New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Square tops
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Square tops
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 13>
Author
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
eric_c View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 21 Jan 18
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 382 		Post Options Post Options   Quote eric_c Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Square tops
    Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 11:24am
Originally posted by H2

....

Well the blaze and H2 are closest in terms of hull dimensions and wetted area of the examples you gave - the Phantom and D0 are considerably different concepts. Besides - as stated, I am not advocating that a square top main is really about maximising power; in the H2 it fits the designers desire for a well balanced boat that is both easy and fun to sail.




Butr isn't the point supposed to be that square top will give better gust response, make the boat easier to sail efficiently and hence give better performance around the course? I don't think any is saying it's about more peak power, apart from the river sailors who want to poke more area above the bushes, as British Moths were doing before any skiff or cat sailors were thinking about 'square tops'.  If the H2 rig is genuinely more 'automatic' it should be easier to sail well and have a lower PY. So why is it significantly slower than a Phantom? Does anyone race those against one another in conditions where gust response matters? Is the superior planform of the square top simply trumped by the amount of multi-sailmaker development that's gone into Phantoms? Or would the PYs just be wrong if you put the two boats around a course in F3 gusting F5 or whatever? The two boats must have pretty similar LWL and SA/Disp(loaded).?
Back to Top
H2 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 17
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 750 		Post Options Post Options   Quote H2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:50am
Originally posted by eric_c

Originally posted by H2

Originally posted by eric_c

The H2 has a PN of 1034?
The Phantom, with almost no roach at all, 1004.
Blaze with a big round roach, 1033.
Dzero 1029

It's not looking like sailing's answer to nitrous oxide is it?

I don't think I have ever considered the sail shape on the H2 to be about maximising speed as such, its a concept that tried to balance out all the factors that people wanted from the boat. But as you raised it the H2 sail area is 9.3 sqm and the Blaze is 10 sqm and we sail off virtually the same PY and are similar lengths and widths so I would say that in this case the H2 rig would seem more efficient than the blaze one.

Or maybe the hull design is significant, the Blaze having a lot of wetted surface and a generally 1990s air about it? not to mention being made out of slate.

Well the blaze and H2 are closest in terms of hull dimensions and wetted area of the examples you gave - the Phantom and D0 are considerably different concepts. Besides - as stated, I am not advocating that a square top main is really about maximising power; in the H2 it fits the designers desire for a well balanced boat that is both easy and fun to sail.
H2 #115 (sold)
H2 145
OK 2082
Back to Top
andy h View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 13 Mar 12
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 69 		Post Options Post Options   Quote andy h Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:45am
Here's my NS14, which is quite square-topped.  Some are even squarer now.  Like the Tasar, this has a rotating mast.  Mine is quite flexi carbon, tapered above the hounds.  On the water rig adjustment is very limited, so you rely on the main and mast's built-in gust response to a large extent.  It's pretty user-friendly.
Europe AUS53 & FF 3615
National 12 3344, Europe 397 and Mirror 53962 all gone with regret
Back to Top
eric_c View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 21 Jan 18
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 382 		Post Options Post Options   Quote eric_c Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:34am
Originally posted by H2

Originally posted by eric_c

The H2 has a PN of 1034?
The Phantom, with almost no roach at all, 1004.
Blaze with a big round roach, 1033.
Dzero 1029

It's not looking like sailing's answer to nitrous oxide is it?

I don't think I have ever considered the sail shape on the H2 to be about maximising speed as such, its a concept that tried to balance out all the factors that people wanted from the boat. But as you raised it the H2 sail area is 9.3 sqm and the Blaze is 10 sqm and we sail off virtually the same PY and are similar lengths and widths so I would say that in this case the H2 rig would seem more efficient than the blaze one.

Or maybe the hull design is significant, the Blaze having a lot of wetted surface and a generally 1990s air about it? not to mention being made out of slate.
Back to Top
eric_c View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 21 Jan 18
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 382 		Post Options Post Options   Quote eric_c Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:30am
Originally posted by CT249

Originally posted by eric_c


For a cheapskate club sailor like me, I think some of these sails have a lot of stress in them, resulting in shorter usable life than you get from a more traditional roached sail?


I bought another Tasar the other week, just to sell it within the club in the hopes of generating more boats. Unlike our good Tasar, it only had dacron sails.

We took it out for a race to see how it went and it was very interesting to drop back into dacrons from the flatter, bigger, roachier Mylar sails the class now has. The old deep dacron main required vastly more mainsheet and traveller work in gusts to keep the correct amount of twist. The mylar's bigger roach and larger, flatter shape has far more gust response and it was a shock to go back to the old way. IMHO the fleet closed up with the Mylar sails because they required less work to optimise twist.

BUT..... the Mylars stay in top "championship podium" shape for longer and then lose structural integrity far faster. The old dacron sails, unless flapped and crunched, can't be killed with a stick. The Mylars, no matter how well cared for, will tear a decade or so before dacrons would start to lose any noticeable strength.

I'm still far from sure that moving to Mylar was the correct choice for the class overall.  It's not conservatism (I've had Mylar sails for decades, and love my amazing membrane yacht headsails to bits) but as you imply, for a SMOD the durability of less-stressed pinhead dacron sails makes a lot of sense.
I never said anything about Dacron, I had in mind more the Solo and RS400 etc sails in old fashioned planforms but more modern cloth. Dacron is for cruising yachts and things you're happy to replace frequently like Merlin jibs and replica Laser sails.
Back to Top
ChrisI View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 09 Aug 10
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 143 		Post Options Post Options   Quote ChrisI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:27am
Originally posted by H2


Originally posted by eric_c


Originally posted by H2

Never had a square top before my H2 which also has a bendy carbon mast, very easy to make work in medium and strong winds but has taken us time as a class to make the rig work really well in light winds if that helps!
What are the symptoms of it 'not working well' in light winds?

The boat feels "sticky" in light winds, essentially its easy to stall the rig in light winds. We have had to learn how to flatten the fully battened sail so that the flow remains attached. This has been achieved by reducing rig tension to straighten the mast whilst also experimenting with kicker to control the roach twist. Put another way - when the H2 first came along it seemed like we could sail to our PY in medium or heavy winds but when it went light we got a total kicking in PY racing but after several years of trial and error we have found some new "gears" that keep the boat powered up as the breeze falls. Hope that helps?


Thanks for this. This is exactly where we are - exploring how one uses a square top in light winds and where I guess those Punts with square tops are. I think we were (although very happy to stand corrected) one of the first modern monohull dinghy designs to use square top rigs in a lighter wind boat (I don't count A Raters as a dinghy .) On the Thames in tide and with regular huge shifts in wind direction kicker control is critical but as per my OP bendy 'gust response' masts are important too. We still have lots to learn.

Edited by ChrisI - 08 Jun 22 at 10:36am
Back to Top
eric_c View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 21 Jan 18
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 382 		Post Options Post Options   Quote eric_c Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:25am
Originally posted by ChrisI

.....And re the A Class and ultra straight masts - I guess that shows they are experiencing the flip side of 'gust response' which is lost energy from the wind, which they don't want.
If the mast is a spring without much damping, the energy of a gust is stored rather than lost. The energy is recovered as the gust eases.                                  
                                         
I think to some extent modern materials mean the flexing is better handled in the battens and sails than the topmast.
Back to Top
ChrisI View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 09 Aug 10
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 143 		Post Options Post Options   Quote ChrisI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 10:07am
Originally posted by CT249



Originally posted by ChrisI

Originally posted by Mozzy


I actually think square tops are easier to get to work with a solid mast, like those used by cats rather than a whippy carbon mast seen in some other classes (skiffs). So I think they can be made to work with a pretty solid mast which is designed with very little compliance. Cats go for rotating masts which are very stiff and need less in the way of stays to keep them upright. Then use sheet tension, Cunningham and battens to control the stability of sail (response to gusts). 


But doesn't the 'gust response' you get in a cat with a stiff aluminium mast come from the fact there is no kicker tensioning the leach i.e. the gust hits and the mainsail clew rises slightly (and comes inboard slightly) opening the top of the sail...?

Nope, or not from my experience owning and sailing a couple of them. The cat don't need as much gust response as their higher upwind speed means that a gust is a lower percentage of apparent windspeed. They also (as far as I can recall) use flatter sails than skiff types, so it needs actual less twist and mast bend to create a similar depowering effect.
I've never seen my F16 or F18 clew rise or come in to windward, personally. The mainsheet loads are way too high. We took the mainsheet off our old 20' cat and stuck it on the 36' 5 ton offshore mono we have, and it's easier to work on that than it was on the cat!
The proof may come in A Class cats. They have had extremely light carbon wingmasts, rather than stiff alloy rigs, for eons. Despite the fact that they could probably design in as much bend as they want (ie by shifting from carbon to 'glass etc) they have extremely straight masts - so straight that they don't use halyards at all but just push the sail straight up the mast from the bottom because there is basically no luff curve to create resistance.  But (AFAIK) the mainsail chord is so flat that the minimal amount of mast bend created by downhaul pressure is enough to completely flatten the sail when needed. Mono sails are still deeper (AFAIK) so have more draft to be taken out so need more mast bend.
This is just my belief and there are many people who know much more; I'll grab one of them when our season starts again.



Thanks for your real life experience (I am not a cat sailor). The point about relative speeds and angles makes complete sense - i.e. travelling at such speeds they don't need it. And re the A Class and ultra straight masts - I guess that shows they are experiencing the flip side of 'gust response' which is lost energy from the wind, which they don't want.
Back to Top
H2 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 17
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 750 		Post Options Post Options   Quote H2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 9:41am
Originally posted by eric_c

The H2 has a PN of 1034?
The Phantom, with almost no roach at all, 1004.
Blaze with a big round roach, 1033.
Dzero 1029

It's not looking like sailing's answer to nitrous oxide is it?

I don't think I have ever considered the sail shape on the H2 to be about maximising speed as such, its a concept that tried to balance out all the factors that people wanted from the boat. But as you raised it the H2 sail area is 9.3 sqm and the Blaze is 10 sqm and we sail off virtually the same PY and are similar lengths and widths so I would say that in this case the H2 rig would seem more efficient than the blaze one.
H2 #115 (sold)
H2 145
OK 2082
Back to Top
CT249 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 08 Jul 06
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 399 		Post Options Post Options   Quote CT249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Jun 22 at 9:37am
Originally posted by eric_c


For a cheapskate club sailor like me, I think some of these sails have a lot of stress in them, resulting in shorter usable life than you get from a more traditional roached sail?


I bought another Tasar the other week, just to sell it within the club in the hopes of generating more boats. Unlike our good Tasar, it only had dacron sails.

We took it out for a race to see how it went and it was very interesting to drop back into dacrons from the flatter, bigger, roachier Mylar sails the class now has. The old deep dacron main required vastly more mainsheet and traveller work in gusts to keep the correct amount of twist. The mylar's bigger roach and larger, flatter shape has far more gust response and it was a shock to go back to the old way. IMHO the fleet closed up with the Mylar sails because they required less work to optimise twist.

BUT..... the Mylars stay in top "championship podium" shape for longer and then lose structural integrity far faster. The old dacron sails, unless flapped and crunched, can't be killed with a stick. The Mylars, no matter how well cared for, will tear a decade or so before dacrons would start to lose any noticeable strength.

I'm still far from sure that moving to Mylar was the correct choice for the class overall.  It's not conservatism (I've had Mylar sails for decades, and love my amazing membrane yacht headsails to bits) but as you imply, for a SMOD the durability of less-stressed pinhead dacron sails makes a lot of sense.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy