Expensive Sports...
Printed From: Yachts and Yachting Online
Category: Dinghy classes
Forum Name: Dinghy development
Forum Discription: The latest moves in the dinghy market
URL: http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12515
Printed Date: 07 Jul 25 at 6:30am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.665y - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Expensive Sports...
Posted By: JimC
Subject: Expensive Sports...
Date Posted: 10 Sep 16 at 10:06pm
£40 petrol return to Leeds
£25 match ticket
£4 cheeseburger
£1 diet coke
£3 program
£35 parking ticket :-(
Over £100 to see one shot off target and a weak header :-(
And I thought sailing was expensive!! |
(Post http://www.intcanoe.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1817&p=10043&sid=1f22486434a3ba69f4686af4c34f6f96#p10043" rel="nofollow - on the IC Forum ).
|
Replies:
Posted By: iiiiticki
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 11:13am
I was at the Goodwood Revival on Friday. this makes every sport look cheap, Buy a Ferrari 1962 250 GT SWB. £1.5 Million. Hire an ex champion touring car driver to drive it, £££££ Hire an expert team to maintain it, £££ Transport it round Europe to various high quality classic race meetings, ££££ Entry fees, tyres, consumables ££££ Then said touring car driver smacks it into the tyre wall *******
Sailing is so cheap......
|
Posted By: Chris 249
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 12:28pm
Try big-boat sailing! About 150,000 pounds for a mainsail and 6-10 mill for a boat.
------------- sailcraftblog.wordpress.com
The history and design of the racing dinghy.
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 12:47pm
Mad. Quite mad.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 1:05pm
Expensive to participate or spectate?
Participating in a quick sunday morning game of footy down at the rec is fairly cheap
|
Posted By: Brass
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 1:15pm
And watching a park game even cheaper <g>
|
Posted By: Steve411
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 2:43pm
I often watch park games, but then I'm a Coventry City fan 
------------- Steve B
RS300 411
https://www.facebook.com/groups/55859303803" rel="nofollow - RS300 page
|
Posted By: Daniel Holman
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 6:27pm
250 SWB for £1.5 million?! Buy buy buy I thought they were $5-7 million?!
|
Posted By: iiiiticki
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 6:59pm
Originally posted by Daniel Holman
250 SWB for £1.5 million?! Buy buy buy I thought they were $5-7 million?!
|
Probably true Dan but I thought no one would believe me!
|
Posted By: BruceV
Date Posted: 12 Sep 16 at 7:57pm
Watching the Goodwood Revival live stream was excellent, free and dry (for Saturday, at least).
|
Posted By: Cameron Winton
Date Posted: 17 Sep 16 at 1:57pm
Is golf not hideously expensive for a walk in the park?
|
Posted By: Do Different
Date Posted: 17 Sep 16 at 4:20pm
Not really, municipal courses can be little different to hiring a Club boat for the day. Fact is little or much you can make pretty well any sport as expensive or cheap as your ambition or desire dictates.
|
Posted By: Ardea
Date Posted: 19 Sep 16 at 9:05am
My understanding is that golf can be from about £15 upwards for a round depending on where you go. Then a set of clubs can be found from about £100 upwards. £200 probably gets you your first year of trying golfing and that probably wouldn't get you very far with sailing.
As an ongoing hobby it's very likely more expensive than sailing, but cheaper to dip in and out of. Plus a set of clubs can linger in the loft without any real cost or inconvenience.
|
Posted By: Cirrus
Date Posted: 19 Sep 16 at 11:30am
Previous generations often got into the sport by sailing (and working on)cheaper older boats and crewing for others. .... They got DIY boat skills doing the former and could learn a lot off the typically older helms they crewed with. If they got the bug, as so many did, they soon made their own choices on where they spent their own modest resources - and partly sacrificed other 'expensive' things to get a more decent boat in time.
Nice if the bank of 'mum & dad' (typically) help more today .... but imo this route does not necessarily instal lasting and deep involvement for a majority. This can blow away as soon as the crutch of transport/support and 'provided' hardware disappears.
It is not the price of new boats that is the problem... they were always 'expensive' surely relative to an (early) modest income at any price. There is still a very strong case in my mind for promoting crewed boats at clubs in part for the impact it appeared to have in the past. Singlehanders are great BUT 'team' based involvment can help build lasting greater committment early on ..... Discuss.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 19 Sep 16 at 11:38am
The trouble with crewed boats is the need for two lifestyles to coincide. I'd much rather sail a two hander, but its not practical for me.
|
Posted By: davidyacht
Date Posted: 19 Sep 16 at 12:18pm
Back in the day I sailed in a club where Cadets were the junior class, and we had fleets of OK's, National 12's and Merlins, there was no Handicap fleet. As the cadets got older, the Cadet Crews would become Cadet Helms, and the Cadet Helms would progress to helming or crewing in the "Senior" boats ... having transferable skills.
Worth bearing in mind that there was a good stock of competitive second hand boats in these classes at the time, that could be done up, and season old sails could be picked up off the open meeting sailors.
At that time magazines like Y&Y and Yachting and Boating Weekly made heroes of some of the open meeting winners, and therefore it was exciting when a Silver Tiller Meeting came to the lake, especially if you got to crew for one of the old boys at the club.
Also, the Adult Class boats were often lent to Juniors/Cadets to give them the experience, often for Open Meetings or Cup Races. Quite a few of my generation at that club are still racing dinghies today ... 40 years on.
------------- Happily living in the past
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 1:38pm
Originally posted by JimC
The trouble with crewed boats is the need for two lifestyles to coincide. I'd much rather sail a two hander, but its not practical for me. |
Jim - are you sure there's absolutely no-one in your life who might like to learn to sail and could manage the front of something like an Ent?
Or do you really mean you can't find anyone to crew a high performance double-hander with a view to winning?
Of course, so many helm's aversion to doing the former may be a reason for the distinct lack of the latter type of crew.
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 1:53pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
Originally posted by JimC
The trouble with crewed boats is the need for two lifestyles to coincide. I'd much rather sail a two hander, but its not practical for me. |
Jim - are you sure there's absolutely no-one in your life who might like to learn to sail and could manage the front of something like an Ent?
Or do you really mean you can't find anyone to crew a high performance double-hander with a view to winning?
Of course, so many helm's aversion to doing the former may be a reason for the distinct lack of the latter type of crew. |
for me it's simply a matter of time... a friend and I talked about buying a fireball for club racing on a Wednesday night. Nice in theory, but then a quick look at calendars and we could have both made a max of 5 of them all year due to work and pre-existing / priority family holidays.... sorry, but that's just not enough of a return on investment.... We came to the conclusion that in reality, we'd be better off sharing a Laser- a suggestion that neither of us have rushed to take to fruition.
|
Posted By: blueboy
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 3:37pm
Originally posted by JimC
The trouble with crewed boats is the need for two lifestyles to coincide. I'd much rather sail a two hander, but its not practical for me. |
Yes, I much prefer a two hander but the fact is I've done much more sailing with a single hander than in my last few seasons with a two hander.
|
Posted By: gordon1277
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 3:53pm
I bought a 400 to have a bit of fun with and try to get some of the trainees into crewing but its not been that easy. ended up with a good guy for the summer which got me back sailing the boat a lot better but he has gone back to sea in the merchant.
So anybody want to have a go at Lee on Solent for the Autumn? ideally not to heavy but strong enough to get the kite up and down. Happy to teach from base level but would prefer a little experience.
Saturday afternoons at 2.30 changing to 2pm when the clocks change.
Keeping the Phantom for proper sailing for a lard Ar#e and when crews cant be found.
------------- Gordon
Lossc
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 3:59pm
Originally posted by turnturtle
...
for me it's simply a matter of time... a friend and I talked about buying a fireball for club racing on a Wednesday night. Nice in theory, but then a quick look at calendars and we could have both made a max of 5 of them all year due to work and pre-existing / priority family holidays.... sorry, but that's just not enough of a return on investment.... We came to the conclusion that in reality, we'd be better off sharing a Laser- a suggestion that neither of us have rushed to take to fruition.
|
Two friends of mine co-own an RS800. They both get guest crews in to sail it, and sail it together a few times a year. Some clubs are not helpful with this kind of arrangement, only allowing guest crews for say 3 races. With keelboats, it's quite common for syndicates to own boats and get crew from a wide circle of people. Sometimes points in the series are just for the boat, which is handy when your helm is still on the M25 when the gun goes...
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 4:08pm
Originally posted by gordon1277
So anybody want to have a go at Lee on Solent for the Autumn? ideally not to heavy but strong enough to get the kite up and down. Happy to teach from base level but would prefer a little experience.
Saturday afternoons at 2.30 changing to 2pm when the clocks change.
|
To a degree you're all proving my point - the examples above all seem to want a ready trained sailor to crew a complex trap and/or kite boat. Go to just a main and jib and the pool of potential crews grows a huge amount. You have to specifically invite people though, to get new people through the door. Just randomly asking rarely seems to bring results.
The point relating to the original thread - conflating boat ownership and going sailing as one and the same is the mistake. Crewing is cheap as chips, boat ownership less so...
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 4:47pm
It did cross my mind that an Ent might suit my (ir)regular crew and I better then the Spice but then I decided I didn't want to go back to something that took 10 mins to empty after the inevitable capsize. I realised this year that I'm still quite a good sailor on my own and a regular crew and the chance to practice together is probably not going to happen so this sport is just about to get twice as expensive
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 4:48pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
To a degree you're all proving my point - the examples above all seem to want... |
Actually I prefer to sail as forward hand.
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 4:56pm
Originally posted by JimC
Originally posted by DiscoBall
To a degree you're all proving my point - the examples above all seem to want... |
Actually I prefer to sail as forward hand. |
Fair enough, but that's certainly reducing the pool of potential team-mates.
|
Posted By: rb_stretch
Date Posted: 21 Sep 16 at 8:25pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
To a degree you're all proving my point - the examples above all seem to want a ready trained sailor to crew a complex trap and/or kite boat. Go to just a main and jib and the pool of potential crews grows a huge amount. You have to specifically invite people though, to get new people through the door. Just randomly asking rarely seems to bring results. The point relating to the original thread - conflating boat ownership and going sailing as one and the same is the mistake. Crewing is cheap as chips, boat ownership less so... |
Very much the reason behind why I bought an Albacore - easy to get even inexperienced crews to join in. Surprisingly some of the better sailors seem to really enjoy the jib and jib stick combo.
|
Posted By: blueboy
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 7:13am
Sorry but if the answer is that I should sail an Enterprise or an Albacore, the wrong question is being asked. I've zero interest in doing that and yes I have sailed Ents enough to know that.
|
Posted By: gordon1277
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 7:51am
The reason I bought the 400 is we have a fleet at the club, plus the other option is the 2000 which does seem to work for novices as they are often taught to sail in them or similar(sorry I dont like the 2000 so I had no choice). But RYA training seems to exclude spinnakers and crewing skills in general.
I still think the RYA should create a Dinghy crews course with level 1 being rigging jib and learning about what angles when balance , tell tales etc.
level 2 asyemetric spinnaker rigging and the use of.
level 3 symetric spinnaker
At a club like Lee with big sea courses not having a spinnaker in a two man boat would be daft, I agree completely different on a smaller venue.
------------- Gordon
Lossc
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 2:14pm
Originally posted by blueboy
Sorry but if the answer is that I should sail an Enterprise or an Albacore, the wrong question is being asked. I've zero interest in doing that and yes I have sailed Ents enough to know that.
|
Not sure anyone is going to force you, I purely plucked the Ent out as an example of a simple boat.
Given how often sailing's decline is discussed on here it's curious that very few are willing in any way to adjust their own sailing in a way that might grow the sport. Easier to hope that external things such as TV coverage or ever faster boats will somehow solve it, or that the blame lies with those non-sailors being 'too lazy' (quite a common line of reasoning in various dying activities - a bit like a crap restaurant blaming its absent customers rather than the food...  ).
Crewing solves the main barrier - the perception that sailing in any form is expensive - but it's not going to get very far unless we sail boats that are accessible for a broad spectrum of crews.
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 2:21pm
Originally posted by RS400atC
Originally posted by turnturtle
...
for me it's simply a matter of time... a friend and I talked about buying a fireball for club racing on a Wednesday night. Nice in theory, but then a quick look at calendars and we could have both made a max of 5 of them all year due to work and pre-existing / priority family holidays.... sorry, but that's just not enough of a return on investment.... We came to the conclusion that in reality, we'd be better off sharing a Laser- a suggestion that neither of us have rushed to take to fruition.
|
Two friends of mine co-own an RS800. They both get guest crews in to sail it, and sail it together a few times a year. Some clubs are not helpful with this kind of arrangement, only allowing guest crews for say 3 races. With keelboats, it's quite common for syndicates to own boats and get crew from a wide circle of people. Sometimes points in the series are just for the boat, which is handy when your helm is still on the M25 when the gun goes...
|
that might work with the Fireball tbh.... not sure either of us are too keen on stepping back in an 800 again.
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 2:39pm
Educated guess would suggest that the initial costs would be about £5000 for a novice couple to get into sailing with a second hand boat.
Crewing position is not seen as attractive as wiggling the stick. The crew are still treated as second class sailors by many in the sport. Many clubs still don't publish the crew names in their results.
.
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 3:00pm
Originally posted by transient
The crew are still treated as second class sailors by many in the sport. Many clubs still don't publish the crew names in their results.
.
|
and is that likely to change if we all go out and buy Ents or iCons or whatever they are to be called by the Seppos.... hunting for crews on club Facebook groups whilst trying to manage yours and their duty swaps on that other sh*t site we all use now.
What's the alternative ... picking up adult newbies off of courses only to be stitched come winter time and they've all ticked 'sailing' on their bucket list? And let's not go started on the other talent pool: 'grooming' crews out of youth classes..... shall we call this Operation Yewtree just for the irony? It genuinely wouldn't surprise me to find out that parents would ask to CRB check boat owners these days before Amelia and Tarquin are allowed out to play.... times have certainly changed folks, no point harking back.
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 3:28pm
[/QUOTE]
What's the alternative ... picking up adult newbies off of courses only to be stitched come winter time and they've all ticked 'sailing' on their bucket list?
[/QUOTE]
Well we could all just argue about PY over and over and over (and over) again...
I think you're way off about the adult beginners. My local kayak clubs racing section was equally sceptical about running an adult begin racing course (it's a sport with almost identical demographic problems and expensive, difficult to use kit). A year on we have over 50% of the original course still racing and a similar hit ratio for the second course. Probably the biggest influx of new people they've seen for a very long time.
Sailing courses are pretty expensive - people have to be pretty motivated to do that. I suspect they then get put off when they realise how inward looking and disinterested in beginners most clubs are.
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 3:28pm
Originally posted by turnturtle
Originally posted by transient
The crew are still treated as second class sailors by many in the sport. Many clubs still don't publish the crew names in their results.
.
|
and is that likely to change if we all go out and buy Ents or iCons or whatever they are to be called by the Seppos.... hunting for crews on club Facebook groups whilst trying to manage yours and their duty swaps on that other sh*t site we all use now.
What's the alternative ... picking up adult newbies off of courses only to be stitched come winter time and they've all ticked 'sailing' on their bucket list? And let's not go started on the other talent pool: 'grooming' crews out of youth classes..... shall we call this Operation Yewtree just for the irony? It genuinely wouldn't surprise me to find out that parents would ask to CRB check boat owners these days before Amelia and Tarquin are allowed out to play.... times have certainly changed folks, no point harking back.
|
???
The answer to my 2 points is simple:
Many need to show a little more respect for the crew. and Those that don't need to feckin well publish crew names in the results.
Not sure why you over complicated your response
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 3:44pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
I suspect they then get put off when they realise how inward looking and disinterested in beginners most clubs are.
|
indeed - I think you could be very right. I'd be interested to see the sign up rate and retention rate (3 years +) from adult beginner courses. I suspect the latter is mere snip of the former, but hey, I'm completely guessing here...... perhaps there's someone who actually knows lurking here?
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 3:54pm
But isn't that the lack of places (i.e. crewing positions) to go after the course?
Beginners buying their own boats and trailing round way behind the club fleet is - unsusprisingly - demotivating for them in many cases,
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 4:00pm
catch 22 I guess..... unfortunately there is a distinct lack of boats which work in single handed and double handed mode with sufficient enjoyment in both.
It's one of the lures of the 16ft cats.... high performance, but accessible single handers, or good rides for newbies on the front too.
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 4:19pm
Not really great from the expense side of things though...
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 4:24pm
Originally posted by transient
Educated guess would suggest that the initial costs would be about £5000 for a novice couple to get into sailing with a second hand boat.
Crewing position is not seen as attractive as wiggling the stick. The crew are still treated as second class sailors by many in the sport. Many clubs still don't publish the crew names in their results.
|
Agreed about crewing positions attractiveness but I'm contemplating moving up the front of the Spice and letting my crew take over stick wiggling duties to see if we work together better that way (we have very little time to practice together and even less racing). I'll be tactician, mainsail trimmer, spinnaker handler and moving ballast, he can just point it and concentrate on keeping it in the groove.
I disagree tha £5k is entry level money though, a beginner could easily buy a used boat, all the sailing kit and join a club and still have change from £1000 if they are happy with an old Ent/L@ser or WHY and not too precious about having the latest carbon/kevlar/foam sandwich super light boat from whatever is currently the flavour of the month.
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 5:17pm
As for the costs, I did say a "novice couple". My costs were calculated using the governing body prescribed method as in "Get Afloat"
2 handed Boat that works, not an old tub. RYA 1&2 course Kit for hot and cold Membership Boat park fees Insurance.
On top of that there would be expected duties at the club, so sooner or later there would be Power boat course and Safety boat course.
what is and what isn't expensive is purely subjective anyhow.
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 5:47pm
Ok, fair comment but factoring in the cost of a 5 day L1&2 course and two people I still think it's possible for under £2k all in. There are plenty of decent boats out there for under £1000, theres a very tidy Topper Topaz Trez going for £750 at my club as I type (cheaper than a 5 day L1&2 course for two people).
Sailing is never going to be as cheap to participate in as footy on the park but it needn't be an expensive sport by most people's standards.
Perhaps what puts a lot of people off is the perceived need to go on courses, back in the boom times in the '60s we just went out and did it. I was lucky enough to be "messing about in boats" (my own Optimist) when I was 11, a few pointers from my dad and then I just worked it out for myself. Same 20 years later when I got into windsurfing, I read a couple of books and taught myself.
|
Posted By: blueboy
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 6:40pm
Originally posted by transient
On top of that there would be expected duties at the club, so sooner or later there would be Power boat course and Safety boat course. |
There are plenty of duties that don't involve the need to drive a safety boat. Plus is it precisely the duty you don't want to spread around too much, otherwise you end up with drivers who don't get enough practice to be useful.
|
Posted By: blueboy
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 6:45pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
Given how often sailing's decline is discussed on here it's curious that very few are willing in any way to adjust their own sailing in a way that might grow the sport. |
Just very few? I'm surprised there are any at all if your suggestion is that we should go and buy different boats to the ones we actually want on the questionable assumption that would attract new sailors.
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 7:07pm
Originally posted by blueboy
Originally posted by transient
On top of that there would be expected duties at the club, so sooner or later there would be Power boat course and Safety boat course. |
There are plenty of duties that don't involve the need to drive a safety boat. Plus is it precisely the duty you don't want to spread around too much, otherwise you end up with drivers who don't get enough practice to be useful.
|
I'm presenting my thoughts from the perspective of a novice couple who have researched the details of taking up sailing.
They would probably go to the RYA site to check out how to learn. They would conclude that they needed a 1&2 certificate and would have to join a club. Good sense that.
They would probably go to a club website to find out what was expected. Some clubs state that duties are expected. One of the duties stated would be safety boat and of course the appropriate course would be suggested.
I agree with you that the courses don't have to be done.......but it is often presented that way.
|
Posted By: rb_stretch
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 7:08pm
Originally posted by blueboy
Originally posted by DiscoBall
Given how often sailing's decline is discussed on here it's curious that very few are willing in any way to adjust their own sailing in a way that might grow the sport. | Just very few? I'm surprised there are any at all if your suggestion is that we should go and buy different boats to the ones we actually want on the questionable assumption that would attract new sailors. |
Well the boat I would want to sail would be one where I'm at the back on a trap. Given my lack of time, to get back up to the skill level where any half decent crew would be interested, basically means I would be crewless and not sailing at all. So yes I bought a boat that would be easy to find crews for, not one I really wanted to sail.
|
Posted By: craiggo
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 8:03pm
Having sailed all manner of boats incl. Graduates, Lasers, ISO, Int 14, RS600, 49er, RS700 I now sail a Graduate and an OK. Both traditional boats and both somewhat slower than many of my previous boats. The thing is that these boats are no less rewarding. Sure they don't have the initial kerb appeal, but you don't watch your boat sailing, you actively participate in sailing it so a) it doesn't matter what it looks like and b) it doesn't actually matter how fast it is. The key thing is that it feels good and keeps you entertained.
For me the thing that is killing entry to the sport is the misguided belief that you need the qualifications before you race. The only sailing course I have done was a joint services comp. crew which was frankly just a free holiday, and yet I have somehow survived dinghy racing for 35yrs. Rather than simply churning people through courses we need to just get them out crewing for people.
But the next issue is that an awful lot of wannabe sailors want to helm and don't seem to have any interest in crewing, so even when offered opportunities they turn them down because they want the glory job of steering.
Of course all of this is mixed with the desire for instant gratification. People expect to have a chance of winning on their 2nd sail, but that's just madness unless you are iGRF ;)
Somehow we need to get people crewing and we need boats like Ents, Grads, Fireflies and Albacores to get people in.
------------- OK 2129
RS200 411
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 8:22pm
Originally posted by transient
....I'm presenting my thoughts from the perspective of a novice couple who have researched the details of taking up sailing.
They would probably go to the RYA site to check out how to learn. They would conclude that they needed a 1&2 certificate and would have to join a club. Good sense that.
They would probably go to a club website to find out what was expected. Some clubs state that duties are expected. One of the duties stated would be safety boat and of course the appropriate course would be suggested.
I agree with you that the courses don't have to be done.......but it is often presented that way. |
None of my last four clubs have required powerboat or safetyboat courses.
I think your hypothetical (?) couple need to decide what they want. Sailing is not just a sport to dip into, it's halfway to being a way of life.
Sometimes it seems to me what makes it expensive is half-decent club racers splashing out on new boats, sails etc, just for club racing. Which puts pressure on people not to have a go with a tatty old boat and old sails. My latest exploit is costing similar to gym membership. I reckon £200 club membership and boat storage, harbour dues. £200 for a replica L*ser sail every other year £70 for insurance £100 for depreciation on a mid fleet boat?
At least half the UK population could afford that if they wanted to, you just have to wind back on the Sky, flash holidays, cars on HP, drugs gambling, smoking or drinking.
Sailing isn't for everyone, there is little point trying to drag more people in if they'd rather be doing something else. Also, what are you trying to drag them into? Sailing or Dinghy Racing?
|
Posted By: zippyRN
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 9:10pm
Originally posted by blueboy
Originally posted by transient
On top of that there would be expected duties at the club, so sooner or later there would be Power boat course and Safety boat course. |
There are plenty of duties that don't involve the need to drive a safety boat. Plus is it precisely the duty you don't want to spread around too much, otherwise you end up with drivers who don't get enough practice to be useful.
|
and in conditions where a safety boat is actually needed there are usually some suitably trained people who can be encouraged to provide a 'proper' rescue boat service
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 9:33pm
Originally posted by RS400atC
Originally posted by transient
....I'm presenting my thoughts from the perspective of a novice couple who have researched the details of taking up sailing.
They would probably go to the RYA site to check out how to learn. They would conclude that they needed a 1&2 certificate and would have to join a club. Good sense that.
They would probably go to a club website to find out what was expected. Some clubs state that duties are expected. One of the duties stated would be safety boat and of course the appropriate course would be suggested.
I agree with you that the courses don't have to be done.......but it is often presented that way. |
None of my last four clubs have required powerboat or safetyboat courses.
I think your hypothetical (?) couple need to decide what they want. Sailing is not just a sport to dip into, it's halfway to being a way of life.
Sometimes it seems to me what makes it expensive is half-decent club racers splashing out on new boats, sails etc, just for club racing. Which puts pressure on people not to have a go with a tatty old boat and old sails. My latest exploit is costing similar to gym membership. I reckon £200 club membership and boat storage, harbour dues. £200 for a replica L*ser sail every other year £70 for insurance £100 for depreciation on a mid fleet boat?
At least half the UK population could afford that if they wanted to, you just have to wind back on the Sky, flash holidays, cars on HP, drugs gambling, smoking or drinking.
Sailing isn't for everyone, there is little point trying to drag more people in if they'd rather be doing something else. Also, what are you trying to drag them into? Sailing or Dinghy Racing?
|
And my club doesn't require it. I was saying that some clubs suggest safety boat duties are required and that safety boat courses are available, in print, on their websites. It is presented as an additional expense to a lay person researching the sport.
I'm not trying to drag anyone into anything but the "Sailing or Dinghy Racing" comment.....that really is a laugh on this forum.
Sailing is not the cheapest sport to get into neither is it the most expensive (horse riding sheesh) but if you think any lasting participants can do it for a few quid then you are mistaken.
Many of these expense issues (and others) come about by the way that sailing presents itself.
|
Posted By: DiscoBall
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 10:22pm
Originally posted by blueboy
Just very few? I'm surprised there are any at all if your suggestion is that we should go and buy different boats to the ones we actually want on the questionable assumption that would attract new sailors.
|
Indeed wherever would there be any evidence of affordable, easy to use kit making an activity more popular.
The dinghy boom...sit-on-top kayaks...digital cameras...SUP...monofilament fishing line and glassfibre rods...probably plenty of other examples in other sports and activities.
As Chris249 seems to have pointing out for years on this forum - the most popular dinghy classes are the slow, relatively cheap, simple to use and own. The future is unlikely to be foils or multis no matter how many photos, videos and breathless column inches in the sailing press there are.
Also most competitive kit sports end up with the equipment being pushed further and further to the elite end of the spectrum by a small number of the participants. So you end up with where windsurfing or kayaking are - a boom and then a (maybe permanent) bust. SUP racing is heading along this trajectory at the moment - big growth, but the top guys want ever narrower boards...it won't end well.
With sailing in general and dinghy racing in particular - without taking people sailing (ideally more than once) there is little way they can decide if they are going to like it. It is such an abstract sport and so far removed from most people's experience - but it is worth sharing, rather than retreating into 'it's like that and that the way it is'.
|
Posted By: Chris 249
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 10:29pm
Originally posted by DiscoBall
[/QUOTE]
|
What's the alternative ... picking up adult newbies off of courses only to be stitched come winter time and they've all ticked 'sailing' on their bucket list?
[/QUOTE]
Well we could all just argue about PY over and over and over (and over) again...
I think you're way off about the adult beginners. My local kayak clubs racing section was equally sceptical about running an adult begin racing course (it's a sport with almost identical demographic problems and expensive, difficult to use kit). A year on we have over 50% of the original course still racing and a similar hit ratio for the second course. Probably the biggest influx of new people they've seen for a very long time.
Sailing courses are pretty expensive - people have to be pretty motivated to do that. I suspect they then get put off when they realise how inward looking and disinterested in beginners most clubs are.
[/QUOTE]
The only couple to go from my club's beginner course who got into racing tell us that until my wife and I (also newbs to the club) went over to talk to them, they had basically been completely ignored. They love the sport, bought their own boat, and then got left behind both on the water and in the clubhouse afterwards.
Now they have both crewed our boat, I've crewed their boat, and we see each other socially off the water. But it's hard for a small group of people to overcome the issue that the club has a whole is not welcoming, and it's hard to see how one can overcome that. We've basically given up and will probably not re-join or do club racing this season.
It's been an eye-opener to move away from our old club when we moved house. People who dropped in at our old club often used to say how different it was to go to check out a club and have people come up and chat to them. Many people raced old boats, and that was completely accepted. Partly for that reason, it actually has more boats and more members than it did in the '80s, when dinghy sailing was generally much stronger.
The sad thing is that I get the impression that our new club is more typical of the sport as a whole than our old one. Of course, if you listen to some people in the industry there is a very simple cure to the whole problem. Next time someone wonders about sailing, just show them the latest foiling cat that costs a mere year's salary, and they'll jump at it! 
------------- sailcraftblog.wordpress.com
The history and design of the racing dinghy.
|
Posted By: Do Different
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 11:04pm
Originally posted by craiggo
Having sailed all manner of boats incl. Graduates, Lasers, ISO, Int 14, RS600, 49er, RS700 I now sail a Graduate and an OK. Both traditional boats and both somewhat slower than many of my previous boats. The thing is that these boats are no less rewarding. Sure they don't have the initial kerb appeal, but you don't watch your boat sailing, you actively participate in sailing it so a) it doesn't matter what it looks like and b) it doesn't actually matter how fast it is. The key thing is that it feels good and keeps you entertained.
For me the thing that is killing entry to the sport is the misguided belief that you need the qualifications before you race. The only sailing course I have done was a joint services comp. crew which was frankly just a free holiday, and yet I have somehow survived dinghy racing for 35yrs. Rather than simply churning people through courses we need to just get them out crewing for people.
But the next issue is that an awful lot of wannabe sailors want to helm and don't seem to have any interest in crewing, so even when offered opportunities they turn them down because they want the glory job of steering.
Of course all of this is mixed with the desire for instant gratification. People expect to have a chance of winning on their 2nd sail, but that's just madness unless you are iGRF ;)
Somehow we need to get people crewing and we need boats like Ents, Grads, Fireflies and Albacores to get people in. |
 I wouldn't find fault with courses because I respect the time and effort our unpaid instructors put in. BUT Doing a course is only a small element of learning to sail and race. Unless you are particularly gifted you can multiply the hours spent on a course by 5 if a youngster and 10 in a late entrant for muscle memory and confidence to become established. Crewing can play a useful part in getting this time on the water.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 22 Sep 16 at 11:19pm
Originally posted by Chris 249
if you listen to some people in the industry there is a very simple cure ... latest foiling cat that costs a mere year's salary |
Don't see much of that from the people who actually sell boats though do we...
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 7:42am
Courses are there to put the building blocks in place so that you can learn more quickly, with fewer dead ends and bad habits. Sadly, they are treated as end goals in themselves, not as beginnings. And sadly, many centres perpetuate that idea.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: Do Different
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 8:48am
Posted By: gordon1277
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 9:21am
Some are mentioning the cost of courses being prohibitive, I think we went down the wrong route a few years ago at Lee by doing a £60 memebership and very cheap level 1 and 2 courses with the following years membership at the normal I think £120 ish for a single adult.
So lots of volunteer time training half hearted people ticking a bucket list,
club training boats given a good hammering for virtually no people staying the following year as for them buying a boat and joining in!
Making things to cheap is not always a good thing.
------------- Gordon
Lossc
|
Posted By: getafix
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 9:42am
while I'm never going to argue that dinghy racing is a cheap sport I do think people get side tracked by the cost of equipment issue and this thread picks up on the same causes I have in mind when the debate comes around (and around and around but less often that PY) about 'increasing participation. I like to be consistent, so here goes: we need less sailing clubs in this country. This would concentrate sailors of all types, including the friendly ones who actually talk to and encourage newbies, into less places, making them much easier for newbies to find. More members should equal more income, enabling clubs to have better on-shore facilities (a key part in encouraging people from outside in - changing in a portacabin or drafty old shack in January is for serious devotees only).
Most motor racing, anything to do with horses, a lot of carbon road bikes and triathlon all have hefty equipment costs, to name but a few (rowing would be another). I don't think equipment costs are the key differentiator. I know of a couple who spent about 6k last year traveling and bird watching. You can get a lot of sailing in for 6k a year.
|
Posted By: rich96
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 10:01am
It is commonly recognised that if you have your child in a football academy you should budget £5-7K a year - most of this is travel, time off work etc (3 - 4 sessions a week plus games)
I guess that might equate fairly well with youth sailing at a decent level overall ?
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 10:38am
Originally posted by getafix
so here goes: we need less sailing clubs in this country. This would concentrate sailors of all types, including the friendly ones who actually talk to and encourage newbies, into less places, making them much easier for newbies to find. More members should equal more income, enabling clubs to have better on-shore facilities (a key part in encouraging people from outside in - changing in a portacabin or drafty old shack in January is for serious devotees only). |
I'm not sure I'm terribly comfortable with that idea but it does make a strange kind of sense. But, it ain't gonna happen unless clubs close down due to lack of members (sad for the few remaining loyal members) or two clubs sharing a water amalgamate (as happened to the club I was a member of in my youth). The latter can only happen where two clubs are on the same pond, river or bit of coast so it's not going to make much difference to the overall number of clubs in the UK.
|
Posted By: AlanH
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 10:54am
Fraternal greetings to Craiggo above. I've just acquired a one third stake in Graduate 2918, for princely sum of £150. For all three of the co owners, its a second boat, hence used only occasionally by each of us. I normally race an Osprey, but the Grad will let me cruise singlehanded, or take other ppl out for shotties. So sharing purchase cost of a boat is an easy way of reducing the costs of the sport, at least the initial boat purchase. In UK we have loads of boats up to 30 or 40 years old which are still in good sailing condition, plus a lot of 90s designs like ISOs which are now unfashionable, and hence very cheap, but fun. Quite agree you can learn plenty in slow boats.
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 11:06am
Originally posted by getafix
while I'm never going to argue that dinghy racing is a cheap sport I do think people get side tracked by the cost of equipment issue and this thread picks up on the same causes I have in mind when the debate comes around (and around and around but less often that PY) about 'increasing participation. I like to be consistent, so here goes: we need less sailing clubs in this country. This would concentrate sailors of all types, including the friendly ones who actually talk to and encourage newbies, into less places, making them much easier for newbies to find. More members should equal more income, enabling clubs to have better on-shore facilities (a key part in encouraging people from outside in - changing in a portacabin or drafty old shack in January is for serious devotees only).
Most motor racing, anything to do with horses, a lot of carbon road bikes and triathlon all have hefty equipment costs, to name but a few (rowing would be another). I don't think equipment costs are the key differentiator. I know of a couple who spent about 6k last year traveling and bird watching. You can get a lot of sailing in for 6k a year.
|
A few clubs have closed, New Landlords, leases expired etc, There are some that I know of who are suffering low membership. I'm not entirely sure that any new ones have sprung up, at least not in the format that we're used to, i.e. run by members for the members........This was on the cards at least 10 years ago. Who know's it may make the sport healthier.
|
Posted By: getafix
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:00pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons
Originally posted by getafix
so here goes: we need less sailing clubs in this country. This would concentrate sailors of all types, including the friendly ones who actually talk to and encourage newbies, into less places, making them much easier for newbies to find. More members should equal more income, enabling clubs to have better on-shore facilities (a key part in encouraging people from outside in - changing in a portacabin or drafty old shack in January is for serious devotees only). |
I'm not sure I'm terribly comfortable with that idea but it does make a strange kind of sense. But, it ain't gonna happen unless clubs close down due to lack of members (sad for the few remaining loyal members) or two clubs sharing a water amalgamate (as happened to the club I was a member of in my youth). The latter can only happen where two clubs are on the same pond, river or bit of coast so it's not going to make much difference to the overall number of clubs in the UK. |
Its not comfortable viewing but it would be progress, IMO.
There might be just one club operating on most inland lakes or reservoirs but travel to pretty much any estuary, harbour or even coastal town in Britain and you will likely find at least 2 or 3 clubs mostly scraping along, perhaps one big one and then a few small....
I really HATE nannying by government or national governing bodies, but when discussing this the other night someone suggested legislation might be the only way (i.e. mandate standards or minimum facilities) to accelerate change, it was hard to find a counter that would have anywhere near the same impact as fast....
|
Posted By: bustinben
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:13pm
Originally posted by getafix
while I'm never going to argue that dinghy racing is a cheap sport I do think people get side tracked by the cost of equipment issue and this thread picks up on the same causes I have in mind when the debate comes around (and around and around but less often that PY) about 'increasing participation. I like to be consistent, so here goes: we need less sailing clubs in this country. This would concentrate sailors of all types, including the friendly ones who actually talk to and encourage newbies, into less places, making them much easier for newbies to find. More members should equal more income, enabling clubs to have better on-shore facilities (a key part in encouraging people from outside in - changing in a portacabin or drafty old shack in January is for serious devotees only).
Most motor racing, anything to do with horses, a lot of carbon road bikes and triathlon all have hefty equipment costs, to name but a few (rowing would be another). I don't think equipment costs are the key differentiator. I know of a couple who spent about 6k last year traveling and bird watching. You can get a lot of sailing in for 6k a year.
|
I agree with that one - we need fewer classes of boat too.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:18pm
Thing is the big clubs are the most expensive, and so are the big classes. Add to that increased travel time to fewer clubs and you're pushing an awful lot of people out of the sport.
|
Posted By: Cirrus
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:20pm
I really HATE nannying by government or
national governing bodies, but when discussing this the other night someone
suggested legislation might be the only way...
.. and you will presumably make sure the 'trains running on time' as well before too long.... And the new order 'National' classes will be just that .. The ... only permitted classes. Can we all have a distinctive uniform as well or at least lapel pin or armband ? Can't wait .... Why not work the proposals up into a concise '5 year' plan to start with ? .... 
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:28pm
I think I prefer a sport where people can sail the boat they like at a club they like. Most clubs round our way have more members than in the so called boom years.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: PeterG
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:36pm
Agree that in principle you could argue that fewer clubs in some places would make sense. However, where I live there are 4 clubs within the estuary, offering a range of racing in different classes, and conditions. You could reasonably argue that where I choose to sail is the least convenient in terms of tidal access, but against that where I live 100m from the club, and a large percentage of members live within walking distance. So the choice of sailing here, or getting in the car on roads that can get clogged up for 20-40 minutes is one I find easy to make. If I had to get in the car anyway I might well choose differently. I expect that the same argument would apply to many of the smaller clubs that have others nearby.
------------- Peter
Ex Cont 707
Ex Laser 189635
DY 59
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 12:58pm
Originally posted by PeterG
Agree that in principle you could argue that fewer clubs in some places would make sense. However, where I live there are 4 clubs within the estuary, offering a range of racing in different classes, and conditions. You could reasonably argue that where I choose to sail is the least convenient in terms of tidal access, but against that where I live 100m from the club, and a large percentage of members live within walking distance. So the choice of sailing here, or getting in the car on roads that can get clogged up for 20-40 minutes is one I find easy to make. If I had to get in the car anyway I might well choose differently. I expect that the same argument would apply to many of the smaller clubs that have others nearby. |
there's quite a difference between coastal and inland venues...... there's at least 10 sailing clubs within an hours drive of my house in the cotswolds (assuming normal traffic, which you can never assume when the Clarksons and Caravaners of the world turn a road into a playground). All seem to struggle for regular numbers - both on the race course and in the hut. Secondly, other than lasers and solos, there's literally no proper class racing for anything else - which is depressing considering the stories the old guys can tell. Harsh as it might sound, a few of those 10 going pop wouldn't exactly be a bad medium to long term outcome.
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 1:52pm
Originally posted by turnturtle
....there's quite a difference between coastal and inland venues...... there's at least 10 sailing clubs within an hours drive of my house in the cotswolds (assuming normal traffic, which you can never assume when the Clarksons and Caravaners of the world turn a road into a playground). All seem to struggle for regular numbers - both on the race course and in the hut. Secondly, other than lasers and solos, there's literally no proper class racing for anything else - which is depressing considering the stories the old guys can tell. Harsh as it might sound, a few of those 10 going pop wouldn't exactly be a bad medium to long term outcome. |
Seems to me an hour's drive each way would be the kiss of death. People go running, footballing, mountain biking ten minutes from home. Nobody drives an hour to the gym, or to play golf every week. Some of our most successful racing is evening racing, and that is simply not going to work if many people had an hour's drive each way.
The main reason most people don't race dinghies is because they don't want to. It doesn't appeal to everyone, get over it and think about the people who do want to sail.
|
Posted By: fab100
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 2:03pm
I'm not criticising any of these clubs in any way, but I am ceaselessly amazed that on about 12 miles of Solent coast, you have 8 sailing clubs (Weston, Netley, Hamble River, Warsash, Hill Head, Seafarers, Lee-on-Solent and Stokes Bay) all providing dinghy racing. That's a lot of choice.
------------- http://clubsailor.co.uk/wp/club-sailor-from-back-to-front/" rel="nofollow - Great book for Club Sailors here
|
Posted By: JohnJack
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 2:14pm
Jeez, I wish I had £5k to spend on sailing!! I started in the sport the old fashioned way, went down to my local club and crewed for anyone who needed someone in the front of an Enterprise. First time we went out i wore a pari of shorts, t-shirt and an old pair of trainers. So first year of dinghy sailing cost me the club membership, a few hundred. I then did my L1 and L2 so I could take club boats out and progressed from there. Ten years later I still predominantly crew and am not that bad at it. I have spent some time on the tiller, had a Laser for a bit. Done 4 National Championships and done quite well considering I hadn't sailed a dinghy before I was 24. In that first year I must have crewed for at least a dozen different very competent helms all very different not just in the way that they sailed but how they engaged with a new crew (and I think this is also very important. The range went from sit there pull that in tight and sit still to feeling part of a team, a helm asking to look for wind, offer tactical suggestion (and explaining why I was wrong), I learnt the most from the latter, and enjoyed it much much more. Feeling part of something is very important. If there was just the first type of helm, I think I would have felt a bit disenfranchised and left out had I not been so keen on sailing (and probably given up)
I am willing to jump in a boat and crew for anyone whether they be beginner or seasoned vetran and always encourage crew swapping on club/fleet days
Its the best way to learn rather than doing courses
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 2:37pm
Originally posted by RS400atC
Seems to me an hour's drive each way would be the kiss of death.
|
indeed .... chuck in the windguru validation rule, the web cam second opinion rule and the hangovers and yep, I don't bother going more than I ought to admit.... especially not for handicap racing with separated starts - a policy which flushed the only five minutes of actual proper racing down the toilet.
|
Posted By: bustinben
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 3:16pm
Originally posted by JimC
Thing is the big clubs are the most expensive, and so are the big classes. Add to that increased travel time to fewer clubs and you're pushing an awful lot of people out of the sport. |
I'm not sure I agree - I'm only advocating hoovering up and abolishing the bit classes. Also if you look at the number of clubs in some areas you wouldn't really be increasing travel time...
Where I am for example there are about 10 within a 5 mile radius!
Interestingly, at the welsh harp where I used to sail they've got what I think is a very effective system - there are only certain approved classes that can use the lake (GP14s, Merlins, Lasers) and although there are multiple clubs (each club vaguely "owns" some of the classes), they get great turnouts, good racing and a really strong stream of beginners coming through.
In the laser fleet there are gold, silver and bronze fleets racing, with individual prizes and rankings, so that the lessor/newer sailors have still got something to fight for which keeps them interested and progressing.
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 3:55pm
I sail one of the more recent 'lost classes' the Topper Spice. It is the only boat I'm aware of that meets all my criteria (assy kite, twin wires, forgiving enough to sail without regular training sessions and cheap, £800 in the case of the Spice). Ok maybe I'm in a minority amongst dinghy sailors but I like my 'unusual' boat and I reckon I've spent less than £2.5k on sailing since then. That's including the boat, new road base, used sails, repairs, spares, dinghy specific sailing kit, entry fees and a years club subs ('cos I only joined a club back home last year, my holiday club doesn't have premises or subs just race entry fees).
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 4:15pm
Sam, you are not unusual at all. Most of the boats I've owned and raced would be banned by the "too many classes" brigade. I'm not sure of any situation where less choice has been a good thing.
Great news, my supermarket has been closed, because there was another one only 30 minutes drive away. Now I can shop with more people! Oh good, they only have 3 brands of breakfast cereal on the shelf. No shreddies for me to eat, but I can buy the same brand as my neighbours now.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: bustinben
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 4:20pm
Originally posted by Rupert
Sam, you are not unusual at all. Most of the boats I've owned and raced would be banned by the "too many classes" brigade. I'm not sure of any situation where less choice has been a good thing.
Great news, my supermarket has been closed, because there was another one only 30 minutes drive away. Now I can shop with more people! Oh good, they only have 3 brands of breakfast cereal on the shelf. No shreddies for me to eat, but I can buy the same brand as my neighbours now. |
Let's be honest though, this analogy is terrible  where to even start...
How about this... it's all about cereal eating competitions... and you're the only one with shreddies so you have to sit in a corner on your own.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 4:30pm
Originally posted by bustinben
it's all about cereal eating competitions... and you're the only one with shreddies |
Tell me I've got to eat cornflakes and I'll stay at home.
As I've said before its just b******s that people like class racing. They feel they should say they do, but the actions don't match the words. If it were true then it would be really hard to introduce new classes, and really easy to keep a fleet going at a club. But as anyone who's tried will tell you the really hard bit is to keep a fleet together once formed.
Yes back in the 70s many clubs had only approved classes, and they almost all have handicap fleets now. Why? because people would rather not sail at all than sail a boat they don't like, and once the boom was over (in those days many clubs even had waiting lists!) the approved fleet thing cost too many subscriptions.
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 4:40pm
Originally posted by bustinben
Originally posted by Rupert
Sam, you are not unusual at all. Most of the boats I've owned and raced would be banned by the "too many classes" brigade. I'm not sure of any situation where less choice has been a good thing.
<br style="-webkit-user-: text;">
<br style="-webkit-user-: text;">Great news, my supermarket has been closed, because there was another one only 30 minutes drive away. Now I can shop with more people! Oh good, they only have 3 brands of breakfast cereal on the shelf. No shreddies for me to eat, but I can buy the same brand as my neighbours now. |
<div style="-webkit-user-: text;"><br style="-webkit-user-: text;"><div style="-webkit-user-: text;">Let's be honest though, this analogy is terrible where to even start...<div style="-webkit-user-: text;"><div style="-webkit-user-: text;">How about this... it's all about cereal eating competitions... and you're the only one with shreddies so you have to sit in a corner on your own.
|
Maybe I can go to a small shreddies eating contest, and not have to join in with cornflake eaters at all, who take it much to seriously, and eat something which tastes like cardboard? Or maybe it is a cereal eating contest where you can choose the cereal which appeals most?
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: transient
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 5:05pm
Anybody still sailing with a bar towel stitched to their a*se? or maybe someone has recently fashioned a new rudder out of an old sh** house door? 
Sailing really does need to catch up. Folk want the latest iphone and strawberries at Christmas these days. They also don't want to learn the hard way. Very sad but true.
My hypothetical couple that maybe would have spent 5K getting into the sport have just had a good look around and walked away.
This may be a mutually agreeable situation at the time but where does that leave the future of sailing clubs.
|
Posted By: getafix
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 5:18pm
Originally posted by Cirrus
I really HATE nannying by government or
national governing bodies, but when discussing this the other night someone
suggested legislation might be the only way...
.. and you will presumably make sure the 'trains running on time' as well before too long.... And the new order 'National' classes will be just that .. The ... only permitted classes. Can we all have a distinctive uniform as well or at least lapel pin or armband ? Can't wait .... Why not work the proposals up into a concise '5 year' plan to start with ? .... 
|
now now, be kind, otherwise I might start thinking about outlawing new classes not from the two state-approved manufacturers 
... I think you'll find I have said nothing about reducing the number of classes, just the number of small clubs into larger ones. I don't buy the argument they will neccessarily be more expensive and class popularity is easily taken care of by market forces. Unfortunately, with 30+ years dinghy sailing here and abroad, I think its likely die-hards would carry on going to 'their club' till they die, even if there was just 5-10 of them.
|
Posted By: Cirrus
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 5:38pm
you don't need TWO makers... in the peoples ('democratic') republic there can only ever be ONE. We can all have a sailing Trabbant then... and it will be so wonderful ... and fair for absolutely everyone.
Imagine - no more complaints or moans either.... all that sort of stuff will be outlawed as well
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 6:11pm
We've already got one, it's called the "L@ser"
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 23 Sep 16 at 11:29pm
We would all be sailing something like the Water Wag, wouldn't we? After all, it was the original one design. No need for anything else.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by Rupert
We would all be sailing something like the Water Wag, wouldn't we? After all, it was the original one design. No need for anything else. |
There is much to be said for racing old one designs. but if the Water Wag had been an international class at the time, can you imagine the process of getting these changes approved:
In 1900 a new design which differs from the earlier design by being
1'-3" longer, having a transom and flying a jib, which was designed by
James (or Maimie) Doyle from Kingstown was introduced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Wag#cite_note-Delany-2" rel="nofollow - [2]
The new design was subject to some minor adjustments of sheer line and
rudder size over the years 1901-1902 before the design was finalised.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by RS400atC
... can you imagine the process of getting these changes approved:. |
People are much the same now as they were then. I've seen correspondance between Uffa Fox and the Royal Canoe club about rule changes back in the 1930s, and it was all very familiar territory.
|
Posted By: zippyRN
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 2:39pm
Originally posted by JimC
Thing is the big clubs are the most expensive, and so are the big classes. Add to that increased travel time to fewer clubs and you're pushing an awful lot of people out of the sport. |
Big inland clubs are often on reservoirs and the water companies being (ex)public sector love their rules and regs , compared tothe attitude taken by the aggegate companies who are quite happy to turn over the vast majority of responsibilities for management of what is their 'waste' ...
|
Posted By: Sam.Spoons
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 2:53pm
I'm just about to change clubs form one on a water board reservoir to one on a 'flash'. The former don't allow dogs on site, or even on the footpaths surrounding the lake. If my non-sailing wife is to spend an afternoon watching me sail she will only do so if she can bring the dog :)
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 3:09pm
Originally posted by zippyRN
Originally posted by JimC
Thing is the big clubs are the most expensive, and so are the big classes. Add to that increased travel time to fewer clubs and you're pushing an awful lot of people out of the sport. |
Big inland clubs are often on reservoirs and the water companies being (ex)public sector love their rules and regs , compared tothe attitude taken by the aggegate companies who are quite happy to turn over the vast majority of responsibilities for management of what is their 'waste' ... |
The reason inland water is expensive is often that sailing has to compete with trout fishing, which generates serious money. Maybe sport just exists to use up all our spare money? If all boats were half the price, I'd buy a more expenssive one....
|
Posted By: zippyRN
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by RS400atC
Originally posted by zippyRN
Originally posted by JimC
Thing is the big clubs are the most expensive, and so are the big classes. Add to that increased travel time to fewer clubs and you're pushing an awful lot of people out of the sport. |
Big inland clubs are often on reservoirs and the water companies being (ex)public sector love their rules and regs , compared tothe attitude taken by the aggegate companies who are quite happy to turn over the vast majority of responsibilities for management of what is their 'waste' ... |
The reason inland water is expensive is often that sailing has to compete with trout fishing, which generates serious money. Maybe sport just exists to use up all our spare money? If all boats were half the price, I'd buy a more expenssive one....
|
interestingly where sailing clubs have become the master lesee for a water they don;t seek to exclude others ... comared to some of the fishing 'clubs' ...
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 4:15pm
Not universally true. My club leases the fishing rights for our Thames Water reservoir and prohibit fishing.
|
Posted By: Rupert
Date Posted: 24 Sep 16 at 7:12pm
We have a fishing club. Generates income, means people are around during the week. But we have to put up with the rubbish they leave behind and the occasional obnoxious one.
------------- Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
Posted By: bustinben
Date Posted: 25 Sep 16 at 5:49pm
Originally posted by JimC
Originally posted by bustinben
it's all about cereal eating competitions... and you're the only one with shreddies |
Tell me I've got to eat cornflakes and I'll stay at home.
As I've said before its just b******s that people like class racing. They feel they should say they do, but the actions don't match the words. If it were true then it would be really hard to introduce new classes, and really easy to keep a fleet going at a club. But as anyone who's tried will tell you the really hard bit is to keep a fleet together once formed.
Yes back in the 70s many clubs had only approved classes, and they almost all have handicap fleets now. Why? because people would rather not sail at all than sail a boat they don't like, and once the boom was over (in those days many clubs even had waiting lists!) the approved fleet thing cost too many subscriptions. |
I hear what you're saying, but it only takes one example to disprove the rule, and that is the healthy membership and racing that goes on at the welsh harp. Perhaps people left to their own devices will destroy class racing and subsequently participation, but if you make them all sail the same class everything runs along quite happily?
The way I see the issue is that people want to "win" and in class racing, you generally can't. If you let people go and buy another boat that might let them "win more" even if that's only on the water and not on handicap, or at the very least gives them the excuse that it was the handicaps fault they didn't win then some of them will go and do that.
You can also solve the problem with a little bit of effort in the organisation and have different competitions running within the class racing for people of different standards. I'm a firm believer that quality of racing is what matters, not "quality" or "speed" of boat.
|
Posted By: Do Different
Date Posted: 25 Sep 16 at 6:06pm
http://www.welshharpsailingclub.org/results/laser_sat_summer.htm
http://www.welshharpsailingclub.org/results/sat_summer16_a.htm
Please forgive my completely random selection of results but that looks a lot of DNQs there for the series. North London so I'm guessing hardly short of population to go at.
|
Posted By: JimC
Date Posted: 25 Sep 16 at 6:50pm
I think it quite probable that the every dog has its day aspect of handicap racing is part of its appeal, but as, to me, the real aim of club racing should be that as many folk as possible have a fun days sailing, I don't see that as a problem.
To me amateur sports clubs should be there to serve people as they are, not to try and guide them into what some authority thinks they ought to be. That, in my day at least, was the role of School sport.
|
Posted By: Do Different
Date Posted: 25 Sep 16 at 6:55pm
Absolutely agree Mr Jim.
|
Posted By: Chris 249
Date Posted: 26 Sep 16 at 12:01am
On the other hand, in what other amateur sports clubs can you turn up with equipment that varies as much as it does in dinghy sailing?
As an analogy, IMHO the world's standard road bikes all basically fit into a single restricted or formula class; that is, the rules governing their design are probably about as tight as the rules governing (say) the F18s or Merlins, and much tighter than the Moths. If you turn up with anything outside of that box you're not normally allowed on the start line. I notice that even something fairly casual like the Ride London Sportive bans a lot of bikes, including half of the ones I race.
It's interesting that two of the world's dinghy racing heartlands seem to have completely different ideas about class racing. Where I used to live, at most clubs if you turned up with a boat that didn't fit one of the official classes you would have as much chance to compete as if you turned up with a cricket bat and stumps at a baseball club. Obviously that works. Since the UK commonly follows the opposite model, obviously that works as well.
Can anyone tell me whether there is more class racing in the regions of the UK where dinghy sailing is more popular, and (because of the obvious chicken and egg issue) what the changes have been like over time? It's apparent that in the dinghy boomtime, there was a great emphasis on class racing. Obviously the current model still works well, but is there data which proves that one model is better than the other?
PS For what it's worth, I'm the opposite of Jim. Since I moved away from an area where you get class racing I've been trying once again to get into mixed fleet racing, but just find it so frustrating that I've given up club racing instead. I'd rather just train and sail for fun than go mixed fleet racing.
------------- sailcraftblog.wordpress.com
The history and design of the racing dinghy.
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 26 Sep 16 at 9:31am
Originally posted by Chris 249
Can anyone tell me whether there is more class racing in the regions of the UK where dinghy sailing is more popular, and (because of the obvious chicken and egg issue) what the changes have been like over time? It's apparent that in the dinghy boomtime, there was a great emphasis on class racing. Obviously the current model still works well, but is there data which proves that one model is better than the other?
....
PS For what it's worth, I'm the opposite of Jim. Since I moved away from an area where you get class racing I've been trying once again to get into mixed fleet racing, but just find it so frustrating that I've given up club racing instead. I'd rather just train and sail for fun than go mixed fleet racing.
|
For your first point, perhaps it's not location, but age range which divides successful class racing from drossing around against a spreadsheet. You don't see many Optimists at a club which are predominantly sailing Teras or Cadets for instance. Even back in the early 90's my parents switched clubs so my sister and I could sail optimists (to our own agenda), rather than take the natural step into the front of another kid's cadet. It wasn't that unusual, especially when the clubs were less than 20 minutes apart by road.
Parents seem to be more ready to fall in line when it comes to their offspring's choice of boat rather than their own. I'd say that's countrywide, rather than specific to any particular region. Also dinghy racing is pretty diverse across the UK... you might not see it reported as widely, but there are little clubs all over the least hospitable parts of this land (even Lancashire).... and they all provide good, solid club racing with a strong class ethos in youth and junior levels.
Regarding the final point - I can't agree more. I'm even mulling over the idea of a 2 hour drive each way to get decent mid-week class racing in something other than a Laser next season. I'm not sure if it'll work, or whether work with let it work, but I know if it's a choice between handicap racing and another Laser at my current club, the latter would be the decision a head would make over a heart.
|
Posted By: Dougaldog
Date Posted: 26 Sep 16 at 10:42am
Chris 249 and TT.... Had you asked this question in March, after the Dinghy Show, you'd have gotten a fairly negative, dismal answer. However, as I wander around the UK following events, either as RO or to cover them for various media outlets, I'm seeing something happening. What this is I'm not sure as yet for how things are going to end up is far from clear. What I have started to note is yet another twist in the turn of the fundamental changes that are impacting on the dinghy racing scene. Underpinning these changes is a theme that runs along the lines of " I pay for my club membership, why fork out a small fortune to go somewhere else?". As a result, clubs are trying to sort out the PY system to remove some of the most glaring anomalies, but this is only part of the change I've seen. I've noted that without any top down guidance, sailors at clubs are getting themselves organised into classes (anyone remember class captains??). The result of this is once sailors get good quality sailing at their local club, are they less likely to travel to opens and championships. Just yesterday I picked up on a conversation that suggested that a couple of clubs that were in effect neighbours would do something of a 'local open'...a one day spent all sailing together. When you get a damn good racer, from one of the main open meeting supported classes, making a conscious decision to NOT go to an even because...cost, time away and besides, he's getting good competition locally. Are these just local hot spots in an otherwise gloomy decline or are they the green shoots of a different approach to how adults (I accept the youth scene has a different dynamic) is developing. Am digging further!!
------------- Dougal H
|
Posted By: turnturtle
Date Posted: 26 Sep 16 at 11:22am
keep up the good work..... and agreed, for the next dinghy I won't bother with the pointless trailing accessory to clog up the boat park.
|
Posted By: RS400atC
Date Posted: 26 Sep 16 at 11:53am
Originally posted by Dougaldog
....When you get a damn good racer, from one of the main open meeting supported classes, making a conscious decision to NOT go to an even because...cost, time away and besides, he's getting good competition locally. Are these just local hot spots in an otherwise gloomy decline or are they the green shoots of a different approach to how adults (I accept the youth scene has a different dynamic) is developing. Am digging further!! |
Not being a damned good racer myself, I made a lot of conscious decisions not to travel to open meetings on inland ponds when there was better sailing at home. Too many opens which got glowing write-ups had photos of the crews all sat to leeward when we'd been enjoying strong sea breeze on the coast... The racing might be a joke, but the sailing's a blast sometimes. Yet come the winter, when sea sailing hibernates, we might be more amenable. Driving around the UK is generally not much fun these days, and many of us get far too much of it in the working week.
|
|