Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
The RS100 Owners Thread |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 6162636465 248> |
Author | |||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 17 May 13 at 2:04pm |
||
Ruscoe, yes , thats the quote and I read it back, slight difference in what I tried to type and how it may read . Its subtle, but what I meant was not that it favours weight in terms of results or performance, but that it can carry more weight which was down to its heritage. The 100 had its sail area increased so it could drive more weight in the boat. My point being that the 100 needed to be hiked very hard and perhaps harder than people liked.
The D-one carries the weight and carries the power, but depowers very well and has two rack settings, so seems to suit a wider range competitively. I am not sure where pricing is on either boat now, but at the time there was a real difference, but again the d-one is more of a hand built boat, carbon, racks, traveller etc so bound to be more expensive to make. I am not saying either is right or wrong, you pays your money........ If I were to be looking to buy one of these tomorrow it would probably be a d-one, but mostly because we have more d-ones at the club.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Are there any examples of a class where sail size has been changed to offer weight equalisation? The only one I can think of that tried it was the RS300 and that never really took off ...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Simon you said exactly that 'Its no surprise if favours a bit of weight' so what else am i meant to draw from that statement. I'm not going to get drawn in to any kind of battle over price. We don't need to, very different products. However if you now need to buy both rigs with a 100 and now possibly 3, there is not a great deal of difference in price. Especially given our full carbon construction etc. There are other key factors to consider around build quality and longevity of product vs. long term return on your investment. But i'm not interested in getting into a pissing contest with the 100's again. I just hope they can get a happy resolution for their class members. If indeed this is a problem at all.....
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The D1 is looking a really nice bit of kit ... if you must weight equalise I think adjusting wings seems to work better than different sails. Wing adjustment has worked well for a number of classes, have any classes be successful doing weight equalisation with sails sizes?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I never said the d-one favoured any weight, I just inferred that the design came from a finn sailor, who may not be a spring chicken or the lightest. Giles is at my club and so are sailors with more weight. I think the d-one can suit a wide range, but when sailed back to back with a 100, the the d-one is a physically bigger boat, so can carry weight better without just adding more canvas.
The d-one is bigger, has a bigger battened sail, but depowers more easily for reasons I don't absolutely know, but think are probably a combination of sail shape, unstayed rig and most importantly the traveller. The 10.2 on the 100 may be over canvassed because it has much less leverage than the d-one and I suspect a universal sail of about 9m was probably about right. I have sailed both boats, think they are both great, but lets remember there is also a not insubstantial price difference. Would the 100 have benefitted from a track - possibly, but it increases complexity and cost which makes it less accessible. Just because the 100 is a smod doesnt however mean that it shouldn't evolve and if after several years there is a class wish to make a change then a smart manufacturer will help with this provided it isn't just jumping on each latest craze to allow it to flog a few more boats short term. Take the blaze as an example - the original topper set up was almost unsailable in a breeze and stayed that way until the CA courtesy or one ML stepped in and organised a smaller, semi battened sail that transformed the boat. RS have changed the decks on the 800 and the (Laser) 2000, changed sail shapes and materials on the 400 etc - thats just being smart and helping the class survive, particularly in a situation like this where there is a natural movement and a lot has been learnt about the boat over the past few years. |
|||
![]() |
|||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Ok ... emotive word ... very heavily used ... When a subject it widely discussed on a forum any time there is new news it is likely to receive the same attention. That is the way internet forums work, they are organic ...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
How does the D-one favour a bit of weight?? Charlie Chandler is 75kg, Giles Chipperfield must be near enough the same weight. Former Gold cup winner Augustin Zabaloa in about 70kg. Nick craig is hardly a fat boy. My weight floats between 85-89kg. Tim G is about 90kg but has been heavier, We have some sailors over 100kg. I would hardly say it was designed any particular weight range! We do all this with 1 main sail size and two wing positions. (Albeit there is a 7.4m2 rig which has been mainly used by female sailors) Even in this weekends conditions Charlie and I were swapping places, he won the event but the results don't paint the whole picture however he is a better sailor so i guess the end result does ther talking.
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
How do you think this forum was ' exploited' .?
It is an open forum and at the development point of the 100, the forum became a receptacle for a lot of chat on the subject, but don't see how anyone was 'exploited' as no one was forced to join in in any way. From memory there were less than half a dozen posts from Nick at RS and only when people asked direct questions. I have no doubt that they would have monitored what was said, but the boat was not designed by the forum nor the forum exploited. What was different in that process was the open invitation from RS for people to try the prototype, which is in principle a good thing, provided that a few people's comments are not taken as representing all sailors. I also don't think it was designed to be a fat boys boat, but designed for a wide weight range, albeit the RS design team are perhaps over 75kg ![]() There is no doubt that in the right conditions it can work well for a wide range, but the 10.2 is hard work in a breeze and perhaps us porkers with dodgy knees like an easier life!!! The d-0ne was designed from the start to fit Luca's wishes, so no surprise that it favours a bit of weight and has large ( leather) armchairs on each side
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well as an ex-owner I think he is entitled to an opinion, and perhaps he'd buy another on one day ... To get the hump about the general unwashed discussing your class here is a bit rich considering it was this very forum that was heavily "exploited" as part of the hype/launch of the boat. Now it is unravelling you have to take the ups with the downs
![]() Edited by 2547 - 17 May 13 at 12:30pm |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 6162636465 248> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |