Brave New World
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: General
Forum Name: Banter
Forum Discription: For all those non-sailing related discussions
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2449
Printed Date: 18 Aug 25 at 12:49am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Brave New World
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Subject: Brave New World
Date Posted: 21 Nov 06 at 9:14pm
Stole this from a guy's sig on another forum:
Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
The result of that thinking is just so prevalent at our General Committee meetings. All talk of RIB's, safety cover, electrical and CORGI checks on the club-house, entertainment licences just to play a ghetto blaster, fire regs. Sometimes I just want to shout 'but this is a sailing club!'
Still, it's more jobs for so-called public servants, I guess.
|
Replies:
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 08 Dec 06 at 4:33pm
Oi!
I'm a public servant, I'm also bigger than you and I know where you live, so watch it! 
|
Posted By: mike ellis
Date Posted: 08 Dec 06 at 5:16pm
ive heard that before somewhere
------------- 600 732, will call it Sticks and Stones when i get round to it.
Also International 14, 1318
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 09 Dec 06 at 12:44am
Originally posted by No. 5
Oi!
I'm a public servant, I'm also bigger than you and I know where you live, so watch it! 
|
And I used to be one, so I know whereof I speak... Only democratisation of the promotion system could save the public service imho.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 09 Dec 06 at 12:21pm
Originally posted by Medway Maniac
Sometimes I just want to shout 'but this is a sailing club!'
Still, it's more jobs for so-called public servants, I guess. |
Actually I blame the journos... You can hardly blame the bureaucrats for not being willing to say, when Jeremy Paxman gets into full saracastic mode about why "something wasn't done":-
"Yeah, someone got hurt, sh*t happens. Think of it as evolution in action"
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 1:08pm
Originally posted by turnturtle
Originally posted by JimC
Originally posted by Medway Maniac
Sometimes I just want to shout 'but this is a sailing club!'
Still, it's more jobs for so-called public servants, I guess.
| Actually I blame the journos... You can hardly blame the bureaucrats for not being willing to say, when Jeremy Paxman gets into full saracastic mode about why "something wasn't done":-
"Yeah, someone got hurt, sh*t happens. Think of it as evolution in action" |
absolutely! the irony is I'd be willing to go out and vote for someone who actually said that...
|
Yes I see where you're coming from TT, but it will then swing the other way and we'll get the "Vicky Pollard" yeah but no but yeah but no but muppets who put everything down to Darwinism and can't accept responsibility for anything. Nobody seems to have any balanced judgement these days. Now when I were a lad ...............
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 1:41pm
I know where you're coming from MM, not all civil servants are useless bureaucrats though.
|
Posted By: English Dave
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 2:22pm
I'm not a bureaucrat but two out of three ain't bad
------------- English Dave
http://www.ballyholme.com - Ballyholme Yacht Club
(You'd think I'd be better at it by now)
Hurricane 5.9 SX
RS700
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 4:39pm
Originally posted by No. 5
I know where you're coming from MM, not all civil servants are useless bureaucrats though. |
Absolutely not No.5: most of my colleagues really wanted to do a proper job, but were often thwarted by their amoral, target and promotion-seeking 'superiors', who simply didn't want to know about job quality - that wasn't being assessed and just got in the way of the quantity!
Had we been able to vote for our bosses, on the other hand, we wouldn't have taken the easy option but would have elected someone we knew understood what was required and would appreciate us achieving it. If he/she then voted for their boss and so on the whole thing could have become a public service worthy of the name.
Sorry, everybody, for the rant, but it's where your money is going and you could be getting better value for money and happier officials to boot...
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by Medway Maniac
Absolutely not No.5: most of my colleagues really wanted to do a proper job, but were often thwarted by their amoral, target and promotion-seeking 'superiors', who simply didn't want to know about job quality - that wasn't being assessed and just got in the way of the quantity!
Had we been able to vote for our bosses, on the other hand, we wouldn't have taken the easy option but would have elected someone we knew understood what was required and would appreciate us achieving it. If he/she then voted for their boss and so on the whole thing could have become a public service worthy of the name.
|
It sounds rather like you worked for the same part of the civil service as me- but I expect its the same everywhere.
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 11 Dec 06 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by Medway Maniac
Sorry, everybody, for the rant, but it's where your money is going and you could be getting better value for money and happier officials to boot...
|
I quite agree.
As TT says, It would help if our supposed superiors didn't keep t!tting about with pointless re-branding and marketing of non-commercial organisations, amongst other things.
|
Posted By: tack'ho
Date Posted: 13 Dec 06 at 4:34pm
To hopelessly mis-quote 'Field of Dreams'
"Give them a job and they will vote for you"
Socialist big government policy.
Think I'll go and leap through another hoop.
------------- I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
Posted By: Hector
Date Posted: 18 Dec 06 at 5:55pm
Holiday Greetings to Everyone
Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, nonaddictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter/summer solstice holiday, practiced with the most enjoyable traditions of religious persuasion or secular practices of your choice with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.
I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2007, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make our country great (not to imply that it is necessarily greater than any other country) and without regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee.
By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms:
This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others and is void where prohibited by law, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.
Disclaimer: No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced.

|
Posted By: mike ellis
Date Posted: 18 Dec 06 at 6:28pm
very good, ive stolen it and sent it around
------------- 600 732, will call it Sticks and Stones when i get round to it.
Also International 14, 1318
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 19 Dec 06 at 10:19am
Originally posted by turnturtle
Can't really complain though- moving the aim of the game was good for us; it always meant there was another big bucks/low ROI re-br
anding exercise around the corner for the private sector to implement at the tax payer's expense.... just hurts a bit now the boot's on the other foot.
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6159194.stm - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6159194.stm
So thats where it all goes the keep TT in boats fund.
|
Posted By: Merlinboy
Date Posted: 19 Dec 06 at 3:40pm
All ill say is
Thatchers Britain !!!!!
I know where you are coming from i heard grumblings that our club is going to start something to make sure children are protected whilst doing there rya training, and what to do with allogations of kiddy fiddling I mean for pittys sake!
The kids are with there parents whilst training, oh and there was something about being in the changing rooms at the same time!!! What the F!$k
-------------
|
|