Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
NS14 - Are they Good? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345> |
Author | ||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 12:25am |
|
I should emphasise that (from what I know of the N12) I'm 100% willing
to believe that in the light stuff, especially in shifty winds or
confined waters, the N12 would be a problem for the Tasar.
Looking at yardstick shows the N12 to be slower than a Laser, and assuming that's correct then the case is solved. While the Laser can annoy a Tasar in light stuff downwind or (maybe) upwind if it's very shifty, there's simply no way the Laser is a match for a Tasar in anything of a breeze. |
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
My only time sailing against Tasars on the water showed them to be both about the same speed. bearing in mind the extra two feet a Tasar has on a 12 thats quite a shock really... I'm sure the Tasars would just love a 12's handicap ... however it there was any real breeze somebody was doing something really really wrong !! They did not get their punitive handicap for nothing and I've yet to see an N12 plane upwind alongside the Fireballs and 470's anywhere ..... also the 12 is a bit of a handicap bandit in very light stuff Blaze '720'
|
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
One swallow does not a summer make etc!
I've never even seen a 12, but I would assume it's hard put to go as a Tasar does in some conditions; we used to regularly share water with the gold medal 470 and were regularly faster upwind when they were trapping. We also used to beat the 2 time world Contender champ if I remember right. Edited by Chris 249 |
||
![]() |
||
aardvark_issues ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 Jul 05 Location: Weston-Super-Mare Online Status: Offline Posts: 505 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Having had a chat with a Tasar sailor at the dinghy show, who sails
both N12 and Tasar, interesting to hear that he thought there wasnt
much difference in performance. My only time sailing against Tasars on
the water showed them to be both about the same speed. bearing in mind
the extra two feet a Tasar has on a 12 thats quite a shock really...
Loco Perro may not have the straight line top speed of other recent Cherub designs, but at the end of the day that is not where the Cherub is lacking! |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Its interesting though that if you were to look at the wetted surface of a bolt upright NS, a bolt upright N12 and a bolt upright Tasar that the NS would actually be much closer to the N12 than the Tasar. The clever distortions in the underwater shape to partially evade the type forming effects of the rule mean that the NS is really a significantly different shape to what you might think, and make them suprisingly similar to the modern N12 shapes. A modern N12 is, when you look at the underwater shape, by no means a river boat, and certainly not lacking in speed in a straight line. Whilst (no doubt to the wrath of its owner) I never regarded the recent N12 shaped Cherub as having the legs of modern boats in the Cherub line of development in outright speed terms it was by no means outclassed, and you certainly couldn't call it a pond boat. |
||
![]() |
||
Chew my RS ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Those are good points Jim and I think I've made my views on the N12 known on a previous thread. I'm not a big fan, but they are well suited to pond/river sailing. I like Merlins very much and they are extremeley popular, but they cost so much that they are simply not affordable to many people (I know there are always secondhand bargins to be had if you look hard enough, but thats not really the point) and the hassle of conventional spinnakers appeals to fewer and fewer, even though they are the quickest thing for boats of this type. The RS200, Enterprise, GP14, Merlin and N12 all occupy this middle-of-the-road position for two man, easy-to-sail boats. They are all popular, with big turnouts at events, so thre is demand in this sector. But most of these classes are either stuck in a time warp or restricted by old fashioned rules, so I'm sure that a modern alternative would appeal to many. Good riddance to the GP, Ent and 12, I say! I'm only dreaming, but it would be nice... |
||
![]() |
||
Dead Air ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 Dec 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well said!
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes, but the point is the two are virtually head on for the same sailors. The NS is a glorious boat, but the N12s are great too, are probably more versatile for puddles and rivers than the current NS shapes and so on. As for speed, its pretty much irrelevant - N12a have outnumbered Cherubs 2:1 since the 1980s and it sure isn't anything to do with the Cherub being slower. Emotionally sure I'd think it nice if the N12 rig rules were freed up so that they bacame more like a baby NS, but it wouldn't make me buy one and I doubt it would grab them many sailors frm the RS200. So realistically I don't think there needs to be another box rule class in between the Merlin and the N12, no matter how good it is, and much as my heart says it would be great if those classes were to loosen up rules so that they were more like the NS, my head suggests that it might be detrimental rather than good for them. I'm sure if either class starts to hit significant numbers problems in the future then loosening up rules is the sort of thing they'll look at as a possible fix, in the same way that the spinnaker free ICs are looking at that option. Of course in some circumstances tightening rules ratherthan loosening them is the correct response to a numbers problem, it just depends what the problem is. |
||
![]() |
||
Chew my RS ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The NS has smaller sails than the N12 (and almost any other class - just 9.3m^2), but is much quicker (Merlin speed) and has less restrictive rules (but bans carbon hulls to keep costs down).
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Nope, none in the UK to my knowledge. There's a lot of overlap with the National 12, which I rather suspect has bigger sails than the NS14.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |