Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
AV how will you vote? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Author | ||
tryinghard ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 03 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 05 May 11 at 3:25pm |
|
Whether the result is yes or no it won't be representative of the country because it is unlikely that there will be anything like even a miserable 50% turnout.
If only 40% bother to vote then surely the majority favour a system where you don't have/need to vote? |
||
![]() |
||
G.R.F. ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well I've voted and in the end went yes, I guess just as a protest at living all these years in such a safe Tory seat, not that it will make a blind bit of difference, they'll still win even under AV.
|
||
![]() |
||
Roger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 04 Location: Somerset Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't think anybody is missing the significance of the first preference, it's just that it's not that significant under AV. We can be sure that the majority of constituencies, will go to at least the 2nd preferance for some.
How can it be simpler than just selecting your prefered candidate? Currently some vote tactically in a few constituencies, but not many, AV would be asking everybody to vote tactically, although of course you don't have to make more than one choice! |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You know what Jim, we agree on something. It would be daft to vote in a worse system, I happen to think AV is a better sytem than what we've got....it's just not the best alternative imo.
Edit:
Whatever happens the parties will put a spin on the result in a way that suits their world view....Guaranteed! Edited by GK.LaserII - 05 May 11 at 2:57pm |
||
![]() |
||
mike10626 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 04 Jul 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The question of the ballot paper is: -
"At present, the UK uses the 'first past the post' system to elect MPs to the House of Commons. Should the 'alternative vote' system be used instead?"
I would interpret a No vote as you want to stick to FPTP. If the wording was more vague you might be able to argue you wanted some other system, but they seem to have made the wording explicitly be almost an either/or type question.
|
||
RS500'S@Datchet - The Country's largest Trapeze Asymmetric Fleet ?
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Don't see the logic in that at all. It could equally be said that a No vote , especially if there's not a huge margin , could indicate the public want change, but not that change, whereas a Yes vote means that system will prevail indefinitely because that's what the public voted for... To me it would seem ill advised to vote in favour of a system that you thought was worse than the current one in the hope that it might get changed in the future to something better. |
||
![]() |
||
mike10626 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 04 Jul 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
People seem to be missing the significance of the First Preference in the AV system. It allows you to put first the candidate or party you think is best and this result is recorded for posperity. From this information we should be able to tell how many people really support the two main parties. If this turns out to be less than the 75% they currently muster between them there is a compelling argument to go to the next step - if not the overall result shouldn't be that different anyway.
Having to vote tactically for your second and third preferences is probably less complex than the current system where we have to vote tactically anyway with your only cross. How do you work that one out with all the mis-information that appears about who is second in your constituency?
|
||
RS500'S@Datchet - The Country's largest Trapeze Asymmetric Fleet ?
|
||
![]() |
||
Roger ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 04 Location: Somerset Online Status: Offline Posts: 524 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Pretty much hit the nail on the head there, it's the tactics of 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc choices that make AV so complex, parties will "compute" the best possible options for them to win a particular seat, and campaign at length for voters to use the tactical options ( the tactics will be different in each and every seat), it is nothing like as simple are listing the candidates in order of preferance that is so widely stated. For what it's worth I shall be voting NO, I believe our electoral system should be straight forward and simple, I have never failed to vote, ever, in any election I have been entitled to vote in, and I will continue to do so, it's a right I cherish and always will. I encourage others to vote too, but always accept that their right is to not vote should they so choose, although I would argue that if you dont vote you have no right to complain. |
||
![]() |
||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
-_
Al |
||
![]() |
||
mike10626 ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 04 Jul 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
RS500'S@Datchet - The Country's largest Trapeze Asymmetric Fleet ?
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |