RRS 18 Rule change proposal |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: RRS 18 Rule change proposalPosted: 26 May 22 at 9:20pm |
|
Another way to consider that is that *by definition* you cannot be (clear) behind if you reach the zone first.
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 May 22 at 8:39am |
|
|
I think most folks have simply thought of it as the boat behind not getting mark room when there's no overlap. It's not, after all, really an inside boat if there's no overlap!
With the rules as they are the trouble with any attempt to break overlap by a big change of course at the last second is the "last point of certainty" rule - the presumption that if its uncertain that an existing overlap was broken just before the zone then it wasn't and vice versa. Edited by JimC - 26 May 22 at 8:41am |
||
![]() |
||
ClubRacer
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 26 Sep 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 210 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 10:05pm |
|
|
Interesting that I've never considered the outside boat to get mark room while being the outside boat purely by being clear ahead.
Tactically if you were overlapped outside approaching the zone you could head up massively to ensure you're clear ahead, all be it not heading anywhere near the mark. Here boat 1 would get mark room from 2? ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 9:40pm |
|
|
AIUI with the current rules boat 1 gets mark room from 2 & 3, being clear ahead when a boat reaches the zone, and boat 3 gets mark room from 2.
If I understand the experimental rule correctly then boat 2 gets mark room from 1 & 3, and boat 1 mark room from 2. It would be interesting to hear the logic, and also how the last point of certainty principle would be handled, since I should have thought it rather hard to judge which boat had entered the zone first with widely separated boats like the sketch. We do need to remember, though, this is just a test rule, its not even got as far as being a proposed change. |
||
![]() |
||
423zero
Really should get out more
Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 8:14pm |
|
|
Me too, but the helm put the boat there, then had a strop, threw the tiller at me and said if you can do better, carry on.
|
||
|
Robert
|
||
![]() |
||
eric_c
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 8:09pm |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
ClubRacer
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 26 Sep 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 210 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 7:27pm |
|
|
I was mainly looking for what the current rules are for boats 1 and 2.
My understanding is that in the proposed new rules that 1 would have to give room to 2 (a) When the first of two boats reaches the zone, (1) if the boats are overlapped, the outside boat at that moment shall give the inside boat mark-room. (2) if the boats are not overlapped, the boat that has not reached the zone at that moment shall give the other boat mark-room. They clearly aren't overlapped because 2 is clear astern of 1 at the point 2 reaches the zone. My confusion is on the current rules. It sounds as if with 18.2b that even if boat 2 was half way into the zone but 1 is still clear ahead as it reaches the zone 1 is entitled to mark room. I think in the real world you wouldn't see this scenario as 1 would just gybe heading for the mark and be overlapped anyway, I'm just curious on how to apply the rules here correctly. Edited by ClubRacer - 25 May 22 at 7:49pm |
||
![]() |
||
423zero
Really should get out more
Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 7:13pm |
|
|
If I was boat 1, I would go another boat length, then gybe and blast the for the mark, gybe again for port rounding, sure to beat 2, give 3 a bit of a fright, but should beat her.
|
||
|
Robert
|
||
![]() |
||
eric_c
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 6:45pm |
|
Personally I would have the whole rule re-written based on a flowchart or something. I have seen confusion at a leeward mark between asy boats entering the zone from the sides and blow-along boats entering from the top. People's honest, sincerely held beliefs about the sequence of events are often quite different, because they view from different points. Applying the rules is the easy bit sometimes. I suppose it's a big ask to expect the same rules to work well for skiffs doing 20 knots and mirrors struggling to stem the tide.
|
||
![]() |
||
ClubRacer
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 26 Sep 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 210 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 May 22 at 6:01pm |
|
I presume on the current rule it doesn't specify that its only when the first boat reaches the zone. Only when overlapped, which they clearly aren't? After reading all of this I couldn't tell you why I thought with the current rules 1 would be entitled to mark room from 2 but 3 wouldn't be entitled. I've just always thought they were Other than that I thought it was definitely easier to apply the rules on the test compared to the old one. ![]() Edited by ClubRacer - 25 May 22 at 6:04pm |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |