Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Advertising via sail numbers? 55 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1718192021 67> |
Author | ||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 14 Feb 13 at 9:40am |
|
Well STOP PRESS: Sailboats.co.uk simply don't give a f*ck what you think:
http://www.facebook.com/Sailboats.co.uk Page Status update from yesterday: "Looking forward to getting back on the water after the first victory of the campaign at the Tiger Trophey, Brearey Sailing and Christian Birrell will be in action in Fireball 555 down at Hayling Island SC (HISC) for the pursuit race and some sail testing! Good Luck lads" |
||
![]() |
||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
To resume:
-if the sails do not conform to class rules and -if neither the competitor, the class nor the sailmaker made any effort to inform the race committee; then the sailing instruction requiring boats to conform to their class rules has been broken. If this rule has been broken deliberately then this should be considered as gross misconduct. If it is established to the comfortable satisfaction of the protest committee that the competitor has committed gross misconduct then they can issue a warning or impose a penalty. That is a lot of ifs (no buts!) Personally I believe that the RYA should be asked to deal with this issue, and then publish agreed guidelines on theorganisation of major handicap and pursuit events. Maybe, when there are more than, say, 100 boats then there should be a National Measurer present to follow up any allegations. |
||
Gordon
|
||
![]() |
||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't think the debate is about PY itself, but about sportmanship. Do you knowingly break the SIs when entering a race when you might hope to win it? Also to add to your point, my understanding is that the SJ has biased PY reference points towards the winners, rather than the majority, thereby reinforcing the seriousness of the events. We had a big debate on this a while back.
|
||
![]() |
||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
it's worth qualifying that point of view though.... in a race designed to be just a bit of fun to bring some disparate classes together on the same start line (or finish line in a pursuit!) for a celebration of sailing;much like the ethos of the John Merricks Charity Pursuit Race (aka the Tiger Trophy), does it really matter that there is a level of inaccuracy in it? If it is glaringly obvious, then of course the local RO can adjust, which is exactly what the Great Lakes scheme does in fact; bringing the system back to within levels of acceptable deviation for the majority of participants. The problems occur when people take the handicap racing too seriously. The system is not geared to cope with the level of scrutiny applied by such people- the statistics and real-world qualitative feedback is testament to that. Two winners under the internet witch-hunt in as many years, constant criticism of 'bandits', folks calling for boats to be declared 'out of class' when their own manufacturer AND class association have granted temporary approval to a pending minor change. I've been critical of PY myself, but on reflection that's because I was taking it way to seriously at the time- probably because I was sailing a new class with limited class racing and I looked to the handicap events and handicap racing in my club to provide a similar 'level playing field' to class racing. I was missing the point of the PY system... it could never do that, it doesn't pretend to do that; but it does bring its own merits in other ways and 100 boats out in the middle of silly sh*tty cold season.... well, that's good as long as people approach it with the right attitude. It's also quite ironic that at the time of the Merlin kerfuffle I was also supporting the 'retire'/hard line' rules approach... unwittingly sailing myself, out of class, with tapered sheets! The purpose of PY is bring people together, but this hardline approach is driving us apart.....
Edited by pondmonkey - 14 Feb 13 at 9:11am |
||
![]() |
||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
But the development classes are known and that's why PY adjustments can be made by big PY events. For example the Moth had been knobbled more than the RYA PY, they then won at the BM and everyone was happy for them. How can you set a PY for a supposedly restricted class if you have no idea what out of class changes might be going on.
|
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'd say we wouldn't be having such a long discussion if the Fireball hadn't won and consequently had its picture prominently on this and and other sites, but the again, we had a massive discussion about 420 rudder blades on boats that didn't come close to winning and didn't even have out of class rudder blades at all...
|
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes - there's a great deal of difference between trialling a 300 sail specifically designed not to bring a performance advantage, but forced by obsolescent sail cloth, and where, following testing, there will be no alternative sail, from "testing" (concept of testing in a PY event is pretty much invalid - two boat is how you "test") a sail designed to be faster (exploiting weight advantages of tape drive). In the 300's case the SMOD manufacturer has effectively said - here is your new sail, make sure it works and then give it technical approval. I am less convinced about the 800s where there is, I understand, quite a change of shape. But in a sense it makes me see James point about PY: the 800 races with new gear without a penalty because there is PY lag (if there is a statistically significant performance advantage to drive change over time). A development class can, if class rules allow make much bigger changes and race off the same PY. The lag may well be longer because these classes tend not to add much data.
|
||
![]() |
||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Why, do the RO have the right of veto over the RS class rules, with temporary amendments approved by the class committee?
Edited by pondmonkey - 14 Feb 13 at 9:07am |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It all depends on whether RS sought permission from the Race Organisers. If they did not then yes, the sailors should have retired at the end of the race.
The Fireball thing is particularly egregious because there was a specific SI in place reminding competitors that class rule compliance was required. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1718192021 67> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |