Laurent Giles 'Jolly Boat' Exeter |
Laser XD 203301 Upminster |
J24 (Sail No. 4239) Dartmouth |
List classes of boat for sale |
Best rope for main halyard |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456> |
Author | |
Medway Maniac
Really should get out more Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Best rope for main halyard Posted: 17 Mar 09 at 5:48pm |
But with a 1:1 halyard, the tension in the halyard running down the mast is by definition the same as the tension in the bit of halyard tied to the sail-head (less any minimal losses due to friction in the pulley). You will therefore have 2xT compressing the mast at least between the mast-head pulley and the gooseneck area, assuming the cleat is at or below the gooseneck. Now, move your cleat up to the masthead (to effectively provide a halyard lock) and there's only 1xT acting between the mast-head and gooseneck area, namely that efected by the sail (we're neglecting standing rigging loads etc. here, obviously). Put a 2:1 on the sail head and dead-end it at the mast-head and we'll have a lower tension in the halyard. Thus the compressive force will be that produced by the sail plus the lower tension in the 2:1'd halyard, hence lower compression than with a simple 1:1 halyard. |
|
alstorer
Really should get out more Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 Mar 09 at 6:09pm |
If a 2:1 didn't reduce compression compared to a 1:1, it also wouldn't make it any easier to pull the sail up- the force involved, after all, comes from the same source...
|
|
-_
Al |
|
craiggo
Really should get out more Joined: 01 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1810 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 8:21am |
Yes & No.
Moving the halyard cleat up the mast reduces the exposed length of mast over which the force is acting. However multiple purchases will not reduce the overall force between the head of the sail and the block at the top of the mast, they simply divide the force up over all the runs out of the blocks. The overall force holding the sail up is still the same. Once the blocks are all block to block you loose most, if not all of your mechanical advantage and the load on the tail of the halyard running down the mast will become almost the same as the force holding the sail up. Your theory works absolutely fine assuming that you dont pull your main all the way up, however in doing this you expose much larger lengths of halyard to stretch. |
|
Medway Maniac
Really should get out more Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 9:45am |
In practice you don't get the 2:1 halyard "block -to-block" (there are no blocks, of course), and there are exposed lengths of halyard between the mast-top pulley and the sail head (I've never seen otherwise), so the halyard tension and compression remain reduced. But I think you've now got the point. |
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 9:58am |
MM is right. A cat-style halyard lock does reduce mast compression, as well as eliminate halyard stretch/slip. A 1:1 halyard has twice the compressive load of a halyard lock. A 2:1 halyard has 1.5 times the compressive load of a halyard lock, or 0.75 times the compressive load of a 1:1 system. Some of that gain will be lost due to system inefficiency, but there is still a gain. However, you do end up with another 6m of rope to stow!
Edited by Peaky |
|
Jamesd
Far too distracted from work Joined: 01 Feb 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 377 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 11:11am |
all this is confusing and im struggling to understand. I mean Peaky, since when has a halyard been used in compression? rope would buckle almost immediately in compression. i know, you mean the mast has compressive forces. with 100kN acting downwards on a mast from the sail you then have 50kN running down the mast in the halyard (if 2:1) therefore to resist the force the deck must produce a reaction, of 150kN, or the sail and mast will come out the bottom of the boat. the mast acts as a compressive member. thats all very well and good. but what about the 50kN acting downwards at the dead end of the knot at the top of the mast, that brings the total downward force to 200kN thus the compression in the mast must be 200kN which is the same as a 1:1. the 2:1 will be easier to pull up and would require less of a reaction to hold it up there (think of a mainsheet and the difference of 1:1 and multiple purchases), but mast compression does not change. locking the sail at the top of the mast reduces the compression as you can neglect the halyard loads acting downwards and therefore a smaller reaction is needed. I think thats all right, my head is spinning to be honest. Lol ive just confused myself even more. in reality though, though the compression forces acting down do not run down the centre of the mast. they are offset (the sail at the top) causing a moment and initiating a buckle in the mast and thus the trailing edge of the mast carries compressive load and the front edge will be under tension. plus there are many many more factors to think of, such as the fact the force on the sail is a vector not just a parrallel force |
|
Medway Maniac
Really should get out more Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 11:39am |
|
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 12:34pm |
Quite so. I have drawn a picture - sorry, I'm no artist! On the left is a standard 1:1 mast. Centre is a halyard lock. Right of picture is a 2:1 set up. Rather than drawing the masts I have assumed the head of the sail is suspended from the ceiling, just for clarity. So the tensions shown of 2000N, 1000N and 1500N are in fact compression forces own the mast.
|
|
JohnW
Really should get out more Joined: 17 Jul 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 552 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 1:06pm |
deleted - my head hurts
Edited by JohnW |
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 Mar 09 at 1:51pm |
Deleted reply to JohnW Edited by Peaky |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 23456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |