New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: RS400 Upgrades
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

RS400 Upgrades

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
ttc546 View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Post Options Post Options   Quote ttc546 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: RS400 Upgrades
    Posted: 31 Mar 17 at 1:18pm
Yup, I had a brand new Spice many moons ago. Good fun times with that boat.  Smile
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 17 at 1:11pm
Not a 400 but a similar sized boat and rig, the Spice has a single line system and the main issue is friction in the chute mouth when dropping the kite (and to a lesser extent friction retracting the pole). Launching the kite is no problem.
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish"
Back to Top
Oinks View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 24 Oct 14
Location: Bandol
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Post Options Post Options   Quote Oinks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 17 at 10:18am
Nobody I know still uses the single-line hoist. Its been tried a few times on the 4 but there is just too much rope and too much friction.
Back to Top
ttc546 View Drop Down
Posting king
Posting king
Avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 155
Post Options Post Options   Quote ttc546 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 17 at 10:01am
I read the very long thread Sam Spoons posted a link to regarding the original proposed changes. - http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7237&PN=1&title=rs400-proposed-changes 

Lots of discussion on the single line pole and spinnaker hoist proposal. What are peoples experience of doing this conversion since then? Worth it or not? It seems a lot of people still use the separate halyard and pole launch systems. Mine is set like that still.



Edited by ttc546 - 31 Mar 17 at 10:01am
Back to Top
Oinks View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 24 Oct 14
Location: Bandol
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 267
Post Options Post Options   Quote Oinks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 17 at 12:10am
With the old straight luff main, we used to set the mast up straight in most conditions but mid range, to get the large-ish roach to stand up, we put a tiny amount of inversion in. You couldn't see that if you stood back from the boat but you could sighting up the luff groove with just the jib hoisted and full rig tension. A lot of people were doing this when we all had the old-style main.  I'm not sure with the new main (with more luff curve) that there is any general consensus even now. Some go well with the previous "straight mast" setup. We found it too "stuttery" upwind in a breeze, put in a small amount of pre-bend, put a little more tension in the battens than we had previously to get the leech to stand up and it goes fine now. Needs big mainsheet tension in medium winds but it always did anyhow.
Back to Top
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 17 at 8:33pm
Originally posted by rs41212

2011 was the development boat, currently the fleet is on about 1460. I think numbers from around 1380 are vinylester. The square rig change didn't make it through but the sails did get a redesign. There's more luff curve in the new sail.

Was it really that long ago?
AIUI, the 'more luff curve in the main' thing was supposed to mean we'd all move the spreaders back a bit and more pre-bend would help stop the mast breaking with the kite up.
What actually happened was the top people kept the spreaders the same and got a heavier crew.
But the nett difference is very small.Particularly on a proper w/l course.
I think the new sails with a heavier crew have a real edge on a course with tight or two-sail reaches. But that's about all, unless you're trying for the top 3 at the Nationals.

Most of the hulls are indeed fine, but there are some out there which have been beaten to death. Let's face it, mine is in the middle of the number range and it's 20 years old. A lot have been raced hard, some on the sea. Some have done a lot of road miles around the circuit too.
 
Back to Top
ClubRacer View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 26 Sep 15
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 210
Post Options Post Options   Quote ClubRacer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 17 at 7:52pm
the hulls became vinylester the same time they re-shaped the thwart so you can tell which is which. As someone said, this was done at around late 1300's

The hulls are almost bullet proof, there is very little or next to no difference in them. 

2016 nationals results places 3-4 boats from 2003-2004
Back to Top
rs41212 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 27 Mar 17
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Post Options Post Options   Quote rs41212 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 17 at 2:50pm
2011 was the development boat, currently the fleet is on about 1460. I think numbers from around 1380 are vinylester. The square rig change didn't make it through but the sails did get a redesign. There's more luff curve in the new sail.
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 17 at 2:39pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons

From around hull number (sail number?) 2011 if the suggestion in this old thread was voted through at the first attempt?

http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7237&PN=1&title=rs400-proposed-changes

I dont think they have got that high in terms of sail number. 2011 was probably a number assigned just for testing.

I believe all the changes went through so hullds from some time in 2012 will be vinylester rather than polyester.
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Sam.Spoons View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Mar 12
Location: Manchester UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sam.Spoons Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 17 at 2:26pm
From around hull number (sail number?) 2011 if the suggestion in this old thread was voted through at the first attempt?

http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7237&PN=1&title=rs400-proposed-changes
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy