Print Page | Close Window

First Pictures of 59er with trapeze

Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1613
Printed Date: 16 Jul 25 at 7:32pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: First Pictures of 59er with trapeze
Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Subject: First Pictures of 59er with trapeze
Date Posted: 01 Apr 06 at 11:03am

You saw it here first.

 I finally got some photos today of my 59er fitted with the trapeze. Wind today was from the land and very variable - between 10 and 20 knots. I'd say most of these shots were in about 15 - enjoy

 

 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser



Replies:
Posted By: Prince Buster
Date Posted: 01 Apr 06 at 12:26pm
So what was your verdict on it then?? Better? Worse?

-------------
international moth - "what what?"


Posted By: Pondling
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 6:26pm

it looks the same as a 29er/49er sept theres the fact that its deeper. what s it like to sail?

 



-------------
Sailors don't get old!!! They get a little dinghy (or skiff, or yacht...)
Feva 251
RS200 1117
RS200 897


Posted By: jpbuzz591
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 9:17pm
yeah looks like a beefed up 29er

-------------
Jp Indoe
Contender 518
Buzz591
Chew Valley Sailing club
Bristol


Posted By: Chris Noble
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 9:32pm
a gown ups 29er then...

-------------
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=561 - Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine

FOR SALE:

I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list.


Posted By: 5420
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 9:47pm
a nice 4000 then

-------------


Posted By: Calum_Reid
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 9:54pm
HAHAHAHAHA luke will love that

-------------


Posted By: Chris Noble
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 10:02pm
more of an up to date possibly lighter 4000

-------------
http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=561 - Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine

FOR SALE:

I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list.


Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 10:44pm
I thought the whole point of the 59er was that it didn't have a trapeze?

-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 02 Apr 06 at 11:43pm

Originally posted by Prince Buster

So what was your verdict on it then?? Better? Worse?

This is a short piece I wrote on another thread.

Report on sailing the 59er with trapeze

I've been out a few times now with the trapeze and can now give a better opinion of how it goes fitted with this option. I am using 505s as a yardstick because they are the closest performing boat that we sail against.

Upwind performance

In light conditions obviously no change in performance! In medium conditions, when the trapeze is being used most but not all the time (around 10-13knots) we go much better against the 505s. Previously they put a crew member on the trapeze and sailed away from us in the puffs. I would say we are now about the same or maybe marginally slower in these conditions. In fresher conditions, on trapeze all the time and depowering (15-18 knots) the boat comes alive!! Much more fun than the hiking version of the 59er. In these conditions we go past all but the really well sailed 505s and as we get better I think we will go past them. It needs to be sailed lower and faster than the hiking version and we are still working on getting it into the right groove. The crew needs to work the main more than before and you luff less in puffs and just ease a little more and go faster.

Downwind

Light conditions - no change. Medium conditions (10-13 knots) probably the most surprising change in performance. We absolutely fly past the 505s lower and faster. Previously we were faster but sailed higher. The spinnaker is actually cut too full for the boat in these conditions as we have found that we need to slow down sometimes as we are sailing too high on the apparent wind for the spinnaker to cope. Fresher conditions (15 - 18 knots) not as much change. We are still faster than the 505s but not by as much as when it is lighter. We have fitted foot loops on the back of the boat so the crew doesn't go for a ride around the forestay.

Pluses

Much more fun upwind.

Makes it much more than just a light wind flyer

Minuses

Spinnaker cut a little too full for the new configuration.

 

After sailing it a few more times in the new configuration the main comment I would make is that on open water where I sail it makes it easier to sail!

We still don't always negotiate the corners though as you can see.

 

 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 04 Apr 06 at 5:02pm
I'm in two minds about this -

it certainly put's it in 505 competition for races and sailors

But as the design was set up for those of us who regularily sail in less than 14 knts of breeze -as a hiker ....take the bird out (if she is large bone-ed)

and yes a lot lighter than a laser 4000 to drag up the beach- I couldn't believe how heavy the laser 4 was.

Swifty has more of the blowy stuff in Aus. on average- have some awesome blasting Han Solo!

Just Watch out for the willy-willy's from behind cobber !


Posted By: limey
Date Posted: 04 Apr 06 at 10:12pm
If you want a modern skiff, lighter than the laser 4K , single trapeze, one already exists. Its called an RS 800 something. It was another LDC brainwave at making money. I think somebody may have actually have  bought one which probably reflects the demand for this type of boat. So probably best save your money and keep the 59er as one of the few sitting out skiffs; just needs remarketing as something other than a boat for heavy old farts!!!


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 04 Apr 06 at 11:04pm

Originally posted by damp_freddie

I'm in two minds about this -

it certainly put's it in 505 competition for races and sailors

But as the design was set up for those of us who regularily sail in less than 14 knts of breeze -as a hiker ....take the bird out (if she is large bone-ed)

and yes a lot lighter than a laser 4000 to drag up the beach- I couldn't believe how heavy the laser 4 was.

Swifty has more of the blowy stuff in Aus. on average- have some awesome blasting Han Solo!

Just Watch out for the willy-willy's from behind cobber !

Hi Mr Freddie,

All I can say is after you get one sail as a hiker then invest $100 or pounds in the trapeze kit. If you don't like it as a trapeze boat you can take the trapeze stuff off - I bet you don't.

If it is light conditions you just don't use it.

Here are a couple more pictures.....yes there is more than one of us.

 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 05 Apr 06 at 3:57am
All I have to say is when can I have a go?

-------------
One step forwards, 2 steps back...


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 05 Apr 06 at 3:43pm
Swify

Yeah, sounds cool. If we can get two PY handicaps and choose for our less expereinced crew or light winds good.

Hope nationals could be a majority decision or an agreement to sail in light without it.

Nice piccies. nice weather, looks like warm water, You sod.


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 05 Apr 06 at 3:45pm
Ok- lets reposition the boat

A mind bending blaster which is a damn site easier to sail than a 49er and cheaper and easiere to rig than the 505 . which you won't be buying anyway now as a large pair of chaps or chapesses looking for 21st century bang for buck.

to summarise- " big guys get more time for big beers with the 59er than the 505"


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 5:07am

Originally posted by damp_freddie

Swify

Yeah, sounds cool. If we can get two PY handicaps and choose for our less expereinced crew or light winds good.

Hope nationals could be a majority decision or an agreement to sail in light without it.

Nice piccies. nice weather, looks like warm water, You sod.

It isn't class legal (yet) so if a Nationals was sailed it would be as a hiking boat. My thoughts are that to get Nationals happening it will need to transition to a trapeze boat. The level of interest at my club has been much higher since we made the change to trapeze.

All I can say since we made the change we are having a hoot!! 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 5:10am

Originally posted by damp_freddie

Ok- lets reposition the boat

A mind bending blaster which is a damn site easier to sail than a 49er and cheaper and easiere to rig than the 505 . which you won't be buying anyway now as a large pair of chaps or chapesses looking for 21st century bang for buck.

to summarise- " big guys get more time for big beers with the 59er than the 505"

Hmmm.............Not sure about the marketing slogan....but the rest of it is about right. 

 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: Norbert
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 10:08am
Sorry to be really down about this guys, and as one of the people that were targeted as the potential market for the 39er / 59er, i find it depressing that the mini mafia are coming along and corrupting the design ethos behind this boat by introducing trapezes and in so doing at one stroke disenfranchising the very people that the boat was initially designed for.

If this is what you're really interested in why not go back to the original European style B14s that had mini wings and single trapeze and leave the 59er for the fat brigade.


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 12:01pm

Originally posted by Norbert

Sorry to be really down about this guys, and as one of the people that were targeted as the potential market for the 39er / 59er, i find it depressing that the mini mafia are coming along and corrupting the design ethos behind this boat by introducing trapezes and in so doing at one stroke disenfranchising the very people that the boat was initially designed for.

If this is what you're really interested in why not go back to the original European style B14s that had mini wings and single trapeze and leave the 59er for the fat brigade.

I understand your perspective but where were the Nationals in the UK for the 59er as a hiking boat this year?

Oh thats right, I don't think they happened. They didn't over here in OZ either.

I think it is an outstanding design and happen to think it is better with a trapeze. I'm sure a trapeze isn't going to stop fatties - I'm one myself! It is the 9er design that could bring real high performance sailing to mortals. The 29er starts to sink if you put two full size adults in it. The 49er is bloody difficult to sail in over 15 knots.

They have their target markets but in the middle you have the 59er which is beautifully designed fast light and sailable by mere mortals in a good breeze. The only thing that held it back was its upwind performance in a breeze. The trapeze fixes this hole in its performance. It is also easier to sail. Upwind you have more weight holding it down. Downwind you can concentrate your weight at the back of the boat better.

Why not give it a try and if it is no good take it back off the boat. I bet you won't!! 

Steve (Not the MIni Mafia)



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 12:06pm
How about  5-oh 9er then?

And some proper OD whatever happens to the majority of boats.


 instead of all this

1) development where an unknown number are on the pace

2) pricey 505s etc


Each to their own. With Neil Prydes  on it and a less breakable format than the other 9ers I think it gives good value for money for folk who want skiff performance in average winds of under 14 knots.


Head to head? since when has a cherub carried any weight? You can have head to head twin traps now - 29er XX as on ovi's web site.


The laser 4000 is nice enough, just heavy and I'm unconvinced it sails well with more than 28 stone. But I may have to buy a harness and go crew if I wanna do more than 15 knts round here....


Posted By: m_liddell
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 9:58pm

Originally posted by Norbert

Sorry to be really down about this guys, and as one of the people that were targeted as the potential market for the 39er / 59er, i find it depressing that the mini mafia are coming along and corrupting the design ethos behind this boat by introducing trapezes and in so doing at one stroke disenfranchising the very people that the boat was initially designed for.

If this is what you're really interested in why not go back to the original European style B14s that had mini wings and single trapeze and leave the 59er for the fat brigade.

I agree but the class wasn't exactly doing well, something needed to change to make it more popular.



Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 11:42pm

Originally posted by turnturtle

Okay when can we put two strings on it and go head-to-head againt the cherub?

We are probably quicker already on 1 string!

As a hiking boat the PN was 905. My guess as a trap boat it would be 870 to 880 territory?

What is a twin string cherub? 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 06 Apr 06 at 11:54pm
Originally posted by swiftsolo.org

Originally posted by turnturtle

Okay when can we put two strings on it and go head-to-head againt the cherub?

We are probably quicker already on 1 string!

As a hiking boat the PN was 905. My guess as a trap boat it would be 870 to 880 territory?

What is a twin string cherub? 



Thats probibly pretty similar to twin string cherub teritory... The problem is cherubs will decimate all given perfect courses and conditions, but are dog-slow in a drifter so its damn near impossible to get a fair handicap figure and there arent enough returns on the 05 rules boats to make a decent estimate

Andy P races off 865 at his home club but he isnt exactly your average cherub sailor... Thats probibly not too far off in a decent breeze but were looking at over 1000 in the light stuff...
general opinion is that around 900 is about as representative as we'll get


-------------


Posted By: charlie w
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:04am

So the 59er is now the new 505. That means it joins quite a long list.

I recall the Laser 5000 and ISO being referred to as that 15 yrs ago, and just about every other bowsprit boat since (PY of between about 950 and 850) being given the same label.  The question is why?

We hear regularly on this forum about why the 505 is outdated/boring/overpriced.  So what is it that these new designs aspire to? 

I testsailed the 59er, with my dad about 18months ago, and that boat did feel really nice.  Basically like a well mannered / slightly de-tuned B14.  Did it feel like a 505....?

I'll say this for it, though.  It was a well built design (unlike some other recent designs one could mention).  In terms of relationship to the 505 design, you have to say that the lines of the hull do bear a striking resemblance from the shrouds backwards.

I did like the way the boat glided upwind - reminiscent of the best in the business in that class - the flying fifteen.  Personally though, I'd back the fifteen in that contest.

Overall a good performance hiking boat, in the Tasar mould, I'd guess.  I think it would be a shame to wreck it by adding a trapeze and throwing it into an already overcrowded market sector.

It would do better to try to create it's own marketplace, given time.

Oh and finally, the 505 that won the 2003 Nationals, and was second this year is now 11yrs old, it sold for about £6k.  Please don't believe the hype on this one. 

A competitive 505 isn't more expensive than anything else.  A new one is, admittedly.

CW



-------------
Quality never goes out of fashion.


Posted By: BBSCFaithfull
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:14am
Isis, i know cherubs are hugely quick when the breeze picks up and deadly slow when the breeze drops. But in 3 words deal with it. Other people just have on py figure y can't cherubs? If they are around 850-870 then leave the number there u cant as a class change the number to suit your wims otherwise we could all race on an oppies handicap.

-------------
Greatfully Sponsored By
www.allgoodfun.com
Int 14 GBR 1503!!


Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:33am
Isis, i know cherubs are hugely quick when the breeze picks up and deadly slow when the breeze drops. But in 3 words deal with it.

Trust me, I can deal with that. I know we will float around with the lasers in no wind, I also know we will decimate 4ks in lots of wind. If I wasnt OK with that situation I wouldnt have bought a cherub.

Other people just have on py figure y can't cherubs?

We do.

If they are around 850-870 then leave the number there u cant as a class change the number to suit your wims

They are not around 850-870. Handicaps have to represent performance across a range of conditions which in this case puts the average around 950. However a WELL SAILED cherub will either be a lot faster than this figure, or a vast amount slower so it is not a realistic representation of its speed. The figures I gave are estimates of what kind of handicap cherubs would race to in various conditions to give someone who asked a genuine question a more realistic idea of their speed. If we were changing our handicap at a whim to suit us, we'd hardly be lowering the number would we?

Now back in your corner...


-------------


Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:46am

Originally posted by BBSCFaithfull

Isis, i know cherubs are hugely quick when the breeze picks up and deadly slow when the breeze drops. But in 3 words deal with it. Other people just have on py figure y can't cherubs? If they are around 850-870 then leave the number there u cant as a class change the number to suit your wims otherwise we could all race on an oppies handicap.

Official PY is 975. In anything above a F2 we will blitz this. I don't sail in less than a F2. Go figure....

I'm perfectly happy with the handicap!



-------------
Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry


Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:46am
To be honest Isis I was going to make a similar content to BBSCFaithful, it's the second time in the last couple of days you've mentioned it.. And the points you make apply to other boats as well, maybe not to such a great extent with some other classes but that is then an inherent limitation built into the class. If the PN for the Cherub is about 950 and the 4000 is 908 then on average the 4000 is faster, rather than just thinking about ideal Cherub conditions..

-------------
RS800 GBR848
Weston SC


Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:57am
Originally posted by CurlyBen

To be honest Isis I was going to make a similar content to BBSCFaithful, it's the second time in the last couple of days you've mentioned it.. And the points you make apply to other boats as well, maybe not to such a great extent with some other classes but that is then an inherent limitation built into the class. If the PN for the Cherub is about 950 and the 4000 is 908 then on average the 4000 is faster, rather than just thinking about ideal Cherub conditions..


Its the second time its been mentioned because its the second time its been asked about.



-------------


Posted By: BBSCFaithfull
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 12:49pm
But surely the number should be around the 870-900 mark even though they are slow in the lighter stuff. Wudnt it make it fairer in the heavier stuff. Where a cherub i am right in thinking would outperform a 4k. Or would it be fairer for clubs to use personal handicaps based on the cherubs' rule sets and boat design etc


-------------
Greatfully Sponsored By
www.allgoodfun.com
Int 14 GBR 1503!!


Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 1:39pm
The point of the RYA allocated PY is that it is indicative over a wide range of conditions. So the published PY takes in to account the days that is blows and the Cherub guys fly (quite literally) off into the distance and also the light wind days when they are probably very very slow.

Remember it is the club sailors that give the RYA a majority of data so what people do in class events is null and void as far as PY is concerned.

Does anyone know how many of the big handicap events pass their data to the RYA for analysis?

I know that Fastsail has what about Bllody Mary, Exmoor beastie, Tiger trophy et al?

Please lets not have another huge debate on how good some boats are in certain conditions......


-------------
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 07 Apr 06 at 10:30pm
Originally posted by charlie w

So the 59er is now the new 505. That means it joins quite a long list.

I recall the Laser 5000 and ISO being referred to as that 15 yrs ago, and just about every other bowsprit boat since (PY of between about 950 and 850) being given the same label.  The question is why?

We hear regularly on this forum about why the 505 is outdated/boring/overpriced.  So what is it that these new designs aspire to? 

I testsailed the 59er, with my dad about 18months ago, and that boat did feel really nice.  Basically like a well mannered / slightly de-tuned B14.  Did it feel like a 505....?

I'll say this for it, though.  It was a well built design (unlike some other recent designs one could mention).  In terms of relationship to the 505 design, you have to say that the lines of the hull do bear a striking resemblance from the shrouds backwards.

I did like the way the boat glided upwind - reminiscent of the best in the business in that class - the flying fifteen.  Personally though, I'd back the fifteen in that contest.

Overall a good performance hiking boat, in the Tasar mould, I'd guess.  I think it would be a shame to wreck it by adding a trapeze and throwing it into an already overcrowded market sector.

It would do better to try to create it's own marketplace, given time.

Oh and finally, the 505 that won the 2003 Nationals, and was second this year is now 11yrs old, it sold for about £6k.  Please don't believe the hype on this one. 

A competitive 505 isn't more expensive than anything else.  A new one is, admittedly.

CW

I am not suggesting that the 59er is the new 505.

The 505 is a great class. 

I've sailed the 59er as both a hiker and a trapeze boat. Putting on a trapeze does not wreck it as you state. If you think it glides upwind well as a hiking boat guess how it goes with a trapeze - better.

Why don't you sail one over there that has been converted and then still tell me that it wrecks it?  



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 08 Apr 06 at 1:27pm
Thanks for the photos BTW swifty

maybe I'll hijack a Cheub thread and rant about the dreadful humps in the drag curve and the wierd polar diagram, and how the NS14 and 18ft skiff desingers overcame this drag in light airs .  A tricky development boat for those light sailors who like that kind of thing

Meanwhile we have a very nicely presented 'out the box' hyper modern strict one design (maybe with trap coming) 

........which is phenominal in under 10 knts breeze and great, -simple-ish to sail- fun in more wind ( what is the average at your club? FB reckons a hell of a lot of sailing happens in av- 9knts in inshore or lake waters)


and it is aimed at heavier people currently bumped out of many modern designs on lard grounds!


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 08 Apr 06 at 2:33pm
Swifty- once fitted how much longer does it take to rig the boat?

I seem to remember it was faster than the 29er to rig, does the trap slow it down?


Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 09 Apr 06 at 11:41am

Saturday was probably too light for the trap on Moreton Bay but Swifty still looked like he was having fun...

Anyhow, I can't see why it would take a different amount of time to rig than a 29er - the sails may be a different size but you still have all the same bits of string to deal with as the systems are basically identical.



-------------
One step forwards, 2 steps back...


Posted By: combat wombat
Date Posted: 09 Apr 06 at 12:00pm
I don't think time to rig is an issue.  The core problem with whacking a trap on the 59er is that the design brief for the boat was for a 2 man hiking "skiff".  Whilst I won't agree that it is a skiff, the idea is good as it allows the older sailor who doesn't want traps to sail fast, in a relatively sedate boat that doesn't require huge agility or strength.  Adding a trapeze moves the boat away from this design brief (which is quite unique) and adds it to the pile of single trap spinny boats (ie RS500, ISO, Buzz, 505, Laser II, Laser 2K, Laser 3K, Laser 4K, 29er).  Yes, these aren't designed for heavier crews, but the trapeze will also lower the minimum crew weight of the boat, further removing it from the original idea and placing it amongst these boats.   The reason that the 59er was for heavier crews was because it had no trapeze, hence the bigger sails and lack of righting moment required a heavier crew. 

I don't think the idea is a bad one, it just seems a shame to add a trap to it and push it into one of the most over subscribed niches in Dinghy sailing today.


-------------
B14 GBR 772


Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 09 Apr 06 at 12:24pm

I would agree with you if the class had become established on that basis.  The fact is it hasn't - many people say the marketing was wrong but even with that holding it back, you would expect some localised fleets to develop around the first few boats where it the reality of the boat would outweigh the original marketing spiel and even this hasn't happened.

So there is a product in the market place that has a niche - but it would appear that that niche is so small it won't support a class - so why shouldn't some existing owners have some more fun out of their boats?



-------------
One step forwards, 2 steps back...


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 1:00am
Originally posted by Blobby

Saturday was probably too light for the trap on Moreton Bay but Swifty still looked like he was having fun...

Anyhow, I can't see why it would take a different amount of time to rig than a 29er - the sails may be a different size but you still have all the same bits of string to deal with as the systems are basically identical.

You are right - it was very light out there at the weekend, I had a party to go to in the late afternoon so I let my crew steer and we just had a bit of fun out there. It would be exactly the same as a 29er to rig as the systems are basically identical.

If I sailed in a light wind venue perhaps the idea of the trapeze wouldn't be as appealing but for about 9 months of the year here there is an afternoon sea breeze which is around 15 - 20 knots so the extra righting moment is very welcome.

Personally I don't think that it could work in the niche that it was originally aimed at because the average couple that want a 2 person hiking boat would want something more stable. (You need to hold it by the stays to keep it upright when it is at rest) The people that would be interested in it as a performance boat thought it was boring because it had no trapeze. Solution - Fit a trapeze!! 

I'll say it again. In open water venues fitting a trapeze makes it easier to sail. So surely that hasn't moved it too far from the original philosphy of a simple to sail modern high performance boat that can accomodate 2 full size adults?



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: Shingle
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 11:00am

Steve,

Thanks for the pictures; I have come in to this late as I've been away. This thread shows what a bunch of whinging Poms we are!  Our boat will be converted this weekend. What 59er threads seem to generate, is the need for a new purpose built single wire assymetric boat. The ISO/Buzz and 4000 are long in the tooth and the market will sustain a replacement. The initial RS500 thread was full of disappointment once it was announced it was for kids. LDC will not bring out a single wire boat in the ISO 4000 weight range as it could detract from 800 sales for those who struggle to trapeze helm.  Ovington’s have other projects, and probably are a little nervous of trying to release another new venture into the market place. Laser seem to have moved away from performance dinghies. So Iguess this is going to be a good as it gets for now.

 



-------------
Drink Feck girls!


Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 11:16am
The RS 500 came to Whitefriars a couple of weeks ago, and it went down really well. One of the first people to order one is 66 year old Fireball sailor, so hardly a boat for kids! It appears to be more Fireball speed than 59er speed, so maybe there is room for the faster boat for bigger water and more gung-ho sailors. RS would see that as the 800's role, of course.

-------------
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686


Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 11:26am
yer the rs500 targets a sliughtly different market.  and i dont like saying it but classes like the 4k etc (single trapeze for fat people) will die out in the future and there will definatly be a market for single trapeze boats for bigger people and the 59er could be the one cos it has all the things of skiff sailing with modern materials etc.   and it def looks fun

-------------
International 14 1503


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 1:49pm
Originally posted by Shingle

Steve,

Thanks for the pictures; I have come in to this late as I've been away. This thread shows what a bunch of whinging Poms we are!  Our boat will be converted this weekend. What 59er threads seem to generate, is the need for a new purpose built single wire assymetric boat. The ISO/Buzz and 4000 are long in the tooth and the market will sustain a replacement. The initial RS500 thread was full of disappointment once it was announced it was for kids. LDC will not bring out a single wire boat in the ISO 4000 weight range as it could detract from 800 sales for those who struggle to trapeze helm.  Ovington’s have other projects, and probably are a little nervous of trying to release another new venture into the market place. Laser seem to have moved away from performance dinghies. So Iguess this is going to be a good as it gets for now.

That is great to hear that the first boats in "old blighty" are making the move. Please make sure you let me know what you think about it after you have converted it. I really look forward to hearing another perspective on it.

We don't have such an overcrowded marketplace over here for trapeze boats so maybe it will start to move over here a bit quicker. Having said that most of the other single trapeze boats would appear to not be in the same class as the 59er for speed so it may do well over there as well. Certainly the level of interest that we have got locally is much greater since we made the move.  



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 2:25pm
Looks liek you were still overpowered in those last photos!


How do you cope with reaching between marks when you can't bear away?

 ie say a club outer perimeter marls race with some tight reaches?

It is a fairly monster kite.


Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 2:30pm
Originally posted by Rupert

The RS 500 came to Whitefriars a couple of weeks ago, and it went down really well. One of the first people to order one is 66 year old Fireball sailor, so hardly a boat for kids! It appears to be more Fireball speed than 59er speed, so maybe there is room for the faster boat for bigger water and more gung-ho sailors. RS would see that as the 800's role, of course.


I think the 59er fits between the 800 and those sailors looking for something faster with true apparent wind performance than the 400- which is fun to sail but not in under 19 knts breeze IMHO-&Exp.

I am a great respector of the 800 " if you can't beat em', join em'" design but I would struggle to get a crew to single trap and take time to learn trap helming. Also there are none here so I am open minded to any boat which will take 32 stone with an assym.




Posted By: russell
Date Posted: 10 Apr 06 at 6:04pm

Great pics, looks like a nice place to sail too.  

I wonder what effect this would have on races with both varities.  It does look like an event list has been prepared for this year.



-------------
Russell

Phantom 1330
59er 090


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 11 Apr 06 at 1:55am

Originally posted by damp_freddie

Looks liek you were still overpowered in those last photos!


How do you cope with reaching between marks when you can't bear away?

 ie say a club outer perimeter marls race with some tight reaches?

It is a fairly monster kite.

Where we sail it is windward leeward courses. Once the wind is over about 8 knots there is no way that you would get to a wing mark on a triangle course with the spinnaker up. We are actually sailing lower with the trapeze on as we are moving the apparent wind so much.  

The size of the kite is also a little intimidating for people that would be in the market for sedate little hiking boat. It is way bigger than a 29ers and at 23sq metres is only 4sq metres smaller than a 49ers!!  Yee Hah!!!!! 



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: boatshed
Date Posted: 11 Apr 06 at 8:34am
Originally posted by swiftsolo.org

Originally posted by damp_freddie

Looks liek you were still overpowered in those last photos!


How do you cope with reaching between marks when you can't bear away?

 ie say a club outer perimeter marls race with some tight reaches?

It is a fairly monster kite.

Where we sail it is windward leeward courses. Once the wind is over about 8 knots there is no way that you would get to a wing mark on a triangle course with the spinnaker up. We are actually sailing lower with the trapeze on as we are moving the apparent wind so much.  

The size of the kite is also a little intimidating for people that would be in the market for sedate little hiking boat. It is way bigger than a 29ers and at 23sq metres is only 4sq metres smaller than a 49ers!!  Yee Hah!!!!! 

I believe the 49er kite is 38 sq.m.  The B14 is 29.2 sq.m and thats on a hiking boat. We definately struggle in the B14 on triangular courses in a hiking breeze.  But we can go much deeper than RS 800s with their smaller kites.

 



-------------
Steve


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 11 Apr 06 at 11:16pm
Originally posted by boatshed

Originally posted by swiftsolo.org

Originally posted by damp_freddie

Looks liek you were still overpowered in those last photos!


How do you cope with reaching between marks when you can't bear away?

 ie say a club outer perimeter marls race with some tight reaches?

It is a fairly monster kite.

Where we sail it is windward leeward courses. Once the wind is over about 8 knots there is no way that you would get to a wing mark on a triangle course with the spinnaker up. We are actually sailing lower with the trapeze on as we are moving the apparent wind so much.  

The size of the kite is also a little intimidating for people that would be in the market for sedate little hiking boat. It is way bigger than a 29ers and at 23sq metres is only 4sq metres smaller than a 49ers!!  Yee Hah!!!!! 

I believe the 49er kite is 38 sq.m.  The B14 is 29.2 sq.m and thats on a hiking boat. We definately struggle in the B14 on triangular courses in a hiking breeze.  But we can go much deeper than RS 800s with their smaller kites.

I stand to be corrected but this is the source I have for the 49ers statistics

 

NA Portsmouth Number 69.7
RYA Portsmouth Num 747

Dimensions

Length Overall 4.99 m 16.4 ft
Beam 2.9 9.5
Draft (cbd down) 1.5 4.9
Spin Pole Length 1.7 5.6
Mast Height 8.5 m 27.9 ft

Sail Areas

Sail Area Mainsail 12.75 sq-m 137.2 sq-ft
Sail Area Jib 5.3 57.0
Sail Area Tot Working 18.1 194.7
Sail Area Spinnaker 28.9 310.9

Weights

Hull Weight 92 kg 203.3 lbs

Crew

Weight Range Min 145 kg 320.5 lbs
Weight Range Max 165 364.7
Total Crew 2  
Crew On Trapeze 2  

The source is the Skiff Asia website.

I have never seen a B14 in the flesh but they look like they are a really nice boat.

Steve



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 11 Apr 06 at 11:40pm
Ovington's site states a hull weight of 70kg, main and jib of 21.2 sq.m and a spinnaker of 38 sqm. Last time I looked (which admittedly wasn't recently) Skiff Asia didn't have 49ers?

-------------
RS800 GBR848
Weston SC


Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 11 Apr 06 at 11:51pm
the skiff asia stats look a bit off to me too

-------------


Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 12 Apr 06 at 4:05am

I stand corrected.

That is a frigging huge kite!



-------------
Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser


Posted By: Anteroom
Date Posted: 08 Jan 14 at 4:02am

I bought a 59er and am importing it into Toronto this summer. I am expecting to outfit the boat with a trap for my teenage son / crew and was wondering if you could offer any tips on hardware / attachment recommendations (on the off change you see this late posting!). 



Posted By: timeonthewater
Date Posted: 10 Jan 14 at 7:38pm
Either weld a small stainless ring to the upper shroud turnbuckle, so you can attach a spliced loop of dyneema trapeze line to, or a 6mm line through the mast at the turnbuckle apertures, with a bobble to take the load on the leeward side of the mast. The line can have stainless rings spliced on the ends doe the trapeze lines.



-------------
Too many toys..not enough time


Posted By: BarnsieB14768
Date Posted: 11 Jan 14 at 2:46pm
Hate to disappoint but there has been a 59er on the north kent Coast with a trapeze for at least 5 yearsWink


Posted By: alstorer
Date Posted: 11 Jan 14 at 7:11pm
THe first posts in this thread though Barnsie are nearly eight years old!

-------------
-_
Al


Posted By: Anteroom
Date Posted: 12 Jan 14 at 4:04pm
By small ring would something in the 10-12mm diameter range  welded on a vertical axis (316 stainless steel) be ok?  Are there any material compatibility issues with welding the ring and you are aware of?  I don't have the boat / rig yet and here in Toronto so there aren't any 59ers to look at.

 Thanks for the tip!


Posted By: timeonthewater
Date Posted: 13 Jan 14 at 2:49pm
Anteroom
that would be fine..loads of Int 14's have this system. No issues with welding a stainless small ring onto the compressed end of the turnbuckle.


-------------
Too many toys..not enough time



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com