12ft skiff
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=800
Printed Date: 18 Apr 24 at 12:02pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: 12ft skiff
Posted By: tgruitt
Subject: 12ft skiff
Date Posted: 20 Jun 05 at 4:06pm
Hi all.
My friend and his friend are buying a 12ft skiff from australia, he has never sailed on before, or a cherub or anything like it really. He has a laser 4000. I said I would be a crash test dummy and helm it if he wanted someone 2, hopefully i can do something using my limited cherub experience! Has anyone got any tips or adive for them so they don't end up in hospital with too many injuries? Are there going to be any modified cherubs around this year that they could have a blast against?
p.s apologies to him about how this post sounded in the first place, I didn't mean it mate!
------------- Needs to sail more...
|
Replies:
Posted By: Mike278
Date Posted: 20 Jun 05 at 6:45pm
There is a cherub with a 12ft skiff rig at draycote, but i'm not sure how often he sails it
------------- Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 20 Jun 05 at 7:06pm
Moving from a L4000 to a 12ft skiff without passing Go! ( UK Cherub )
should be interesting.
I'd buy a crash helmet if I were you.
Talk to Simon Roberts, either on the Cherub email list or from the web
site via the Technical Area reps link.
Good luck.
PS can I just ask, how old the skiff he's getting, and will it have it's full
compliment of rigs, and why your friend doesn't fancy a UK Cherub?
Oh there's a blasting day coming up if your mate want's to try his hand at
something 12ft long before he sends the money transfer!
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: Lucy Lee
Date Posted: 20 Jun 05 at 7:38pm
Originally posted by Mike278
There is a cherub with a 12ft skiff rig at draycote, but i'm not sure how often he sails it |
As much as he can, but he's a busy man.
------------- Fly Cherub!
|
Posted By: jimmywalsh2
Date Posted: 20 Jun 05 at 11:58pm
Do you know which boat he is getting ? he will probably pay as much for shipping as he pays for the boat.
He would be much better off getting a Cherub as he will have other people to help him, without the support of other 12 sailors I can guarantee he will spend a lot of time upside down
|
Posted By: tgruitt
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 11:11am
shipping is free (his dad owns a company that ships stuff from australia, luckily) I am trying to persuade him to get a cherub and just stick a massive rig on when he wants the 12ft skiff effect! we will have to see
------------- Needs to sail more...
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 11:40am
Sticking a HUGE rig on a Cherub may not be the best way to go, as a little
birdy tells me that Simons slug ( the UK Cherub with No 2 - 12ft skiff rig)
space frame is sqeeking a little and he is planing on taking the deck off
and repairing it.
Anyway tell him to go for it, just get some good med insurance. :-)
And he can always sail it as a UK Cherub when he is getting lonely.
On another matter.... your mates Dad couldn't go the other way could he?
there's a few of us over here that are real keen to do the Interdoms plus
there is a big Skiff event in 2006 in Sydney that Jimmy has invited the UK
Cherubs to. Be great to do it with a transport sponsor. I'll email off list
latter.
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 11:44am
don't cherubs have a huge rig anyway?
-------------
|
Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 1:18pm
Originally posted by Jack Sparrow
birdy tells me that Simons slug ( the UK Cherub with No 2 - 12ft skiff rig) space frame is sqeeking a little and he is planing on taking the deck off and repairing it. And he can always sail it as a UK Cherub when he is getting lonely.
|
I think it may be more difficult to convert a 12ft skiff to UK Cherub rules than to beef up a cherub to take a 12 rig.
Converting a non retracting pole to retracting wont be easy plus possably needing to add some chines
------------- If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
Posted By: Tornado_ALIVE
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 1:24pm
Originally posted by Peter Rhodes
don't cherubs have a huge rig anyway? |
UK Cherubs have big rigs...... Aussie Skiffs (12s and 18s atleast) have bloody HUGE rigs.
Jumping into a skiff you will spend a lot of time swimming. All Skiffies have been there and it is part and parcel of becoming a true skiffy. The more you sail it the less time you will spend in the tide and will find it a very rewarding experience.
Best advice apart from build yourself up slowly to the fresh winds......... would be........ Learn to laugh at yourself.
When you go ripping past the rest of the fleet like this...... you will have the final laugh.
-------------
http://www.formula18alive.com - www.formula18alive.com
|
Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 1:45pm
does that have hydrofoils?
-------------
|
Posted By: Jamie
Date Posted: 21 Jun 05 at 3:47pm
I don't think they do. In a boat that travels as fast as a 12 footer why would you want them? Just creates more interesting ways of breaking yourself than you had before.
------------- www.sailfd.org/GBR - GBR Flying Dutchman
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 22 Jun 05 at 9:44am
Originally posted by Granite
Originally posted by Jack Sparrow
birdy tells me that Simons
slug ( the UK Cherub with No 2 - 12ft skiff rig) space frame is sqeeking a
little and he is planing on taking the deck off and repairing it. And he can
always sail it as a UK Cherub when he is getting lonely. |
I think it may be more difficult to convert a 12ft skiff to UK Cherub
rules than to beef up a cherub to take a 12 rig.
Converting a non retracting pole to retracting wont be easy plus
possably needing to add some chines |
Very Ture... but possiable. :-)
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 22 Jun 05 at 10:30am
Bit of filler up near the shear line for a chine and an off-centre pole and bob's your uncle...as long as you don't mind still having a bag kite putting a chute or sock in would be rather more drastic surgery I guess.
But the worst thing would be the lack of the false floor and not being self draining...
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 22 Jun 05 at 10:32am
Originally posted by Blobby
But the worst thing would be the lack of the false floor and not being
self draining...
|
even truer!
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: Tornado_ALIVE
Date Posted: 22 Jun 05 at 11:36am
Originally posted by Peter Rhodes
does that have hydrofoils? |
No Mate,
Thats just how Aussie Skiffs sail. Don't need hydrofoils atleast downwind.
-------------
http://www.formula18alive.com - www.formula18alive.com
|
Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 12:08pm
by the way that top pic is of a british skiff!!
------------- International 14 1503
|
Posted By: Tornado_ALIVE
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 12:15pm
British crewed and maybe built????? But Aussie 18
The only true Aussie skiffs left are the 12, 16 and 18.
14 footer amalgamated with the International 14s a long time ago and tightened up the restrictions.
16s and 18s are very strick designs now, leaving the 12 as the only true development skiff.
-------------
http://www.formula18alive.com - www.formula18alive.com
|
Posted By: Peter Rhodes
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 12:24pm
so what lifts them up?
-------------
|
Posted By: Jack Sparrow
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 12:26pm
Originally posted by Peter Rhodes
so what lifts them up? |
The Wind!
------------- http://www.uk3-7class.org/index.html" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Class Website
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092602470772759/" rel="nofollow - Farr 3.7 Building - Facebook Group
|
Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 12:29pm
well it is wind and waves!!
------------- International 14 1503
|
Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 1:14pm
Originally posted by Tornado_ALIVE
16s and 18s are very strick designs now, leaving the 12 as the only true development skiff.
|
I was looking at the 16 foot skiff class rules a while back and they had build tollerences for the hull but you were banned from designing a hull within those tollerences which might be faster than current hulls.
All changes from current designs must be pre aproved and any changes that might make the boat go faster are banned. all seemed a bit heavy handed to me.
------------- If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 23 Jun 05 at 10:28pm
almost like an ANTI development class. sounds a bit odd to me
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: guytoon
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 10:08am
Yes but y I think boats belongs to the club and are using many masts and sails.
If they need to upgrade every year it can be very expensive. It was the same when 18 footers were belonging to the australian league
------------- Cherub 2692 "NBS"
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 3:49pm
Originally posted by Blobby
But the worst thing would be the lack of the false floor and not being self draining.. |
There are very few rules in twelves the following are not allowed to be changed other than this ANYTHING goes
Length 12ft, Width 6ft, Minium weight 45kgs sail Area UNLIMITED NO RULES if you what bigger you can have it. Big rigs are between 26 and 31 ft mesured from the keel and big spiniker pole are 11 to 14 ft from the bow. Now you may be able to see why we sail like we do.
Self draining boats are legal, however it is faster to stay upright, and are slower than non false floored boats.
Check out the twelve site http://www.skiff.org.au - www.skiff.org.au there are links with pic vids and Our entire rules on the site
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 6:34pm
Whoa sexy boat that, like the colour !
------------- -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
RS600 933
|
Posted By: Ginger_69
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 8:04pm
have u ever reefed?
------------- Chew valley lake s c
Topper(RED)-29412
I14 1209
lightning-168
Whaam (cherub)
Atum bom (cherub)old crew (the 1 in the youtube vids)
Will be arup skiff crew aka marmite
|
Posted By: Wave Rider
Date Posted: 24 Jun 05 at 10:16pm
Good question but skiffs dont reef mate, thye change down a rig size cos they have diffrent rig sizes depending on the wind conditions.
------------- -[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club
RS600 933
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 25 Jun 05 at 3:25am
Originally posted by Ginger_69
have u ever reefed? |
No we do not reef. we take with us different sized rigs generally three to four complete with masts or you can have 2 masts with a stumping arrangement similer to an inter 14. follow the link http://www.skiff.org.au - www.skiff.org.au to see more
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: matt peat
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 1:07pm
The reason that we sail 12's like that is because they are prone to nose diving becuase of the amount of sail area that we carry. See.
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 3:47pm
thats a nice example of a pitchpole. next time i expect to see it a bit
straighter with the tip of the mast hitting the water first in a
perfect line
on a serious note, big respect to you 12 sailors. I really need to give
it a go at some point. I thought that my cherub was fast downwind with
my 18m kite but with a 60odd it must be insane!
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: m_liddell
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 5:58pm
Why/how do 12ft skiffs carry so much more sail than cherubs? Are they just much wider?
|
Posted By: Mike278
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 6:07pm
no, they both have a beam of 1.8m, so they probably carry so much more sail because they are just crazy
------------- Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.
|
Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 8:38pm
The 12's carry s**t loads of sail because their area is unrestricted. The Cherubs carry 15.5m2 beacuse this is what the class rules allow.
------------- Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry
|
Posted By: Granite
Date Posted: 27 Jun 05 at 10:05pm
The 12's also have multiple rigs and change down to smaller sails
when the wind gets up. the smallest rig is probably about the same size
as the old UK cherub rig upwind but with a larger kite.
------------- If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 10:49am
Originally posted by timnoyce
thats a nice example of a pitchpole. next time i expect to see it a bit straighter with the tip of the mast hitting the water first in a perfect line
|
First off we don't call it a "pitchpole" we call it "going down the mine" or just "mining". This wins you and you crew a beer, which must be skulled, this boat got fourth in the series and nearly won the "Underall Trophy", Yes there is a BETTER photo which is of the Australian boat that won the Interdomions.
Cherubs are WIDER than 12's at least the Ozzie one are, lines for the Woof Hull, current design, are on our web site. I have seen posted on the pic of the week, lines for a UK Cherub.
As for sail area, we take 3-4 distinct rigs to a race with some people having reef points and/or other jibs to create the perfect rig for the race or regatta. If you don't like you sails you may change them overnight and race with them without any kind of penalty. We also "rig for the holes", that is pick a rig to get you "powered up" in all conditions expected in that race. We can be powered up in 5 knots & up to about 25-30 knots, after that you are "in the lap of the Gods".
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 11:20am
i stand corrected! i was trying to get them to introduce the miners
helmet at the cherub nats this year, and the winner to neck a helmet
full of beer.
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 11:46am
For the UK Cherub guys, check out the NZ R Class http://www.rclass.org/ - http://www.rclass.org/ These are kind of a restricted twelve. The rig size listed is about 4th rig, in fact you will see NZ 12's racing as R Classes & those boats use their R Class rigs as a 4th (the smallest)
Did you know we have a bloke who admits to being 70( however I think is much OLDER ) steering a twelve. Maybe its because they are additive.
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: Tornado_ALIVE
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 11:56am
Originally posted by Skiffe
First off we don't call it a "pitchpole" we call it "going down the mine" or just "mining". This wins you and you crew a beer, which must be skulled
|
Thats why skiff sailors are alcoholics.
Or should I say alcoholism turns you to skiff racing
-------------
http://www.formula18alive.com - www.formula18alive.com
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 3:50pm
skiffe. just wondered what the maximum beam of the R-Class is? I found
this information on the website but it doesn't seem to say a maximum
width including the wings? or have i missed something?
- 3.0 Beam
- 3.1 The extreme beam measured to the outside of the hull must not be
less than 1.4 metres measured between perpendiculars to the waterline.
- 3.2 The full width of the forward section of the boat, measured across the
boat, 300mm back from the stem must not exceed 700mm.
Also at 3.9 metres surely they have an advantage upwind over the 12's
running as R-classes as they are about 25cm longer? or doesn't it make
a difference?
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: MikeBz
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 4:21pm
Is it just me, or my eyes, or is the kite actually goose-winged in the first picture at the bottom of page 3? Must be one mother of a gust to have to go that deep!
Is 'skulling' a beer just tipping it over your head?
Mike
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 28 Jun 05 at 4:28pm
it
could be that the apparent wind was so much that they managed to bear
away so far onto the run that the wind flipped sides of the boat. That
always causes a spectacular wipeout i've found!
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 29 Jun 05 at 10:32am
Originally posted by timnoyce
skiffe. just wondered what the maximum beam of the R-Class is? I found this information on the website but it doesn't seem to say a maximum width including the wings? or have i missed something?
- 3.0 Beam
- 3.1 The extreme beam measured to the outside of the hull must not be less than 1.4 metres measured between perpendiculars to the waterline.
- 3.2 The full width of the forward section of the boat, measured across the boat, 300mm back from the stem must not exceed 700mm.
Also at 3.9 metres surely they have an advantage upwind over the 12's running as R-classes as they are about 25cm longer? or doesn't it make a difference? |
To my knowledge the r class is 1800mm wide with no wings. The 12 guys who want to really compete, I've been told, have tried "clip-on" hull extensions. I don't think it worked. This Nuplex is the same boat the the mining Pic, it just won the Leander Trophy, their National, I think. As you can see there are no hull mods.
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 29 Jun 05 at 10:40am
Originally posted by MikeBz
Is it just me, or my eyes, or is the kite actually goose-winged in the first picture at the bottom of page 3? Must be one mother of a gust to have to go that deep!
Is 'skulling' a beer just tipping it over your head?
Mike
|
You might spell it this way,Skoaling, is just drinking a beer in the quickest time(5 sec has been done) as possible
what other class can you see almost 100 years of development?
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: jakey
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 5:44am
some more pics from the inters for ya.
How to deal with manly ferries: give them the finger
...and then keep going
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 6:44am
That series of shots was on the Favourite Pics thread about 6 weeks ago!
re R-Class - you can go as wide as you like, but the limitation is on extensions to the width that might be dangerous to people or boats to the satisfaction of the measurer (Rule 4.2). That is a nice subjective rule for you.
The length difference between the R's & 12s doesn't seem to make much difference - 3% ish difference in theory based on the waterline length. R's are a much smaller fleet though so the pace of development may well have been slower, so although the 12s are smaller I think the hull shape has progressed to a more refined state giving very little difference in performance. (just my humble opinion which is rarely influenced by facts).
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 9:53am
haha, what a humourous rule. Surely it's level of danger is all down to
the person sailing it, rookies should have thin boats with padding!
right back to a previous question, i posted it on the 12 foot skiff
forum but got no reply.... Is the rudder on this boat standard in the
12's or is it a bit of an experiment? I still haven't got round to
building my new rudder for the cherub so was wondering if there were
any benefits to having one of this shape?
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: Skiffe
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 10:22am
Originally posted by timnoyce
i posted it on the 12 foot skiff forum but got no reply.... Is the rudder on this boat standard in the 12's or is it a bit of an experiment? I still haven't got round to building my new rudder for the cherub so was wondering if there were any benefits to having one of this shape?
|
There are all shapes. Chord lengths of about 120mm -250mm. the short chord lenght is to stop cavitation at speed.they are all a bit of a one off.
------------- 12footers. The Only Way to FLY
Remember Professionals built the titanic, Amateurs built the ark.
|
Posted By: SARSIPPIUS
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 2:14pm
Originally posted by Blobby
"That series of shots was on the Favourite Pics thread about 6 weeks ago!"
|
Once again I think it a case of people taking pics and not giving credit where credit is due. Way to go to rubbish the actual person who took the pic!!!
|
Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 3:15pm
What is the PY of a 12ft skiff? Do they even use PY as their handicap in the southern hemisphere? What would it be?
------------- Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 3:32pm
Originally posted by Strawberry
What is the PY of a 12ft skiff? Do they even use PY as their handicap in the southern hemisphere? What would it be? |
To my knowledge the only States in AUS that publish PY numbers are Vic and SA and I don't think either has a signifcant 12 footer fleet. Vic rate the 12 tentatively at 92, where the I14 is 86.5 and B14 96.5, and FD 92.5.
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 4:51pm
92! that seems a little bit too slow doesn't it? Whats their relative
speed like upwind as i thought that they would be planing upwind in
just about all conditions.
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: m_liddell
Date Posted: 30 Jun 05 at 10:10pm
Originally posted by JimC
Originally posted by Strawberry
What is the PY of a 12ft skiff? Do they even use PY as their handicap in the southern hemisphere? What would it be? | To my knowledge the only States in AUS that publish PY numbers are Vic and SA and I don't think either has a signifcant 12 footer fleet. Vic rate the 12 tentatively at 92, where the I14 is 86.5 and B14 96.5, and FD 92.5. |
Their difference in PY between the I14 and B14 is interesting...
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 1:23am
Originally posted by Skiffe
Originally posted by timnoyce
i posted it on the 12 foot skiff forum but got no reply.... Is the rudder on this boat standard in the 12's or is it a bit of an experiment? I still haven't got round to building my new rudder for the cherub so was wondering if there were any benefits to having one of this shape?
|
There are all shapes. Chord lengths of about 120mm -250mm. the short chord lenght is to stop cavitation at speed.they are all a bit of a one off.
|
The narrow section is there to specifically reduce the drag due to the surface piercing effect. It uses exactly the same principal as the foils made by a certain Mr. Paterson at Bloodaxe for the 470's. The waisted section has narrower chord, finer radius leading edge and the maximum thickness further aft.
That particular foil is made by Alex Vallings of C-tech and he can mould you a nice shiny new one at a very reasonable price. (at least, the quote he gave me was reasonable).
|
Posted By: jakey
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 4:55am
Originally posted by Blobby
That series of shots was on the Favourite Pics thread about 6 weeks ago!
|
Yeh sorry about that. Only just started looking at this forum. I noticed that when the pics were originally posted people were asking questions as to why someone would have tried to beat the ferry. I took the photos...so I can tell you - they were coming down from the top mark on the first lap in 4th place. The mark they were aiming for was past a point that was to windward of their heading. If they had gone behind the ferry they have lost 10 places as a big pack was right behind them, as can be seen in the photo below, which was taken about 10 seconds later.
It took that pack about 1 minute to reach the spot where P&O was.
cheers
|
Posted By: jimmywalsh2
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 5:29am
The 12 is a hard boat to handicap as the variety of rigs allow it to be at maximum speed in any breeze, where most boats are slow in the light stuff and get faster as the breeze comes in.
As an example we have some older 14ft skiffs sailing with us and in the light breeze with our biggest rigs we would beat them by over 15-20 minutes in an hour race. When the breeze comes in we are only about 5-10 minutes faster. These boats would be about 20 minutes slower than a top 14ft skiff.
As another comparison we raced the same course as the Flying Dutchmen fleet, which included ex World champions so were top notch and we were on average 7-8% faster around the course.
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 01 Jul 05 at 6:22am
Originally posted by jakey
Originally posted by Blobby
That series of shots was on the Favourite Pics thread about 6 weeks ago!
|
Yeh sorry about that. Only just started looking at this forum. I noticed that when the pics were originally posted people were asking questions as to why someone would have tried to beat the ferry. I took the photos...so I can tell you - they were coming down from the top mark on the first lap in 4th place. The mark they were aiming for was past a point that was to windward of their heading. If they had gone behind the ferry they have lost 10 places as a big pack was right behind them, as can be seen in the photo below, which was taken about 10 seconds later.
It took that pack about 1 minute to reach the spot where P&O was.
cheers
|
No worries - I take it they made it?
|
|