Final Positions?
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: General
Forum Name: Racing Rules
Forum Discription: Discuss the rules and your interpretations here
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2909
Printed Date: 25 Jun 25 at 3:17am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Final Positions?
Posted By: rogerd
Subject: Final Positions?
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 8:31am
Yesterday we had a three race event with two to count. Your comments appreciated.
Boat A. finished 3rd. 1st . 2nd.
Boat B finished 5th 2nd 1st.
With discards both have three points. Who wins the series. |
|
|
Replies:
Posted By: Contender 541
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 8:35am
Boat A on countback.
In case of a tie, split them on the discard scores. If there is still a tie after that then generally its a tie, although I have known this (rare) situation to be solved on the toss of a coin!
------------- When you find a big kettle of crazy it's probably best not to stir it - Pointy Haired Boss
Crew on 505 8780
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:00am
Boat B is claiming that the final race result is taken and discards are not counted. |
|
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:01am
but he would wouldnt he |
|
|
Posted By: Mark Jardine
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:16am
I think boat B wins, discards don't really count in this. Here are the two applicable rules:
A8 SERIES TIES
A8.1 If there is a series score tie between two or more boats, each boat’s
race scores shall be listed in order of best to worst, and at the first
point(s) where there is a difference the tie shall be broken in favour of
the boat(s) with the best score(s). No excluded scores shall be used.
A8.2 If a tie remains between two or more boats, they shall be ranked
in order of their scores in the last race. Any remaining ties shall be
broken by using the tied boats’ scores in the next-to-last race and so
on until all ties are broken. These scores shall be used even if some of
them are excluded scores.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:17am
Unless your SIs say something different Boat B is correct. Read Appendix A. At the moment discards aren't taken into account at all.
A8 SERIES TIES
A8.1 If there is a series score tie between two or more boats, each boat’s
race scores shall be listed in order of best to worst, and at the first
point(s) where there is a difference the tie shall be broken in favour of
the boat(s) with the best score(s). No excluded scores shall be used.
A8.2 If a tie remains between two or more boats, they shall be ranked
in order of their scores in the last race. Any remaining ties shall be
broken by using the tied boats’ scores in the next-to-last race and so
on until all ties are broken. These scores shall be used even if some of
them are excluded scores.. |
|
Posted By: KnightMare
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:21am
it al depends on what is set out in the sailing club (SSI's) we have a weird thing at our club where the open events SSI's say final race and the club racing is count back... has changed positions...
------------- http://theramblingsofmyinnergeek.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 9:25am
Mark & Jim.
Thankyou. That clarifies the situation even though its not the result I want to hear. I was boat A. Things got a little heated between boat B and the OOD yesterday so I said I would look into it and abide by the current rules. To be honest I was chuffed to be in the running at all. |
|
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 10:16am
You should have nailed boat B on the start line and then sat on him ...
Then you'd not be asking this question.
(assuming the winner of race 1 was not in the picture ...)
-------------
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 10:18am
Originally posted by rogerd
That clarifies the situation even though its not the result I want to hear. I was boat A. |
It changes regularly. In 2004 boat A would have won. The tie break rules change fairly regularly as ISAF juggle them when people come up with clever ways of exploiting the rules with what's seen as undesirable results. Should you have a few hours with nothing better to do you *could* go back through ISAF meeting minutes and find the logic.
Its a useful lesson - no RC should act without double checking the rule book because it might have changed since last time they read it.
Funnily enough it came up in a Open at my club this weekend too, 1,2,3,1 beat 2,1,1,2. What made it particularly ironic was that 2,1,1,2 was the guy who wrote the SIs that said standard appendix A and thus cost him the 1st place.
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 10:47am
Moral victory to Mr Roger D. in the blue corner. The other bloke's a cad.
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 10:51am
Originally posted by rogerd
Mark & Jim.
Thankyou. That clarifies the situation even though its not the result I want to hear. I was boat A. Things got a little heated between boat B and the OOD yesterday so I said I would look into it and abide by the current rules. To be honest I was chuffed to be in the running at all. |
|
|
OOuch, seems unfair to me. My sympathies. Pierre's right, You're the moral victor .
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 11:31am
Originally posted by JimC
Funnily enough it came up in a Open at my club this weekend too, 1,2,3,1 beat 2,1,1,2. What made it particularly ironic was that 2,1,1,2 was the guy who wrote the SIs that said standard appendix A and thus cost him the 1st place. |
Again ... if you are sitting on a 2,1,1 there is no way they other guy should have been able to win the final race ...
-------------
|
Posted By: 422797
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 1:10pm
I think 'no way the other guy should have been able to win the final race' is probably a bit strong. Even the very best sailors in the world could not absolutely 100% stop someone beating them.
Take your point though!
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 2:49pm
I feel I have to qualify.This was handicap racing he was in a YW Dayboat and I had to beat him by some distance to win on Handicap in a Wayfarer. The Daybarge as we affectionately call them has a bit of an advantage on our puddle so I was pleased to get the result I did. Add to that my crap start in the final race I needed to finish 6 minutes ahead of him and finished about four and a half ahead.
Life is full of if onlys.......... ho hum |
|
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 3:00pm
Originally posted by rogerd
I feel I have to qualify.This was handicap racing he was in a YW Dayboat and I had to beat him by some distance to win on Handicap in a Wayfarer. The Daybarge as we affectionately call them has a bit of an advantage on our puddle so I was pleased to get the result I did. Add to that my crap start in the final race I needed to finish 6 minutes ahead of him and finished about four and a half ahead.
Life is full of if onlys.......... ho hum |
|
|
I had assumed class racing ... but ...
As the owner of the faster boat you could of sat on him hard, if he escaped use your speed to get back in front and then do it again and again ...
-------------
|
Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 3:53pm
Sorry if this just shows I've never sailed in handicap races (or many fleet races for that matter!) but would that not just mean the slow boat comprehensively beats the fast boat and you're in the same position, but with a bigger discard for the fast boat? Edit: Or is the aim solely to prevent the slow boat getting first place?
------------- RS800 GBR848
Weston SC
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 4:27pm
I see no point in sitting on a boat that i need to beat by a substantial margin on the water to beat him on handicap. That would just give him the race. If I hadnt let him get away ahead of me he wouldnt have slowed me down up the first beat I might have got away far enough to beat him by the required time. |
|
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 4:37pm
Frankly, I find the idea of sitting on someone hard pretty unsporting, and liable to lead to bad feeling - we're not professionals and are in this for fun after all.
I thought racing was all about finding the best sailor, and to my mind the better sailor is the one who can sail his boat fastest round the course, not the one who can use the rules to b*gg*r people up.
Sympathies to Rogerd, you are indeed the moral victor. Time for the ISAF to change the rules to obviate the need to b*gg*r people up.
------------- http://www.wilsoniansc.org.uk" rel="nofollow - Wilsonian SC
http://www.3000class.org.uk" rel="nofollow - 3000 Class
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 4:43pm
Originally posted by CurlyBen
Sorry if this just shows I've never sailed in handicap races (or many fleet races for that matter!) but would that not just mean the slow boat comprehensively beats the fast boat and you're in the same position, but with a bigger discard for the fast boat?
|
You would be able to sail the slow boat down the fleet (in handicap terms); and if they did escape you can just catch them up again. you would bea ble to keep them in dirty air for the whole race; It would work if the other boat would lose if the result of this race was a big discard for the slow boat (and a worse discard) for the fast boat. Basically if the series was to be split on discards and the fast boat has a better discard going into this race, then the fast boat can sail the slow boat down the fleet so ensuring the slow boat has to count their (worse) discard as both boats will take this race as their discard.
So in summary, it would work !
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 5:00pm
I personally wouldn't feel comfortable about doing that in a club handicap race. Its hardly the way to maintain the respect of your competitors.
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 5:05pm
Originally posted by JimC
I personally wouldn't feel comfortable about doing that in a club handicap race. Its hardly the way to maintain the respect of your competitors. |
Plus there's lions very near where Roger sails Could turn nasty.
|
Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 30 Apr 07 at 6:29pm
I guessed the idea (roughly) shortly after I wrote that post but I thought I'd leave it up just to make sure I'd got the right idea. However, whilst probably not a problem in this example and dependant on the split of fleets in handicap racing, I would think this could be tricky in higher performance boats. For example, windy day and a very mixed assymetric fleet, if a 49er is trying to control a 2000 things could get very entertaining for the 9er, especially trying to go downwind without the kite. I suppose in some ways it would be like team racing, trying to prevent yourself getting seperated from the action!
------------- RS800 GBR848
Weston SC
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 01 May 07 at 4:55pm
As you say Jim off the water we are good friends so have to agree. On the day however most people had gone home leaving the three in contention to fight it out so in this situation I had to sail fast. No fleet to sail him down and he is a crafty b***er so my only option was to go for a win. |
|
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 01 May 07 at 4:56pm
Oh, and P we reserve the Lions for the fishermen. |
|
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 09 May 07 at 4:46pm
Everyone is being very kind to you Roger, saying you were the Moral victor and all, but lets face it, if you decided to sail a Waybarge at Shearwater you were lucky to come 2nd of 3, even, and deserved to come 4th! Where was your Hornet?!
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 11 May 07 at 12:47pm
Rupert.
Hornet at Shearwater... dont be silly. Your welcome to try of course. |
|
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 11 May 07 at 12:52pm
This is part of the game ... the Anslie/Schite showdown in Sydney was the only bit of coverage from the games that really got any media coverage.
Although this level of desire to win is probably a bit OTT in a club handicap race ... but then again if your don't want to race then just cruise ...
-------------
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 11 May 07 at 8:44pm
Originally posted by Guest#260
This is part of the game ... the Anslie/Schite showdown in Sydney was the only bit of coverage from the games that really got any media coverage. |
Surely 'Scheidt' ?!!!
But I thought the aim of sailing races was to find the fastest sailor, not the best lawyer?
We all love Ben, but personally I'd have been ashamed to win using those tactics. OK, it's the Olympics and they're all professionals, but imho anyone using those tactics at club level would be a tw@
------------- http://www.wilsoniansc.org.uk" rel="nofollow - Wilsonian SC
http://www.3000class.org.uk" rel="nofollow - 3000 Class
|
Posted By: Lukepiewalker
Date Posted: 11 May 07 at 9:03pm
Did Robert Scheidt not do the same thing to Ainslie at Savannah in '96?
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 11 May 07 at 10:19pm
There's a whole world of difference between a close covering game between equal boats than between boats of radically different speeds. For one Laser to be able to sit on another and cover them to the back of the fleet takes skill. For (to take an extreme example) a 49er to cover a Solo to the back of the fleet would take very little skill and be pretty damn close to unsportsmanlike.
It certainly wouldn't be winning by sailing better in any shape or form, and is perilously close to not competing "in compliance with recognised principles of sportsmanship and fair play", and the penalty or that is a guaranteed series losing DND.
|
Posted By: Garry
Date Posted: 13 May 07 at 2:57pm
I can't see why a faster boat would want to sail a slower boat down the fleet in handicap racing. Firstly you don't know the final positions until the times have been corrected and secondly the relative positions between the boats gets worse for the fast boat the longer the race goes on for. Can someone show me some actual scoring that demonstrates this would work, i.e a series where in the last race the fast boat is last and the slow boat is in the bottom 50% of the fleet and the fast boat would win. Or if this scenario requires the slow boat to be second to last how will you know when to stop messing around and get back to racing?
------------- Garry
Lark 2252, Contender 298
www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk
|
Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 14 May 07 at 2:26pm
If you're leading (excluding discard) before a final race, with only 2 boats in contention then obviously, the other team has to improve their score to beat you. If you can stop them doing that - you'll still be in front no matter where you finish. So in any series where there's a discard, and you're beating them before the last race, sailing them out of contention can succeed.
You can even use it to beat a boat that's generally done the best and probably would win. For example Imagine a 50 boat Nationals 6 races, 5 to count:
Boat A has 1- 1- 15 - 1 - 1 Total before last race 19 but after discard 4pts
Boat B Has 2 - 3 - 5 - 2 - 6 Total before last Race 18 but after discard 12pts
So if in the last race, Boat B can force Boat A to 15th or worse, Boat B still finishes with 18 and wins over Boat A who's still on 19.
I totally agree that it's very unsporting to do that to a much slower boat.
|
Posted By: Garry
Date Posted: 15 May 07 at 7:58pm
But in handicap racing your on the water position is NOT your finishing position, and if, as suggested its the faster boat sailing the slower boat to the back you increase the probability that the slower boat will beat you on handicap. So this strategy can not work in handicap racing, unless you bury the slow boat at the start and then sail very fast - but you won't know if its worked until after the times have been calculated. and if, as suggested you just sailed the slow boat backwards and you finished 16th the slow boat would finish behind on the water but ahead on handicap then you've given away your position.
In the Lark for a 50 minute race I have to be some 2.5 minutes ahead of an Enterprise to beat it, so say I waste 15 minutes sailing them to the back, I've now got to achieve a 2.5 minute lead in the remaining 35 minutes sailing back through the slower boats and the Ent sailor must be as good as me otherwise I wouldn't bother. Boatspeed differential will only get me about 2 minutes - where does the rest of the time come from?
------------- Garry
Lark 2252, Contender 298
www.cuckoos.eclipse.co.uk
|
Posted By: andymck
Date Posted: 15 May 07 at 11:23pm
Must admit i need a new rule book, but are a discard and an excluded race the same? If they are not then appendix A reads differently, and the way we were used to.
------------- Andy Mck
|
Posted By: gordon
Date Posted: 17 May 07 at 9:28am
Andymck,
Can you find any use of the word "discard" in Appendix A? The rules only refer to excluded races.
Gordon
------------- Gordon
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 17 May 07 at 12:47pm
Originally posted by Garry
But in handicap racing your on the water position is NOT your finishing position, and if, as suggested its the faster boat sailing the slower boat to the back you increase the probability that the slower boat will beat you on handicap. So this strategy can not work in handicap racing, unless you bury the slow boat at the start and then sail very fast - but you won't know if its worked until after the times have been calculated. and if, as suggested you just sailed the slow boat backwards and you finished 16th the slow boat would finish behind on the water but ahead on handicap then you've given away your position.
In the Lark for a 50 minute race I have to be some 2.5 minutes ahead of an Enterprise to beat it, so say I waste 15 minutes sailing them to the back, I've now got to achieve a 2.5 minute lead in the remaining 35 minutes sailing back through the slower boats and the Ent sailor must be as good as me otherwise I wouldn't bother. Boatspeed differential will only get me about 2 minutes - where does the rest of the time come from?
|
You are missing the whole point of the post above; I'll make it more extreame to make it obvious what we are trying to explain....
Fast boat has 1,1,2,2, 3,3 to count
Slow boat has 2,2,1,3,1,9 to count in a fleet of 50 boats on hanicap.
So in order to win the series, slow boat must score better than 3rd in the last race to win (so discarding the 9 and beating the 3 that fast boat is counting).
If fast boat sails slow down the fleet all the way around the course by covering them all the time, fast boat should be able to ensure that slow ends up with worse then 3rd. Fast boats position in the last race will not count(remember thar are countinmg a 3). The best plan for fast boat is to sail slow boat down the fleet as then have CONTROL over this.
The only other way to ensure winning the series is to win the last race and this is not totally under their control. Slowing down the slow boat is under their control.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: andymck
Date Posted: 18 May 07 at 9:43pm
Gordon, as you will see from my post I cant read appendix A, as I dont have a rule book!
Is a discard now called an excluded race?
Seems that natural justice should suppport the boat that did better in the event overall, rather than the one that was less consistent in a tie situation, I expect that this is just another attempt to make the Olyimpics on more exciting on the last day, and not about finding the best overall sailor.
AndyMck
------------- Andy Mck
|
Posted By: gordon
Date Posted: 19 May 07 at 1:11am
The rules are all available on www.sailing.org
Races are now excluded rather than discarded. The first tie break (best to worst) does not count excluded races, the second tie-break (result of last race) does.
Clubs can adopt their own scoring system. They can, for instance, decide that, for club racing, series ties will not be broken and prizes/trophies shared.
------------- Gordon
|
|