New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Very tight Argo centreboard
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Very tight Argo centreboard

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
ClubRacer View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 26 Sep 15
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Post Options Post Options   Quote ClubRacer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Very tight Argo centreboard
    Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 6:14pm
topper brochure has it listed at 1095
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 5:18pm
Having raced a 2000 against Argos and an Argo against 2000s, I can safely say the Argo is somewhat slower. Whilst the weight and length are similar, the hull is more flexible, the rig smaller and the main lacking the same power. Nice boat, though - the only one of the bigger roto boats I'd say that about, really, though I've not sailed the Quest enough to have an opinion.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
ColPrice2002 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 25 Nov 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 222
Post Options Post Options   Quote ColPrice2002 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 5:13pm
Hi,

Glad you sorted out the centreboard problem - I suspect it's easy to just ad another strip rather than dig out the old ones!

Sail training centre I worked for had Argos - sailing with Jib and Mainsail was fairly pedestrian, ir's a heavy dinghy so it doesn't accelerate quickly, but is pretty stable. The Genniker, however, is huge! It seemed to be larger than main+jib so using that downwind will make a huge difference to the PY rating.
The Argo is part of the Topper products - their brochure give PY = 1095. There's no information on the RYA site.
The Argo is used for lots of training - perhaps it's not used for racing that much.

Colin
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 3:23pm
Agreed, though I think it is still useful as a starting point for a boat with no published PN. My spreadsheet actually predicts the Blaze at 1001, 32 less than it's actual numbers but the Spice comes out at 926 so only 4 points below it's last PN (which is IMO about 30 points too low). When I get the time I'll put a few more two handers into the spreadsheet and see where they end up (FWIW it predicts 1047 for the Vago when it's last PN was 1074). I suspect the general upward creep in PNs means that an annual adjustment to the formula will be necessary. Mostly though it's just a bit of fun (just like handicap racing).

Edited by Sam.Spoons - 23 Jun 22 at 6:36pm
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish"
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 3:11pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

It is 8" longer than a L@ser Vago with a bigger rig and weighs about the same. The Vago had a PN of 1074 in 2016 so the Argo should be slightly faster*. That said my Fuller Formula spreadsheet gives a Fuller Number for the Vago of 1148 and for the Argo of 1080. Those numbers maybe a bit generous but I think around 1100 would be a good starting point if you can persuade your race committee...

* Just looked at the RS Venture (bigger) and Quest (smaller) and Great Lakes give them 1080 and 1130 respectively so 1100 seems about right for the Argo.

The Fuller number is only valid for conventional singlehanders.  Use it here at considerable risk!
Back to Top
Chillidoggy View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 02 Jun 22
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chillidoggy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 10:10am
The only PY I found after extensive searching was one at 1075, and one at 1090. Having sailed a Laser 2000 for years, I would put it around that kind of performance, but I have no proof whatsoever, it's just a feeling, and I have no idea how one would arrive at a calculated figure.
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 22 at 9:04am
It is 8" longer than a L@ser Vago with a bigger rig and weighs about the same. The Vago had a PN of 1074 in 2016 so the Argo should be slightly faster*. That said my Fuller Formula spreadsheet gives a Fuller Number for the Vago of 1148 and for the Argo of 1080. Those numbers maybe a bit generous but I think around 1100 would be a good starting point if you can persuade your race committee...

* Just looked at the RS Venture (bigger) and Quest (smaller) and Great Lakes give them 1080 and 1130 respectively so 1100 seems about right for the Argo.
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish"
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 22 at 4:41pm
The PY system has next to nothing for the Argo. Not even enough to make a suggestion, well, between 1200 and 1250 is as far as I would go. All you can do is to make a list of vaguely similar boats and try and slot it in. Length is the most important factor by a mile, then weight and sail area.



Edited by JimC - 22 Jun 22 at 4:44pm
Back to Top
Chillidoggy View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 02 Jun 22
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chillidoggy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 22 at 8:30am
I found loads more packing strips in the slot than there should be, replaced it with new strips, and it now works perfectly.

I'm now looking for any tips on tuning, mast rake in particular. Once again, I cannot find anything on the web, and there seems to be no Class Association, so I don't know if it has a PY. any help on this would be welcome!
Back to Top
Chillidoggy View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 02 Jun 22
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chillidoggy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jun 22 at 4:53pm
Thanks so much for the replies, I’m going to have a go at removing the centreboard next week, will report back as to what I find.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy