() |
|
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, the Tasar is not "average weight"; the hull with fittings is a genuine 68kg which is significantly lighter than even an International 14, let alone the Merlin. The Tasar also has the advantage of an over-rotating wing mast. Re upwind planing. Planing of course is almost impossible to really define; it seems easy at first but many top designers are baffled when it comes to working out just when it happens. Uffa Fox claimed to have invented the planing dinghy, but he told naval architects years later that sailboats were “not really in the “planing” range at all!" Planing, Julian Bethwaite agrees, is “virtually impossible to define – and the more you look into it, the more impossible it is to define”. Having said, that, you want pics of a Tasar planing upwind? Try pic 20.13 of Bethwaite's High Performance Sailing. It's hard, though, to take a pic that reall demonstrates upwind planing, and going upwind in planing mode in a Tasar is significantly but not massively faster for VMG than just going high and fast. We used to be clearly faster than the gold medal 470 upwind in breeze and we were very light; good enough to beat 90 boats at the worlds but not the remaining 15 or so. The Tasar is clearly closer in upwind characteristics to an International Canoe than it is to a Laser, put it that way. Notes from a tuning talk by Charlie McKee explicitly refer to the fact that the boat can plane upwind; see http://www.tasar.org/racing/mckeesem85.html Charlie was one of the top 18 Foot Skiff sailors in the world, an Olympic medallist in 49ers, and either a gold medal FD sailor or silver medal 470 sailor (I forget which McKee brother won which medal). I suspect someone with that sort of history in trap boats and skiffs may have some knowledge of planing. In the end, and just to confuse matters, a Tasar planing upwind is slower than a modern NS14 which slices upwind rather in the matter of a Moth. By the way, according to John Spencer (designer of the Cherub and its 14' sister the Javelin) the super-efficient NS14 was for some time quicker than the trap-powered Jav upwind. Edited by Chris 249 |
|
![]() |
|
combat wombat ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 345 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So where did the PN come from then? My argument is that hull and
rig efficiency, yes they are a big factor, but in the end the boat is
not much different to a Laser II, and the PN reflects this. Yes,
the Laser II does have a kite which will make it faster downwind so by
rights the Tasar will be faster upwind, but it isn't rocket ship fast
and certainly not International Canoe fast.
Its just people seem to think that the Tasar is the be all and end all of boats, whenever someone asks what boat they should buy, or what boat is best on handicap, someone always pipes up with Tasar "cos its the best" etc. I know its a good boat and I will say that it was ahead of its time, but it annoys me when people are so set on their belief that they will not admit its drawbacks. As for weight, 66 kgs (unfitted, as the North American Tasar Association says) is not particularly light, my B14 weighs just over 60 kgs unfitted, 2 kgs under the class minimum weight for an unfitted hull. Vareo weighs 67kgs unfitted, others come in at around the 60-70 mark. Again, I'm happy to admit that the Tasar is a good boat with an excellent rig, but it has its drawbacks. |
|
B14 GBR 772
|
|
![]() |
|
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well hmmmm...yeah no (and other non-committal noises that try to
indicate I'm not trying to start a fight but merely to voice an
opinion....)
I suppose it's hard to define "very different" but I can't see much that the L2 shares with the Tasar. Totally different concept in hull shape. Totally different rig. Totally different target market. Different heritage. The 68kg is fitted; I've weighed my boat in at champs many times. It's simply not correct to say that 68kg is "average weight" for a 15 footer. I know the Tasar isn't IC fast (I own and sail an IC too) but the point is that upwind it feels a lot closer to an IC than it does to a Laser or something similar. Is it perfect? HELL NO!! The Tasar has problems. The rotating mast can be a complete sod for the crew. It's certainly not at its best in light winds and enclosed waterways. The hull shape is well out of date in terms of speed for a boat in the medium performance range, and a modern NS14 is much quicker. The Vee shape has higher wetted surface and less dynamic lift. I personally find the traveller setup annoying in tacks. The mast is heavy. Pedestrian downwind? I suppose it depends where you sail and what you like; one of the best NS designers rates the Tasar as similar in speed to the modern NS and in a breezy reach both are very quick for mid-size non-kite dinghies. Would I sail one if I lived where you do? Dunno. Maybe a N12 or MR would be better in that context. No they are not that comparable to a modern NS14. But all I was trying to say is that yes the Tasar can plane upwind. And seen in context (as a mid-size non-spinnaker crewed hiking dinghy) it is probably the fastest OD in the world. Sure it's no B14 but it doesn't pretend to be just like the B14 doesn't pretend to be a 49er (despite having influenced the 49er a hell of a lot). Edited by Chris 249 |
|
![]() |
|
combat wombat ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 345 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fair enough!
The Tasar is a nice boat, but I'm glad someone recognises that it has bad points too! Thank you Chris, in the spirit of reciprocity I'll point out the drawbacks of the B14: It drags its arse unbelivably in light winds the foredecks on the Rondars are fragile takes ages to rig and the wings are hard to put on slams upwind in waves have to bag the huge kite I think as long as everyone can agree that no boat is perfect (and stops suggesting to everyone they should own one (not accusing you of this Chris)) then we'll all get along fine! CW Edited by combat wombat |
|
B14 GBR 772
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would have thought it would be better to compare the Tasar with the Albacore rather than 12's and Merlins? I'd certainly be interested to see if the Tasar could hold its own on handicap (or possibly on the water) in typical UK gravel pit conditions? I've yet to sail a Tasar (on the to do list as a Firefly sailor, the concept behind it being the same) and have crewed Albacores a little and raced against them a lot, so I would love to know which holds the edge, if anyone knows of any that do sail in the same fleet?
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |