Medal Races - poor format?
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: General
Forum Name: Olympic Sailing
Forum Discription: The top end racing in our sport
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4535
Printed Date: 25 Jun 25 at 9:34am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Medal Races - poor format?
Posted By: nutonthetiller
Subject: Medal Races - poor format?
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 7:21pm
I wonder what the feeling on the double scoring medal races format is? It seems to have back fired and what was meant to be an exciting climax for TV turns into a rather boring meaningless race with the first boat sailing the second down the pan. The end result is that the boat that deserves silver doesn't even get a medal. The Gold medal winner comes near to last. How easy is that for non sailors to understand? Another Olympic cock-up in my view.
It so far has worked out for GB but how would we all feel if a Silver Medal turns to dust for one of our boys?
It would be better to have a pursuit race where the boats start in order, and so the first boat across the line wins the Gold. Now that would be so much easier to understand.
|
Replies:
Posted By: ColH
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 7:37pm
I can't think of a better name, but I do think the term "medal race" is bad - until good ol' Bob has explained it countless times it is very easy (and reasonable) for someone to assume that it is THE race which decides the medals.
I'm not sure the double points has much to do with whether, in the one last race, A bounces B over the horizon or not. Surely that's a possibility at the end of any series?
Admittedly I've only been avidly watching the medal races (live), but that's largely because the wind has been better lately.
Don't understand your suggestion about a 'pursuit race' at all. Make no logical sense 
-------------
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 7:53pm
Be interesting to see what happens in the windsurfer medal race with all 3 front runners on the same score.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: Mark Jardine
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 8:09pm
I'm a big fan of the medal race - yes, it has seen someone in silver medal position end up sixth, but this has happened in only one of the medal races.
How can you beat the drama of the 470 men's race? Nick Rogers & Joe Glanfield were down and out after the first beat and weren't in the medal positions at all and stormed back to take silver - simply awesome!
I do think that the TV coverage needs a sidebar with live scoring / leaderboard based on current medal race positions - this way the public could see who's coming where. Surely this could be done with GPS data and a bit of software? (Mags, I'm looking at you!)
|
Posted By: laser4000
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 8:52pm
Originally posted by ColH
I can't think of a better name, but I do think the term "medal race" is bad - until good ol' Bob |
Who's Bob?
|
Posted By: ASok
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 9:00pm
Originally posted by nutonthetiller
rather boring meaningless race with the first boat sailing the second down the pan. |
Surely that would a possible tactic regardless?
-------------
|
Posted By: neilw
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 9:07pm
at least the medal race is easier to understand than the Madison
-------------
|
Posted By: Lukepiewalker
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 9:23pm
Nonsense, Madison makes perfect sense, just don't lose concentration for a moment, it takes about 10 minutes to find the place again. And they are much better 'in the flesh' when you can see the big picture. I digress... I think we have learned that the medal races work, as long as there is wind. Finn (Attempt 2), 470, Yngling all gave perfectly good medal races which made sense within the concept. When there was no wind Finn (Attempt 1), Laser, then the concept fell a bit flat as the risk of getting stuck in a hole and losing touch meant the close cover sailing backwards down the fleet was the prime approach. This catapulted the Swede down to 6th from silver, although strangely the positions when the Finn medal race was abandoned would have left Railey in silver. Without going into the precise details of why, the 49er race showed us what happens when all hell breaks loose. People are split over whether this was ultimately a good thing or a bad thing...
------------- Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch"
Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air"
Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile"
|
Posted By: Chew my RS
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 9:52pm
How about a radical overhaul of the whole race format at the Olympics? I propose a knockout system rather than a points series. Start with, say, 32 teams. After Race 1 only the top 16 go through to Race 2. Then only the first 8 go through to Race 3. Then the top 4 go through to a medal race. Then those 4 fight it out. One team finishes distraught in 4th and the others relatively happy. It encourages winning the final race rather than covering a large lead gained in the previous 10 races and would provide more drama. It would also be easier to follow.
------------- http://www.sailns14.org - http://www.sailns14.org - The ultimate family raceboat now available in the UK
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 19 Aug 08 at 10:53pm
Originally posted by Chew my RS
How about a radical overhaul of the whole race format at the Olympics? I propose a knockout system rather than a points series. Start with, say, 32 teams. After Race 1 only the top 16 go through to Race 2. Then only the first 8 go through to Race 3. Then the top 4 go through to a medal race. Then those 4 fight it out. One team finishes distraught in 4th and the others relatively happy. It encourages winning the final race rather than covering a large lead gained in the previous 10 races and would provide more drama. It would also be easier to follow. |
Might work as long as the races are in places with sensible wind!!!!!!!!!
maybe series for 4 races, drop 50% of the fleet (not probable that they would win a medal from that position anyway).
Now, do we reset the points, or carry thru?
Now do we do 4 more races and drop 50% more?
Means more organisation (less classes if we all have to start at 32 and we know how many problems that can cause!!!!)
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: nutonthetiller
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 7:31am
My suggestion of a pursuit style;e race would be that the points from the series give you a personal handicap. Rather like on the ITV Gladiators programme. So the leading boat goes on the first whistle etc.
|
Posted By: laserboy404
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 7:56am
I agree that the medal race and the double points system is flawed because it is too easy for someone to knock you right down the table, even if you have posted a consistent scoreline all week
------------- Laser 159392
Javelin 53
|
Posted By: laser4000
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 8:02am
I tihnk the medal race format works really well - we've seen: -
- the girlies just going faster,
- ben screwing the other guys start and then sailing away,
- goody doing a number on his opponent (fair enough given the potential for breeze drop out),
- 470 boys fantastically sailing themselves back onto to podium
- Bryony getting a fab bronze in a tactically challenging race
- Laser Radials - USA coming back from a disastrous start
- 49er destruction derby
What more do you want - we've had virtually every type of medal race you could imagine.. other than some crappy knockout which doesn't really reflect the complexities of sailing?
|
Posted By: Coolhand
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 10:33am
The issue for me is if you come into the race in Silver well clear of Bronze but a threat to the sailor in Gold you'll be sc*%wed - can't see how that fits in with the Olympic ethos.
IMHO much better to take in a point for your postion at the end of the fleet races, then add a point for your position at the end of the medal race. Lowest score wins with draws decided by posisition before the medal race.
|
Posted By: laser4000
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 11:15am
Originally posted by Coolhand
The issue for me is if you come into the race in Silver well clear of Bronze but a threat to the sailor in Gold you'll be sc*%wed - can't see how that fits in with the Olympic ethos. |
You all have such short memories - Athens '04 Mens 470s. Nick & Joe were in 1st, USA in silver clear of the bronze position. Nick / Joe just had to stop the USA sailing their race to get gold.. Tried to take them out, blew it and the yanks sailed off.
If you're in 'sliver' there's lots you can do to prevent getting stuiffed - if you outstart the gold then they've got to catch you first. If gold gets you in silver locked up with a minute to go then just infringe, do your donots and get a start..
|
Posted By: laser4000
Date Posted: 20 Aug 08 at 11:33am
Just read SA - and http://www.sailinganarchy.com/index_page1.php - Chris249 post on the medal r aces, got me thinking so howabout this idea..
- Normal series one throwout.
- 2-9 place in the series go through to the knockout round. 1st place as a bye in the first knockout
- Knock out round rules - 15 minute races max..must have a reaching finish...
- Rnd 1 - last 4 get binned
- Rnd 2 - winner of series is automatically in this round, races against 4 others - Medals decided on placings.
Good for tv and avoids "Paul is in 9th place in the medal race and will gold if it stays like this". Gives some advantage to winning the series as it means you only have to beat 2 boats to win a medal. ok doensn't beneifit the guy/girl in 2nd but hey.
Don't think this will lengthen the regatta much either...
.
|
Posted By: Spyderman
Date Posted: 21 Aug 08 at 3:37am
Originally posted by nutonthetiller
I wonder what the feeling on the double scoring medal races format is? It seems to have back fired and what was meant to be an exciting climax for TV turns into a rather boring meaningless race with the first boat sailing the second down the pan. The end result is that the boat that deserves silver doesn't even get a medal. The Gold medal winner comes near to last. How easy is that for non sailors to understand? Another Olympic cock-up in my view.
It so far has worked out for GB but how would we all feel if a Silver Medal turns to dust for one of our boys?
It would be better to have a pursuit race where the boats start in order, and so the first boat across the line wins the Gold. Now that would be so much easier to understand. |
http://rrsstudy.blogspot.com/2008/08/olympic-medal-races.html - Olympic Medal Races
In the articles and news stories about the Olympics, I read over and over again that we are viewing the first
Olympic Medal races. True enough, but a little derogative for all those
people who have developed the system in the last six years. A
lot of time, experiencing and rules tweaking has gone into getting to a
concept that works. I remember a SPA regatta four or five years ago
where the medal race was still an experiment. A lot got done since
then. By ISAF, by Rules Specialists, by the Sailors, by Race Management
and by Organizing Authorities. All to keep the sport of sailing into
the Olympics. It is very easy to have critique about what is
flawed about this concept and perhaps uninteresting to have an eye for
all the positive effect that it has. With all it's drama, in heartbreaking moments for losers and jubilations for the winners, it brings out the best in sailing.
Read the rest on: http://rrsstudy.blogspot.com/2008/08/olympic-medal-races.html - Olympic Medal Races
------------- Are you interested in the Racing Rules of Sailing? Go to: http://rrsstudy.blogspot.com - http://rrsstudy.blogspot.com
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 21 Aug 08 at 9:33pm
Surely Nick Dempsey's fate shows the folly of a double-points medal race, and not (just) because he's a Brit.
After a week's sailing, he was in line for a medal, but thanks to a farcically short medal race, shortened due to a wind shift, he missed out.
Surely the event should be staged in such a way as to sort out the sailors in order of ability as fairly as possible, so that the best sailor wins the gold, the next best the silver and so forth?
The double-points medal race introduces a chance factor (emphasizing one race's result just because it's the last) which tends to randomize the results in the name of 'spectacle'. Hardly appropriate given the effort the the competitors have put in over the four preceding years.
------------- http://www.wilsoniansc.org.uk" rel="nofollow - Wilsonian SC
http://www.3000class.org.uk" rel="nofollow - 3000 Class
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 21 Aug 08 at 11:55pm
For those who are interested I've (using the wonderful Sailwave) reworked the Olympics results using standard series scoring, giving average points to those who didn't sail the medal race.
http://www.devboats.co.uk/olympics08.htm - http://www.devboats.co.uk/olympics08.htm
|
Posted By: laser4000
Date Posted: 22 Aug 08 at 7:25am
Originally posted by Medway Maniac
Surely Nick Dempsey's fate shows the folly of a double-points medal race, and not (just) because he's a Brit.
After a week's sailing, he was in line for a medal, but thanks to a farcically short medal race, shortened due to a wind shift, he missed out.
Surely the event should be staged in such a way as to sort out the sailors in order of ability as fairly as possible, so that the best sailor wins the gold, the next best the silver and so forth?
The double-points medal race introduces a chance factor (emphasizing one race's result just because it's the last) which tends to randomize the results in the name of 'spectacle'. Hardly appropriate given the effort the the competitors have put in over the four preceding years. |
We all know what you're saying but you need to contrast that with the 'need' to make sailing TV friendly. The medal race seemed to be the best compromise at the time to valuing the series but then going for a 'final'
Yes there are more variabilities in sailing than virtually any other olympic sport, but if you turn on the tv and watcht the other sports they all have either heats, qualifying or knockout and then you have a 'winner takes all final' - .e.g. track and field, rowing, cycling etc etc..
The problem it generates is that you then get Simmonds having to explaing "it doesn't matter if Perce/Bart finish in 5th provided they are ahead of the swedes they win gold"...which to us makes sense..to 'armchair fan' doesnt..
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 22 Aug 08 at 8:24am
Originally posted by laser4000
if you turn on the tv and watcht the other sports they all have either heats, qualifying or knockout and then you have a 'winner takes all final' - .e.g. track and field, rowing, cycling etc etc.. |
Archery, shooting, the throwing comps on the field, gymanstics, diving, equestrian, modern pantahlon, decathlon, triathlon are I think all events which depend on a cumulative score like sailing does... As does the often quoted Formula one of course. Its not that hard a topic. There's an argument for using a high score points system not a low one of course.
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 22 Aug 08 at 9:42am
Originally posted by laser4000
The problem it generates is that you then get Simmonds having to explaing "it doesn't matter if Perce/Bart finish in 5th provided they are ahead of the swedes they win gold"...which to us makes sense..to 'armchair fan' doesnt..
|
Maybe doesn't help make it thrilling, though I think most sports fans can cope with cumulative scores.
If we really 'have' to spoil our sport at its highest level by making it more TV friendly (and I really wonder if sailing can ever be that), then I think the earlier suggestion of a pursuit race is not a bad one. It's what they were doing in the final run in the Modern Decathlon, I noticed, and while one could argue forever about the correct separation between starts to allow for the previously accumulated points, the situation is clear for all and the excitement undeniable.
You'd need a big course, however, with minimal lapping and lots of angles to allow for windshifts. In fact I'd like to watch it, not as a medal-decider but as a bonus fun event, maybe. To add contention you could even add PY and mix the classes! But I'm going too far...
------------- http://www.wilsoniansc.org.uk" rel="nofollow - Wilsonian SC
http://www.3000class.org.uk" rel="nofollow - 3000 Class
|
Posted By: nutonthetiller
Date Posted: 23 Aug 08 at 11:19am
In the modern pentathlon the scores obtained from the first 4 events gives you a score which you carry in to the run. The first one over the line gets the gold. Easy to understand, why not in sailing?
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 23 Aug 08 at 12:33pm
Originally posted by nutonthetiller
...score which you carry in to the run. The first one over the line gets the gold |
Its an interesting idea: score on total elapsed time rather than places, and make the last race a pursuit. The only concern is that the fastest would start first in the pursuit, so it might be a rather processional race - indeed Ben Ainslie might well finish before the last folks have started.
Tactics would change quite a lot if the races were on total elapsed time, not places - much less tacking to a safe covering position and that sort of thing.
The Whitbread round the world used to score like that but they abandoned it. I think the trouble was that after 6 or 7 legs people got so far ahead that it was almost game over. I think it would probably work best with no more than two or three race series so no-one could get that far ahead - like skiing events.
It would be an interesting thing to try for a club series or a one day event like the Tiger trophy... Bags I not be on the committee boat if there are 100 starters though!
|
|