Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Advertising via sail numbers? 55 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 4546474849 67> |
Author | ||||
andymck ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 08 Feb 13 at 12:14am |
|||
I have heard the primary and secondary argument before. I know the class I sail in has allowed such technology in the 90's with that argument. I thought the Merlin Class had gone a bit further on clarification of what that was. There may have been a question to the RYA. The statement on the FB website goes appear clear.
Andy |
||||
Andy Mck
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Jeepers ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 26 May 11 Location: Hamphire Online Status: Offline Posts: 147 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Yawn..off to bed
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Roy Race ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Aug 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Well, I have nothing against people or organisations changing their position but please note that at the time of the Tiger Trophy, the only previous comment on this subject (that I am aware of) published by the Fireball Class had been the one above, ruling in favour of the technology, made by the International Technical Committee.
The comment today was made by the UK Technical Committee and was made 4 days after the Tiger Trophy finished. You can only sail using the information available at the time. Anyway, from a rules perspective I don't believe that the tapes are secondary reinforcement and I'll try to summarise why below:
So for something to be reinforcement, it has to be a sheet of sail material. So if like me, you do not believe that 1" glass filament tape is "a sheet of sail material", then you cannot believe it is secondary (or primary) reinforcement. I believe it's correct to consider that the tapes simply act as layers of the laminated ply. Certainly, that's the intention of them. It's also the intention of the reinforcement rule to purely and simply limit the size of the patches. Incidentally, why patch size would need limiting I don't know, because plenty of dinghy classes (and almost all yacht classes) have no such limit and you don't get patch size "arms races" developing. That, though, is another matter. |
||||
![]() |
||||
craiggo ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1810 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The fireball rules are very similar to the graduate rules in terms of secondary reinforcement, and aerowebs were declared illegal in that class a while back.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Jeepers ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 26 May 11 Location: Hamphire Online Status: Offline Posts: 147 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Back to the original Q....Are the new Speed Sails 'team' all using sail numbers along the lines of '55' as a cheap advertising ploy? 20 pages!!!!
Life's too short guys... |
||||
![]() |
||||
SoggyBadger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 26 Oct 10 Location: The Wild Wood Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
No. I don't teach anything and never have.
The patent on Tape Drive expired in 2004 which means that anyone can copy and sell the technology. They just can't call it Tape Drive as that's a registered name and such things never expire. The system Speed use is called Aero Web. Same technology under a different name. I don't know who manufactures it though.
It's a question of scale. Compared to yachts the loads on dinghy sails are tiny and the load in the centre of a dinghy sail is very low so it doesn't really matter that the tapes are straight as the approximation is good enough for the loads experienced.
Technically a franchise would be exclusively tied to the supplying company and trade under their name. |
||||
Best wishes from deep in the woods
SB |
||||
![]() |
||||
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The text from the Fireball website seems pretty clear to me: Aeroweb Tape Drive Sails have been discussed for some years and will again be on the agenda at the Fireball International open forum this September during the World Championships in Slovenia. If agreed at this meeting the proposal will be sent out to each National Association around the world for their feedback and a possible vote to use this type of sails in the future. At present Aeroweb Tape Drive Sails are not class legal contravening Rule 20.3.2 Secondary reinforcement: "Secondary reinforcement of woven or laminated ply shall be within a distance from the sail corner measurement point or Cunningham eye of: Mainsail - 960mm, Foresail - 840mm, Spinnaker - 840mm. Stiffening of the secondary reinforcement by the addition of bonding agents, “close stitching” (consisting of parallel, or nearly parallel, lines of stitching, which are 40mm apart or less and are not sewing the edges of reinforcing patches) or otherwise is not permitted." Tape Drive Sails are illegal because the tape creates a second layer throughout the sail and breaks the Secondary reinforcement Rule. |
||||
![]() |
||||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Well I guess from the information on their website they have revised their position.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Roy Race ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Aug 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
In the interest of balance, I should point out that when I asked if Tape-Drive sails (among others) were class legal in April 2010, the Chairman of the Fireball International Technical Committee indicated that they would be. The comments remained in public view on the International Association website, unchallenged and unaltered for over two years. See copy of thread below: ____________________ By: Roy Race (offline) on Monday, April 19 2010 @ 11:22 AM BST (Read 414 times) Roy Race Roy Race Hi, Could someone (Tom?) clear up for me what is meant in the rules by: "Sails shall be single ply soft sails made of woven or laminated ply." Specifically, would 3DL, D4, Millenium, Vektor, Tape Drive, EPEX, FiberPath or any of the current load path technology sails or Cuben Fiber cloth be permitted as "laminated ply" under the rules? Thanks. Forum Newbie Newbie Status: offline Registered: 04/19/10 Posts: 4 Profile Back to top ____________________ By: Thomas Egli (offline) on Monday, April 19 2010 @ 10:38 PM BST Thomas Egli Thomas Egli The terms used in Rule 20.2 are defined in Section G of ISAF's Equipment Rules of Sailing (ERS). In particular: - G.1.1 defines "sail"; - G.1.4(b) defines "ply"; - G.1.4(c) defines "soft sail"; - G.1.4(d) defines "woven ply" - G.1.4(e) defines "laminated ply"; and - G.1.4(f) defines "single-ply sail". From what I know of the various load path sails mentioned in your post, they would all be considered "laminated ply" sails: - North Sails 3DL (load-bearing filaments sandwiched by two films); - Dimension-Polyant D4 (load-bearing filaments sandwiched by two films); - One Sails Millenium (load-bearing filaments sandwiched by two films); - One Sails Vektor (load-bearing filaments sandwiched by one layer of film and one layer of tape); - UK-Halsey Tape Drive (load-bearing tape bonded to a laminate ply membrane that generally consists of a scrim sandwiched by two films); - Elvstrom EPEX (fundamentally similar to D4); - Ullman FiberPath (fundamentally similar to D4); - North Sails Cuben Fiber (load-bearing tapes sandwiched by two polyester or fluoride films); Please note that most of these sails have carbon filament versions, which would not be allowed by our class rules. Filaments made of non-carbon materials, e.g. polyester, dyneema, spectra, aramid/Kevlar, Pentex..., are allowed. Please let me know if additional information or clarification is required. Best Regards, Thomas Egli, Fireball International Technical Committee Chairman Forum Newbie Newbie Status: offline Registered: 04/19/10 Posts: 2 Montreal, Quebec, Canada Profile Email Back to top ____________________ By: Roy Race (offline) on Tuesday, April 20 2010 @ 04:12 PM BST Roy Race Roy Race Thanks Thomas, that's a very clear answer. I think I figured it out about a half hour after posting, but waited for your official reply anyway. So the following would be not permitted: 1. Any sail material at all which contains carbon fibres 2. Monofilm That's right, isn't it??
Forum Newbie Newbie Status: offline Registered: 04/19/10 Posts: 4 Profile Back to top ____________________ By: Thomas Egli (offline) on Wednesday, April 21 2010 @ 02:35 PM BST Thomas Egli Thomas Egli 1. Anything with long-strand carbon fibres would be prohibited under rule 8 - Prohibitions. 2. Monofilm would not be allowed because it is a single film (that mono thing) rather than a laminated film, and because it is easily damaged when folded flat, thereby contravening ERS G.1.4(c) - Soft Sail. It also deteriorates badly under UV. That being said, we trialed some monofilm jibs in the mid- nineties. They worked out rather well, with decent shape retention and good visibility, but were very prone to damage, and tended to literally blow up at the worst possible moment. 3. I'm still not sure whether the North Sails 3Di process gives a woven ply or laminate ply sail. One could argue that it's a woven ply because there is no film, but one could also argue that it's a laminate ply because it's made up of several layers of combed-out fibre tape. I don't think North is rushing to use the 3Di for dinghy sails, so we have some time to figure it out Smile Best Regards, Thomas Egli, Fireball International Technical Committee Chairman Forum Newbie Newbie Status: offline Registered: 04/19/10 Posts: 2 Montreal, Quebec, Canada Profile Email Back to top |
||||
![]() |
||||
2547 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Well it looks like the fireball association has made the position clear. I can't believe people do this stuff after the Merlin debacle of 2 years ago. |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 4546474849 67> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |