F18's sign on as SCHRS 1.00???
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Multihulls
Forum Name: Dinghy multihulls
Forum Discription: For those who prefer two (or more) hulls to one!
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2235
Printed Date: 29 Jun 25 at 9:01am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: F18's sign on as SCHRS 1.00???
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Subject: F18's sign on as SCHRS 1.00???
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 2:40pm
I have heard mutterings that at a recent event on the south coast the F18’s were made to sign on with a SCHRS rating of 1.00 any truth in it ScoobySi or is it just that - a rumour? 
------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Replies:
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 2:51pm
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
I have heard mutterings that at a recent event on the south coast the F18’s were made to sign on with a SCHRS rating of 1.00 any truth in it ScoobySi or is it just that - a rumour?  |
I've no info on that.
Currently the SCHRS website shows 1.01. As I have said before we are working on changes to the SCHRS formula and as a result some handicaps will change.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 3:01pm
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
I've no info on that.
Currently the SCHRS website shows 1.01.
|
That’s the first place I looked and the last news update was on 18th Jan 2004 and you are not the UK Rep, so thought I had better ask if I wanted a prompt reply!
------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Posted By: Worthy
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 3:43pm
I have heard of that change, and I have sailed under 1.00 this year. I first heard about it at the Ally Pally boat show but I have not seen any official documentation.
I didn't want to mention it in the dart hawk conversation so as not to add confusion.
-------------
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 3:46pm
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
I've no info on that.
Currently the SCHRS website shows 1.01.
|
That’s the first place I looked and the last news update was on 18th Jan 2004 and you are not the UK Rep, so thought I had better ask if I wanted a prompt reply!
|
Well, we are sorting out the rule first before the website (I have no access or control over the website anyway which is a shame).
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: SX Girl
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 4:06pm
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
I have heard mutterings that at a recent event on the south coast the F18’s were made to sign on with a SCHRS rating of 1.00 any truth in it ScoobySi or is it just that - a rumour?  |
It appears you are right Port End Flyer!
http://www.weston.org.uk/site/news/archive/2006/FBR0806.htm - http://www.weston.org.uk/site/news/archive/2006/FBR0806.htm
I've also heard from another SX sailor that 1.00 was used at Eastbourne Sovereign SC Cat Open.
I wonder what they will be using at the Forts this weekend?
|
Posted By: Dermot M
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 4:43pm
I noticed that a few weeks ago. I also noticed that one SX was listed at 1 and another at 1.01.
------------- Dermot
Shadow 075
|
Posted By: SX Girl
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 4:53pm
Yeah I saw that too, not sure why
|
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 4:53pm
Originally posted by Worthy
I didn't want to mention it in the dart hawk conversation so as not to add confusion. |
How does the latest police caution go?
………not mentioning something that you later rely on in court…….

------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Posted By: Worthy
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 5:44pm
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
Originally posted by Worthy
I didn't want to mention it in the dart hawk conversation so as not to add confusion. |
How does the latest police caution go?
………not mentioning something that you later rely on in court…….

|
bugger   
-------------
|
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Date Posted: 21 Sep 06 at 6:49pm
Originally posted by SX Girl
I wonder what they will be using at the Forts this weekend |
Good 
------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Posted By: sailwave
Date Posted: 22 Sep 06 at 10:08am
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
I have heard mutterings that at a recent event on the south coast the F18’s were made to sign on with a SCHRS rating of 1.00 any truth in it ScoobySi or is it just that - a rumour?  |
The French seem to have gone that way too; this from the International A-Class forum in April 06.
Some modest news: the French official sailing organisation (FFV), formally an adopter of the ISAF-rating system, has issued a new list of ratings on its own website http://www.ffvoile.net/ffv/public/voile_legere1/cata/ratings.pdf - http://www.ffvoile.net/ffv/public/voile_legere1/cata/ratings .pdf Therein, the A-cat is mentioned as needing an individual rating but... the F18 rating has gone down from 101 to 100. This means that some recognition is slowly dripping into this rating system that the F18 is underrated and that the gap with the other classes needed a (though modest) adjustment. The justification for the adjustment is attributed to the use of the self-tacking jib so I read somewhere...
Interesting point now is that the ISAF website does not (yet) announce a new rating list for 2006. It becomes even more interesting if we know that Olivier Bovyn is not only the Chairman of the ISAF Multihull Committee (responsible for the ISAF rating) but equally member of the Board of the French sailing association. And both associations are now using different ratings? Any answers available somewhere?
By the way, I e-mailed the person as suggested above, no answer till now...
|
http://p105.ezboard.com/faclasscatamaranforumfrm2.showMessage?topicID=78.topic - http://p105.ezboard.com/faclasscatamaranforumfrm2.showMessag e?topicID=78.topic
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 22 Sep 06 at 10:16am
Originally posted by sailwave
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
I have heard mutterings that at a recent event on the south coast the F18’s were made to sign on with a SCHRS rating of 1.00 any truth in it ScoobySi or is it just that - a rumour?  |
The French seem to have gone that way too; this from the International A-Class forum in April 06.
Some modest news: the French official sailing organisation (FFV), formally an adopter of the ISAF-rating system, has issued a new list of ratings on its own website http://www.ffvoile.net/ffv/public/voile_legere1/cata/ratings.pdf - http://www.ffvoile.net/ffv/public/voile_legere1/cata/ratings .pdf Therein, the A-cat is mentioned as needing an individual rating but... the F18 rating has gone down from 101 to 100. This means that some recognition is slowly dripping into this rating system that the F18 is underrated and that the gap with the other classes needed a (though modest) adjustment. The justification for the adjustment is attributed to the use of the self-tacking jib so I read somewhere...
Interesting point now is that the ISAF website does not (yet) announce a new rating list for 2006. It becomes even more interesting if we know that Olivier Bovyn is not only the Chairman of the ISAF Multihull Committee (responsible for the ISAF rating) but equally member of the Board of the French sailing association. And both associations are now using different ratings? Any answers available somewhere?
By the way, I e-mailed the person as suggested above, no answer till now...
|
http://p105.ezboard.com/faclasscatamaranforumfrm2.showMessage?topicID=78.topic - http://p105.ezboard.com/faclasscatamaranforumfrm2.showMessag e?topicID=78.topic
|
There are NO changes to the SCHRS rating rule for 2006.
The changes that we are working on will be proposed to the ISAF sometime this autumn and then (assuming the approve them) will be implemented sometime (hopefully early) in 2007.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: 353rob
Date Posted: 04 Oct 06 at 5:01pm
Simon, Just fishing here, With the proposed new changes in
the rule are you seeing big differences to all the boats i.e. new numbers for
everybody or only for a few that are not standard ratio boats?
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 04 Oct 06 at 5:56pm
Every boat will get a new number as we are changing a basic element of the rule.
However; no boats are moving a massive amount in % terms from the current numbers. We are talking a few % max.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 11:33am
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
However; no boats are moving a massive amount in % terms from the current numbers. We are talking a few % max. |
The F18 change from 1.01 to 1.00 would be a 1% change.
The dictionary definition of a few is-
adjective - not many but more than one:
Therefore you are saying that some handicaps will change 2, 3 or 4%?
That could make a Tornado 0.89 or 0.97 on the current SCHRS system – interesting!
------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 11:47am
Originally posted by Port End Flyer
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
However; no boats are moving a massive amount in % terms from the current numbers. We are talking a few % max. |
The F18 change from 1.01 to 1.00 would be a 1% change.
The dictionary definition of a few is-
adjective - not many but more than one:
Therefore you are saying that some handicaps will change 2, 3 or 4%?
That could make a Tornado 0.89 or 0.97 on the current SCHRS system – interesting!
|
It could; Yes. But do you think it will? 
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: TornadoSi
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 1:09pm
Im Happy with .97 we might be able to take some more prizes off the F18s but .89 do me a favour !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Posted By: markp
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 2:44pm
Originally posted by TornadoSi
Im Happy with .97 we might be able to take some more prizes off the F18s but .89 do me a favour !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
I sail a 5m x 2.3m F16 solo, Whats my rating? .97 If anybody needs a favour it's me bohemiath.
------------- MP*MULTIHULLS
The UK F16 Dealer
http://www.mp-multihulls.co.uk
|
Posted By: TornadoSi
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 3:11pm
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by TornadoSi
Im Happy with .97 we might be able to take some more prizes off the F18s but .89 do me a favour !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
I sail a 5m x 2.3m F16 solo, Whats my rating? .97 If anybody needs a favour it's me bohemiath.
|
Just Jesting i think the T is pretty much spot on at .94 , if you look at the 3 main long distance races this year ECPR Tornado Won, Fast Cat Spitfire Won, Forts race F18 won - Arguably 3 of the most popular cat classes all coming out level at the end of the day!!! for SCHRS
Your .97 may seem harsh but every dog has its day!!!!
|
Posted By: Port End Flyer
Date Posted: 05 Oct 06 at 3:42pm
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by TornadoSi
Im Happy with .97 we might be able to take some more prizes off the F18s but .89 do me a favour !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
I sail a 5m x 2.3m F16 solo, Whats my rating? .97 If anybody needs a favour it's me bohemiath.
|
Yes there has long been a macho “size matters!” attitude when Cat racing, where the biggest and fastest boats think they have a god given right to win regardless of ability or the lack of it, simply because they are the “biggest and fastest” and can get quite petulant should this not be the case! 
For some reason this is not quite the case with Monohulls? 
------------- Close your eyes and "GO FOR IT!" What else do we pay insurance premiums for?
|
Posted By: markp
Date Posted: 06 Oct 06 at 10:07am
I always thought size mattered but maybe thats in another context. I would agree that schrs is a fairly accurate rating formula, but will this system ever take into account various wind strengths. Maybe following on from their present tweeks they might look into this and follow the U.S in this area of ratings.
------------- MP*MULTIHULLS
The UK F16 Dealer
http://www.mp-multihulls.co.uk
|
Posted By: 353rob
Date Posted: 06 Oct 06 at 4:57pm
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS"
|
Posted By: markp
Date Posted: 08 Oct 06 at 8:59am
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS"
|
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
------------- MP*MULTIHULLS
The UK F16 Dealer
http://www.mp-multihulls.co.uk
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 08 Oct 06 at 10:28am
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS" |
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
|
Keep It Simple Stupid
SCHRS is not currently looking at introducing "wind range" numbers.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: markp
Date Posted: 11 Oct 06 at 9:43am
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS" |
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
|
Keep It Simple Stupid
SCHRS is not currently looking at introducing "wind range" numbers.
D'oh, Mc Fly (keep it simple!! like not taking into account the beam width) |
------------- MP*MULTIHULLS
The UK F16 Dealer
http://www.mp-multihulls.co.uk
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 11 Oct 06 at 2:07pm
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS" |
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
|
Keep It Simple Stupid
SCHRS is not currently looking at introducing "wind range" numbers.
D'oh, Mc Fly (keep it simple!! like not taking into account the beam width)
|
|
Eh ?
We are looking at a righting moment addition to the rule at the moment.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: markp
Date Posted: 11 Oct 06 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS" |
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
|
Keep It Simple Stupid
SCHRS is not currently looking at introducing "wind range" numbers.
D'oh, Mc Fly (keep it simple!! like not taking into account the beam width)
|
|
Eh ?
We are looking at a righting moment addition to the rule at the moment. |
Excellent news. Will this addition make the proposed March 1st 2007 amendements?
------------- MP*MULTIHULLS
The UK F16 Dealer
http://www.mp-multihulls.co.uk
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 11 Oct 06 at 3:45pm
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by Scooby_simon
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by 353rob
It's been done before, it's called IMS, and we all know what happened to that! The golden rule with SCHRS should be "KISS" |
You'll have to enlighten me "KISS"?
|
Keep It Simple Stupid
SCHRS is not currently looking at introducing "wind range" numbers.
D'oh, Mc Fly (keep it simple!! like not taking into account the beam width)
|
|
Eh ?
We are looking at a righting moment addition to the rule at the moment.
|
Excellent news. Will this addition make the proposed March 1st 2007 amendements?
|
Yep.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: redhotchilicat
Date Posted: 13 Oct 06 at 10:26am
Looking forward to see how the numbers look with the inclusion of "righting moment" as this is a major principle in multihull sailing and in my view should have been there from the start (I know I know KISS) but this is a central principle and just think how differently certain boats would perform if they were built to an optimum ratio rather than max. towing width.
I'm also waiting to see who the first person is to cut his beams down!!!
------------- go on you know it makes sense
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 13 Oct 06 at 11:05am
Originally posted by redhotchilicat
Looking forward to see how the numbers look with the inclusion of "righting moment" as this is a major principle in multihull sailing and in my view should have been there from the start (I know I know KISS) but this is a central principle and just think how differently certain boats would perform if they were built to an optimum ratio rather than max. towing width.
I'm also waiting to see who the first person is to cut his beams down!!!
|
Remember when SCHRS was designed, the Tornado was single wire (and the only “wide” boat sailed) and so had (about the) same righting moment as the Hurricane and other twin trap boats.
SCHRS has fallen behind and we are addressing it. We are already talking about the 2008 amendments !
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: redhotchilicat
Date Posted: 13 Oct 06 at 3:53pm
As I said Simon I'm glad it's happening, we all know h'cap racing has it's faults but hopefully this will provide a more even playingfield for the classes who currently seem vey disadvantaged compared to other systems. I take it the new system will be ratio based versus crew number and sail area.
Anyway more importantly I have already instructed John over at Stealth to take 15cms out of your main beam...and here's the good bit he'll take the same out of the rear so it doesn't toe out cool eh. could be a handicap bandit!
------------- go on you know it makes sense
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 13 Oct 06 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by redhotchilicat
As I said Simon I'm glad it's happening, we all know h'cap racing has it's faults but hopefully this will provide a more even playingfield for the classes who currently seem vey disadvantaged compared to other systems. I take it the new system will be ratio based versus crew number and sail area.
Anyway more importantly I have already instructed John over at Stealth to take 15cms out of your main beam...and here's the good bit he'll take the same out of the rear so it doesn't toe out cool eh. could be a handicap bandit!
|

I don't think he has finished laying up the beams yet !
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 19 Oct 06 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by TornadoSi
Originally posted by markp
Originally posted by TornadoSi
Im Happy with .97 we might be able to take some more prizes off the F18s but .89 do me a favour !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
I sail a 5m x 2.3m F16 solo, Whats my rating? .97 If anybody needs a favour it's me bohemiath.
|
Just Jesting i think the T is pretty much spot on at .94 , if you look at the 3 main long distance races this year ECPR Tornado Won, Fast Cat Spitfire Won, Forts race F18 won - Arguably 3 of the most popular cat classes all coming out level at the end of the day!!! for SCHRS
Your .97 may seem harsh but every dog has its day!!!!
|
The SCHRS for a single handed F16 is currently 0.98.
see http://www.schrs.com - www.schrs.com
I may have said 0.97 before. This was wrong.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: 353rob
Date Posted: 27 Nov 06 at 3:35pm
Bump,
Any updates on the 2007 SCHRS rule, has ISAF had a look at it?any feed back
|
Posted By: catmandoo
Date Posted: 27 Nov 06 at 3:42pm
yup we were promised a keek at the draft in the autumn , its definately winter up here !
-------------
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 27 Nov 06 at 3:59pm
Originally posted by catmandoo
yup we were promised a keek at the draft in the autumn , its definately winter up here !
|
Things take time. We are still fiddling around with the rule as a few boats are causing us problems, we are not yet in a position to share the results of our labours.
A number of things were agreed at the ISAF conferance in Finland and I'll be in a position to let people know more details in a while. I'm sorry, but these things take time as we have a number of "admin" hoops we need to jump thru' before we can make things public. We are still on schedule for a new rule to be in place for March 2007 - in time for the new season.
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
Posted By: 353rob
Date Posted: 02 Feb 07 at 3:39pm
The wait is nearly over, only 48 hours or so the web site is saying?
http://www.schrs.com/
My gut feeling is that it will be very close to the Texel numbers
|
Posted By: Scooby_simon
Date Posted: 02 Feb 07 at 4:28pm
Originally posted by 353rob
The wait is nearly over, only 48 hours or so the web site is saying?
http://www.schrs.com/
My gut feeling is that it will be very close to the Texel numbers
|
We are also moving the site to a new server as the message says.
Still waiting on the ISAF for Sign-off....
------------- Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
|