Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
R Speculation |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 6566676869 114> |
Author | ||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 10 Mar 14 at 7:15am |
|
Neil, with respect why should they? They don't for any other class....The whole point of a py is it's pulled together by a mixed set of statistics using all different result sets. I have loads of friends from the phantom fleet mate, but let's be fair part of the massive growth in the class in recent years has been down to over generous py. now it's where it should be (the statistics don't lie) you guys need to suck it up a little. I still believe it's a fairly untouchable boat in the right conditions. It also benefits from a massive open circuit so forget the py rubbish and enjoy a great boat and a great bunch of guys.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've always thought it was pretty amazing that there were all those heavy fellas who seemed to do so well in light winds... Pretty counter-intuitive to me, of course nothing to do with a generous handicap.
Every bubble will burst eventually. |
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
This. There is no way on earth you can sail a Phantom to 1002 on the sea except in exceptional circumstances. |
||
![]() |
||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's kind of the point Graeme, but they have been super fast inland in the UK's most prevalent wind conditions. So it evens itself out.
In an ideal world you would have a system that evens the difference in boa speed out for any condition, size of water etc. so handicap racing really was a true measure of sailor ability. The trouble is (i guess) the budget is somewhat limited (better to spend money of a zone squad network then on club sailing) and there seems like a small sample of data apart from extreme examples. I guess we just have to put up with what's around or do something about it ourselves. God knows why people like Jim and Chris Volunteer to be on the committee. Its a bit like giving back to the community by volunteering to be a traffic warden!
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Personally I think the 1002 figure for the Phantom is
tough. The class does have a great circuit and a lot of good helms ….
Limited compensation that might be though. My suggestion is to get the
class to focus on the Sailjuice series next year and put up its own class
prizes for results extracted from the overall handicap. SJ of course
reserve the right to adjust numbers ... and do so on the assumption that ALL
classes are crewed by 'front of fleet' types... and by and large the standard
is very good across the vast majority of classes attending. Anyway it would be interesting for a keen number cruncher to
look at the degree of class concentration around the clubs .. as expressed in
the returns. My hunch is high class/club concentration will be at least
be associated with a lowering PN number.
It will also be interesting to track the ‘Official’ PN with the GL/SJ ones
and look at the variances between the two sets. We cannot directly or
objectively measure all effects however important they might be like relative
'crew ability' but the degree of class/club concentration must be there in the
data already. So … Don’t worry too much about club racing would be my approach. And possibly go after the Sailjuice series
next year. If enough of you turn up you
get a good race anyway and the stats over time might be very interesting as well .. Mike L. |
||
![]() |
||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Correct and this is why the RYA says clubs should adjust the number for local conditions. Enough said.......
|
||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||
![]() |
||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Without taking away your main point -with which I largely agree - I think that the problem Tasars have, along with other hiking boats that revel in higher wind-strengths, is that they are always going to be beaten on PY by the light-airs specialized hikers (Wayfarers , Ents) in the lighter stuff, and by trapeze boats in stronger winds. They may well beat the trap. boats in lighter winds and the Ents in a blow, but it still means that they won't win on PY, even though their average PY is correct. You need a more extreme boat to do well on PY, in the right conditions.
|
||
![]() |
||
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Spot on.
|
||
Keith
29er 661 (with my daughters / nephew) 49er 688 (with Phil P) RS200 968 Vortex (occasionally) Laser 2049XX |
||
![]() |
||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Which is why I am always urging that we should split the PY fleets not on PY but into trapeze and non-trapeze (alright 'sitting out aids' to include the I. C's with the trapeze boats; Blazes are a moot point, however)
|
||
![]() |
||
Hector ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Location: Otley, Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Back onto the subject if I may.
I tend to agree with the few who are confused by the 'excitement' over the Aero, and I also agree that aesthetically, the Laser looks quite racy in comparison. I hear all the reasoning behind the Dacron sails - but disagree with much of it - especially when there will be 3 rig sizes. I do wonder if producing a boat whose appearance is little better than a Laser is a sound commercial move. When Solos and Phantoms look aesthetically more up-to date I think it's a bad move (to say nothing of Finns, Byte, RS300 etc). Yes, when you get close it looks better, but what is they say about first impressions? I hope it's a great boat, and I'm booked to test sail it to find out. But it will have to be exceptionally brilliant to overcome the attraction that sailing in a regular fleet of 15 Lasers at my club holds, and if doesn't even look cool and up to date, then it might struggle to attract many new buyers ( to whom aesthetics are very important). We (Yorkshire Dales SC) are by the way one of the Demo venues for the Aero. We've also been asked to host a D-Zero demo. I wonder what the chances are we can get them here together ![]() Edited by Hector - 11 Mar 14 at 12:32pm |
||
Keith
29er 661 (with my daughters / nephew) 49er 688 (with Phil P) RS200 968 Vortex (occasionally) Laser 2049XX |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 6566676869 114> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |