New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Scoring
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Scoring

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Andy K View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 03 Jun 14
Location: C I
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andy K Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Scoring
    Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 11:29am
Looking at the Frampton Enterprise Open Meeting, 7th Sept.
The skipper with 4,2,1,1 beat the skipper with 2,2,1,1.
Don't you think that the count-back rules need a bit of a looking at?
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 12:29pm
I depends on how they apply them. 

I seem to recall that you can modify how you do countback from the 'standard' most 1sts, most 2nds, Last race both boats sailed.

Looks like here they are saying the last race will be used as the first tie break point before most 1sts, mosts 3nds, etc...

The guy who was 2nd wrote the report so cannot have been too upset over it.
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 1:41pm
Rule 90.3 and Appendix A of the RRS.

Standard is as above (most 1sts, most 2nds as initial tie break then the last race).

I would imagine the SIs stated the scoring was to use last race as the tie break.
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Ian29937 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 25 May 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ian29937 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 1:56pm
This was scored as per standard.  The 4th was an excluded score so isn't included in the countback.
 
They tied on results
They had the same scores on countback (1,1,2)
The boat which won the last race won.
 
Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 2:19pm
Originally posted by Ian29937

This was scored as per standard.  The 4th was an excluded score so isn't included in the countback.
 
They tied on results
They had the same scores on countback (1,1,2)
The boat which won the last race won.
 

You are correct indeed correct!
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
Brass View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 24 Mar 08
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1146
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 2:59pm
Originally posted by jeffers

I seem to recall that you can modify how you do countback from the 'standard' most 1sts, most 2nds, Last race both boats sailed.

The problem here (such as it is) is not with the tie-breaker rules in Appendix A but with the 'number of races required for a drop' setting in the SI.

But 4 completed races for a drop in a 6 or 7 race series is pretty conventional.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6649
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 4:33pm
Yep. the current fashion in scoring systems is that an excluded race is completely excluded and isn't used as a tiebreak. You can make arguments both ways. In this case it made for a more exciting last race I think.
Back to Top
Ian29937 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 25 May 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
Post Options Post Options   Quote Ian29937 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 5:38pm
Why do we have discards in the first place? - My understanding was that it allowed for exceptional circumstances not to spoil someones event as a DNF/DNS can have a significant effect on a series result
e.g. If someone has an unexpected boat breakage or a delay in arriving at an event due to breakdown, accident etc or for longer series, personal reasons for not attending a number of races.
If you accept that these are reasonable exclusions, it seems logical that everyone should be able to discard the same number of races and that these should not be included in any count backs etc
Ian
Back to Top
gordon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Sep 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1037
Post Options Post Options   Quote gordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 14 at 9:04pm
Some events don't have discards - the Dragon Gold Cup never has, for instance.
Gordon
Back to Top
Andy K View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 03 Jun 14
Location: C I
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andy K Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Sep 14 at 8:57am
As I understand it, a competition should be won by the skipper with the best scores.
I don't really care about the current SI's
The guy with the best scores didn't win.
OK, all skippers knew the regs.regarding the race, but someone, somewhere, in time gone past, has tweaked these regs. And now it is as though it they set in stone.
They are not, and I still think that the wrong skipper won!!!!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy