New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Olympic 'finals' proposal
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Olympic 'finals' proposal

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1011121314>
Author
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Olympic 'finals' proposal
    Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 12:11pm

If you look at the Olympic Programme Commission Report (here: http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_953.pdf ) you'll see that among the things the IOC is concerned with are a) how much of each sport federation's revenues come from the Olympics, b) how expensive are the sports to stage and c) what sort of media return is there? The IOC, quite reasonably, doesn't want to become a sport federation's cash cow, and then have to put on a hugely expensive sport that nobody wants to watch. A significant proportion - I believe that it's actually a majority - of ISAF's funding is from the olympics, and so, to a degree, they are beholden to the IOC to establish a format which agrees with the IOC's aims.

Now, you may sat that all this proves is that sailing should get out of the olympics, and live on it's own feet. Personally, I feel that this is the wrong decision - first, there are many countries around the world where official support for sports is related to their olympic status - olympic sports get state support, non-olympic ones don't. Second, there are many sports trying to get in to the olympics because they understand the marketing potential. Getting out strikes me as cutting of your nose to spite your face.

What I personally have come to believe they should do is acknowledge that  sailing is not a great live broadcast sport. There are two ways to deal with broadcast media and sailing - a) an edited highlights programme and b) - which I believe is far more interesting - increasing exploitation of the internet, with a combination of internet broadcasting and virtual spectator type methods, using live GPS positioning.



Edited by Presuming Ed
Back to Top
Guest View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 12:05pm
Originally posted by Stefan Lloyd

Originally posted by Guest#260

So lets run a traditional series in a bunch of "cheap" exciting classes that creates the opportinity of good "thrills and spills" and opens the sport up to nations that don't have the same resources as GBR.

We are getting away from the subject again, since the proposal has nothing to do with classes. But let's deal with this cost question and look at the "expensive" keelboats. If I remember rightly, one Yngling team reckoned they needed to raise £250K for a 4-year campaign. So the cost of the boat would have been around 10% of that. Most of the rest is modest salaries for the competitors, coaches and other support team, travel and living costs at regattas all over the world. Or consider Paul Cayard who supposedly spent $1M of his own money on his last Star campaign. Again, the boat was a tiny fraction of that. International sailing at the top level is not cheap but the cost of the boat has very little to do with it. The cost is driven by the level of professionalism you now have to bring to the campaign and the fact that it is a full-time occupation, not only for the sailors but for the teams that surround them. Sail the Olympics in Toppers if you like but it will still cost a fortune to win.

The proposal is about increasing media appeal - the classes sailed has a big impact on the media appeal. Just look what the 49er has done for Olympic Sailing.

As for the cost of a campaign the class does have an impact on the costs - shipping a Star around the world is considerably more expensive than turning up with a sailing bag and renting a Laser. That is why for years Robert Shiedt(sp?) competed in th Laser; now hes won 3 medals he can attract sponsors.

Coaching and living costs do contribute much of the cost but there can be no informed argument to say that a Star campaign is comparable with that of a Laser.

SO ... media appeal and classes sailed are linked and so are the costs ...

Rick

Back to Top
Cheeky View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 05 Aug 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Post Options Post Options   Quote Cheeky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 11:50am
Originally posted by Guest#260

I don't think live sailing will ever be interesting
or broadcast (too long) so; the last race show down is a bit of a red
herring due to the fact that coverage will be highlights anyway.[/
P]

Rick




The last Olympics had full race coverage of almost all the raceing. With
the new use of interactive digital channels and the internet. I watched
virtually all the racing on the web whilst working ( full races ). Frankly I
don't have a problem with the new concept. As long as the pre finals
regatta points weighting is correctly devised so the leading boat carries a
fair avantage that has been gained into the Final. The Olympic ideal has
always been more about physical ability, and having one chance to get it
right. And this just ups the anti and means you'll get one balls out race at
the end rather than a load of rules bo**ocks like sailing somebody out the
back door to make the points stack up so you win.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 11:13am
Originally posted by Chris 249

So Stefan, why did many of the poorer nations try to get the Radial in
to replace the Europe? ... ignorant of
the real costs of Olympic sailing?


There's probably a difference between what it takes to put together a medal winning campaign and what it takes for a small country to put together a respectable mid fleet campaign. Plus of course a lot of countries buy into to the "its impossible to change classes" bit and thing that you have to have 100 Finns in the country to produce a finn champ and all the rest of it.
Back to Top
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 10:11am
So Stefan, why did many of the poorer nations try to get the Radial in to replace the Europe? Are the sailing federations and Olympic coaches of these countries (the submissions were on the ISAF site) ignorant of the real costs of Olympic sailing?

One of our Australian Olympians got (IIRC) $9000 for his Olympic campaign after winning the trials. He was in a cheap class so he could charter gear, fly to Europe and survive and get well inside the top 10 which would be a great result for most countries. Just about all his previous campaign had been very low budget local stuff I think.

So you can get top 10 for very little money, even today, in the small strict OD classes.

Exactly how far would his $9000 have gone if he had to buy a 49er or Soling and drag it around Europe, buy 3 or more sails instead of one, etc?





Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 9:23am

Originally posted by Guest#260

So lets run a traditional series in a bunch of "cheap" exciting classes that creates the opportinity of good "thrills and spills" and opens the sport up to nations that don't have the same resources as GBR.

We are getting away from the subject again, since the proposal has nothing to do with classes. But let's deal with this cost question and look at the "expensive" keelboats. If I remember rightly, one Yngling team reckoned they needed to raise £250K for a 4-year campaign. So the cost of the boat would have been around 10% of that. Most of the rest is modest salaries for the competitors, coaches and other support team, travel and living costs at regattas all over the world. Or consider Paul Cayard who supposedly spent $1M of his own money on his last Star campaign. Again, the boat was a tiny fraction of that. International sailing at the top level is not cheap but the cost of the boat has very little to do with it. The cost is driven by the level of professionalism you now have to bring to the campaign and the fact that it is a full-time occupation, not only for the sailors but for the teams that surround them. Sail the Olympics in Toppers if you like but it will still cost a fortune to win.

Back to Top
Guest View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 8:49am

I don't think live sailing will ever be interesting or broadcast (too long) so; the last race show down is a bit of a red herring due to the fact that coverage will be highlights anyway.

So lets run a traditional series in a bunch of "cheap" exciting classes that creates the opportinity of good "thrills and spills" and opens the sport up to nations that don't have the same resources as GBR. The downside is we may win less medals.

Rick

Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 7:05am

Originally posted by turnturtle

erm- is a finn not physically and mentally demanding? 

Half of us couldn't even pull one up the slipway. The Finn and Star are the oldest two boats and also the most physically demanding.

I don't know if Fizzicist has ever wandered around a club when the Olympic classes are in town but last time I did, everyone looked frighteningly fit.

Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 6:58am

Originally posted by Jamie

 And I think that the Ainslie Sheidt dogfight was athe best bit of yachting I have ever seen. Why remove that possibility?

Good point. If non-sailing people mention to me sailing they have seen on TV, it is usually that footage.

Back to Top
Philsy View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Post Options Post Options   Quote Philsy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Nov 05 at 6:53am
I stuggle to enjoy any sport on TV but it does appear that most people like
simple to understand sports, such as rowing - easy to see who's winning.
And even that seems interesting compared to a 100m sprint which is about
as appealing as a premature eqeculation - "And they're off... they've
finished!"

Maybe sailing does need 'sexing up'. Finns and Skiffs are hardly state of the
art, are they?

I wonder if this is aimed at the British - the French, for instance, enjoy
sailing on TV.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1011121314>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy