New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: NS14 - Are they Good?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

NS14 - Are they Good?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
damp_freddie View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 05
Location: Aruba
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 339
Post Options Post Options   Quote damp_freddie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: NS14 - Are they Good?
    Posted: 18 Apr 06 at 3:34pm
If you want to expereince NS14 style sailing with a good learning curve and no messing about with traps then the easiest way in the UK is with the tasar

old boats (some kevlar foam sandwich, others glass foam under 64kg) are still competitive- as I say on the other thread.

It is a simple boat to get in and sail but hard to master, hence allowing you and the er wife or like to develop skills and learn to plane upwind without the need for learning trapezing.

Also the NS14s and the tasar mostly go on top of a large car.


Back to Top
combat wombat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 345
Post Options Post Options   Quote combat wombat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Apr 06 at 3:53pm
I refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast.  Its a narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average weight with average sail area.  It has no spinnaker.  Whilst I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a stiff breeze.

As they say in Sailing Anarchy, pics or it didn't happen.  Just my 2pence but...
B14 GBR 772
Back to Top
Chew my RS View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 790
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chew my RS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Apr 06 at 4:10pm
Well, at the risk of opening the PY debate (again) the Tasar has virtually the same handicap as the Merlin Rocket and there's not much between a Fireball and a Merlin.  The NS is a foot shorter than the Tasar and has much smaller sails, but is more highly developed so is (I think) a little faster overall.  Now, if you were to add a swing rig to it, the jib would act a little like a kite, so would have improved offwind speed.  Hence I think you could get sub 1000.
Back to Top
tickel View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 408
Post Options Post Options   Quote tickel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 8:42am

Originally posted by combat wombat

I refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast.  Its a narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average weight with average sail area.  It has no spinnaker.  Whilst I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a stiff breeze.

As they say in Sailing Anarchy, pics or it didn't happen.  Just my 2pence but...

The Tasar will do" what it says on the tin" but it still requires learning. Long, light and efficient.

tickel
Back to Top
blaze720 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1635
Post Options Post Options   Quote blaze720 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 9:16am

" I  refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast.  Its a narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average weight with average sail area.  It has no spinnaker.  Whilst I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a stiff breeze. ....."

So you will be arguing of course for a PN revision downwards  as its a bit harsh !  However having a read of the Bethwaite bible might be useful first.  The Tasar is like many of their designs exceptional and while it will today struggle against MR's that is a function of many years further development of the MR and their current 'handicap' perhaps.

Yes they can plane upwind in the right conditions but that is as much to do with its ultra efficient mast/sail combination (over-rotating specialist section) as it is to do with an effective and very light hull - makes you wonder what other boats could be a lot faster with an updated over-rotater but for the current SMOD fare it would look a bit expensive for the manufacturers involved perhaps.  It was poorly marketed in the UK originally but thrived in many other countries.

As for refusing to believe ..... 30 years of Tasar racing on several continents has not softened the PN yet but like the Laser it a tough one to sail below - subtle technique required.

Blaze 720     

 

   

Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 9:34am
Originally posted by combat wombat

I refuse to believe that the Tasar is really that fast.  Its a narrow beam 2 man hiking dinghy which was launched in 1975, average weight with average sail area.  It has no spinnaker.  Whilst I will say that it should take out a National 12, it is very unlikely to plane upwind without help from a trapeze or more extreme beam and will be pedestrian downwind due to it only having 2 sails, except in a stiff breeze.

As they say in Sailing Anarchy, pics or it didn't happen.  Just my 2pence but...


Well, the Tasar is not "average weight"; the hull with fittings is a genuine 68kg which is significantly lighter than even an International 14, let alone the Merlin. The Tasar also has the advantage of an over-rotating wing mast.

Re upwind planing.
Planing of course is almost impossible to really define; it seems easy at first but many top designers are baffled when it comes to working out just when it happens. Uffa Fox claimed to have invented the planing dinghy, but he told naval architects years later that sailboats were “not really in the “planing” range at all!" Planing, Julian Bethwaite agrees, is “virtually impossible to define – and the more you look into it, the more impossible it is to define”.

Having said, that, you want pics of a Tasar planing upwind? Try pic 20.13 of Bethwaite's High Performance Sailing. It's hard, though, to take a pic that reall demonstrates upwind planing, and going upwind in planing mode in a Tasar is significantly but not massively faster for VMG than just going high and fast. We used to be clearly faster than the gold medal 470 upwind in breeze and we were very light; good enough to beat 90 boats at the worlds but not the remaining 15 or so. The Tasar is clearly closer in upwind characteristics to an International Canoe than it is to a Laser, put it that way.

Notes from a tuning talk by Charlie McKee explicitly refer to the fact that the boat can plane upwind; see  http://www.tasar.org/racing/mckeesem85.html

Charlie was one of the top 18 Foot Skiff sailors in the world, an Olympic medallist in 49ers, and either a gold medal FD sailor or silver medal 470 sailor (I forget which McKee brother won which medal). I suspect someone with that sort of history in trap boats and skiffs may have some knowledge of planing.

In the end, and just to confuse matters, a Tasar planing upwind is slower than a modern NS14 which slices upwind rather in the matter of a Moth. By the way, according to John Spencer (designer of the Cherub and its 14' sister the Javelin) the super-efficient NS14 was for some time quicker than the trap-powered Jav upwind.


Edited by Chris 249
Back to Top
combat wombat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 345
Post Options Post Options   Quote combat wombat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 10:07am
So where did the PN come from then?  My argument is that hull and rig efficiency, yes they are a big factor, but in the end the boat is not much different to a Laser II, and the PN reflects this.  Yes, the Laser II does have a kite which will make it faster downwind so by rights the Tasar will be faster upwind, but it isn't rocket ship fast and certainly not International Canoe fast. 

Its just people seem to think that the Tasar is the be all and end all of boats, whenever someone asks what boat they should buy, or what boat is best on handicap, someone always pipes up with Tasar "cos its the best" etc.  I know its a good boat and I will say that it was ahead of its time, but it annoys me when people are so set on their belief that they will not admit its drawbacks. 

As for weight, 66 kgs (unfitted, as the North American Tasar Association says) is not particularly light, my B14 weighs just over 60 kgs unfitted, 2 kgs under the class minimum weight for an unfitted hull.  Vareo weighs 67kgs unfitted, others come in at around the 60-70 mark.

Again, I'm happy to admit that the Tasar is a good boat with an excellent rig, but it has its drawbacks. 
B14 GBR 772
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 1:05pm
Well hmmmm...yeah no (and other non-committal noises that try to indicate I'm not trying to start a fight but merely to voice an opinion....)

I suppose it's hard to define "very different" but I can't see much that the L2 shares with the Tasar. Totally different concept in hull shape. Totally different rig. Totally different target market. Different heritage.

The 68kg is fitted; I've weighed my boat in at champs many times. It's simply not correct to say that 68kg is "average weight" for a 15 footer.

I know the Tasar isn't IC fast (I own and sail an IC too) but the point is that upwind it feels a lot closer to an IC than it does to a Laser or something similar.

Is it perfect? HELL NO!!

The Tasar has problems. The rotating mast can be a complete sod for the crew. It's certainly not at its best in light winds and enclosed waterways. The hull shape is well out of date in terms of speed for a boat in the medium performance range, and a modern NS14 is much quicker. The Vee shape has higher wetted surface and less dynamic lift. I personally find the traveller setup annoying in tacks. The mast is heavy.

Pedestrian downwind? I suppose it depends where you sail and what you like; one of the best NS designers rates the Tasar as similar in speed to the modern NS and in a breezy reach both are very quick for mid-size non-kite dinghies.

Would I sail one if I lived where you do? Dunno. Maybe a N12 or MR would be better in that context. No they are not that comparable to a modern NS14.

But all I was trying to say is that yes the Tasar can plane upwind. And seen in context (as a mid-size non-spinnaker crewed hiking dinghy) it is probably the fastest OD in the world. Sure it's no B14 but it doesn't pretend to be just like the B14 doesn't pretend to be a 49er (despite having influenced the 49er a hell of a lot).


Edited by Chris 249
Back to Top
combat wombat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 345
Post Options Post Options   Quote combat wombat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 1:50pm
Fair enough!

The Tasar is a nice boat, but I'm glad someone recognises that it has bad points too!  Thank you Chris, in the spirit of reciprocity I'll point out the drawbacks of the B14:
It drags its arse unbelivably in light winds
the foredecks on the Rondars are fragile
takes ages to rig and the wings are hard to put on
slams upwind in waves
have to bag the huge kite

I think as long as everyone can agree that no boat is perfect (and stops suggesting to everyone they should own one (not accusing you of this Chris)) then we'll all get along fine!

CW


Edited by combat wombat
B14 GBR 772
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Apr 06 at 1:51pm
I would have thought it would be better to compare the Tasar with the Albacore rather than 12's and Merlins? I'd certainly be interested to see if the Tasar could hold its own on handicap (or possibly on the water) in typical UK gravel pit conditions? I've yet to sail a Tasar (on the to do list as a Firefly sailor, the concept behind it being the same) and have crewed Albacores a little and raced against them a lot, so I would love to know which holds the edge, if anyone knows of any that do sail in the same fleet?
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy