Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Lightweight Canoes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Author | |
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 02 Sep 05 at 5:05pm |
Equally, the Merlins have been very cautious about it in order to avoid obsoleting the fleet, and they have been going from strength to strength in the last few years. I don't think there is one formula that works for all classes. You've really got to understand what the sailors in the class get out of it, and what kind of people are realistically likely to come into the class and what they want. While taking a bit of weight out will certainly make the boats faster, I find it hard to believe it is likely to transform downwind tactics. There again, I've never sailed an IC. To answer your question: would it attract me to the class? No, it would probably put me off, because I'd want to start in a 2nd-hand boat to get a feel for the class, but those would now be totally outclassed by newer lighter boats. |
|
![]() |
|
Guest ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Shame to hear that the IC & AC sailors can't work together ... Peoples loyalty to a class is worse than religion ... I'd agree with Stefan; dropping the weight by such a large % will make those entering the class in 2nd hand boats even less competitive; and as such would put me off ... Rick |
|
![]() |
|
Chris Noble ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Nov 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 710 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you could run a sort of internal handicap system that all development classes run to make older boats still potentially competitive...
|
|
Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine
FOR SALE: I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi guys |
|
![]() |
|
Steve Clark ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 14 Jul 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Working at staying together. Many successful marriages require separate bedrooms, particularly for older couples! SHC |
|
![]() |
|
Chris Noble ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Nov 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 710 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good example
|
|
Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine
FOR SALE: I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list. |
|
![]() |
|
Doug Lord ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 03 Sep 05 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 66 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The "Australian and American" proposal also includes wording that -apparently- allows a rudder t-foil (like the 14) but prohibits full flying foils. It seems to me that while the lightening up proposal is a great idea it seems premature to me to ban full flying hydrofoils especially when the numbers show the potential of the lighter boat foiling is greater than the Moth on foils.Perhaps there could be a vote on foils after, say, a year or two trial period on a couple of new boats? What do the rest of you think?
|
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think this board has a very different atmosphere to Sailing Anarchy and I'd rather keep it that way. Anyone who has followed SA will understand what I mean. You have already posted at length on this subject in Steve's thread there and the debate has descending to the usual "yah-boo" mudslinging. While you personally seem quite civil, hijacking other people's threads to ride personal hobby-horses - in your case foils - invites this kind of response. Please don't start it here. |
|
![]() |
|
Doug Lord ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 03 Sep 05 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 66 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, while I like foils I have been interested in the IC for over thirty years and love the class. Mr. Clark has posted his proposal-to one degree or another- on SA, boatdesign.net, the IC forum and this forum. Since he did not mention the rudder t-foil -and attendent restrictions- part of the proposal on any opening post and only in his second post on SA I thought it was -and is -an important question.
If it is hijacking a thread to raise an important and somehow overlooked part of a major class rule change then so be it. I don't think it is because I'm trying hard to understand the thinking on this proposal and I believe that the thread cannot be properly understood without the knowledge of what ELSE is on the table in this "Australian and American" draft rule change. |
|
![]() |
|
Isis ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Sep 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2753 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I personaly cant see the IC, let alone the AC fairing too well on
foils... Even if they are light enough to be flown I cant see you
getting enough fore-and-aft movement to have much effect on pitch
whilst sat on the end of the sliding seat.
Anyone who has seen the moths when they let the foil break the surface of the water will know about the crash landings they experiance. Being sat on the end of a plank is not somewhere id like to be when that happens. The canoe already has a reputation for being too hard to sail for most people, adding foils will just discourage more people from joining the class. But back on topic now.... |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |