Under rated boats
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1470
Printed Date: 12 Jul 25 at 6:14pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Under rated boats
Posted By: tack'ho
Subject: Under rated boats
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 1:29pm
So which boats are out there that are really good but just haven't seemed to catch on, be it due to marketing, lack of interest etc.
or to put it another way, what would sell like hotcakes if only it was made by Ovington boats!
------------- I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
Replies:
Posted By: Bumble
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 1:56pm
Originally posted by tack'ho
......... what would sell like hotcakes if only it was made by Ovington boats! | I think you ask the wrong question. By the look of the 'what do people think of the 59er' thread, being made by Ovington boats is a sure way to keep a great boat down.
|
Posted By: tack'ho
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 2:12pm
LOL Maybe the 59er counts but I think that one already been done to death
------------- I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
Posted By: bigwavedave
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 2:49pm
Megabyte
-------------
|
Posted By: Pierre
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:09pm
Originally posted by bigwavedave
Megabyte |
Yup BWD. Spot on. Excellent boat.
|
Posted By: Calum_Reid
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:20pm
300 - its finally had a well deserved recovery though.
-------------
|
Posted By: tgruitt
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:20pm
mx ray
------------- Needs to sail more...
|
Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:22pm
Supernova
------------- Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry
|
Posted By: Jamie600
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:24pm
Posted By: bigwavedave
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:27pm
I owned a Megabyte for a while (between Finns). It was light, reasonably fast, and very comfortable to hike and loads of room to move about in it. Went upwind well and flew off the wind.
But it had a few design flaws, nothing too major but just the little things that let it down, a really crap plastic bailer that I managed to push through the bottom (and a 4"x2" hole in the bottom of the boat is not ideal) and the mast was a bit too soft for a heavy helm. I also managed to snap off the tiller from the stock (but to be fair I did fall on it).
It had/has the potential to fill a gap in the market for a heavyweights hiking single hander, other than of course the Finn and Phantom. It was just so easy to sail and I thought it was very well priced. A lot of boat for the money.
The Dinghy Store at Datchet worked hard at marketing it and provided a great after sales service, but for some unknown reason it never really took off.
-------------
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 3:44pm
Singlehanders - Megabyte and RS300 would be my picks of recent years. Hope the 300 revival continues.
Two handers - going back to the 70s the Mirror 14 alias Marauder was a nice boat. The Mirror name killed it for a performance boat though I think. More recently I guess you could say that the 97 rules Cherub didn't get built in nearly the numbers it deserved. The only other recent two hander I rate is the 29er, which seems to be doing OK!
|
Posted By: tack'ho
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 4:29pm
Interesting the megabyte got picked up, as with the new rig I think the Byte is a cracking boat for lightweight helms. All the annoying things about the laser solved (mostly!) a really nice rig, light weight to haul up the slip way and really responsive to sailor input. There are thousands of them in Canda yet they've never really taken off here. I wonder if topper aren't too keen on pushing them as the weight range overlaps massively with the original topper which must have a much higher margins!
------------- I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
Posted By: Prince Buster
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 4:35pm
Definitely agree with tgruit - the mx ray looks incrediblebut just hasn't caught on
------------- international moth - "what what?"
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 6:24pm
Originally posted by Jamie600
Bell Flyer! |
HAHA! Brilliant! Have you ever sailed one?! My mate had one for a while and I can honestly say that I am not at all sad that there aren't more of them about!! 
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: Strawberry
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 6:46pm
6ft skiffs, they died out, but there may be a come back soon!
And moths, they definately took off, litterally!
------------- Cherub 2649 "Dangerous Strawberry
|
Posted By: Jamie600
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 7:28pm
Originally posted by timnoyce
Originally posted by Jamie600
Bell Flyer!
|
HAHA! Brilliant! Have you ever sailed one?! My mate had one for a while and I can honestly say that I am not at all sad that there aren't more of them about!!
I've not sailed one, I just like the comedy factor of an assymmetric trapeze boat that looks like it's come from Ikea! That plus the slight misnomer....
|
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 9:42pm
i would say the laser eps and the supernova. the eps looks like a really fun boat i think its a pity it died out and the supernova is only a small class despite being designed to avoid the problems of the laser
-------------
|
Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 10:54pm
I've sailed the EPS a couple of times and its excellent, its just that it competes with some other good boats like the 300, Blaze and Phantom and it wasn't cheap - although that's not been a problem for the Phantom.
I've never sailed an MX Ray but it looks unpromising, probably great off the beach in a blow, but its tiny, so small sail area, very little leverage and precious little bouyancy. Very much a boat for one type of condition, however full marks for inovation.
|
Posted By: Chris Noble
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 11:24pm
taser, could be bigger, very very good boat
------------- http://www.noblemarine.co.uk/home.php3?affid=561 - Competitive Boat Insurance From Noble Marine
FOR SALE:
I14 2 Masts 2 poles 3 Booms, Foils Kites/Mains/Jibs too many to list.
|
Posted By: Blaze-720
Date Posted: 17 Feb 06 at 11:44pm
As a Blaze fanatic I am biased of course - but the most under-rated boat in the UK by a country mile has to be the Tasar. Let down by half-hearted manufacturers in Europe soon after it was launched in the 70's it is a design classic and is today still way ahead of the general lack lustre 2 man design thread in so many ways. Just ask yourself how can it be so fast, easy to sail, and so refined compared with the current smod and other offerings in its market niche .... only 2 sails but almost as fast as a merlin and it planes upwind without wings, excessive sail area or trapeze. If you have ever sailed one you might know what I mean - and if you have not and are looking for a simple performance 2 man flyer just try one.... it defies a lot of the marketing hype flying around out there with ease.
Blaze 720
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 8:57am
I borrowed a Tasar when we had the worlds at our club - 100 boat fleet.
Very nice boat and now they have the new sails it look very "now".
Rick

-------------
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 6:02pm
i quite like the look of the taser. from the photo and the descriptions everyoneone seems to be giving it it looks to be a well fun boat. its sad really that good boats like that miss out on becoming big fleets and boats like the laser don't have to bother changing bad bits to compete.because they already have a big fleet
-------------
|
Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 6:07pm
I was dubious when I first heard about it but the more I see and hear,
the more impressed I am with the new Tasar rig... very good move for
the class IMHO
-------------
|
Posted By: Guest
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 6:20pm
Originally posted by laser47
its sad really that good boats like that miss out on becoming big fleets and boats like the laser don't have to bother changing bad bits to compete.because they already have a big fleet |
I would not call 100 boats a small fleet ... just because it's not that big in the UK it dosn't mean it is not a big class.
I think the new rig gives it a new lease of life and it's a great boat to sail with a small crew and is a nice fast boat for those who don't fancy the kite.
Rick
-------------
|
Posted By: boatshed
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 7:30pm
The mast on the Tasar is unchanged - its just the sails that are a new material for long life and better value. They also look very modern. The rotating mast is two piece and has a flexible top. The aluminium mast section is a short wing type with a very special trailing edge. Add to this the fully battened main and the result is a very efficient rig. Its probably all a bit too expensive to put on a modern SMOD class when you can get the same performance boost by adding an asymmetric kite.
Tasars are neat boats and definately overlooked in the UK
------------- Steve
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 18 Feb 06 at 9:49pm
i dunno, the price of some of the SMOD classes is always rising and technology is advancing all the time
-------------
|
Posted By: tickel
Date Posted: 27 Feb 06 at 10:37pm
If you are old (ish) want something interesting (Frank Bethwaite) and have sailed most other things, try a Tasar and shock your friends with how fast you can go with no wires and no kite. On a small water you dont teabag and you wont sail over the spinnaker. We hope this is all true as we have only sailed it three times! But we did the Tiger, crap was it not?
------------- tickel
|
Posted By: tickel
Date Posted: 27 Feb 06 at 10:49pm
Also my 18 year old son has sailed a lightning 368 for the last 4 years. Fantastic boat in light winds and very quick on the plane. It has no vices unlike lasers and is a lot cheaper. He has won Derbyshire Youth Series,two 4ths in NSSA and is the current National Champion. Check them out at the Dinghy Show. The silly boy has an International Moth now!
------------- tickel
|
Posted By: swiftsolo.org
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 12:47am
A really good class over here is the NS14. The Tasar is basically a 1970s NS14 which was made into a one design.
Check out their web site on http://www.ns14.org/ - http://www.ns14.org/
Interestingly they look like they are starting to pick them up in the US. Like the Tasar they are a good family boat with no trapeze or kite.
------------- Building a Swift Solo
http://www.aussieswift.livesaildie.com - First Australian Swift Solo
Sailing F28 Tri - family cruiser
|
Posted By: limey
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 1:45am
Anyone remember the Harrier; looked very sexy at the time !!!
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 8:51am
There's actually a Harrier revival of sorts going on at a Club up in the NW: they're collecting them.
http://www.bluelightning.co.uk/Harrier/harrierswanted.htm - http://www.bluelightning.co.uk/Harrier/harrierswanted.htm
I had one for a while: I felt it was underdeveloped with the rudder being too short and the rig rather crude.
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 8:57am
There is another good thing about the Tasar...doesn't Nicole Kidman sail one?
That has to be a good reason, especially if you are in the same race.... 
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 9:42am
According to Chris 249, when I set this in the CVRDA quiz, it is a different Nicole Kidman, which came as a grave disappointment to me!
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: Olly4088
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 10:01am
I would have to agree with the Megabyte comment. I went for a test sail at Datchet and it is a quick boat. I then waited to see how they would take off and they never really did. I could never find a website for them or even an association. I belive that they are massive in america.
------------- Phantom 1298
|
Posted By: Chris 249
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 10:45am
Originally posted by Rupert
According to Chris 249, when I set this in the CVRDA
quiz, it is a different Nicole Kidman, which came as a grave
disappointment to me! |
Both Nicole Kidmans are easy on the eye and both come from Sydney and both have red hair...but only one is a Tasar sailor.
The "real" Nicole is a good crew, too. Dunno whether the Hollywood one knows a cruise from a race.
|
Posted By: tickel
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 10:58am
If its good for the class, Tasar, I'll change my name to Elton John.
------------- tickel
|
Posted By: Chew my RS
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 12:14pm
Hey, back to (relative) normality after paternity leave. Two weeks of chaos and sleepless nights, just another 18 years to go! How small do they make buoyancy aids?
Totally agree about the Tasar and the Lightning 368. The Tasar should have sold loads more here, hopefully the new sails will give it a new lease of life. I guess the RS200 has taken many potential Tasar sailors. The 368 looks like one of the neatest boats of its type, the trouble is this is a crowded sector of the market. The Streaker, Byte, Comet, 368, Solo, Brit Moth etc would benefit from working together more, in my opinion.
I nominate the Hurricane 4.9. It was a good little cat (a significant improvement on the Condor), but wasn't sufficiently different from the 5.9 to survive.
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 12:33pm
"The 368 looks like one of the neatest boats of its type, the trouble is this is a crowded sector of the market. The Streaker, Byte, Comet, 368, Solo, Brit Moth etc would benefit from working together more, in my opinion."
I agree. Trouble is, "Slow sail" isn't quite as catchy as the name the spinnakered trapeze boats have come up with! I've owned or sailed all the above boats bar the Streaker (would love to) and currently own a British Moth which is 1/2 way through a rebuild. Short notice, but maybe reps from these classes should get together at the show and discuss joint events and publicity?
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: tack'ho
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 12:40pm
Originally posted by Chew my RS
The 368 looks like one of the neatest boats of its type, the trouble is this is a crowded sector of the market. The Streaker, Byte, Comet, 368, Solo, Brit Moth etc would benefit from working together more, in my opinion.
|
Agreed! except about the 368 being neatest!, but at least it has a bolt rope! In fact the 368 the Byte and another single hander shared their inland championships last year. This is the way foward I think for all these smaller classes. In fact the Byte, 368, Streaker, Solo, Europe and Laser 4.7 are so similar on handicap you might as well race them together.
------------- I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
Posted By: tickel
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 3:50pm
Another sugestion is the JAVELIN. we have sailed one of these for the last 2 seasons. 17'7" long loads of sail and a big kite. They are fast, 126, and fairly easy but with only single wire you need a fat sod dangling from it. At only 10 stone we swam a lot. A very elegant boat though. Since we have replaced it now with the Tasar it will be on e bay soon. What an oportunity, get bidding!!
------------- tickel
|
Posted By: Porteous
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 4:21pm
The Tasar, designed by Frank Bethwaite weighs 60 Kg planes up wind in 12 Knots has new rig with sails from Neil Pryde ala 29er and 59er style and has a PY of 1023
It is one of the fastest two sail boats and certainly one of the most comfortable. 35 boats at Nationals with new importer see the boat at the Dinghy show
|
Posted By: andyrj
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 5:29pm
Does any body remember what happened to the Flying Junior???
I know there is still an active class in the US (found it in the web) but I only have hazy childhood memories of watching one zoom around at WKSC!
------------- water, water, everywhere...
but not a drop to drink
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 7:44pm
It never caught on much in Britain, probebly because it had to fight against the Enterprise at exactly the same length and sail area.
There is one at the Student Sailing Club in Aberystwyth, where they had a fleet of them in the 60's. Rumour has it they mostly sank...
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 8:37pm
which is probably why they never caught on
-------------
|
Posted By: E.J.
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 9:24pm
The Marauder was a very good design by Peter Milne. I sailed one for a few years, and found it to be much quicker than its PY rating, had to leave the class when the competition all but died out. Does anyone know of any still being sailed?
-------------
|
Posted By: tickel
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 10:47pm
A few years ago a maurauder turned up at a farm shop in Cheshire. The owner paid 100 quid for it. I have no idea if it is still there. He also had a rotting shearwater.
------------- tickel
|
Posted By: Offshoretiger
Date Posted: 28 Feb 06 at 10:52pm
Originally posted by andyrj
Does any body remember what happened to the Flying Junior???
I know there is still an active class in the US (found it in the web) but I only have hazy childhood memories of watching one zoom around at WKSC!
|
I believe there are still plenty in Holland and Germany as wel las the US. In the US you get club and international FJ's like they have club and internationel 420s. 'Club' versions dont use the spiniker or trapeze
------------- ...yesterday I couldnt spell enginner...now I are one!......
|
Posted By: Bumble
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 6:00am
Originally posted by Rupert
It never caught on much in Britain, probebly because it had to fight against the Enterprise at exactly the same length and sail area.....
|
I think it is much more than that. see link:
http://www.ifjo.org - http://www.ifjo.org We have a few here in TW and it is fantastic. A junior version of the FD which, a bit like the OK, tries to replicate the developments of its bigger sister with cost aforethought. I think it never caught on in the UK because the FD was never so strong at a lower level. Also we had established youth classes which the parents are never keen to change (the laser 2 vs 420 battle springs to mind) and I think most importantly, at that time anyway, the UK always does the exact opposite of Europe.
It was/is our loss - it is fast, demanding and highly technical.
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 9:25am
Originally posted by laser47
which is probably why they never caught on |
I think it was more the sailors and the large stone pier that kept on jumping out at them, rather than the boats...having said that, the rather over built GP 14's are still floating (if not much else) after 25 years of abuse!
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: NeilP
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 9:45am
As an ex-FJ owner, I have to say it was a great little boat, light and responsive to sail, and a lot more fun than a 420, which is probably the best comparison. The class is still very strong in the US, but also in Europe. Much like the FD, really, big fleets and much-loved just about everywhere except here!
BTW, the Javelin was designed as a training boat for the FD!! Got to agree, though, it's a cracker in its own right.
Neil
------------- No FD? No Comment!
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 10:41am
I think i am right in saying that there was a marauder on ebay a while back which went for a tidy sum. I was looking for a cheap boat at the time but by the end of the auction it was definitely not cheap! Didn't look like a bad boat though, should be sailing about somewhere I'd have thought as it was in good condition.
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 5:54pm
There are two Marauders at Sutton Bingham(yeovil) owned by the same person. He was racing last weekend.
If you want a cheap boat with performance and a challenge try the Hornet. We picked up a reasonable one on a combi for £500. One v good suit of sails and one not so good. Ok it needs some cosmetic work on the varnish but we have sailed her all winter and will tidy her up when the sun shines. She should be competetive with the rest of the fleet so we cant blame the boat anymore.
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 6:50pm
Yes the Hornet's a good boat, I kept mine for ten years i enjoyed it so much. the only reason I sold it was because I got too fat.
|
Posted By: E.J.
Date Posted: 01 Mar 06 at 7:04pm
I would'nt call it under rated though, they always seem to have strong fleets and have done for many years.
-------------
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 02 Mar 06 at 7:10pm
Actually I was wrong. the Hornet's a great boat! And yes, the racing at opens and championships is good, they're sailed by a good crowd of people too.
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:10am
My point was "Off thread" my apologies. Not at all underated but bang for buck you cant do better.
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:50am
You retiring the planker then roger?
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 1:05pm
Paul, the planker will be taking a bit of a back seat this year. She is now 53 years old and a bit frail to push too hard. She will still come out for the occasional play on the beach and the Classic & Vintage nationals but I would like to see if we can keep up with you guys with a more up together boat. I was worried at the SGP that I might end up with a pile of matchwood and dont think thats appropriate for the oldest Sailing Hornet.So I will be treating her with a little more care in future.
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 1:37pm
Good good, so might we see you at Hunts for our classic open then?
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: rogerd
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 2:02pm
Paul PMd you on fastsail.
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 2:55pm
Rog...replied to you on Fastsail....
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: Porteous
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 7:47pm
Dont forget to visit the TASAR stand and see one of sailings best kept secrets
Light, fast 1023 and only two sails
|
Posted By: Porteous
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 7:49pm
[QUOTE=Porteous]
Dont forget to visit the TASAR stand at the dinghy show and see one of sailings best kept secrets
Light, fast PY1023 and only two sails AND Nicole Kidman sails one]
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 8:16pm
but not THE Nicole Kidman (although we are led to believe she is as easy on the eye as the one we all know).
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 8:38pm
-------------
|
Posted By: Porteous
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:15pm
Yes Yes I know, but she is so shy and its, ooh so cold for out-door photos. She has, however, promised to do a shoot and wrap herself in our new trannies (mylar Sails) so keep an eye on the Tasar web site!!
She's also promised to come and have some of our Tasar birthday cake on Saturday at the dinghy show ,so do come over and have a nibble with her . You will also get to see the great new imported Tasars from Aussie with their sexy new trannies.
Tasar : sailings best kept secret
Ps my "other boat is a Blaze" " 528 Cutting edge of cocking about " and no I didn't try a 300
|
Posted By: jeffers
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:25pm
Originally posted by Porteous
Ps my "other boat is a Blaze" " 528 Cutting edge of cocking about " and no I didn't try a 300 |
I thought it was......
------------- Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
|
Posted By: Prince Buster
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:30pm
Okay im not sure what you mean by the word "trannies" porteous but its
definitely conjuring up less than desirable images in my mind .
------------- international moth - "what what?"
|
Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 9:38pm
Trannies are laminate sails... im assuming its from 'transparent'
The cherubs get a bad rep for too much class plugging on here (which
rarely happens anyway except in jest.. I think we're quite restrained
considering how damn great we are)... how many tasar related posts have
we had this week? 
Looking foreward to having a look at the new boat this weekend though...
-------------
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 03 Mar 06 at 11:19pm
But then the Tasar is just another Cherub offshoot anyway... [grin]
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 04 Mar 06 at 1:57am
Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 04 Mar 06 at 12:38pm
Isis is right, I so tired of going to this topic and not finding any pics. Here's me in somebody elses boat
|
Posted By: redback
Date Posted: 04 Mar 06 at 12:41pm
And here's me in my boat, not super exciting I know but better than text.

|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 04 Mar 06 at 9:12pm
Originally posted by Blobby
Stretching it there Jim! |
No, Jim is quite right. The cherub, by John Spencer, spawned a longer version, the Javelin, which was the basis for the Tasar, Bethwaite adapting lines to suit his design brief.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: Blobby
Date Posted: 04 Mar 06 at 11:22pm
I KNOW!!!!!
How would you describe a 14ft offshoot of a 12ft class?
12ft to 14ft = stretching it!
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 05 Mar 06 at 6:42pm
lol, just a little.
i didn't know the tasar and the javelin came from the cherub
-------------
|
Posted By: E.J.
Date Posted: 05 Mar 06 at 8:10pm
I think the Javelin mentioned is the Aussie Skiff kind(similar in appearence to the 12ft that spawned it) and not the fastsail Peter Milne designed British kind.
-------------
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 05 Mar 06 at 10:15pm
Originally posted by laser47
lol, just a little.
i didn't know the tasar and the javelin came from the cherub |
You can make a case that every skiff influenced new dinghy decends from John Spancer's orginal Pennant Class design "Cherub", and if you really stretch (both ways) all the big lightweight offshore boats too, which are in the lineage of John Spencer's "Ragtime" which had a certain look of 65ft Cherub about it with its lightweight hull and hard chines.
Spencer was by far the most underated and perhaps the most influential designer of the second half of the twentieth century. Amongst those he was personally involved with were the Bethwaites, Ron Holland and Bruce Farr.
A couple of obituaries...
http://www.firebug.co.nz/images/acrobat/download/js_obituary.pdf - http://www.firebug.co.nz/images/acrobat/download/js_obituary .pdf
http://www.sailingsource.com/cherub/spencer.htm - http://www.sailingsource.com/cherub/spencer.htm
|
Posted By: Robochimp
Date Posted: 06 Mar 06 at 1:33pm
are cherubs a class or a cult????
|
Posted By: timnoyce
Date Posted: 06 Mar 06 at 2:34pm
Well we regularly meet at stone henge, dance round camp fires, eat dead bats and bath in smod sailors blood..... mwah ha ha ha 
(the majority of this post may in fact be totally fictional)
------------- http://www.facebook.com/bearfootdesign - BEARFOOT DESIGN
Cherub 2648 - Comfortably Numb
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 06 Mar 06 at 9:32pm
so what you really mean to say is you regullarly meet at a randomly selected destinatation. talk about cherubs a lot and sl*g off smod classes while getting drunk
sounds like fun
-------------
|
Posted By: Isis
Date Posted: 06 Mar 06 at 9:38pm
there not randomly selected destinations...
-------------
|
Posted By: Robochimp
Date Posted: 07 Mar 06 at 12:32am
Originally posted by timnoyce
Well we regularly meet at stone henge, dance round camp fires, eat dead bats and bath in smod sailors blood..... mwah ha ha ha 
(the majority of this post may in fact be totally fictional)
|
no virgin sacrifces....im dissapointed.
|
Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 14 Mar 06 at 8:00pm
Originally posted by Guest#260
I borrowed a Tasar when we had the worlds at our club - 100 boat fleet.
Very nice boat and now they have the new sails it look very "now".
Rick

|
very tasty photo, cheers rick
whip many boats on the fetch as they plane so easily.
Mylars should save the class. I had one and may buy one
again as the mylars are cheap and last longer tthan dacron. Need tight
leeeches- as with any boat though
Megabyte
laser EPS - too many build issues
RS200- many say it is nicer than the 400- used to eat them in the tasar though
did I forget to say 59er....
|
Posted By: hurricane
Date Posted: 14 Mar 06 at 9:25pm
the hurricane 5.9 is in my opinion a under rated boat in todays market,
it has so much going for it, cheap 2nd hand prices, great build quality, large nationals (50), great fleet, option to go 3 sail and stay same handicap + many many more!!
------------- lifes to short to sail slow boats!
RIP Olympic Tornado 1976-2007
|
Posted By: laser47
Date Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 7:13pm
OMG the EPS has a kite now !!!!
-------------
|
Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 7:16pm
what are u on about? laser stoped production years ago
by any chance do u mean the vortex?
------------- International 14 1503
|
Posted By: Matt Jackson
Date Posted: 15 Mar 06 at 7:48pm
Maybe that's just their strategy... if it stops selling stick an assy on it and see if anyone buys one?
------------- Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
Posted By: carshalton fc
Date Posted: 16 Mar 06 at 11:08am
yer maybe. it does look fun but if u want a singlehanded trapeze boat with an assy there is the 700.mps and they look so much better than the minging vortex.
------------- International 14 1503
|
Posted By: Chew my RS
Date Posted: 16 Mar 06 at 11:24am
Originally posted by Matt Jackson
Maybe that's just their strategy... if it stops selling stick an assy on it and see if anyone buys one? |
That seems to be Topper's strategy too. Bring out a singlehander, add a jib, then a kite, then a trapeze, then a bigger main. What next?
I think the Vortex offers something different to the MPS/700, but how anyone can claim it's not a cat is beyond me (although cat sailors may not want to be associated with it!).
Not so much under rated as unknown (in the UK), the NS14. The Tasar is essentially a (slightly stretched) one-design 30 year old NS14. I haven't sailed one, but I reckon if the Tasar is good, the NS must be better.
|
Posted By: damp_freddie
Date Posted: 08 Apr 06 at 2:31pm
I think that was toppers Idea
but turboing a 600 when you have a perfectly good 700 or MPS....
|
Posted By: vscott
Date Posted: 12 Apr 06 at 5:57pm
I have great memories of my parents' Jolly Boat in Chichester Harbour.
Planed beautifully but the genoa took a lot of getting in.
Now I'm in an Osprey which is close....
|
Posted By: Medway Maniac
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 12:59am
Best boat I ever sailed (and owned in fact) was a Jacksnipe, Jack Holt's answer to the Fireball.
Exciting, easy to sail and easily the best behaved boat I've known when capsized. It had a double-bottom with footwells for the helm, would sit indefinitely on its side without turtling yet self-drained just fine when up again. Poor build quality and poor marketing let it down though.
Closest thing today is the 3000, easy-peasy, but great fun. I gather the V3000 with its sealed mast is also reluctant to turtle.
|
Posted By: Dave389
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 2:58am
The vortex is not a cat its a tunnel hull, a cat by definition has two hulls, and im sure the last time I looked the vortex only had one.
Yes i'm a cat sailor but i have also sailed the vortex as my old crew had one as a toy they do handle a bit like a cat and some of the techniques used in cat sailing do work well on the vortex but when you get half the hull out the water they dont go any faster where one hull out the water on a cat sure makes a big difference in terms of speed.
and as with the EPS the vortex has some build issues IMHO
ps cut my teeth racing ents and fireballs many moons ago and for what its worth the fire brick was and still is a great boat to sail.
|
Posted By: Chris 249
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 8:30am
But what's the difference between a tunnel hull and a catamaran? Does
the Vortex actually only have one hull? What's the definition of
a "hull"?
I'm pretty sure all of the tunnel-hull powerboats are/were called cats,
not monos; certainly most are, whether or not they have an air gap
between the hulls if I remember right.
The difference can't just be having a solid bit between the "hulls",
because that means old Shearwaters, Yvonnes etc and cruising cats are
tunnel hulls.
There was a "tunnel hull" racing boat way back in the 1800s; Dominion.
It was a big scow, with a tunnel through the centre. Even then, she was
often called a catamaran. She was certainly banned because she
was too much like one and I'm pretty sure that cat sailors have claimed
her as one of their ancestors. Tunnel hull Moths were also banned
as being catamarans.
Surely if we just try to work out how many "hulls" something has,
there's plenty of potential for things to get really messy. If a Vortex
is a mono, when what about a modified Vortex with a bigger tunnel and
more defined "hulls"? At exactly what stage does it stop being part of
a tunnel hull, and one of two separate hulls? How would you define that
to keep boats that are effectively cats out of mono racing?
Seems to me a boat that has two separate pieces of buoyancy
side-by-side and connected has two hulls by definition and is therefore
either a cat or a proa.
|
Posted By: Chew my RS
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 9:02am
Originally posted by Dave389
The vortex is not a cat its a tunnel hull, a cat by definition has two hulls, and im sure the last time I looked the vortex only had one.
Yes i'm a cat sailor but i have also sailed the vortex as my old crew had one as a toy they do handle a bit like a cat and some of the techniques used in cat sailing do work well on the vortex but when you get half the hull out the water they dont go any faster where one hull out the water on a cat sure makes a big difference in terms of speed.
and as with the EPS the vortex has some build issues IMHO
ps cut my teeth racing ents and fireballs many moons ago and for what its worth the fire brick was and still is a great boat to sail.
|
Its definitely a cat, albeit a small one. I'll eat my hat if that hull works effectively as a lift device (far too much weight, too big a gap and not aerodynamic enough). They're not as bad as people make out, but it is definitely a cat.
I would call the red moth here a tunnel hull mono http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.tsca.net/images/Tassie/ODMoth615.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.tsca.net/Tassie2.html&h=216&w=350&sz=25&hl=en&start=9&tbnid=CfnEg5GiNRlqwM:&tbnh=71&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dscow%2Bmoth%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN - http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.tsca.net/i mages/Tassie/ODMoth615.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.tsca.net /Tassie2.html&h=216&w=350&sz=25&hl=en&st art=9&tbnid=CfnEg5GiNRlqwM:&tbnh=71&tbnw=116& ;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dscow%2Bmoth%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr% 3D%26sa%3DN but even then others might claim its a cat.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 9:08am
On the other hand you don't really sail the Vortex as a Cat - at least when I tried doing the wild thing downwind in one it don't ome off (unlike me). I call it a one-and-a-half-maran.
|
Posted By: CurlyBen
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 11:22am
Chew Valley SC seem to count them as monos, as I've seen at least one down there and there's a ban on multihulls. Maybe you could argue it's a monohull if the buoyancy tanks are continuous? Just a thought..
------------- RS800 GBR848
Weston SC
|
Posted By: Chew my RS
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 12:06pm
Nice idea Curly, but not so. Buoyancy aint buoyancy if its not in the water and there's no continuous transverse buoyancy below the water on a Vortex. Also I don't think the 'tramp' is hollow, so there's no contiuous reserve buoyancy above the water.
Perhaps the difference can be described by the design philosophy. A cat gets its performance due the high initial stability and slender hulls. A tunnel hull gets its performance from being lifted by air, which reduces drag. The Vortex fits this description of a cat, but not the tunnel hull description. Ergo, its a catamaran. The fact that Chew allow them just shows that Bristol Water don't know the difference.
|
Posted By: No. 5
Date Posted: 13 Apr 06 at 12:08pm
The vortex has four waterlines, that makes it a cat, surely. I think the vortex is accepted by monohull only clubs because it's dimensions and performance are within the parameters of a lot of monohulls.
|
|