New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: V Twin
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

V Twin

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 142>
Author
RS400atC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Dec 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3011
Post Options Post Options   Quote RS400atC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: V Twin
    Posted: 25 May 12 at 1:16pm
Originally posted by Ruscoe

I happen to agree about weight, Whilst there are some classes I believe would benefit from substantial weight loss (contender) I think a bit of weight helps with a boats "idle" characteristics.  I like a boat to be slightly less full on in between races, I like to be able to have a bit of control whilst launching and dumping my trolley.  Whilst a light boat accelerates quickly I guess it does not hold its momentum in the lulls as well.  Not to mention, a higher minimum weight (as a general rule) should help with longevity.

 

As an example, I am not sure a 49er would be any quicker if it was massively lighter.  I should imagine it would be one hell of a handful and would possibly spoil some of the class characteristics.


How much direct evidence does it take? The 49er's drag has been measured at various all-up weights, proving that  more weight= more drag at all speeds.

The performance of the 49er Fx recently shows that weight is not the only issue, quality of design, aerodynamic drag, and waterline length are all important factors too.

Regarding the ease of handling and stability, hull weight will usually improve static stability, but once the boat is moving, the hydrodynamics of the hull and foils are far more significant. Even a fairly traditional boat like the RS400 is far tippier when it's not moving. Of course if we were designing the 400 today, a lighter carbon rig would help static stability as well as speed through waves.
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 12:55pm
I'm sure the Contender could take 10kgs off without any trouble, as most newer ones carry that much in lead, now, but what exactly would they gain? The (very small) speed increase wouldn't attract anyone else to the class, I'd think, apart from GRF? The class is all about fleet racing. People wanting to go faster presumably either by an MPS, a windsurfer or a Cat?
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
robinft View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 04
Location: Thorpe Bay YC
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Post Options Post Options   Quote robinft Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 12:51pm
An RS600 is a Contender on weight loss and steroids. I much prefer the Contender, it's a proper boat.
Laser number 9
Back to Top
mongrel View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 27 Aug 08
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 304
Post Options Post Options   Quote mongrel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 12:48pm
Originally posted by Ruscoe

I happen to agree about weight, Whilst there are some classes I believe would benefit from substantial weight loss (contender) I think a bit of weight helps with a boats "idle" characteristics.  I like a boat to be slightly less full on in between races, I like to be able to have a bit of control whilst launching and dumping my trolley.  Whilst a light boat accelerates quickly I guess it does not hold its momentum in the lulls as well.  Not to mention, a higher minimum weight (as a general rule) should help with longevity.

 

As an example, I am not sure a 49er would be any quicker if it was massively lighter.  I should imagine it would be one hell of a handful and would possibly spoil some of the class characteristics.

So you think a Contender would benefit from a substantial weight loss, but you don't think a 49er would because it would be a handful?
Do you not think a Contender would be a hell of a handful after a substantial weight loss?
What constitutes a substantial weight loss?
Back to Top
Ruscoe View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1514
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ruscoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 12:29pm

I happen to agree about weight, Whilst there are some classes I believe would benefit from substantial weight loss (contender) I think a bit of weight helps with a boats "idle" characteristics.  I like a boat to be slightly less full on in between races, I like to be able to have a bit of control whilst launching and dumping my trolley.  Whilst a light boat accelerates quickly I guess it does not hold its momentum in the lulls as well.  Not to mention, a higher minimum weight (as a general rule) should help with longevity.

 

As an example, I am not sure a 49er would be any quicker if it was massively lighter.  I should imagine it would be one hell of a handful and would possibly spoil some of the class characteristics.


Back to Top
pondmonkey View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2202
Post Options Post Options   Quote pondmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 12:28pm
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by pondmonkey


Take the (heavy, old) 49er with its new rig, nothing seems to hold a candle to it for its size.  

That's because its still pretty light for its size (it was *very* light compared to its competitors at Torbole), and none of the other ladies' trial entrants were anything like as big and especially long.

Fair points- but the weight game for elite sporting products has changed since Torbole.   I guess I'm saying the 49er hull seems to have stood the test of time- relative to the pace of technology-change in other aspects of our lives.  

And agreed, waterline length is not only crucial for speed, but also stability; which relatively inexperienced skiff sailors would find 'quicker' around a course.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 11:09am
Originally posted by pondmonkey


Take the (heavy, old) 49er with its new rig, nothing seems to hold a candle to it for its size.  

That's because its still pretty light for its size (it was *very* light compared to its competitors at Torbole), and none of the other ladies' trial entrants were anything like as big and especially long.

Edited by JimC - 25 May 12 at 11:10am
Back to Top
winging it View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 07
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3958
Post Options Post Options   Quote winging it Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 10:57am
yep, mend boats while the sun shines.  I've been waiting for this sun for ages so I can get the epoxy out.
the same, but different...

Back to Top
radixon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2407
Post Options Post Options   Quote radixon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 10:23am
The V-Twin Thread.... The Boat that got the Y+Y forum talking, going off topic, and also feeds the Troll, (Daily)

Graeme, What you have done is great, lets just hope you can patch it up and get it on the water again.


Edited by radixon - 25 May 12 at 10:24am
Back to Top
pondmonkey View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2202
Post Options Post Options   Quote pondmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 May 12 at 9:47am
Well I'm not convinced light does necessarily equal quicker.  

Take the (heavy, old) 49er with its new rig, nothing seems to hold a candle to it for its size.  Even at the recent ISAF womens skiff trials the smaller rigged 49FX still wiped the floor across the water with more or less every other entrant, which included a mix of very light and narrow (rebel), and light, narrow and short, (cherub)  and a couple of mainstream builder options bother packing 15 years of alleged advantage over the 49er hull form, yet the 49er still came home.  There's some talk that the FX might actually be quicker than the mens boat in the right conditions too.

Sure we have the extremes like the foiling moth, but the weight saving there is to reduce the foiling wind speed, not necessarily to improve max speed.  Besides, if we're talking outside of the conventional monohull box, then if you want to maximise ease of use, with high performance, then you need to look to multihulls and probably solid rigs delivering efficiency on a stable platform; not skiffs which essentially deliver power over an unstable one.


Edited by pondmonkey - 25 May 12 at 9:51am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 142>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy