Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
V Twin |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1819202122 142> |
Author | ||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 25 May 12 at 1:16pm |
|
How much direct evidence does it take? The 49er's drag has been measured at various all-up weights, proving that more weight= more drag at all speeds. The performance of the 49er Fx recently shows that weight is not the only issue, quality of design, aerodynamic drag, and waterline length are all important factors too. Regarding the ease of handling and stability, hull weight will usually improve static stability, but once the boat is moving, the hydrodynamics of the hull and foils are far more significant. Even a fairly traditional boat like the RS400 is far tippier when it's not moving. Of course if we were designing the 400 today, a lighter carbon rig would help static stability as well as speed through waves. |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm sure the Contender could take 10kgs off without any trouble, as most newer ones carry that much in lead, now, but what exactly would they gain? The (very small) speed increase wouldn't attract anyone else to the class, I'd think, apart from GRF? The class is all about fleet racing. People wanting to go faster presumably either by an MPS, a windsurfer or a Cat?
|
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
robinft ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 18 Jun 04 Location: Thorpe Bay YC Online Status: Offline Posts: 252 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
An RS600 is a Contender on weight loss and steroids. I much prefer the Contender, it's a proper boat.
|
||
Laser number 9
|
||
![]() |
||
mongrel ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 27 Aug 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 304 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So you think a Contender would benefit from a substantial weight loss, but you don't think a 49er would because it would be a handful? Do you not think a Contender would be a hell of a handful after a substantial weight loss? What constitutes a substantial weight loss?
|
||
![]() |
||
Ruscoe ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I happen to agree about weight, Whilst there are some classes I believe would benefit from substantial weight loss (contender) I think a bit of weight helps with a boats "idle" characteristics. I like a boat to be slightly less full on in between races, I like to be able to have a bit of control whilst launching and dumping my trolley. Whilst a light boat accelerates quickly I guess it does not hold its momentum in the lulls as well. Not to mention, a higher minimum weight (as a general rule) should help with longevity. As an example, I am not sure a 49er would be any quicker if it was massively lighter. I should imagine it would be one hell of a handful and would possibly spoil some of the class characteristics. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Fair points- but the weight game for elite sporting products has changed since Torbole. I guess I'm saying the 49er hull seems to have stood the test of time- relative to the pace of technology-change in other aspects of our lives. And agreed, waterline length is not only crucial for speed, but also stability; which relatively inexperienced skiff sailors would find 'quicker' around a course.
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's because its still pretty light for its size (it was *very* light compared to its competitors at Torbole), and none of the other ladies' trial entrants were anything like as big and especially long. Edited by JimC - 25 May 12 at 11:10am |
||
![]() |
||
winging it ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Mar 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3958 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
yep, mend boats while the sun shines. I've been waiting for this sun for ages so I can get the epoxy out.
|
||
the same, but different...
|
||
![]() |
||
radixon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 27 Oct 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2407 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The V-Twin Thread.... The Boat that got the Y+Y forum talking, going off topic, and also feeds the Troll, (Daily)
Graeme, What you have done is great, lets just hope you can patch it up and get it on the water again. Edited by radixon - 25 May 12 at 10:24am |
||
![]() |
||
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well I'm not convinced light does necessarily equal quicker.
Take the (heavy, old) 49er with its new rig, nothing seems to hold a candle to it for its size. Even at the recent ISAF womens skiff trials the smaller rigged 49FX still wiped the floor across the water with more or less every other entrant, which included a mix of very light and narrow (rebel), and light, narrow and short, (cherub) and a couple of mainstream builder options bother packing 15 years of alleged advantage over the 49er hull form, yet the 49er still came home. There's some talk that the FX might actually be quicker than the mens boat in the right conditions too. Sure we have the extremes like the foiling moth, but the weight saving there is to reduce the foiling wind speed, not necessarily to improve max speed. Besides, if we're talking outside of the conventional monohull box, then if you want to maximise ease of use, with high performance, then you need to look to multihulls and probably solid rigs delivering efficiency on a stable platform; not skiffs which essentially deliver power over an unstable one.
Edited by pondmonkey - 25 May 12 at 9:51am |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1819202122 142> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |