Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Technical query |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
mike ellis ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2339 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 25 Feb 06 at 2:49pm |
|
i thought planing was the boat overtaking its bow wave or is this another "oversimplification" i dont no much on this topic, all i do is sail. i dont understand the hydrodynamic whatsits. |
||
600 732, will call it Sticks and Stones when i get round to it.
Also International 14, 1318 |
||
![]() |
||
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Agreed JimC but from an understanding point of view you have to start somewhere. Sailing is a complex sport to understand and to succeed in knowledge transfer, you have to start somewhere. From a coaching point of view, its all about building up the jigsaw piece by piece without getting to 'complex' at the start. As a qualified naval architect, I am lucky to have been taught about the complexities of this subject over a number of years. The majority of dinghy sailors haven't had this luxury and hence it is better to introduce a starting block from which to build on. As for the rant, it just annoys me when someone just says 'your wrong at all levels' with no justification. My posting on this subject is at an end, thank you and goodnight |
||
![]() |
||
Bumble ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Nov 05 Location: Taiwan Online Status: Offline Posts: 302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Calm down Children.
Look Barty, you must be aware that over simplistic sums create immense confusion. And that is an over simplistic formula - as you know in practice surface area is not a constant as it decreses as the boat lifts, and coeffient of lift varies hugely, probably close order of magnitude, on trim, on each wave, and probably nine dozen other factors. Then you also have aerodynamic lift from the rig (doesn't lift the bow, does lift the boat) aerodynamic lift perhaps even from the hull surface etc etc etc. So what you have given is a formula that is technically correct and is relatively straightforward to understand, but practically useless and doesn't represent what really goes on. In the real world this stuff is very complex. |
||
![]() |
||
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thanks Stefan for that well balance and informative argument. Having looked at the link you posted I realise that my head must have been up my a$%e when I wrote my orginal post. I can't belive I got so much of it fundementally wrong. I really must look at my uni notes on hydrodynamics again and write a stern letter to my old lecturer who obviously has been fooling everyone over the years Could you please publish the dates of your naval architect whisperer tour as I'd look to come and hear you speak |
||
![]() |
||
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Unfortunately it is also wrong. Not "detail" wrong, or "second order effect" wrong but fundamentally wrong. |
||
![]() |
||
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Aye thats why I said 'should be assumed' and not 'is'. With this assumption the equation is relatively straight forward for everyone. If you bring angle of incidence, form factors etc is becomes difficult. Its just maths for the masses
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Actually no. The coefficient of lift is proportional to the angle of attack (roughly speaking and up to to the point where seperation begins). See, for example http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/lift_drag.htm So one reason to move back in the boat is to increase the angle of attack, and hence Cl and hence lift. Unfortunately this also increases drag.
|
||
![]() |
||
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Lift is defined by the equation: L=0.5CLñsv2 NOTE: ñ should be Rho the greek letter P but the symbol won't work on here! where CL is the coefficient of lift, ñ is the density of water, s is the surface area and v is the velocity squared Lift will be close to the displacement weight at the point of planning, i.e is the boat and crew weighs 300kg then 300kg of lift would take it out the water but something less will start to lift it out. Rearranging for speed gives v = square root (L/0.5CLñs) The density of water is fixed and the coefficient for lift ahould be assumed relatively constant so the only thing that affects the speed is surface area. This is why in all RYA learn to sail bits it tell you to lean back when its windy on a reach. This pulls the bow up and effectively reduces surface area and hence the potential to plane. If you had a boat with flat sections all the way down the hull it is hard to reduce surface area even when hanging of the back. Clever designers produce hull shapes that allow the surface area to be reduced the faster the boat goes. Think of a jet plane wing. Next time you take off look at the wing. They extend the trailing edge to increase surface area at lower speeds to increase lift. Once in the air and speed increase they retract the trailing edge to give a smaller surface area and therefore the ability to fly faster. If only it was this simple in a dinghy Look at RIBS and you will see that most have a 'shallow' V hull i.e. relatively flat, which is good for getting onto the plane but then difficult to reduce wetted area easily. This is why it has spray rails to allow the boat to climb progressively up the rails and hence reduce wetted area. Offshore RIBS tend to have 'deep' V hulls so that the wetted area can quickly be reduced to give higher speed potentials. So our friend Froude quite rightly says that a long boat will go faster than a shorter one but a shorter one can plane faster if the hull design allows wetted area to be reduced and has the available power to maintain the increases in speed required. |
||
![]() |
||
m_liddell ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 583 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The first time I took my 14 out I got someone to video us from a RIB behind the boat. It was single wire occasional marginal twin wire conditions, upwind you can see as soon as the crew hits the wire the wake behind the boat change as it starts to plane. Interesting to watch. Despite my 14 being a old design the transition from displacement to planing upwind is very subtle, but after sailing the boat a few times you can feel it happen. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |