Laurent Giles 'Jolly Boat' Exeter |
J24 (Sail No. 4239) Dartmouth |
29er GBR 074 Tynemouth |
List classes of boat for sale |
Definition of Planing |
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Author | |
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Definition of Planing Posted: 01 Mar 19 at 7:33pm |
Rule 42.3c states Except on a beat to windward, when surfing (rapidly accelerating down the front of a wave) or planing is possible, the boat’s crew may pull in any sail in order to initiate surfing or planing, but each sail may be pulled in only once for each wave or gust of wind.
“Surfing” is defined in the rule, but “planing” is not, nor is it defined in the definitions section of the rules. For that matter neither is “gust”. I read the interpretations of Rule 42 on the WS website, but can’t see anything that defines planing (or gust), and I don’t believe either is as straightforward to define as may first appear. The WS interpretations do say that planing need not be successfully achieved, but it does have to be possible (and if you fail to get planing after more than two attempts are likely to have broken the rules). |
|
Daniel Holman
Really should get out more Joined: 17 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 997 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 01 Mar 19 at 8:46pm |
Planing is when a substantial part of displacement is supported by dynamic lift rather than bouyancy. Fn = 1 i.e. 12kts for a 14ft dinghy is where true planing can start. But for a canoe or catamaran which won't create lift it won't be planing. 12kts is pretty fast for most 14ft dinghies. I guess surfing is the more likely excuse for some kinetics, which is defined as presumably acceleration on a wave? How big is a wave etc etc. |
|
Sam.Spoons
Really should get out more Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3398 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 01 Mar 19 at 8:49pm |
So cat sailors can't pump to get planing
|
|
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 01 Mar 19 at 9:10pm |
Yes, but “substantial” isn’t very precise and linking it to Fn is not a definition, more a rule of thumb or convenience. Loads of Laser and RS200sailors would claim to be planing at much lower speeds than that. And yes, what constitutes a wave... |
|
Rupert
Really should get out more Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 01 Mar 19 at 9:45pm |
Surely the idea here is that the boat can break displacement wave forms and go faster than waterline length would normally allow? Hull shapes, weight and rig design will all affect a boat's ability to successfully go faster than displacement speed. Long thin hills don't create the same wave forms, so yes, I'd say that cats shouldn't be allowed to pump. Bet they do anyway.
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 19 at 7:52am |
So planing is sailing at any speed greater than “allowed” by waterline length, unless it’s long and thin? Pretty vague still, for the basis of enforcing a rule. Presumably the allowed speed would be Fn = 0.4 (where wavelength equals hull length), but that isn’t a hard barrier to speed in displacement mode, many dinghies can go faster than this upwind.
And anyway, why should you only be allowed to sheet in once per gust if it gets you planing (however defined)? Seems discriminatory against boats that would still accelerate without planing. |
|
Rupert
Really should get out more Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 19 at 9:06pm |
Why should it be allowed at all, do you mean? Sounds like adding a paddle stroke to me.
|
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 19 at 9:56pm |
Why shouldn’t everyone be allowed to sheet once per gust, regardless of whether you get planing? Seems sensible if no definition if planing exists, and why should only some boats be allowed to (try to) benefit?
|
|
Daniel Holman
Really should get out more Joined: 17 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 997 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 19 at 10:14pm |
If sailing properly, one should be adjusting sheets to every change in wind strength and direction / steering input / waver pertubation. When does an adjustment become a "pump" or some other kinetic grey area. I like kinetics its bloody skillful, and think that those like Paul Henderson who would seek to regulate it out entirely would remove a major part of the art.
|
|
Rupert
Really should get out more Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 03 Mar 19 at 7:41am |
Sheet adjustments and body movements are designed to make the most of conditions as they change, and as you say, they are (or will be if you concentrate) constant. Pumping is creating power by human means.
Much wiser minds than mine have failed to spot the difference. It can be impossible to tell even when sailing oneself whether a particular movement was making the most of conditions or creating them. Sometimes it is bleeding obvious, though! But I don't really think we should stop promoting increasing speed as wave conditions allow by not allowing limited body or mainsheet movement. Sailing is supposed to be fun, after all. |
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |