Campaigning with electric cars. |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1112131415 31> |
| Author | ||
turnturtle
Really should get out more
Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Campaigning with electric cars.Posted: 30 Nov 17 at 9:59pm |
|
|
I let them tease me about my parsimonious approach to motoring Craiggo... small victories for them masking bigger wins in the toys game for me with things that float on water and snow...
As for tax rants ... I pay corp, income, employer NI, employee NI, benefit on a fuel card, VAT on the toys - nothing ‘above the line’ in narcissistic sponsorship etc. And that’s just the ones I know about and see on an everyday basis... but I don’t whinge or moan, and feel privileged to be able to contribute. So yes, my own personal bugbear is corporate and elite tax avoidance rather the Government plugging fiscal gaps with fuel and stamp duty (annoying as they are). Aggressive tax avoidance is the root of all ill when it comes to what the Government should have to spend on a responsible 21st century programme of social democracy. Edited by turnturtle - 30 Nov 17 at 10:01pm |
||
![]() |
||
Pierre
Really should get out more
Joined: 15 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1532 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 8:17am |
|
|
Well said that man TT. Well said.
|
||
![]() |
||
PeterG
Really should get out more
Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 823 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 9:14am |
|
|
Aggressive tax avoidance is the root of all ill when it comes to what the Government should have to spend on a responsible 21st century programme of social democracy.
+1
|
||
|
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
||
![]() |
||
Old Timer
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 05 Jun 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 10:01am |
|
I had to look that up ... I will use that in future
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
fab100
Really should get out more
Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 10:44am |
|
We are well off sailing as a subject here, but what the hell... When I was a young, doing my accountancy training, one of the tax department's big concerns was that HMRC might challenge the transfer pricing between on and off shore companies in the same group. If HMRC deemed the business was profit shifting simply to reduce its UK tax bill, it would challenge that, 'assess' a 'fair' transfer price and levy tax and penalties accordingly. Somewhere, that has been lost, so Google, Apple, Facebook, M**rosoft, Amazon, Starbucks et al seem to manage to generate huge turnover in the UK, none of which is profitable, even though the group internationally is. Clearly this is total humbug. It is also totally unfair competition for a solely UK based business and damages the UK economy. We also are still supposed to have an accounting principle of 'substance over form' (i.e. cut thru the weaselling) that flies out of the window for the multinationals (I'm having to resist a pop at the big-4 audit firms and their oligopoly here) Reactivate these two principles and the playing field gets re-levelled, the tax burden gets spread more fairly. Mind you, iGRF and I could also cut public spending by at least 10% in about a fortnight. Apply all that and we'd all have to pay less tax and have more money to spend on boats, sails, coaching (books!) and kit. Yay, I knew I could pull it back to sailing.
|
||
![]() |
||
Jack Sparrow
Really should get out more
Joined: 08 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2965 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 10:47am |
|
|
The one sport where I would have immediately thought that the ground swell of support for a environmentally conscious transport future would be inherent, I would have thought, would be sailing. I'm drawn to it precisely 'because' of its use of the natural elements as a form of propulsion. But from what I can see here I've read the landscape completely wrong. Or have I?
|
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle
Really should get out more
Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 10:58am |
|
|
Well to link Fab100 and Jack, Naomi Klein was on desert island discs this morning... a major influence in my own awakening to the ill intent of globalisation. Also talking about environmental issues ... I will buy her latest book after hearing her talk on the subject.
Edited by turnturtle - 01 Dec 17 at 10:59am |
||
![]() |
||
fab100
Really should get out more
Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 11:14am |
|
So am I, but perhaps because of that, my view of the direction of travel (sorry) towards environmentally conscious transport is that it is misguided. Misguided because the electricity for battery operated cars is still mostly going to come from hydro-carbons for the foreseeable future. Misguided because no economy has the electricity generating capacity to power everyone's vehicles. Misguided because no one has yet come up with a truly decent* battery technology or solar power array. Misguided because wind-farms^ are a flippin' awful idea when there is no easy way to store the output and also, when the country needs energy most, winter and summer, that weather usually coincides with their being no wind. Misleading because, if we did all switch to electric cars, the government would have to find a way to tax that energy usage to generate the same revenue as it does today from petrol and diesel. Not sure a land-yacht would get me up the hill on the way to Frensham though. * which I would define as giving a max 4 year cost payback (not 15-20 years) without any subsidies and does not scar the earth thru industrial mining of rare materials ^ Windfarms that, through inflated energy prices and subsidies transfer wealth from the poor to the land-owning rich. And chop up birds, bats etc and are also blots on the landscape. I'll further bet that, when they become recognised irrelevancies their operators will be special-pleading for subsidies to take them down and dispose of them.
Edited by fab100 - 01 Dec 17 at 12:38pm |
||
![]() |
||
Old Timer
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 05 Jun 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 370 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 11:27am |
|
Would it be fair to say you are on the fence on the issue then?
|
||
![]() |
||
johnr
Newbie
Joined: 04 Apr 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 34 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Dec 17 at 11:37am |
|
|
It is pretty funny listening to someone with an electric car tell you how green they are because all their electricity comes from renewables. In their mind the grid has a special cable to their house with only green energy flowing. Obviously when the wind is not blowing in their part of the country there is another wind turbine creating their energy 500 miles way with no transmission losses.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1112131415 31> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |