New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Luffing rights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Luffing rights

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 625
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Sep 15 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by Rupert

My unreliable memory tells me that even before mast abeam was removed you couldn't luff when overtaking from astern.

Yes, exactly. Because the w/ward boat had been ahead of mast abeam when the overlap was established. 

To luff as a leeward, overtaking boat, you had get to clear ahead, and then when WW established a new overlap, you could luff her. 
Back to Top
Brass View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 24 Mar 08
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 887
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 9:21pm
I don't wish to be rude, but technically, 'luff' and 'luffing' are highly ambiguous terms which have not been used or defined in the RRS since 1995.

Their use almost always causes confusion in rules discussions.

If you are talking and thinking in terms of 'luffing rights', then you are applying the wrong conceptual approach to the modern rules.

The issues here are simply:

* Has a windward boat kept clear;

* Has a leeward boat changing course towards the wind given a windward overlapped boat room to keep clear as required by rule 16; and

* Has a boat that has become overlapped to leeward from clear astern within two of her hull lengths sailed above her proper course contrary to rule 17.

As others have said, the old concept of luffing rights was probably meant to implement a basic human right of a boat ahead to 'protect her wind' or something.

That is still available through the ability of a right of way leeward boat to change course, subject to the limitations of rules 16 and 17.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5955
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 6:50pm
Yeah, its been the case since at least 1989 rules (earliest I have handy) that you couldn't luff when overtaking from leeward, but you could luff if you came up from below. And gosh, isn't the phrasing of the rules from back then clumsy. Don't let anyone tell you that pre rewrite rules were clearer and easier to follow...
Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8151
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 6:42pm
My unreliable memory tells me that even before mast abeam was removed you couldn't luff when overtaking from astern. I assume it has been kept all through from the IRPCS and overtaking boat keep clear. It also seems "fair", though as some rules don't, you can't always judge things by that.
Firefly 2324, Lightning 130, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 625
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 6:10pm
Originally posted by about a boat

Why is a boat (with luffing rights) allowed to push another up to head to wind? and;

IMHO, because after the abandonment of "mast abeam" hails in 97, you have to stop somewhere. HtW seems as good a place as any. Relatively easy to determine. 

Originally posted by about a boat

Why is the method of establishing the overlap so important as to give rise to this right? 

Again, without "mast abeam", a way of limiting the power of boats overtaking close to leeward was needed. 
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5955
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 12:57pm
Tradition is probably as good an answer as any...

But I suppose it was about blocking people who came from behind and attempted to take your wind.
Back to Top
about a boat View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 25 Oct 06
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 60
Post Options Post Options   Quote about  a boat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Sep 15 at 12:48pm
This might be a bit of a basic question. I understand how luffing rights are established by a leeward boat on a beat and do not have a problem with that. My two questions are:

Why is a boat (with luffing rights) allowed to push another up to head to wind? and;

Why is the method of establishing the overlap so important as to give rise to this right?

Thanks
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy